The controversies around and hatred against Blacks, since 1760 are the result of the fact that European whites were once ruled and despotically oppressed by Blacks; who also brought them civilisation. These Blacks were the highest European ‘blue blooded’ nobility and the European royal families we today, due to revisionism, think of as whites. In looks they were a ‘fixed mulatto race’ with brown and black complexions, and some looking more African, Asian or white. The whites were looked down upon and were called ‘t Grauw (the Grays) or Pink. To maintain colour, a sign of their ‘pure’ noble blood, they practiced strict intermarriage. This system of society can be compared to South African Apartheid, when a supposedly superior white minority oppressed a Black and coloured majority; and can thus be defined as Reversed Apartheid. Which system also benefited the non-noble European Blacks who were given opportunities to study and were given high positions. All the great names of this era belong to the Black and coloured group, so Europe during this period, can also be defined as a Black Civilisation.
Blue blood is black blood
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
The Hapsburg Jaw was really just whitewashed negro prognathism. Those are gloves on his hand by the way, notice how they bunch up and sag at the wrists.
>this level of nigger delusion
Blue blood refers to being so pale (due to not having to stand outside in the sun to work) that the veins of your arm would appear blue, as opposed to farmer who would have tanned arms, dumb nigger
> who also brought them civilisation.
Cucuteni-Trypilian, Vinca, Minoan Greece, Pelasgics, Myceneans, Nuragic civ, classical and hellenistic greeks, celts, scandinavian seafarers, italics, slavs and iberians all were way ahead of niggers in their own respective ages. While Romans were building the parthenon, niggers were busy hanging on trees.
> All the great names of this era belong to the Black and coloured group, so Europe during this period, can also be defined as a Black Civilisation.
Source, nigger. Apart from Mongols, Arabs, Amazigh and Turks in conquered areas, the rulers of Europe were indigenous.
The hapsburg jaw was an effect of inbreeding in royal houses, as similar effects are documented in nearly every other royal family of Europe
>pic
>the scpetre and orb are european
Mansa Musa was represented by euroeans with european-style clothing, crown and scepter, chiefly because Europeans who didn't travel outisde Europe for the most part had no clue of how niggers dressed. Or i suppose MAnsa Musa was secretly an European KANG as well.
>Cucuteni-Trypilian, Vinca, Minoan Greece, Pelasgics, Myceneans, Nuragic civ, classical and hellenistic greeks, celts, scandinavian seafarers, italics, slavs and iberians all were way ahead of niggers in their own respective ages. While Romans were building the parthenon, niggers were busy hanging on trees.
sorry to burst your bubble but allow of those people were black. Whites aren't even indigenous to Europe but come from the mountains of central Asia.
>The hapsburg jaw was an effect of inbreeding in royal houses, as similar effects are documented in nearly every other royal family of Europe
Let me guess; You read that in a history book from official academia. This is a quote you should familiarize yourself with.
That's strange. It seems some artists in South America at the time mistook the great King Charles V for a nigger. How could that be?
>greeks were black
>latins were black
>sardinians were black
>celts were black
>scandinavians were black
>slavs were black
Shit tier baiting faggot, put some effort in a claim at least
>pic
The Romans described the Silures and neighbroing tribes as darker and MEDITERRANEAN-looking, not niggers. Fucking niggers are too dumb to realize there's more than pale white and coal black to this earth lol
>Whites aren't even indigenous to Europe
They are as proven by genetics (e.g. the sardinains being unchanged since the neolithic), adaptation of the skin color to the european environment (getting paler as it goes further north), prevalence of blondism in baltic/scandi area, etc.
albert einstein was black, benjaman franklin was black, etc
because south american shitskins had only used turds to paint human skin until the first whites taught those apes some respect
>benjaman franklin
What did he mean by this?
nikola tesla was a black man, alfred hitchcock was a black man
isaac newton was definitely a black man
as was julius caesar
(you're dumber than a flat-earth believer)
He is roughly the same skin color of incas, which is tanned/dark olive, very common in teh mediterranean basin
Besides, here is another panel, representing Charles V as an european man, clearly paler this time. How do you argue that one is more valid than the other? Because your childish nigger brain suggests so?
>You read that in a history book from official academia.
>WUT I DON LIEK BEEZ WHITEYS LIE
Royal houses from all over the World have been marrying their relatives to preserve royal purity and inbreeding tends to cause such deformities, subhuman nigger. But i guess scientific facts are far off the grasp of a negroid's primitive brain
that the people from the british archipelago are some of the palest on the planet as they get the least sun cover
panel
Band name
>as blue blood runs black
a slightly tan person could easily be considered "swarthy" by someone like benjamin franklin, you... retarded... fuck
This is the wrong place to post this user. a large majority of Jow Forums think they are they are a part of the Aryan master race and are larping as Nazi fags. Painting history as black will get you nothing but a tirade of fag and nigger insults thrown at you
clicked the wrong post. sorry "friend"
you retarted
>This is the wrong place to post this ano
nigger pseudohistory shouldn't really be posted anywhere, even only for the sake of niggers so people won't realize that they are even dumber than it is said
Blue bloods are descendants of Cain, not niggers.
niggers are still dickwashers
oh, funny story:
a nig on here once tried to say that those niggers in the pic are "doctors"
how often is a doctor seen being pat on the head for his effort?
Ohh shit. WTF??
Everything I learned was a lie.
We made slaves of you.
>how often is a doctor seen being pat on the head for his effort?
kek
>How do you argue that one is more valid than the other?
Gradual miscegenation over time with whites.
There exist personal descriptions of noble and royal persons, which describe them as brown or black of complexion. Queen Charlotte of Britain is described as ‘brown’ and having a ‘true mulatto face.’ William I of Orange is ‘more brown then white’ and ‘brown of complexion and the beard.’ Charles II Stuart was called ‘The Black Boy,’ and described on a wanted poster as ‘a tall black man.’ Yet they are mostly shown as whites, and without ethnic facial traits. But further research show many contemporary prints and drawings that show the dark complexion and Black facial traits, like prognathism and woolly hair that fit the descriptions. This immediately leads to the question why these black nobles and kings were also depicted as whites, and why museums want us to believe they were whites. Why do museums exhibit whitened portraits of persons described as brown or black? And when and why this was decided. This all follows when we are told that European Blacks turned white, and there were no Blacks in Europe. Or when we were told that ‘black’ refers to hair colour while the portraits show a brown or black complexion. But we also read of members of the white race, who can be very dark; the so-called Black Caucasians. All these distortions fall under the head of revisionism. The use of authentic, fashionably whitened portraits today is revisionist, because they are used to hide an important historical fact, that Europe was ruled by a Black identified, noble and royal elite.
Arabs and Turks did. We gave them their due from time to time doe
what about paintings that are thousands of years old?
you're SO fucking retarded
Black americans are related to European nobility through their former masters.
what about the sistine chapel ceilling? (1508 and 1512)
you are such a typical, retarded nigger
Great thread op will definitely save this and use in ylyl threads, best chuckle in a while
They may have been tanned skinned, but they weren't "black", the middle east skin stones have been dominant in the Mediterranean for millennia.
But keep on thinking all the "kangs" were nignogs, explains why they don't rule anymore.
shieet...if steph curry and Mariah caryl are black.
How gullible do you have to be to think anyone would need a designated penis washer? Those guys are clearly performing circumcision and that image has been whitewashed.
What black history? Most progress comes from the middle east, Asia, and Europe. What grand things did the central and southern African people develop?
COJ144?
oh, the nigger's delusions
>Charluz wuz blak
In England "black" did not mean negroid until latter centuries, and was used to refer to swarthy people (which do dwell in England, e.g. the mediterranean-looking Silures you already cited)
Besides, none of his ancestors were described as negroes.
Same for William of Orange, not to mention that there are no niggers with "brown beard and hair"
>queen Charlotte
Here's her portrait, let the people judge
>like prognathism and woolly hair that fit the description
Proganthism was only described in cerrtain inbred families and we do knwo for sure that it happens in such conditions you subhuman nigger. Woolly hair as in the fuzzy-wuzzy hair of niggers does never occurr in european populations, but curly and wavy do certainly occurr.
>. Why do museums exhibit whitened portraits of persons described as brown or black? And when and why this was decided.
Because no niggers ruled Europe, my dear dumb nigger
Besides, where's the other BLAK KANGZ?
Niggers are too dumb to realize that whites have a variety of skin complexions
?
hey retard. how do you account for this ancient roman art?
what you're implying couldn't be true. you'd rather believe that your heritage was stolen than accept that niggers never even invented the wheel. it was colonists that had to show them its practicality
You are confused user. Look back and ask that question to someone else
u wuz never kangs, nigger. kys.
great portrait of middle eastern caucasoids, tehy sure have remained very similar if not the same through the centuries
>How do you argue that one is more valid than the other?
also you still haven't answered groid, hwo do you argue for Charles V being a nigger when there are images clearly portraying him as otherwise?
Nvm user. I've seen a youtube channel who has said a lot of the things you have in this thread.
Chronicles of Judah 144. I don't believe a lot of his channel, I only watch for sports analysis.
You should check him out.
Specifically, search "history Chronicles of Judah 144" into youtube.
holy fuck how delusional are you to think royalty throughout history DIDN'T have penis washers you brain dead nigger mongoloid
Is it black history month already?
it's so easy to find examples of ancient paintings and sculptures depicting the white people that created them
hey nigger, are you also implying that white people went around remodelling every single sculpture in europe to "whitewash" everything"?
if that's the case, how did they ever manage to overpower the nigger creators of said art?
you entire race is RETARDED and was conquered easily by the whites that created the art you claim your ancestors were responsible for
LOL
Why can't you fuckers just be proud of who you are? Your ancestors were a bunch of mud-hut dwelling dindus. So what? Use it to your advantage. Embrace your primitivism. Bang a drum and cannibalize your enemies.
Shit like this just makes people hate you more.
>Demographics never change.
Ikr, all those Australian aboriginal and Native American conspiracy theories. Everyone knows America and Australia have always been white.
No, I was being rhetorical, there is no great african history until the Egyptians. Mostly because central and southern african cultures they didn't write anything down, but if the height of progress is building mud huts... well yeah not much to write about.
Will do.
you basically implied that whites smashed the face of every single sculpture of a black person and replaced it with a white person's face -- though no evidence of such a massive revising of history can be found in any book ever created
oh yeah, that's totally more believable than the idea of white people living in europe and creating all of these things for themselves
Rare footage of the Black King of Sweden bathing, 1600 AD
youtube.com
> Wash my penis but ignore the rest of my body.
you do realize that niggers are inferior, right?
And when exactly did this "great replacement" of "The original" egyptians take place in your little dysfunctional mind, subhuman nigger? Answer me please
Egyptians aren't even really black user.
They differentiate from niggers, calling themselves "nylotic"(I think that's how it's spelled) peoples
That's like asking what great did people from the amazon do? Jungles aren't good for civilization.
it's so easy to find examples of ancient paintings and sculptures depicting the white people that created them
hey nigger, are you also implying that white people went around remodelling every single sculpture in europe to "whitewash" everything"?
if that's the case, how did they ever manage to overpower the nigger creators of said art?
you entire race is RETARDED and was conquered easily by the whites that created the art you claim your ancestors were responsible for
LOL
you retards also think egyptians were subsaharan africans LOL
This guy does a great work of debunking the "WE WUZ AMERIKUN INJUNZ" subhuman niggecentrists btw
youtube.com
how about them apples, retard-nigger?
niggers have had a variety of environments and plenty of resources to evolve in in Subsharan Africa, yet constantly failed and barely progressed beyond stacking rocks, piling up mud or planting sticks
They are dysfunctional retarded child-like subhumans and they well know it, which is why it pains them so much
how does that in any way corroborate what you've said?
address the following with words, instead of pictures (monkey-nigger):
you basically implied that whites smashed the face of every single sculpture of a black person and replaced it with a white person's face -- though no evidence of such a massive revising of history can be found in any book ever created
oh yeah, that's totally more believable than the idea of white people living in europe and creating all of these things for themselves
>another nigger too dumb to understand the context of an image posts it randomly trying to prove a point he doesn't understand himself
It is no wonder the clinically retarded nigger subhuman never discovered the wheel or brick
Egyptians are a squarely Africa group although not related to American blacks. The sub-Saharan is a misleading qualifier in that it ignores the fact that Saharan and trans-Saharan peoples exist, and they are shades ranging from pitch black to Kardashian due to varying levels of admixture.
So trying to steal Egyptian history isn't enough, and we're now moving on to stealing European history too?
Damn. Fucking parasites.
"Caucasians" TECHNICALLY exist in the following locations: Europe, Western Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa. Caucasian doesn't only mean "white skinned"
here's a chart explaining the caucasoid skull shape, retard-nigger
subsaharan blacks don't even have a caucasoid skull shape... what does that mean? look for yourself nigger
In the jungle, they didn't do much, becuase jungle conditions are not conducive to civilizations, but immiediatley outside the jungle in the sahel and sudan they created some fairly intersting societies.
>flat earthers have around 200IQ
where is the insult?
>The sub-Saharan is a misleading qualifier
The men who started the lie.
look at this image, nigger
grimace at the sight of your own ignorance
you are such a filthy retarded nigger that you refuse to address this:
>you basically implied that whites smashed the face of every single sculpture of a black person and replaced it with a white person's face -- though no evidence of such a massive revising of history can be found in any book ever created
> oh yeah, that's totally more believable than the idea of white people living in europe and creating all of these things for themselves
>subsaharan blacks
Blacks are universal and not limited to below the Sahara.
It's funny how that image gives a completely different history of Charlemagne than the real history. He's the son of WHITE Pepin the Short, a white guy who was the first of the Carolignans to become king after Charles the Hammer.
This is just more black-washing by people who are now trying to justify their invasion of Europe by claiming they've always been there.
You must be trolling, ape
>people built with basic materials in basic shapes (circle which helps conservating heat)
No shit you subhuman nigger, difference is that we invented bricks, arches, vaulst and whatnot and niggers dìveing too dumb remained stuck at dung houses
>Afrcian etruscans
pic related, actual etruscans. Caucasoid mediterraneans, not niggers. Nigger subhumans are too dumb to check out modern-day italians and realize we look identical to said portraits.
>senate
lol you do realize assemblies of elders were a thing all over the world, right? Besides, the legal system, social startification etc. were completely different, you subhuman nigger
>pheonicians colonizing europe and naming cities
Nigger subhumans straight up inventing history out of nowhere at this point, greeks founded cities on mediterranean shores of western europe, phoenicians mostly stayed in North africa
Why are you nigger subhumans so dumb you can not even look at the basis of your claims?
nigger, you keep ignoring what i wrote earlier. address this:
>you basically implied that whites smashed the face of every single sculpture of a black person and replaced it with a white person's face -- though no evidence of such a massive revising of history can be found in any book ever created
> oh yeah, that's totally more believable than the idea of white people living in europe and creating all of these things for themselves
You know whenever i se one of these nigger supremacy culteral posters on one of the chans
Im never able to tell whether they are a pol user trying to shit post as one of the deluded heboons or if hes just another nog switching back and fourth between the bored and a video of a realistic black strapon being fucked in to meth addicted blonde chick whos getting paid tripple her normal rate to just be in the same room as something as disgusting as a nigger
I guess it really doesnt matter though
Just like it wouldnt matter if you were right.
Lets say we give it to you
we say that all the white people in history of character and value are white
the kings
the painters
the invents
fuck maybe even hitler is black now lol
What the fuck does it matter?
I am white
my children will be white
If whites had litterally the culteral history of abos or eskimos i wouldnt give a fuck
I fight for my people because they are mine not because they are superior
Want to know another way it wouldnt matter?
All those fucker in those silos with the nuclear missles?
They're white
Want to know what the crews of the nuclear submacines and air craft carriers look like
They're white
Want to know what all the starving fucks and ebola babies in the congo look like?
They're black
Whatever fucking propoganda you make
whatever fucking autistic we waz kangs screaching you spout
Whatever you say
the world will still exist as it does
reality will not change based on your perception
you will still be dirty starving moronic animals
and whites will still be your superiors
Blue blood literally referres to the paleness of their skin, nobles had no tan so you could see their viens through their forearms.
I hope you live long enough to realize the truth.
i need more, and i need sources
poor delusional subhuman niggers, it must be shocking to spend your time claiming romans and celts and then realize all you did through history was this
youtube.com
you didn't address what i wrote
you're a low IQ brainlet nigger. i'm clearly more sophisticated and intelligent than you are, and i'm still giving you a chance to respond. oh yeah, that's totally more believable than the idea of white people living in europe and creating all of these things for themselves
funny thing is, the nigger ape is avoiding all of my questions each time, and every time i dismantle his arguments he avoids his defeat and just moves on to a nother topic for me or somebody else to debunk it again
I get it that it's Saturday night and most of you have no friends and no girlfriends so you are here instead shitposting on Jow Forums. But honestly don't you have anything better to do than argue with a monkey that can talk about "we wuz kangz" shit?
Fuck off Cucksembourg, you've been shilling nonstop and everyone can see through it.
mine too.
funny how this always happens to nigposters promoting impossible-to-prove, primitive nigger conspiracies
their points are so illogical and primitive that you can tell they're simply a nigger's way of accounting for his lack of intelligence (dunning-kruger)
it'll never answer. its programming reboots every time he has to answer something that wasn't a question it was prepared for