What does it even mean to be against multi-culturalism?

Freedom of association is always going to lead to different religions, interests, hobbies, niches, etc. Why do people want a monoculture?

Attached: Drumpf.jpg (700x696, 98K)

I want whites only culturalism.

because culture is more than just 'derp i like spicy food', OP

Nothing good comes from multiculturalism. Luckily we're currently fixing the problem

Maybe its forced multiculturalism thats hated, but thats just me

Freedom of association hasn't been around for decades.

less conflicts more social cohesion why would you not want that

How is the government importing people from foreign countries against my will freedom of association when I can't choose not to associate with them?
>freedom of association
>government builds a refugee camp 300 feet from my house and fills it with Somalis

HRE, Roman Empire, Italy are all multicultural countries. You have different types of Germans, different types of Spaniards, different types of Italians, all combing their cultures into one big culture whilst still containing their own culture in a sub category. I guarantee you a man from Pomerania is almost entirely different from a man from Bayerland. The thing about these countries is that they don't force cultures upon each other, and all these cultures either have a common origin, order, and ideals. You cannot put a man in Rome and not expect him to do as the Romans do. It is absolutely unthinkable how much people push that an Arabian man and a Frank can accept each others cultures'. Last time someone tried that it was the Ottoman Empire attempting to force all Arabs, Balkans, and Africans to accept Turkish culture and religion. So what did they do? They killed many of them with their military capacity, and as quickly as it rose it also fell.

Attached: 1532871520651.jpg (600x525, 69K)

>Freedom of association

And therein lies the problem. Islam and niggers were dumped on our doorstep without so much as a please or a thank you. And even if you like some sort of cross-cultural exchange, who in their right mind would have 'chosen' those cultures? Top-down authoritarian multiculturalism is AIDS.

Culture can be a lot of things. In this situation it usually means respect for laws, civilized behavior, and respect for others' rights. A lot of migrants from shithole countries cause a lot of problems with that.

People want a culture. Cultures are disassembled by multiculturalistic synthesis.

At its base, a country is a tribe. Now mash together shitloads of tribes with wildly different opinions and values about how a tribe should be run.
Multiculturalism never works.

>Religion
>Interests
>Hobbies
These aren't a culture you dumb fuck; social behavior and values are. We dont care that migrants have differnt hobbies, we care that they don't always believe in American ideals like freedom and personal responsibility. You might think those are universal, they're not.

It's more of a resistance against the forced association between groups. The targeted erosion of communities, etc.

Attached: in a world.jpg (1591x3502, 983K)

Attached: noam chomsky on good propaganda.png (560x903, 347K)

I like multiculturalism but only with white people

>Wordswordswordswordswords
tl;dr

Did you really just ask for a tl:dr on something sub 100 words...? Are you native...?

Meh what the hell; here you go

slogans like diversity is our strength is bullshit so it's harder to argue with,

You don't know what multiculturalism, means, do you?

It's about how that picture is laid out, not about whether I understand it or not. It's too long.

It's not hard to argue with something that can be defeated with how or why.

With people who understand logic, yes you're right.

Misleading. Chomsky would support most, if not all of those slogans.

Free exchange of ideas and cultures is a good thing when it's voluntary. A government importing tons of different people with radically different worldviews, then telling you to shut your mouth and eat shit is "multiculturalism" as we are currently being told to accept.

We shouldn't be importing hordes of people with nothing in common and little if anything to contribute. We shouldn't be demonized for questioning aspects of their culture that clash with our own. We shouldn't have to feel ashamed of wanting to keep our own identity.

Look at America then look at China and Japan
One is multicultural melting pot and two are mono cultures. How well is this "multi-cultural dream" doing and well are niggers melting to Europe while melting it's economy

>Nothing good comes from multiculturalism.
all the wealthest cities in the world are multi cultural
LA
SINGAPORE
NEW YORK
LONDON
BARCELONA
PARIS
KULA LUMPUR
HONG KONG

all multicultural. The main key to make these cities successful is that people arent trying to shit down each other race and rule of law is absolutely paramount and degeneracy is kept at a minimum or safely hidden away.

Monoculturalists are for local monocultures.
Multiculturalists are for global monoculture.
That's what globalisation is, racially diverse people dressed similarly, thinking exactly same way.
Those business capitals you are listing are examples of this trend.

This is literally the opposite of true.

Purely because they are uneducated little boys sitting in their parent's houses, playing on the internet with a computer their parents bought for them, and living on the retarded delusion that creating memes will somehow make them wealthy and admired citizens. Oh, and being racist online owns the libs.

Attached: pure shit.jpg (1362x542, 78K)

who hurt you boy?

I know you're joking, but I think this is close to true.

>What does it even mean to be against multi-culturalism?


It means to be against influences and trends which are an obvious danger to you, your people and your way of life.
It also means you're not an idiot who thinks vastly different cultures could somehow coexist peacefully for a long period of time, when all available evidence clearly shows they can't, and one inevitably defeats the other.

>It means to be against influences and trends which are an obvious danger to you, your people and your way of life.
This is so vague that it can be used for all types of demagoguery.