Oh boy oh boy
82nd Airborne Division deployed to the Souther border
Other urls found in this thread:
law.cornell.edu
twitter.com
If they try this shit with the 82nd instead of unarmed Mexican Police they're gonna get ventilated, right?
As long as a few stray bullets hit some pro migrants running around trying to "help"
Just a peaceful invading force of 7,000 military aged men burning US flags
Whatever happens
we have got
the Maxim gun
and they have not.
head on back to Jow Forums
>US military being deployed
>Not Jow Forums
Seething spic spotted, I repeat we got an S.S.S here!
they had like 20 or so women they put out front for the cameras too
To do literally nothing. They straight up just stand around and watch. This has happened a bunch of times before.
Fake News media also already deploying their army. In the next week we will see a soap opera of massive proportions on North American and European media. Crying children, crying pregnant woman and crying old people everywhere.
Kill yourself nigger.
Hold on to your butts.
you Jow Forumstards really aren't fooling anyone
head on back to the oven kike
This. Regular military and national guard have been sent to the border before. The only thing they do is provide administrative and logistical support. They play zero role in enforcement.
t. Seething newfag
Military is Jow Forums
Military possibly getting to test new "less lethal" toys on 7,500 violent invaders is extra Jow Forums
Dark skinned people are literally the most potent (bio) weapon ever deployed against White nations...if that is not Jow Forums material i don't know what is.
They could deploy those sound wave and microwave "crowd dispersion" weapons, that would be cool to watch...but it would probably be very bad PR so they won't do it.
Quit making shit up you underage fucking faggot.
Shut up shariablue. Green texts were funnier before you got here
Cave you fucking skull in nigger. You shitposting cunts need to be massacred.
Underrated
No, you kill yourself. Just because something gets discussed that you dont like or hurts your feelings, doesnt mean everyone else should censor themselves.
Dont like Jow Forums? Dont go there
Dont like a thread you see? Dont fucking enter it. You can literally hide threads and when you come in here and shit it up with your fucking Marxists bullshit, youre only pushing for the rest of them to make these more out of spite. This is a thread about a military operation being conducted on US soil. You are going to bet its going to be on Jow Forums. Said event has to deal with politics. Act like a god damned adult and deal with it you fucking baby instead of whining about having to see something you dont like.
By the way, stupid motherfuckers like you who feel the need to censor everyone and everything are the reason more people who maybe didnt give a shit so much before are finding themselves to become Nazi and far right in their views. Maybe remember that next time before you open your mouth and make another normal moderate browser here turn into a Jow Forumsboy who makes more threads you hate.
>whines about being censored
>tries to censor posts in thread
Nice rant faggot. Pretty fucking telling that you can't actually defend the content of your blatantly anti-factual thread.
>Act like a god damned adult and deal with it you fucking baby instead of whining about having to see something you don't like.
Holy shit motherfucker, this is EXACTLY what you're doing right this second.
Take a minute and think about the fact that you flat out just defended people being actual Nazis because someone might have said some naughty words at them once.
Kill all spics
>said the inbred offspring of filthy Micks and WOPs.
At what point did I try to censor him? I didnt sage and I didnt report. I offered him advice to even hide the thread. But you wouldnt know that being busy moving goal posts and all. Keep on keeping with your bullshit.
>act like a bitch
>call someone out for being a bitch
>omg youre acting like a bitch
Delete yourself
Take a minute to reflect that youre picking strawmen. Its okay to be a communist but not a Nazi? Last time I checked, national socialism is a political belief and people are entitled to their beliefs. Theyre however not entitled to attacking others beliefs
The military doesn't do anything at the border. They're just mall cops: observe and report to border patrol.
Maxim? I hardly even know him...
>this thread
Holy fuck you leftists are a stain upon this board.
Fuck off back to leftypol or Jow Forumssocialistra. We've had nigger defense threads for ages. We've had Rhodesia threads for ages. Pro-gun rights is a right-wing position.
>act like a bitch
>call someone out for being a bitch
>omg youre acting like a bitch
Delete yourself
Quality advice. You should practice this yourself you whiny faggot.
And Rhodesia threads actually focus on weapons and tactics primarily.
>Pro-gun rights is a right-wing position.
No you fucking cocksucking bootlicker. It's a pro-liberty position.
I like most spics but I still hope this caravan is stopped before it reaches the border. It's pretty funny that the one death in this caravan is from a traffic accident. After driving a rental in Guadalajara for a couple weeks I'm convinced that Mexican drivers are more dangerous than cartel violence.
Kek not an arguement. Keep trying though buddy. Youll get there eventually.. maybe.
>the left wants guns only to kill people they don’t agree with
Yeah fuck off faggot. “If you disarm your enemies, they win”
Fuck of newfag trash. This board had near as makes no difference no politics threads 10 years ago.
Name one left wing ideology that preaches liberty. Just one. Ill wait
You haven't made an argument or even a cohesive point in this entire thread. All you've done is cry like a little bitch that you can't have 2 identical boards.
Actual liberalism.
That's definitionally what classical liberalism is.
And you know American conservatism is classically left wing by global and historical standards, right? No, of course you don't.
>Talking about your military securing your country's borders from an invading horde of thousands who have already committed acts of violence = Nazism
These fucking newfags Jesus Christ
Please cite where I said that and ill eat my words.
Pretty broad ideology there..
Wow, a shitpost thread counter by more shitposting, compounded by counter-counter shitposting. Welcome to modern Jow Forums.
Orange man bad, you nazi!
can they air drop em for training? or will they just show up in 8mpg mraps?
>American conservatism is left wing
>Republicans are nazis reeee
Way to move the goalposts.
Leave Jow Forums faggot
Way to fall short of the predetermined goalposts, tard. You dont even know what that word means, clearly.
Discussions about politics or current events belong on Jow Forums.
Get the fuck off my board motherfucker.
Fuick you nigger. You asked for an answer and got and objectively factual one.
ideology none the less that is slightly to the left of the political spectrum. Really, true liberalism only really differs from modern conservative leaning views really on what role the government should have in a society. Other than that, they pretty much agree on everything else that would be considered conservative in modern times.
>free markets
>patriotism and nationalism
>protection of borders
>etc.
Jow Forums is a board devoted to weapons and military
Shut up douchebag. You wanted someone to name a left ideology that preaches liberty and received an answer multiple times that is correct in its dictionary definition. If you don't like facts, that's your fucking fault.
Typos? Getting worked up much? I asked you to describe a left wing ideology that is inherently for liberty. The answer I got was classical liberalism which is by all standards classified as right wing. As asked for specifics. Not broadness. You cant give me a straight answer because there isnt one
Mentioning the military in passing but it being totally irrelevant to the actual intended subject of the thread doesn't make it a military thread.
>classical liberalism which is by all standards classified as right wing
It's literally not you absolute, reality-hating faggot. Do our species a favor and blow your syphilitic brains out all over your whore mother's basement.
Yes that's why Military Enlistment General is a thing up 24/7 and accepted by mods.
How does it feel being stupid?
So lets try an get this back on topic, how exactly DO you stop a crowd of several thousand people without killing them?
I suggest a non lethal version of pic related, the pike phalanx. A solid and well disciplined pike phalanx cannot be broken by melee infantry from the front, so if the caravan can be funneled into a single chokepoint it will simply be impossible for them to break through. Eventually, even the most dedicated of the group will simply be too exhausted to try, and the whole caravan will be forced to retreat.
If this were the case, we wouldnt even be having the discussion we are having and you know it. Youre playing devils advocate right now. At least I hope.
So what is Donald Trump and the entire GOP/Republican party?
>cuckime
Classical liberalism is on the left in every single scope of political science. That's not up for debate.
>So lets try an get this back on topic, how exactly DO you stop a crowd of several thousand people without killing them?
You shoot the first dozen who try to break through and see if they still want to come.
If they do, you shoot the next dozen.
Repeat ad infinitum or until they stop trying to break through.
Real big thinkies here
Rhodesia threads have always been a subtle redpill to you faggots. Africa was far superior under white rule because niggers lack the IQ to rule a nation effectively.
Every Marxist nation had draconian gun laws. Meanwhile Hitler made it far easier for the vast majority of German citizens to own guns.
They're free market classical liberals. The economic part is an add-on not inherent to the political aspect.
This has always been a right wing board with libertarians and nationalists being the vast majority of users. It is pro-private busisness and pro-private property.
That's not from any political science text. An MS paint graphic saying something doesn't make it true.
So then why are we even having this conversation if the farthest right ideology is left (its not)
Modern day liberalism is none of those. It was co-opted by leftists.
You are describing CLASSICAL liberalism you dumbfuck which became libertarianism. Classical liberals are not left-wing. They are righ-wing (though not far-right).
Then show me the real one that proves Im wrong? Im waiting.
You speak for nobody but yourself you nogunz twat.
Post your guns, leftist nigger.
Hes not wrong though
This is what appears in every introductory polisci book.
>classical liberal is left
>anti affirmative action
>anti laws that ban "discrimination" for private businesses
>pro-gun
>extremely low taxes
>strong private property rights
>anti "hate speech" laws
>strongly pro-capitalist
NONE of these positions are left wing, you absolute faggot. Modern liberalism holds nothing in common with classical liberalism.
Where is classical liberalism on there? Ill give you a hint. Its to the right on the center line..
Classical liberalism doesn't address any of these things directly. Read a book you illiterate nigger fucking faggot.
No, it's not, especially not by global or historical standards. By modern day developed world standards, yes.
>read a book
>doesnt recommend a book specifically
Wanna know how I know youre projecting?
Classical liberals opppse all those things because they are for NEGATIVE LIBERTY. Not "positive liberty" which is primary focus by the left and modern """""""liberals""""""".
It is not even remotely left wing. Classical liberalism began being referrered to as libertarianism after you leftist faggots hijacked the term.
Neuter yourself for the good of the global gene pool.
Then by all means. Dont keep me waiting on the edge of my seat! Im waiting for proofs!? Actually take a stance and back your argument with proof?
classical liberalism is its own thing that stands for equal suffrage and that people are inherently good and don't need to be regulated, but the government does. Republicanism is pretty much identical with the exception of civic duties to the Nation. Libertarianism is as close as you can get to an Anarcho state without being an Anarcho state, as much as I would love for the government to forever fuck off along with other citizens, that just doesn't really work out in a realist sense. The same goes for classic liberalism with "people are inherently good". You want to know what the best of the best of the best is? Then answer me this.
>Would you like to know more?
Fuck off nigger. The term libertarianism massively predates the modern left taking on the 'liberal' label.
>still cant give anything more than sour insults
Oof. You all have seen it here. This arguement is over. This guy cant even recommend a book to back up the most basic of his beliefs.
Take your own advice. You haven't provided a single shred of evidence to support your position either despite actively and being first to make a claim that is patently counter-factual.
>still can't do anything but deflect
Oof. You all have seen it here. This argument is over. This guy can't even disprove objective facts.
>Would you like to know more?
This.
I thought it was illegal to use the armed forces to enforce US laws without explicit congressional approval. So are they going to be just "deployed" there for show?
You're admitting that you don't understand the very subject that you're arguing about. You do see that, don't you?
btw: 978-0230367258
Yet its funny how every single political compass puts classical liberalism in the same general location. I am providing facts. If dont wish to believe them, you need to counter them WITH FACTS. Thats how these things work.
The reason you cannot is because you already know youre wrong but youre in too deep to admit it. Which is fine. It happens. Just stop before you look even dumber
>only one posting facts
>deflecting
Heh. Yeah okay buddy.
>So are they going to be just "deployed" there for show?
Yes. As stated, they do nothing except observe & report. They provide administrative and logistical support only.
>libertarianism is for an anarchist society
Holy fuck you dumb false flagging nigger. The vast majority of libertarians are not anarcho-capitalists. They are for a small government with free markets just like what classical liberals espoused.
Let me educate you:
In the earlt 20th century there was a split in the liberal movement. Before this split, "liberalism" referred to classical liberalism. Not modern day progressive social "liberals." The classical liberals saw the hijacking and co-opting of their ideology and began calling themselves libertarian instead. Modern """"liberalism"""" is extremelt corrupted and holds nothing in common with OG liberals like Adam Smith. Classical liberals are for negative liberty and are strongly pro-capitalist. These are not left wing positions.
Pull it out of an actual book, not some fucking 2 second custom MS paint image. It's weird that you think that qualifies as proof to anyone with a fucking brain stem.