How do we stop the athiest problem?

Godlessness went up, traditional life styles went down. I'm not religious but even a humble leaf like myself can understand why people are upset about it's decline.

And these things are bad because...?

Somewhere between a third and half the people here are christian according to a pol several months back, so they'll take issue by default.

Otherwise, if you've been an atheist on the internet for any stretch of time and engaged in atheism vs. religion subject-matter, there's nothing new to be said. Atheism is conflated with Liberalism and degeneracy and all atheists are fat fedora-wearing neckbeards blablablablablablabla.

It's always amusing when morons like fire off this cliche, like birth-rates aren't down across the board or ideas are'nt spread by convincing your fellow humans via argumentation instead of seeing who can push out the most babies.

I though they had their heads in each other asses from the pic.
I have been here to long.

Attached: 1539671261530.png (216x233, 8K)

>godtards actually "believe"
>instead of using their ((("GOD")))-GIVEN faculty of logic-processing to scrutinise

Attached: the_god_paradox.jpg (666x666, 151K)

You seriously misunderstand the nature of evolution. Chickens did not descend directly from tyrannosaurus rex, and no biologist worth their salt would ever claim that they did. Instead, the two species share a common ancestor, and we can observe certain shared traits between the species that this shared ancestor would have also possessed.

Another thing, you seriously misunderstand how much life can change given enough time. All life originates from single-cell organisms, so the idea that modern chickens are a distant relative to ancient dinosaurs is not ridiculous.

Attached: b_rel.jpg (589x581, 127K)

...declining marriage and fertility rates among westerners leading to a demographic time bomb that seems poised to bring about violent political turmoil in our lifetime. I know belief is silly to some, but religion is a stabilizing force when culturally dominant.

This is a must-watch
Genetic Entropy
youtube.com/watch?v=eY98io7JH-c

I'm not an Atheist and I believe in Evolution, why would you deny gods beautiful Algorythms of creation?

Attached: emoji_thinking_cup.jpg (425x425, 24K)

What's wrong with demographic change?

People's reaction to it mostly. The west is going to become much colder as ethnic majorities become racially aware due to their waning influence.

believers can only complain but don't have a better empirical theory.

If you dont believe you evolved from niggers very recently and chickens were once T-rexs your a ignorant unscientific retard

First meet them in the middle.
The creation narrative doesn't necessarily take 6 of our days to unfold. The heaven and earth are created, an undisclosed amount of time passes, then the first day God creates light. Until the sun and moon are created a day has to have a different definition. From then on: with god a day is as a thousand years (2 peter 3:8)

Also even if there was no God, if it's possible for the signal-exchange between neurons and the effect they have on matter could become conscious accidentally, then the stars would have had the same thing happen with them.

What do you call a universe sized conscious entity? Anyone?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 76K)

deprive a child of education and the internet, and you will get perfect humans like you

Fuck man, you're so fucking dumb.

Being religious is one of the most NPC things anyone can do.

>Flag

Did not disappoint

>How do we stop the athiest problem?

How do we solve the spelling problem on Jow Forums?

Attached: drag_queen_2.width-800.jpg (749x637, 89K)

So shouldn't we focus more on promoting love and tolerance than on cultural segregation?

>Somewhere between a third and half the people here are christian according to a pol several months back, so they'll take issue by default.

Let me get this right. A third to half of Jow Forums use a Chinese cartoon board riddled with porn? Makes perfect sense. The day of the rope anyone?

checked. Brits are fucking faggots in 2018.
>finding myself agreeing with Leafs more than Brits nowadays

This is impossible.
They are NPC's finest.

that's because you're left behind and can't get any pussy now that your parents can't have an arranged marriage.

Time to get with the times you virgin

You could try but there doesn't seem to be much support for opposing identity politics from either end of the ideological spectrum.
wow rude

>When your born again friend takes you flying and the rapture happens

>So shouldn't we focus more on promoting love and tolerance than on cultural segregation?

Lol, Jesus. Sure, just answer this one question: how?
How do you get one side to stop alleging bigotry and isms every thirty seconds when the people they're accusing are mostly after enforcement of the law and reasonable/optimal immigration processes?
How do you promote love and tolerance if open and honest discussion isn't possible between all sides?

>a fucking chicken
HOW DID THEY FUCK?

Attached: raf,750x1000,075,t,101010:01c5ca27c6.u2.jpg (750x1000, 63K)

>devolution
Kinda happening over in Europe right now due to migrants.

Huge cocks, retard.

1. dinosaurs always had feathers
2. the dinosaurs modern birds evolved from were the smaller ones, the ones that survived the extinction event
3. it makes perfect sense for them to develop flight given that in the years after the extinction these small dinosaurs would've been easy prey for the mammals that survived
4. naturally the swifter and faster ones survived, until they developed basic wings to replace their forelimbs, of course, it was a very gradual and slow process, and early birds/dinos couldn't fly nearly as well as modern ones
but i wouldnt expect a bogan chimp to know anything about science or logic, so carry on

I heard that it was tail to tail.

how do chickens fuck?
how do alligators fuck?
how do elephants fuck?

some dinosaurs also became capable of flight before the extinction event, like the aechaeopterix

>whats wrong with your race going extinct
america was a mistake

>nobody tell him

Attached: 1539206476050.png (979x735, 555K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoatzin
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassowary

It will take an act of God.

I rather enjoy being surrounded by people who believe in fairy tales. If you can make 'em believe in a magic man in the sky with no evidence, get them to disregard mountains of hard counter evidence to justify their belief in the magic guy in the sky, you can make 'em drink any flavor of kool-aid you want.

evolution doesnt equal atheism, unless you think everything that is true equals atheism.

>what are common ancestors
No way someone is this stup-
>checks flag
Yep, checks out

Attached: 1ad.png (361x333, 63K)

Yes, but reeeing against evolution with no evidence is not the way to bring back religion. Let’s face it- the religions that served as the foundations of our societies are largely obsolete. What do you do when your computer is obsolete? Do you buy some chalk, a blackboard and an abacus? Or do you get a new computer?

Society needs religion. Society needs science. Christianity is the gayest and lowest IQ of all world religions and is incompatible with science. Society needs a new religion.

"Hey I've got the perfect way to discredit Evolution - let's openly lie about how it works in such a way that even high schoolers who've learnt the theory can spot, that way Evolution looks stupid and we look smart!
This is a smart plan that absolutely doesn't make us targets for mockery!!!"

Npc's hate different opinions.

Atheism is the destruction of Western Civilization - the thing that brought about virtually every comfort and piece of technology you enjoy.

quite the opposite, atheism is the result of logical thinking, progress and scientific method which are what produce technology and virtually every comfort.

WE

Attached: 1524092006462.png (746x600, 12K)

Attached: ever evolution debate ever.png (1000x1223, 1.42M)

youtube.com/watch?v=nYCQ5KNlTXc

> he never slammed his dinosaur action figures together as a kid
Sad

Because they're fundamentalists. That means they're stupid. Fundamentalists are stupid. All that needs to be said.

Posting in the slide thread

How do we stop the religious retards who don’t understand evolution problem?

Wow. Literally retarded

Another religious retard who doesn’t understand that anyone can have their religion debunked and thus become and atheist

It’s not. Religious polacks don’t know the difference between a rightwing atheist and leftwing atheist because they’re retarded

Go and live with niggers if you can’t grasp it

>How do we stop the athiest problem?

I unironically believe that atheism/rationalism or science in place of religion could save the west. Religion is useful, it preserves the family and community but it has a limit. For example: Christians refusing to abort tards that are a burden on the family and tard as well.

I browsed the atheism subreddit and looked at humanist meetups and am flabbergasted as to why they're all liberal. There was literal a post on Jow Forumsatheism that asked why modesty is important to which another user responded "to remind women they belong to men" or something to that degree, even though modesty extends to men as well.

Spread scientifically backed research defending conservative and nationalist values such as why borders are important, why multiculturalism fails, why women who have less partners have healthier relationships (actually is a study on this), then there wouldn't be an atheist problem.

>I’m so retarded I have to strawman evolution
>I’m not smart enough to question my parents religion
>over a hundred years of solid science which has greatly progressed the world’s understanding is bunk because it goes against the religion i was indoctrinated to believe

Why would you do that to savages who can’t treat you the same way back? You’d have to be a moron not to see how racist and vile and unprincipled the average nigger is. Of course you know all of this but you’re a cuck like the rest of them

Whereas you’ve always been retarded and worthless

Religiosity increases as IQ decreases. You'll find the most religious people in places like Thailand, Kenya, Sudan, and Philippines. Atheism goes up as the IQ increases. Problem is people have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, but luckily science goes more in hand with traditional values than liberalism and it can be used against so called pro science leftists.

Says the retard who literally can’t think for himself and relies upon what his parents indoctrinated him to believe

Because atheism means no morals which means western civilization and white survival doesn't matter.

>Because atheism means no morals

Why not have values based on rationality than myths? Take Shapiro's "facts don't care about your feelings" and apply it to atheism.

Because morality has to be objective to be real, and if atheism is true, then morality is by definition subjective and thus completely arbitrary and pointless.

Morality is not facts. But the Bible teaches that morality is objective and decided by God.

I don't see anything wrong with them, they are the only ones capable of finding excuses for mass genocide and implement them without remorse

>if atheism is true, then morality is by definition subjective and thus completely arbitrary and pointless.

I can't see why morality can be based on objectivity.

>But the Bible teaches that morality is objective and decided by God.

I agree with Biblical morals. But once you go atheist there's really no turning back, especially in the advanced countries in the west. The only alternative is a traditional based atheism.

>I can't see why morality can be based on objectivity.
You can't pin secular morals on any fundamental truth. Why is murder wrong according to secular morality? What's to say existence (being alive) is better than non-existence (being dead)?

nobody agrees with biblical morals, you still choose which parts you follow aka you use your own morals.
If you actually followed the bible you would be seen as a monster and likely get put in prison.

Attached: bible.jpg (700x836, 78K)

Dinos had feathers you uneducated cur.

Attached: A2SVSGGWUAI6PGWZZIDBT3P2AU.jpg (1484x989, 223K)

Based and faggot pilled.

>Why is murder wrong according to secular morality?

It's generally accepted that going against one's person or property is objectively wrong.

>What's to say existence (being alive) is better than non-existence (being dead)?

If you have meaning in your life you will have a reason to exist. And that meaning doesn't have to be God or any deity, can be your family, nation, or passion.

Just because something is generally accepted doesn't make it true. And just because you have "subjective meaning in your life" doesn't mean that being alive has any fundamentally, intrinsically and objectively positive to it. In fact, being dead would permanently remove the capacity of subjective experience, meaning that any potentiality for suffering is gone.

This has always been one of the biggest questions in philosophy by the way, and secular philosophers have struggled for millenia with this very topic.

It's not, other than eliminating the myths/threats that keep shitty from behaving terribly; which could be a big thing, but don't know what a white society free from religion would be like because Jews are replacing Christianity with Marxism and anti-white hatred, thus corrupting people that might've otherwise been fine without religion.

You're absolutely right, but the reason atheism is growing is because people don't have any evidence for their religion. It's a product in higher IQ countries such as Japan and Western Europe, both of which have high percentages of atheism. It's hard to go back to religion after this stage.

> secular philosophers have struggled for millenia with this very topic.

Any answer brought by secularism will be stronger than anything faith based. I've heard that UPB by Stefan Molyneux provides an answer but haven't read it.

>keep shitty from behaving terribly
keep shitty people from behaving terribly*

>You can't pin secular morals on any fundamental truth.

and yet christfag morals depend on a bunch of desert fables invented by sheepherders

far from any fundamental truth

whereas not killing your own species is quite commonly hardwired throughout the entire animal kingdom

>buying into protestant "muh 6000" memes
OP is bluepilled

Attached: Qlg3BeU.png (853x872, 68K)

Actually it's a product of midwit socities (100-105 IQ) brainwashing their populations against religiosity. The reality is that religious thinking and religious philosophy is much better at explaining fundamental philosophical questions than is secularity. If Western Europe and Japan started teaching their populations in religion instead of in secularity, they would be religious. America is a good example, because whites have quite large IQ in America and still are among the most religious in the world.

Religious ethics and philosophy can be better defended than secular ones. It's only midwits who scrape the surface of religious thinking and find an easy way to criticize it. Actually high-IQ people are often religious (120+).

Of course there are attempts at secular morality like Hans Hermann Hoppe's argumentative ethics and Molyneux UPB, but they never dig into the deeper philosophical issues and always just axiomatically assumes a bunch of "truths" like how self-preservation and survival is objectively positive when in reality you need religious truths to hammer these things in and to assume that human life is fundamentally valuable and worth defending.

>Because morality has to be objective to be real, and if atheism is true, then morality is by definition subjective and thus completely arbitrary and pointless.
I think you are just the kind of person that likes being told what to do and how to think instead of forming your own world view and creating your own set of morals to follow.

Attached: new life.jpg (518x782, 154K)

You miss the point. At least Christians and religious people adheres to a morality that purports to be objective truth from God.

Atheists don't even pretend to believe in any sort of fundamental truth. They openly admit that any morality is subjective and arbitrary and thus useless. If you murder someone on the street for no reason, that's only bad because our culture says so -- not because murder is fundamentally evil.

So what's the evidence for any religion? Should the population just pretend to believe in God just for morality alone?

Attached: 77725270-A416-447A-94A8-2F0E5B26D003.jpg (640x533, 89K)

Based and Red Pilled

Attached: 5F102DD6-42D1-4E3F-BFEF-3F47B395F3F1.jpg (750x717, 74K)

>Atheists actually believe this...
Is it really so hard to believe?

You can see it happening right now with people in the West devloving into weak, domesticated livestock.

You don’t need to attack atheism on those grounds. Read the “Irrational Atheist” by Vox Day and he BTFOs atheists WITH science.

>t. Atheist but arguments and evidence are what they are

Attached: C5E14120-95B2-4937-AD3D-8F457C45FE09.jpg (683x1024, 140K)

I think you're confusing "atheist" with "anyone who's been keeping up with evidence-based knowledge for the past hundred and fifty years."