Is paying for sex morally wrong?

Is paying for sex morally wrong?

Attached: IDK.jpg (888x500, 123K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DVWh7OgBkTc
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/sex morally wrong/page/1/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

one way or another you always pay for it

depends on the situation. you may be supporting human traffickers. or you may be using a legit woman who chooses to do the work for a living which is ethically fine

you're paying for it either way

Nope
That's called a square deal.
upfront, honest about what you're going to get.
What exactly do you have problem with here?

Attached: 1469127847861.jpg (300x300, 19K)

Your question appears to accept that morality has some objective metric. It does not.

yes, those women should not be earning keep by fucking strangers, they should be earning keep by making and raising children for some man

tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society

Not necessarily wrong, but it is suboptimal. Copulating with someone who doesn't want to copulate with you is an inherently lacking experience.

It's only wrong if they're being forced into it
If it's their own freewill, should be fair game

1, 4, 2, 3

And yes it is but man is flawed and a sinner

Attached: 123442553533563636.jpg (317x315, 37K)

depends morality

youtube.com/watch?v=DVWh7OgBkTc

How much?

No. Prostitution has been a part of Western Society only in the last hundreds years due to women's suffrage has it become a shame because of certain strands of feminists. I have known several sex workers and they were well off girls that just wanted extra cash and to leverage their looks.

What is wrong is jacking off to porn and not leaving the house to meet a woman or only paying prostitutes instead of trying to meet a woman for a relationship.

Attached: a fascist has 4 women in his life.jpg (1024x576, 110K)

Honestly, why do ALL Brazillion women look like trannys?

Only if it’s counterfeit bills

>making this thread for almost 2 months

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/sex morally wrong/page/1/

Attached: 1538428928051.png (400x386, 238K)

Attached: 0e3.png (281x355, 33K)

Any sort of company-for-money kind of relationship's pathetic for both parts.
You're paying for something that's given for free to most people, how is that not sad?

>brazilian
>big ass women
>Glow in the Dark memes.
Reminder, this are Trilateral Commision Brazilification Memes aimed to fuck with your heads anons.

Filter and Sage in options.

Attached: internet_conditioning.jpg (2268x900, 164K)

>tfw pay for escort
>drop 400 Canuck bucks
>Sex was extremely underwhelming

get a gf instead

Attached: andromeda_ryder_male.jpg (367x399, 48K)

No, but adultery and fornication are wrong.

No.

Sex is generally morally neutral as long as there is informed consent.

nothing between consenting adults is morally wrong. That's called freedom

Attached: 1532304683481.png (558x744, 428K)

Oy vey.

Attached: 1535312709358.png (558x568, 383K)

Yes, we already know there's no objective morality, you tryhard. Why don't you try hard to understand that he's asking about our subjective moralities.

No, I've done it many times. Had plenty of fun.

>you may be supporting human traffickers
Sex slavery is extremely rare, at least in America. If a woman really wanted to leave prostitution, it would be easy for her to run away.

Sex outside of marriage is morally wrong
Paying for it doesn't make it worse.

kek

It's Free Enterprise my dude

/thread

>is paying for sex morally wrong
Depends on what you are paying with.

Hold the phone bud. Whores have been around for at least 2000 years and that’s a conservative estimate. Many a civ has come and gone in that time. I see no connection between whores being present in our society and it’s ultimate downfall (which will come about through imposition of Islam by 2032)

Black bitch is the only one without tattoos so I would have to pick her.

Nope. Sure it might be nasty but that honestly depends on how much money you choose to drop. The more expensive, the hotter, smarter, and less shady the girl. Guys like to fuck, and some girls have no other skill besides that.

nah

>Whores have been around for at least 2000 years
and yet no civilisation has lasted those 2000 years, in other words you dont have a point

>I see no connection between whores being present in our society

you are tolerating the destruction of the family unit and subsidising the lives of women who are choosing to not provide a man with children

you are wrong

Fuck off already. I've seen you for 2 weeks now. It's obviously not very "secret" when you spam it this much, faggot.

It's a honeypot retard.

Attached: 1528650790090.gif (200x200, 3.51M)

>Is paying for sex morally wrong?

No, it's just pathetic. When you have to pay for sex you are no longer a man. You are a failure.

Well that's where your wrong kiddo, see Japan's Yamato dynasty.

Convenience?

depends on whose paying and whose being paid.

is it morally acceptable to receive payment then?

based and redpilled

Attached: 1511832978767.gif (500x418, 957K)

Attached: 1537173416960.jpg (387x302, 32K)

In some, but not all, cases.

What is wrong with you, you deranged degenerate faggot? I see this thread daily. At least you finally figured out proper english after 3 months of posting it "Is pay for sex morally wrong"

Subhuman fucking monkey

why? if the only thing you want is have sex, why is this a failure?
if you say, cause you can get it for free, ok, but i want it now, if the girl is so easy that you can fuck her in the first date, it's the same as a whore doesnt she

how is wearing janitor clothing, wearing sunglasses at night, going to a ghetto atm at 3 in the morning having your dick sucked and then having to go home and triple shower in any way convenient?

it's basically a cashier that sucks your dick, they have machines for that now.

lost all its power long ago and holds only a ceremonial position, thats like saying the fucking goblinigels in buckinham are a legitimate power

Delet this

Attached: 1537036566677.jpg (245x245, 5K)

If it’s the only way you can get sex it’s kinda pathetic. But it’s probably better than no sex.

yeah, I guess eating dirt cookies is kinda pathetic but it's probably better than no food.

Aside from a few dinners out and a birthday/ anniversary present not really. You just have to be an alpha and not a little faggot.

Fpbp

No, but making someone else pay for it is.

Attached: 1523051010567.png (309x302, 154K)

"No sex" is disease free.

>making someone else pay for you to have sex with somebody else

The Jewish wet dream.

reality is going to hit you so hard.

Attached: 1433739401969.jpg (678x960, 103K)

Attached: 1503638494571.gif (230x175, 1.94M)

escorts from a reputable service are cleaner than any slut app thot.

prepare yourself virgin

Attached: 1525678962100.gif (301x405, 2.52M)

Attached: 84FEA1F4-7B23-48C9-A217-F486A4510513.jpg (426x500, 48K)

Fuck off, its that sort of opinion that gives power to the Roasties. Men should not be judged by there success with women

Attached: mfwnoreactionimages.png (716x641, 646K)

You never gave money to kids after having sex with them? That's not very nice of you.

To these shits yes

Am I hallucinating or do I see the exact same threads every single day on this board almost like bots are spamming this place.

Yes. Giving women money for any reason is morally wrong.

High test. It means your kids will be taller, stronger, more assertive and have a bigger dick, faggot.

Attached: sad vlad.jpg (1926x1445, 134K)

Sex outside of marriage is ALWAYS immoral

Constantly making this threads is morally wrong

SAGE

>Is paying for sex morally wrong?

sex is morally wrong

if my gf said she paid for sex I would dump her like the plague, and I stand by the notion that the same rules apply to me.

delet this

Attached: bloom.jpg (238x215, 14K)

Female hindquarters are for assisting in procreation only.

Attached: 1520618836243.png (900x1008, 827K)

Thats called marriage.

>t.ChaimGoldberg

Yes.
rampant material reductionism is a syndrome of the demonic jew

because they ARE

No.
It can be unwise if not financially stable and isn't the most spiritually fulfilling. But it's not too impactful. Enjoy responsibly.
Getting married and having kids is much worse and is even more of a waste of energy, resources, and time.

lmao...

Not really though

clap

Here's how it goes

>be average 6-7/10 male
>approach average female and she #metoos your ass unless you're Chad
>tinder is a waste of time unless you're Chad
>best you can hope for is to be the beta provider for some landwhale and tyrones son

Contrary to what feminists and their tradcuck cousins say, human trafficking isn't all that prevalent here. I don't fuck hookers who are clearly junkies, but if they want to sell their pussy to somebody else to feed their drug habit what do I give a fuck?

Also this

Attached: harshreality101.png (500x810, 234K)

Not if it's this girl.

Attached: mother of god.jpg (1278x1920, 153K)

Attached: 1529463228324.jpg (250x250, 7K)

G-good thing I don't have sex.

Attached: 1538956669696.png (579x564, 308K)

marriage IS paying for sex though

Attached: 1459713932700.jpg (1756x2200, 755K)

No

Not in Brazil