What's your opinion on Southeast Asians?
>rules: no mention of sex toursim
What's your opinion on Southeast Asians?
Other urls found in this thread:
intelligence-humaine.com
twitter.com
Based and redpilled. Beautiful women.
sex tourism is the solution to the incel problem
Rice paddy nationalism
> women
You people are cool, but get out of Europe.
DELET THIS
Khmer was cool, until pol pot came about
It's nice. Watch "Mystics in Bali".
Vietnam is a pretty nice country with mostly nice friendly people despite our bad history.
My ex girlfriend's grandpa was minangkabau.
Wonder how Cambodia is now
The whole of Indochina was the shit tbqh.
Still having PTSD from Pot's murder pits I imagine, be killed 25% of the population after all
out-standing soldiers.
Not as good as the Chinese takeaway.
sad that some of you choose to be muslim
makes no sense
Sex toys for fat western men
I enjoy the sex tourism.
*he killed
Disgusting. KYS. Sex tourism is degenerate. Tame your own women and stop pulling other races into your psychosexual problems.
>on a right-wing forum
Sex tourism is unvirtuous. You are supposed to promote virtue and 1488, not be edgelord faggots who go around fucking like bonobos and destroying traditional cultures.
Their Islam used to mostly be "Traditional Islam" which incorporates alot of cultural elements from their Hindu/Buddhist culture before Islam. They're also legitimately known to be rather moderate in the past with many women not wearing Hijab and interreligious marriages.
Sad of what is happening now.
Lot's of foreign non-muslim men marry Indon girls though
Cambodia is a tragic dirt-poor shithole today, as far as I could see. The old glory days of the Khmer empire are long gone, you might as well bring back the pharaohs. Cambodia today is a hellish wasteland and its main export is prostitutes. That country has one of the most brutal histories in the world, and even without Pol Pot's auto-genocide, they'd still get jerked around by Vietnam or China.
Vietnam is the elite country of Southeast Asia, what the Prussians were to Central Europe and the Japanese were to East Asia. More disciplined than their neighbors, more hard-working, more militarily successful. Vietnam recovered very fast from the war and went back to its old role as the regional power.
Thailand and Vietnam are the two successful nations in Southeast Asia, the other two are satellite states to them. If you count Indonesia, they're the greatest nationalist success.
blame capitalism.
Indonesia's success is also remarkable because they're not good soldiers (Vietnam) or a centralized kingdom that dodged colonization (Thailand).
Indonesia is the naval empire of Java, and its history is literally the Javanese outbreeding their island neighbors. Java is a bit like a Borg swarm, eating its neighbors one by one.
It's a combination of globalized capitalism and Jews, yes.
Nice countries overall, people are generally quite respectful and pleasant. Tragic that the south was Islamized it's really degraded their culture in my opinion (compare Indonesian culture to Bali).
Hard to generalize too much though because it's a very diverse area, not in a pozzed way but there are huge variations in culture/ethnicity.
This and the amount of malnourishment in their country has resulted in them having the least intelligent Asians, scoring as low as 65
>Vietnam recovered very fast from the war and went back to its old role as the regional power.
TOP LEL, they have been constantly mogged by Indonesia in terms of military for the past century and is also has the weakest economy of the top 5. There's still ruins after the war, and minefields are abundant as well in certain areas.
Their military performance has literally been a result of pure luck.
both Indons and Congs deployed zerg rush tactics at times of war. Neither were very effective, but Indons didn't get much time to make up their losses due to the Ronde Tafel Conferentie happening only 2 years later
I am sick and tired of IQ but the reality is any SEA nation succeeds due to the Chinese minority
IQ of southeast asia is actually within Eastern Europe levels, despite the severe malnourishment. Thai, Viets and Filipinos score on average 90, ranging between 85 to 100
intelligence-humaine.com
Don't care as long as they stay out if my nation
Very interesting thanks for linking, would be curious to see greater breakdowns by ethnic group especially for some of the smaller ones like the Negritos, Hmong, etc.
Probably all fairly close but it's fascinating how diverse the populations there are.
Nice people. No issues with them at all really.
Usually just want to keep to themselves and work. Provide a better life for their kids.
Don't cause much trouble, don't really get in to local politics and don't push their religion etc... unlike certain groups of immigrants I could mention.
well, there's a huge deviation in Southeast Asia. Sometimes the average on samples are scored at over 100, other times they are scored at 70 levels. There are evidence of malnourishment affecting intelligence there aswell. There were one sample where mothers of children in agricultural areas in Philippines had average IQ of 77, while the children scored 92. The children grew up in better conditions than their parents which probably attributes their better cognitive developments
As for Negritos and Hmongs, there's no data on the former that I know of but from what I have gathered, Hmongs aren't very intelligent apparently.
The US stereotype of the Hmong matches that view too.
Very interesting stuff thanks for sharing, I will have to read more on SE Asia IQ.
Is that the Hory Shet guy?
Basically chinks but lower IQ and uglier.
exceptional women to have sex with and never call again.
/thread
Sex tourism? That's my hobby you faggot.
They are a lot more poorer than east asians but they are more cultural, traditional and celebrate their heritages alot.