I don't think they do

The context: a crippeld jew in toronto obsessively posting animal cruelty videos on Jow Forums

Attached: dedicated to the animal cruelty crippled jew.jpg (507x386, 50K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3BQO-9nP8a0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

A right to live does not exist.

The Jew as an individual is genetically a sociopathic NPC, the original MOB, easiest to program, fucking over preferably his own, not in the slightest tribal

>Individual Jews selling out other Jews to the Egyptians
>Individual Jews selling other Jews out to the Romans
>Individual Jews selling other Jews out to Charles the IV
>Individual Jews selling out other Jews to Hitler
>Individual Jews selling out their own nation
The only thing that makes Jews tribal are imagined existential threats

The moment the holocaust religion fails Jews will all start to sell each other out again
So to make jews fuck over each other give them the feeling of security and a possibility to profit

Just do what Trump does, while you dig their graves in the shadows

As prove, to little known laws of the Jews
youtube.com/watch?v=3BQO-9nP8a0

Humans in general should not have the right to exist. Who lived and who dies should be decided by an artificial intelligence, a superior lifeform. (Much like how we dictate which animals live as companions and which die for food.)

sounds like your will to live doesn't exist. faggot.

why do the fuckers get special treatment then, who gave them power over everyone that is fully functional and can take care of themselves, i think fully functional people deserve to live

A.I. bothers me because it still can be edited by the programmers (eg. Tay)

People who can defend their life or convince others to defend their life will survive. Rights are imaginary.

You're not making much sense, mutt.

Attached: 1522970057698.jpg (600x540, 43K)

As an ardent Trump supporter I think we should throw all the disabled from helicopters into the ocean

Cripples have as much right to live as anyone else.
A better question is, do they have right to preferential access and facilitation? I would say no. They don't have a right to it. Businesses and individuals should be allowed to choose to give access and facilitation to cripples if relevant and beneficial to them. Not forced by mandate to do so.

Everyone alive has a right to live you fucking commie dipshit.

No. Handitards are God’s mulligans

I don't think anyone should have any obligation to keep them alive. It should be up to the cripples to keep themselves alive or to make others do so for them. If they are at least able and willing to do something productive like working with computers they may as well be left alive. If, like the context given, they are incapable or unwilling to be productive, just don't bother trying to keep them alive, they will either figure something out or starve.

>This is what Americans call an argument

Attached: 1532733345189.webm (368x640, 1.85M)

>Everyone is equal
>You're the commie
Kek.

What on earth is this

Attached: 1522970556383.png (500x305, 78K)

This is the hill I will always die on in Jow Forums
Disabled people have every right to live, and they often respect life more than people without disabilities.
They serve as a reminder to how good some of us have it, and to how people are capable of making the best of the worst situations.
They are individuals, and individuals should not be killed unless they threaten the lives or individuality of other individuals.
This is why I will absolutely never be able to make the leap from Libertarian to NatSoc, and I'm frankly glad.

Attached: 1535214724741.gif (315x290, 98K)

I never said they were equal. I said being alive gives them the right to be alive you commie asshole.

You don't get to assume I believe in equality meme.

WHAT IS IT!!!!!!!!!
WHATTT
WHATTTATS
ANDSNSnkdsad
HUMAN HORSE HYBRID WHAT DID I JUST SEE IS ALEX JONES RIGHT?

Attached: katana fedora.jpg (192x262, 7K)

>rights are anything other than fiction
>everyone has equal rights
>you're the commie
Sure bud.

alive doesnt mean equal you fucking legit moron

So if you only have the right to be alive while you're alive, does that mean you lose that right once I kill you?

>cripples
>(((them)))
What did this limp wood leaf mean by this?

I do not know what rights are, but to claim any right without universal equality is inherently infringing on anothers.

cripples are just that: cripples. they weren't born that way and their potential disabilities ar not heritable.

the badly deformed from birth, provided their disability IS heritable, do indeed have the right to life, but not the right to reproduce, as it would potentially disable their offspring thereby robbing their offspring of the health a human being deserves from the onset.

your apparent inability to distinguish the crippled from those with birth defects is disturbing and you should be ashamed.

in america, all citizens not proven guilty of a crime have a right to life (but not sustenance)

rights are imbued and god given from conception to death.

the disabled are compounded from those not previously disabled but disabled by activity and those that were disabled from birth as a result of mutation. all get the same rights (life, liberty, pursuit of happiness) but not the right to reproduce.

nice.
>preferential access and facilitation
agreed. individuals, in the name of equality of opportunity, do not deserve special access to medicine or welfare as a result of their injuries regardless of the circumstance of said injuries.

agreed, unless they are a criminal guilty of depriving another individual of said rights.

Everyone has a right to live. That does not, however, mean that anyone has the right to have other people make sacrifices or concessions in order for them to live.

>rights are imbued and god given from conception to death.
The eternal christcuck.