Jow Forums BTFO

Why are right-wing NPCs unable to come up with salient critiques of left-wing economics?

Attached: npc communism.jpg (720x690, 44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_Soviet_Union
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I like food therefore I don't like communism

Anyone with a minor in economics can explain it to you, but you’re an NPC so it’s not like it will actually change your mind

>9001 years later.
>The left still can't meme.

Attached: NPC_no_u_notext.jpg (640x454, 28K)

>steals memes to gaslight them badly
I have never seen you shills and kike media this assblasted over a simple meme. Twitter is already outright banning them. Jews fear nothing more than their normie cattle snapping out of their trance. We need to use the NPC meme to raise normie awareness of the kike control over their news media, entertainment media, educational systems, politics etc. It's obviously exceptionally effective. This meme is so dangerous for (((them))) because it puts the psychological tricks normies are subjected to into layman terms so well.

~80% of the population are NPC. The remaining 20% of the population fight for control of the NPCs. This was a well established fact long before the meme started.

If you want to dive further into it, that 20% is divided into positive and negative souls... Negative souls are essentially what we know as sociopaths... (((people))) who exist solely for their own benefit and view others as nothing more than tools to enrich their own lives. Positive souls are those who have empathy and care about the future of humanity. These are the people who would give up their lives for the people they love.

As you can imagine, Jews are the ring leaders of the negative souls.

Attached: NPC golem.jpg (666x714, 144K)

National socialism = socialism

>fascism is bad
It's just an endless stream of "no u" "no u"

Attached: 1539954614362.png (645x773, 21K)

Yeah whatever Steven crowder

What is strasserism...
The nazis kicked out all of the socialists from the party

>left-wing
>economics

> Left wing economics

Lost!

Attached: 5FF8BFCF-86F7-429B-81CB-DB299B89061F.jpg (800x589, 46K)

Attached: TheyAreNPCs.jpg (602x569, 184K)

/thread

also:
>1 post by this kike

Attached: 1517603212645.png (559x527, 13K)

Somebody pls post gommunism copypasta

First of all
>left wing economics

Second of all, a cursory look at 20th century history gives you literally all the arguments you need against communism. It's about on-par with Islam when it comes to violating even the most basic of human and civil rights.

Attached: 144869386039.png (516x532, 271K)

> Real communism has never been tried because those other times millions were butchered, others starved, and it was a huge pile of shit!

Attached: 1539729116479.png (374x229, 23K)

Reeducation through starvation would do some good to a lot of you desu.

>capitalism is bad
>why?
>:(
great meme op, you fucking faggot

ftfy

Attached: fixed.jpg (720x690, 102K)

t. seething inbreds

t. inbred Jew

Attached: Logo-for-website-2016x2.png (550x260, 49K)

>Why are right-wing NPCs unable to come up with salient critiques of left-wing economics?
How about this? Dozens of countries have done the socialist experiment and it failed every single time.

Nice attempt to use silly Jew meme.
Too bad for you this is usually satire or trolling and not a sincere racist position held by almost anyone.

NPC-ness applies to both extremes, of course.
Go only a little Left and you start finding legions of extreme crazy NPCs.
Islam is populated almost exclusively by NPCs (true also of many religions, but Islam is the only one with T-virus programming attached)
Only a handful of genuine Nazis are NPCs.

The majority of people on the Right are center-right, or even center-left who are politically homeless in the US because the mainstream Left is a bunch of crazy NPCs suddenly and have been ejected into the Right or Libertarian spheres.
I've yet to meet a full-blown NPC Libertarian -- which is also their weakness because they can never form a political party as they all have their own ideas.

NPC tends to mean "Leftist" right now.
That might not always be true, but it is overwhelmingly true right now.

I'm not even in the US but it is easy to see this just by glancing at headlines.
90% Crazy business.
Where is the real news anyway? Only STEM news and "boring" geopol sites print meaningful stuff now.
To quote a great American: "Sad."

Why ?
Hmmm well can I post photos only from my city ? Thanks.

Attached: stan wojenny 3.jpg (800x598, 88K)

The critiques of left wing economics are so solid they're literally the prevailing and underlying economic theory for the lost successful nations and economies ever.

Attached: 636124787425341910.jpg (910x524, 86K)

Attached: 5zVktoARGh0dHA6Ly9vY2RuLmV1L25ld3N3ZWVrLXdlYi80NWRiMjA5NC1hM2ZmLTQwOTUtODMwZi1lNGM2NjEwNjljZjYuanBnk (1845x1050, 321K)

Attached: 24720-3x2-original.jpg (900x600, 121K)

Attached: 1539743678648.gif (750x1250, 116K)

>Why are right-wing NPCs unable to come up with salient critiques of left-wing economics?

Attached: 1539739769544.png (374x229, 28K)

>left-wing economics
What did he mean by this?

Attached: wut.png (5000x5000, 412K)

"We demand bread"

Attached: 1956.jpg (300x272, 30K)

Attached: Czerwiec-1956.jpg (960x632, 88K)

The direct contrast is good:
Communism has no index of value anywhere in its theory. None at all.
There is no possible way for those in charge of central administration of the economy to determine what efforts are good to engage VS ones that are counterproductive.
There is also no index of efficiency because there is no index of value, and therefore no indicator that can be used to favor efficient process introduction over inefficient methods.

Lacking these then of course people will eventually face the situation where they are building many trucks but refining no oil, or starving without farming while producing exquisite shoes.
Even though the Soviet introduced artificial indices of value, it still succumbed to this problem.
China has this problem now in real estate market (among others) -- and may collapse because of this imbalance.
And yet Communists will claim that the problem here was "not Communist enough" -- that more of the same disease is the solution to the symptoms.

How did your USSR turn? Go push your bus home in North Korea cunt face.

To the posters getting all rates at the very mention of communism, ahve a read of what Marx proposed and described, instead of just ranting about socialism because cold war propaganda and PragerU told you communism was big bad.

Attached: 0003AY3CATB4NWL8-C317-F3.jpg (600x452, 64K)

That's not communism only communist Leninist elitist. So communism has only communism as its name. It was not Marx's idea

I have read Marx as well.
He has no happy stories and the transitions between phases are like magic, with no clear causation and no guidelines for how the managerial class is to conduct itself, as there is supposed to be a centrally commanded economy (as well as society) and yet no commanding category.
Somehow everyone becomes a perfect altruist and the needs and plans of every individual are known by magic.

It isn't what is in Marx that is so much the problem as what was left out by Marx.
We have seen the consistent effects of improvisation over these omissions throughout the 20th century, though.

Slide threat

>economic calculation problem
>violation of property rights
What more do you need?

Attached: received_334875570407789.png (680x381, 312K)

Marx criticised the capitalism of his day and didn't propose shit. Marx basically said "and the workers will rise up and then magic wonderland happens!".
From the practical things he proposed, that I can think of, everyone of these has been implemented in the west. Wow 8 hour work day!

What everyone after him tried to implement turned out not to work, precisely because of an (deliberate) ignorance of economics and the nature of people.

Why?
100 million dead in the 20th century. Democide

Attached: received_564983633928035.png (500x337, 135K)

I've been looking into the topic lately. Wikipedia actually lays out many of the pros and cons of Stalinism.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_Soviet_Union

>attempt to mock Jow Forums by appropriating a meme
>just like they always do
>thereby proving they can't think originally, again.
>thereby proving the point of the meme
Pottery.

this basically

>economic calculation problem

This is the big one. And whats really funny are the solutions the intelligent lefties (that can see that this is a problem) propose. "We just build a super computer that will calculate the needs of everyone and the whole economy!"

No... the problem is deeper than that.. you see the information of the want/needs of everyone you would need to even start calculating are only expressed in the market process itself, so you never know.

Because it's some magical dream philosophy desired by some poor workers who know nothing about power and economics. People will be greedy no matter what and in order for society to function there will have to be some kind of order. Leaving it all up to the state or
'the people' is not a good idea.

>leaf
>commiefag
>autistic
All checks out

>salient
Relying on catchphrase shut-down clapbacks is an NPC thing, dude. Left or right. The NPC meme itself is NPC as fuck.

Literally the entire board here with the notable exception of leftiepol brainlets could explain to you in depth why communism is both counter productive and immoral.

Nice to see lefties are still so bad at memes that they can't even use the ones we came up with correctly.

Regarding other critical components which are "left out" by Marx:

>Communism has no index of value anywhere in its theory. None at all.
> There is no possible way for those in charge of central administration of the economy to determine what efforts are good to engage VS ones that are counterproductive.
> There is also no index of efficiency because there is no index of value, and therefore no indicator that can be used to favor efficient process introduction over inefficient methods.

Times communism has been tried: a whole fucking lot
Times communism has actually succeeded: 0

Attached: 1540023773021.jpg (793x1704, 483K)

Because the left wing keep straw manning the same argument that they've been pulling out their ass for 50 years; trickle-down economics. This economic theory doesn't have a set of academic literature stating the economic theory nor explaining what school of economic theory it's from, being from supply-side economics, keynesian economics or from another school.

The problem is the Left-wing NPCs tell about trickle-down economics without addressing what conservatives believe; supply-side economics. From this the cycle of mischaraterisation continues to annoy anybody trying to explain simple economics to ideologues making them act like right-wing NPCs.

>Communism is bad
>Why?
>Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin, Che, Maduro, Castro .. how many more examples do you need?

Also:

>1 post by this ID

Saged.

The the victims of communism were just NPC's and it doesn't matter that they died?

He proposes that there will be a transition via a dictatorship by the proletariat. Which we are arguably already in.

The NPC would have to be the one asking why

A loose argument. Nazism is quite obviously not socialism. It does strongly lean to the left as evidenced by the founders of fascism all previously being marxists .

COMMUNISM = GOOD
I AM A WOMAN SAYING THIS AND YOU MUST BELIEVE WOMEN
THEREFORE COMMUNISM = GOOD

Attached: 179.png (425x425, 74K)

Please make bait worthwhile

here is an irrefutable explanation of why communism can never work.

Socialism according to Marx exists only to bridge the gap between the necessary evil of capitalism and the inevitable 'utopia' of communism
Under communism, the means of production are owned, by definition, by the state.
Under communism there exists no free market as the state sets prices.
Without subtracting the input from the output, one cannot do cost accounting. It cannot be determined if production is more efficient under communism than under capitalism, or if production is more efficient than last week, or if it is even profitable at all, as "profits" are illegal.

You use your money to buy flour, yeast, rent an oven for a day, ect. Why do you do this? To bake bread. Why? Because you have determined and bet that there is a market for bread. You invest $50 and bake 50 loaves. So $1/loaf is your input cost. Your research says people will pay $2 or more for good bread every day, but they'll only pay $0.50/loaf for shitty bread. So, if you bake shitty bread you'll only be able to sell it for $25, half of the cost of production, a loss. But, if you are reasonably sure you can bake great bread, you may invest the time and money to bake 50 loaves and sell them for $100. It cost you $50 to make so your profit is $50, you have doubled your money, pretty good.

But under socialistic conditions, there can never be any cost accounting. That's why there is always bread lines and famines in communist countries, even in breadbaskets like Ukraine and Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. Communism is genocide. Socialism and democracy must be opposed as a moral imperative.

The elites know that communism is a sick joke that can never work and they revel in tricking the goyim into doing their bidding, the logic is, if theyre too stupid to realize its a trick, then they deserve slavery

fools being led around by single-post MASTER using reverse psychology

Attached: 1539499428705.jpg (945x960, 102K)

The PCs were liquidated at the start of the revolution.

>Under communism, the means of production are owned, by definition, by the state

Incorrect. Learn what it is you are arguing against before you try and act all smug

> "a dictatorship by the proletariat"
Such a sentence must either indicate magic or be pure semantic nonsense.
See the problem?

The more I've re-read Marx over the years suspicion has grown in me that he simply did not understand people (neither normals nor elites), economics, politics, the phenomenon of money, how a business (large or small) is run, logistics, agriculture, accounting, or how one goes about acquiring and retaining a job.

The more I have read about Marx's personal life and status as a singly patronized individual these suspicions have only hardened into something approaching conclusions.

ask your granddad if fascism is bad
tell him he is an NPC

Attached: 1539476351119.jpg (672x684, 36K)

Attached: 72b.jpg (368x475, 24K)

You guys are just flat-out terrible at usurping memes.

Checked.

Attached: 1540001659443.png (307x348, 51K)

This is why

Attached: 1457856936040.jpg (640x640, 83K)

>What is eastern block
I fucking hate communists so damn much.

Nice digits sucky meme

guess whos behind the "npc meme"

Attached: 1540023977721.jpg (602x569, 33K)

Punishes the most productive. Removes incentive to work

No because he'd unironically say it's good

We constantly provide critiques against communism. Stick around longer than 60 seconds before leaving for /leftypol/ and maybe you'll learn something next time.

Pic related should tell anyone in this thread the truth of what's happening here. A hit and run shill post. Don't forget the sage.

Attached: firefox_2018-10-20_02-45-56.png (115x68, 2K)

salty trumpanzee snowflake tears

Attached: 1539736831943.jpg (710x486, 58K)

A dictatorship by the proletariat was used in contrast to a dictatorship by the aristocracy or bourgeoisie. It describes a society where workers hold the power of the state. It came about in a time where there were restrictions on democratic power base on wealth or heritage.

The dictatorship part comes from Marx' belief that any state is inherently dictatorial.

This doesn't answer the Jap's main point, which is that what 'control of the state by the workers' will actually entail or how and why those in power would voluntarily relinquish it.

>Why?
You can go visit Magadan or Barnaul and after that never ask these questions about muh great commies again

Well that shit head ruins everything...

Attached: npc'sunity.jpg (1920x1280, 1.39M)

>Why?
Because theres no incentive for anyone to do anything and no reason for them to do a good job of it

The primary issue here is that for a communist revolution to occur you must have the working class on your side.

Go ahead and try to revolt, if you can. I'm not too worried.

Attached: 151810460845.png (305x197, 49K)

Attached: NPC Nigger 1.1.jpg (608x463, 80K)

Stop bumping this goddamn garbage you stupid faggots. Every day these blatant shill threads get a billion bumps, fuck this place sage

Occupy democrats looking ass meme.

Who is the bigger NPC?
Shills who create 1 post by this ID bait threats or the idiots who fall for it?

Who owns the means of production under communism?

Attached: 1536174253871m.jpg (1024x710, 196K)

Most modern democracies would fit the description. He didn't describe a specific form of government, but rather a state of society.

And those in power wouldnt be giving up power to anyone. "Those in power" is everyone, and the transition will happen as the state becomes redundant.

Kek saved

>:salty trumpanzee snowflake tears
LOL

Anarchist huh...

Everything you have is just copy pasted from original right wing ideas.

Because you are a.... fucking NPC

Everyone and nobody

fuck off retard. better dead than red

>most modern democracies would fit the description
This is top bait. Marx was talking about control by industrial workers, not by professional faggots in the pockets of corporations. What we have now is bourgeoisie and the dictatorship of the proletariat explicitly isn't everyone because you haven't liquidated the other classes yet.

Because they're NPCs. Only NPCs think that "NPC" signifies a political affiliation and don't realise it describes a mode of thought that just happens to be almost ubiquitous among vocal leftists.

The only quality meme I’ve seem that can be used by lefties. Nice one!

Attached: YesNoMaybe.jpg (720x690, 109K)