Who was in the wrong here?

I'd miss antifa. They'd stay home and get high rather than go out and make asses of themselves.

tucker was retarded on this one

Drugs are for losers! Don't forget to drink your coffee and soda while taking Zoloft and Lorazepam.

As a fan of Tucker this was just embarrassing for him. Weed makes you not care about poor govt. policy? Most people don't care even if they are sober. EMBARRASSING tucker, embarrassing.

Attached: 1scoop.png (1515x1104, 1.69M)

legalize cocaine

Tucker has quickly become a GOP Cuckservative Inc. shill. He must be in middle of negotiating a contract extension. It's fucking obvious he's been gelded

Both of them. Every weed plant should be exterminated.

I love watching people get tucked but /our guy/ was in the wrong here. While weed IS degenerate, it should be legal.

I can go to any TYT video and see the like to dislike ratio but that doesn't mean anything.

Neither really. Tucker wasn't arguing for prohibition, in fact argued against it. They were having two arguments that were not connected at all.
I have read conflicting reports that both support and detract Tucker's claims, so it was kind of a wash.
I think his goal was to bring up that marijuana will make the masses dumber and less likely to revolt. The advocate brought up the 'Nam protesters, and how most were pot smoking hippies. However, weed back then was around 10-20% as potent as it is now, so it's not really analogous. Kind of like comparing beer to whiskey.
All in all, it was kind of a waste of time where nothing was really discussed at length. I was kind of disappointed with this segment, which is rare for Tucker. Can't always bat a thousand.

Attached: 1539812417360.jpg (465x478, 26K)

the Prohibition on alcohol was successful
"Second, alcohol consumption declined dramatically during Prohibition. Cirrhosis death rates for men were 29.5 per 100,000 in 1911 and 10.7 in 1929. Admissions to state mental hospitals for alcoholic psychosis declined from 10.1 per 100,000 in 1919 to 4.7 in 1928.
Continue reading the main story

Advertisement
Continue reading the main story

Arrests for public drunkennness and disorderly conduct declined 50 percent between 1916 and 1922. For the population as a whole, the best estimates are that consumption of alcohol declined by 30 percent to 50 percent.

Third, violent crime did not increase dramatically during Prohibition. Homicide rates rose dramatically from 1900 to 1910 but remained roughly constant during Prohibition's 14 year rule. Organized crime may have become more visible and lurid during Prohibition, but it existed before and after.

Fourth, following the repeal of Prohibition, alcohol consumption increased. Today, alcohol is estimated to be the cause of more than 23,000 motor vehicle deaths and is implicated in more than half of the nation's 20,000 homicides. In contrast, drugs have not yet been persuasively linked to highway fatalities and are believed to account for 10 percent to 20 percent of homicides."
nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opinion/actually-prohibition-was-a-success.html

grow up druggie

>Tucker thinks wrongly that weed will make people complacent and easy to control/exploit
>Aldous Huxley actually stated that opiates can be useful to government by stupefying people and make them easy to control/exploit.

Keep swallowing the pills and be mesmerized by the talking heads on your television who tell you how to think. We know your mind feels too cloudy to think for yourself because of the pills, it's okay we are in control! No need to question or have inner monologue, consume! Our culture we manufactured for you is your friend! The social programming is working! Do you think the opioid epedimic crisis is coincidence?

He’s right but he can’t say why. It should stay criminal to give cops an excuse to arrest blacks and shitlibs when they can’t pin anything else on them.

That's retarded.

Tucker is controlled opposition. He reeled you neets in flirting with red pills, now that he has your guard down he's going FULL on GOP kike talking points

First line
>Canada has become the second country in the world to legalize...
except for all the countries it grew in before it was made illegal decades ago.

Why?

for once i agree with a commie memeflag

Because it's a waste of money, retard. All the resources wasted on not chasing violent offenders and thieves is disgusting.
You want to stroke your little pecker because someone you disagree with is being harmed while there are rapists, murderers and thieves running around. I want the cops to find the guy that broke into my apartment and stole my laptop, not the guy smoking weed in the street.

Attached: vrENjhRN.jpg (1024x595, 97K)

>I love Tucker when he owns the libs epic style, but he needs to keep his fascist hands off my weedle deedle deed! Getting hella baked is a human right!! My body my choice dude! Toke up brah!

The absolute state of Jow Forums. Stonie addicts pls go

Attached: 960AA8DE-E3EF-4D6A-872E-5F61F14039F1.jpg (659x700, 140K)

But they're the same guy

for all you faggots that think weed is harmless read these and think again:
www.jneurosci.org/content/18/14/5322.full
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.12703/abstract
nature.com/mp/journal/v22/n1/full/mp201621a.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26961342
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6818588
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037578/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624312
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16128224
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3606907/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846283
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104335/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037578/
sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-marijuana-as-the-new-herbalism-part-1-the-politics-of-weed-versus-science/

>I want the cops to find the guy that broke into my apartment and stole my laptop, not the guy smoking weed in the street.

When the cops know the nog who broke into your apartment but can’t pin it on him, they can take him in for the dimebag in his pocket retard. It’s like a “get into jail free” card for the criminal class. How is that not a good thing?

The idiot who isn't cashing in on the next boom.

Attached: why you do this things.png (526x438, 195K)

ron/pol/ disagrees with this statement user

Haha yeah let’s find drugs for profits! Porn and homosexual degeneracy too! How about heroin and opiates and pedophilia? Surely those will be great moneymakers too! Who cares about the goyim cattle, amirite?

t. alcoholic who ruins everyone around him
at least it's not weed

>

Attached: 3452345376387.jpg (500x373, 148K)

This. I mean cost of jail time alone for nonviolent offenders is pretty crazy. It also puts them in a situation where they can’t find a decent job due to crime. I mean c’mon, my dealer DeShaun is a rare present nigger father. Dude deals on the side to make money for his kids college while working at a normie job.

Tucker acted like a complete mong. His whole argument was that the government was engaged in a creepy conspiracy to dumb down the youth of the nation by keeping them premabaked. It was real based filter merchant tier.

weed shrinks the hippocampus, which is responsible for regulating memory processing
fuck druggies

>Let's give the cops more power
Man, that sounds like an awesome idea man. Let's give the cops, that have a track record of abuse, more power to selectivity enforce laws. Cops are infallible and always get the right guy, how could I forget? What happens if they pull over some guy smoking and minding his business?
Besides, him being arrested for weed without proof of stealing my shit doesn't get my shit back.

Attached: 1517110350741.jpg (640x640, 80K)

this. surprised to see this from a dutch though

>What happens if they pull over some guy smoking and minding his business?

Driving while intoxicated is reckless and dangerous, user. He should be arrested. Jfc I knew stonies were dumb but how much of a loser addict do you have to be to defend DWI?

Weed should be legal (and is here now) mostly to fuck the criminals. Some farmers got intimidated or got hurt by traps made by criminal in their cornfield. If you walk in the wood and get near a weed plant spot, you may get assaulted by a "spotter". You can ignore stoners but not criminals threathening yourself because they think you want to steal their plants.

The dude he had on the show needed a cone to chill the fuck out. He did the typical pot head strategy of screaming whenever somebody says something slightly negative or questionable about weed.

The nignog that stole your laptop probably bought a bunch of weed and is smoking it on the street. Weed is degenerate and unproductive.

WHY DOES TUCKER LOOK SO CONFUSED 100% OF THE TIME?

Attached: tc.jpg (640x333, 50K)

>faggots
>weed
OK. Checked out a random link. Here's what it says:
>Nicotine from cigarette smoking increases circulating levels of cortisol, growth hormone, and prolactin in male chronic smokers.
That's a breddy big fail there, leaf.
And no, I don't think habitual weed smoking is awesome; I've smoke weed maybe three times in the last 10 years. But then, I don't drink at all, don't eat sugar, etc.
I do know that I'd rather have a kid smoking occasionally weed than zombied out on SSRIs, as pushed by our educational system, psych-med establishment, etc, etc.

good info

growing up in Amsterdam put me in contact with enough druggies to know that drugs are degenerate and their users do nothing but make excuses

i never even defended cigarettes. stop making straw mans
kek. they try to defend their degenerate habits way too much and say its good for you

this is why free market capitalism should never be implemented

Its the only face the boomers understand.

DUDE WEED CURES CANCER LMAO

>Driving while intoxicated is reckless and dangerous, user
Of course. Which is why every car should be equipped by law with a breathalyzer.
Also, we need to devise a way to detect driving while fatigued, which kills thousands each year. Murderous sleepy truckers, fucking assholes. Need to get out in front of that shit.
What other behavior should we regulate? I mean, fuck, speeding is the #1 cause of death on roads. I think we're close to being able to have cars automatically slow down based on the local limit. What could possibly go wrong?
Anger and road rage... let's get a genetics test for that. Maybe with implants we can forestall someone driving while pissed, like, detect increased neurological activity and lock that fucking ignition key down.
Of course we'll eventually just legislate the ability to drive your own car away completely, and leave it all to daddy Google.
>tl; dr you are so deep up your fucking cuckservative ass, you literally don't see the slippery slope you're sliding down when you regulate behavior instead of consequences

>i never even defended cigarettes. stop making straw mans
You posted a link for me to read about how bad weed is and it was about nicotine from cigarettes. Try harder.
>habits
I don't call once in 3 years a "habit". Next?

>who was in the wrong here?
They both sucked.
Worst Tucker ever. He acted like his guests usually act.
The guy from MPP was horrible, which is consistent with my experience of them. Bunch of paid idiots.

>making driving while being drugged up illegal is the same as making driving illegal
Goddamn pot makes you dumb

WTF I love communism now!!!!

you still think im defending nicotine and cigarettes. and the habit part wasnt for you. i was replying to another person.

>straw mans
>DUDE WEED CURES CANCER LMAO

but I'm not debating anybody

Pull over was the wrong word, I meant stop. But I have driven with weed in the car and not been intoxicated. Having weed on you does not mean you're high, just like having beer in the car doesn't mean you're drunk. How else am I supposed to get the beer from the store to my house, numb nuts?

Attached: 1537779347224.jpg (480x562, 24K)

>quoting without any extra input or context

Let's be real. It's just a moral argument.
Legalizing it won't make our society better. The gray economy for it already exists and the taxes it will generate is a drop in the bucket.

It's just another wet splash on the slip 'n slide of cultural degeneracy. Want to legalize it on principle fine. But don't be surprised when everyone's smoking Marlboro spliffs on the reg and functional IQ drops by 10 points.

What is Tucker's "and therefore" point? Weed makes young people dumb and complacent so _blank_. It doesn't seem like Tucker wants to keep it illegal.

Weed stay in your system for days. Alcohol doesn’t. Do you refrain from driving for a week every time you smoke a fat epic hella doobie?

Tucker. I love Tucc time but he was just being silly that night.

>Does not address the slippery slope.
You said driving while high is reckless, which it is and no one has advocated driving under the influence, that was a strawman you created, boot licker.
You clearly want more police intervention to punish those you disagree with, and disguise it as a concern for safety. Address what he said, why shouldn't every car have a breathalyser? Why shouldn't there be road stops to make sure you aren't too sleepy to drive? Hell, I had a bad day at work the other day and I was angry while driving home. Driving angry can increase my chances of driving recklessly, how do we patrol that?
Punish the people that drive recklessly, not for having a substance on them. That's just retarded.

Attached: Screenshot from 2018-01-18 21:40:27.png (319x262, 93K)

Why is the commie the only one with a brain in this thread.
What the fuck is going on here

I'm thinking he just had to find some way to make a shitfit so the boomer viewers would be on board.

No, I don't think you're defending cigarettes.
You said, here >for all you faggots that think weed is harmless read these and think again:
... and you followed that up with what I assume is a bunch of copypasta that you yourself apparently never read. While I don't think weed is "harmless" (smoking weed everyday is not good), I was curious as to what these studies are all about. So I picked a link at random and went to look at it. What did I get? The headline was literally this:
>Nicotine from cigarette smoking increases circulating levels of cortisol, growth hormone, and prolactin in male chronic smokers.
... which has exactly nothing to do with marijuana, at least based on the headline. That article, as support for the argument
>for all you faggots that think weed is harmless read these and think again:
... is an actual, literal straw man since it relates in only the most tangential way to marijuana. It's just some link you threw up there which gives the appearance you have data to back your shit up, when a mere cursory investigation shows you might as well put a fucking link up about how cute kittens are, since cute kittens are distracting and might have a deleterious effect on one's work ethic.
I know this is hard for you to follow being a 14 year old edge lord and all. You can apologize, go "reeee faggot", or fade into the woodwork. Up to you.

niggers are violent offenders and thieves

>blacks are 13% of the american population
>well over half of all violent crime is committed by blacks
>over 90% of the violent crime committed by blacks is committed by black males
>so it turns out that 6.5% of the population commits over half of all violent crime
>wait, the majority of crime is committed by males aged 16-35
>so you be sayin' that about 3.5% of the population commits over half of all violent crime in a country of over 300 million?

Attached: 1528253053738.png (662x703, 123K)

>.. and you followed that up with what I assume is a bunch of copypasta that you yourself apparently never read
you forgot to address the data and evidence. you can't just dismiss it like that, you dishonest fucking kike

Tucker made some pretty retarded arguments in that segment.

Tucker he's a faget

Disappointed. I've never personally done anything marijuana in my life, but come on the case for maintaining a large government operation to deny people fucking marijuana is absurd.

What's the point if Tucker is just going to parrot basic loser neocon points.

>responds to argument with ad hom
>"dumb"
Putting aside I barely drink coffee, let alone routinely self-medicate, I'll note in passing that, while I know we can't compare IQ's on an anonymous korean basket weaving forum, I'm pretty confident I'll win that dick-measuring contest with you, fren.
So, got an argument? Because that idea, right there, that the State must randomly test all and sundry to detect some behavior it deems "irresponsible", has literally made mincemeat of my constitutionally guaranteed right to avoid being searched without a warrant.

Weed stays in your fat cells, which unlike you, people do not have in their brains.
Besides, you don't even have to be 100% sober to drive when drinking alcohol. Ar you advocating a 0.00 BAC level for driving?
I don't even smoke anymore, I just think it's a waste of time and resources (i.e. my taxes) to patrol a fucking plant. You gotta be a pearl clutching faggot to want to regulate other people's behavior.

Attached: 1508512376659.jpg (211x238, 15K)

>"who was in the wrong here?"
>one post by OP
filter this shit people.

Top lel this is one of the most fedora posts I’ve ever read

We should ban sugar before we decriminalize marijuana.

>forgot to address the evidence
I looked up one, and it was what I said. Literally irrelevant.
Oh wait, I'm supposed to click EVERY SINGLE ONE, and spend all afternoon on it? Yeah, no.
>kike
LOL. Ad hom as usual.
You want a proxy to enforce race war by the State. OK. That's what you want. It's totally fucking retarded, but I accept that's your justification for shredding my constitution. But then, rule of law - your heritage as a white european (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you don't give me) - is apparently of no concern to you.

decriminalization > legalization

But muh hippocampus is indelible

Is that guy related to the architect somehow?

That's meth. I used to smoke a lot of that.

>weed is known to increase appetite
>supporter is a fatass
No surprise. Weed is degenerate.

Attached: 768.jpg (680x450, 41K)

Don’t smoke weed Jow Forumslacks or you’ll permanently be stuck in 14 year old smarty pants libertarian fedora mode for life like this guy

Yeah, I’m a big tucker fan but he’s p retarded for this one. Most right-wingers want weed legalized. Not really an argument, but there are tons of arguments for legalization while there aren’t many valid ones against. A lot of opposition to legalization view it as degenerate, but that’s not entirely true. Degenerates tend to openly consume cannabis, unlike the silent majority that consumes with close friends or in complete privacy.

Listen you fucking morons, it's as simple as this.

It's none of your fucking business how I choose to treat my own body.

>muh body muh choice!
Yaasss queen slayyy

Also strange hearing this from a former deadhead

Attached: tuck is somewhere in there.jpg (1242x736, 126K)

>he points out how cigs are bad but then never addresses the weed data

legalize stims and our country would be the most productive in the entire world

i don't smoke
but holy fuck the tax dollars

>i dont like it when people want the best for me

LOL. Found the kike.

>14 year old smarty pants
Is that natsoc edge cutting you as hard as it's cutting me tho?
Literally kys.