What does a old 55+ nihilist atheist look like what beliefs do they hold

Enough, stop being autistic. 10$ say you're an atheist and look like the amazing atheist.

Do you think he felt pretty tho? Is he still a thing?

I also love theists who have these pictures saved on their computer. Do you understand how fucking creepy it is to have some fat naked idiot on your computer?

Maybe in the US. Here it's christcucks who are fedoras and twinks, just see the leader of our Christian party
also this thread is an extension of pic

Attached: 1539179340334.png (1051x159, 18K)

Based and red pilled

It probably is the guy in the pic. It acts like the amazing atheist too, always asking where people are basing their claims from, and trying to be ultra logical

>can't answer the question
Hopefully you saw where I was going with that and feel as stupid as your assertion is.

>some fat naked idiot
Behold your thought leader, atheist swine

>expects a normal conversation about atheists on Jow Forums

Oh yeah tell me all about how retarded you are

Good god! Why are Atheists such degenerate fucks?
Foot Soldiers of the Jew World Order.

Attached: Patriot 816726996-tumblr_mhkpxbGVIh1qlhck1o1_r1_500.gif (500x250, 951K)

>always asking where people are basing their claims from
You're right, lets just act like rebbit and make up our own reality. Sorry for bringing reason into the discussion.

damn sam hyde looks like shit these days

most people that aren't stupid are atheists by now. Your bible has nothing of value.

Probably mostly in the US but were I come from most Christians look like drug addicts and pedophiles

d&c shills

>thought leader
He's a poster boy for not how to live. Disgusting.

>rebbit and make up our own reality
You're the only plebbit tier poster in this thread.

You have to go back

>Oh yeah tell me all about how retarded you are
I'm not, guy who was just asserting things based on nothing.

No you're the one acting like an autist

>You're the only plebbit tier poster in this thread.
Did you want to try and provide evidence for this claim? I'm not following your shitty line of logic here.

Attached: 1538354847256.jpg (660x515, 43K)

>"no u"
Got it.

Dude now you resort to more ad homs?
Just give up already.
Yes there are a bunch of idiots like AA who are fun to laugh at but most atheists are atheist by default because they've never thought about it and don't give a fuck. They didn't actively decide to be atheist anymore than you actively decided to be non-father christmas-ist. Most people just don't think about it.
"Do You believe in God or a god?"
"Erm....nah."
And that's it.

Shut up queer.

being anything but agnostic is mindless and pretentious. to believe in a supernatural creator, or to insist that he definitely doesn't exist, is just idiotic. We do not know. We don't know what came before us, what came before the big bang, what came before that, it's inconceivable.

>muh dark matter
how did that get there then?

If their is a deity, it's something most likely so beyond our senses, imagination or comprehension that we cannot even understand it.
Think plato's the cave allegory. we'd probably go insane had we seen such a thing

Most 'redpilled' would be to admit that, and on top of that it's a lovely thing to take on the morals and teachings of organized religion, without believing in the supernatural aspect

you can admit that you're not sure there's a god, but accept the teaching of Christ or Allah or whoever, while accepting that it's fable. That's the most sensible and logical thing to do.

>muh logic
>muh assertion
>muh reason

Good lord you cucks are like a broken record

>inb4 I'm so smart obviously I value these words lol haha I'm so smart

based

That’s not the theme of this thread to look super hard into whether or whether not atheists are mainly fat and ugly. This is like a discussion thread not a political or scientifically one. You atheists just can’t ever stop it’s why you don’t get invited to parties

>being anything but agnostic is mindless and pretentious
Do you believe in a God?

>the problem is the crist cucks that are pushing their crap in to our mouths and making us swallow

Sorry, you're right. Asking you to provide something to substantiate your blind opinion is retarded. You might be onto something.

Attached: amazing atheist.jpg (290x174, 7K)

did you read my post?

I don't know. I won't believe in something without proof or evidence, but I can't discredit it either.

There might be, there might not. what's the point in arguing it

if there is one, which i think is a big more likely than not, it's beyond our possible imagination, much more beyond a sentient creature or a judgement-giving omnipresent arbiter.

Oldschool T.J, I miss this dude. I never realized how much of a liberal cuck he was till 2016

MUH BIBLE VERSUS THOUGH

>That’s not the theme of this thread to look super hard into whether or whether not atheists are mainly fat and ugly
If you decided not to be upset over a post on Jow Forums for a second, you'd go to my first post and understand how the discussion went.

They spend obscene amount of time reading about God, talking about God, debating about God. They are obsessed. They actually do believe in God they are just angry at Him

also checked but i just want to add, i do surely /HOPE/ there is. I'd like to think there's one, and sometimes i send out "God, if you're there i'm sorry for not following/believing" thoughts/prayers out of me head.

What wrong with believing in the good values a religion teaches?

Asking for "validating" the "claim" that "all" atheists look like something just makes you look like exactly the kind of atheists this thread is about. So I'm having a laugh at you.

>I won't believe in something without proof or evidence, but I can't discredit it either.
what does this even mean you faggot

I like to think most Christians realize this by now. The ones in this thread are just d&c shills. Getting people to argue over the unfalsifiable is sadly very effective
sage

pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=335391400

This. Those stupid bible thumping Christians held us back for far too long. Everything that we are accomplishing now is but a mere taste of what is to come. The Christians will suffer the most not only for their crimes of forcing us to be normal functioning members of their society but also because their stupid morals make them consider us and everything we want to see achieved as “degenerate.”

Attached: FEF959C1-49D0-46FD-B024-74CB85A380CE.jpg (673x850, 361K)

funny cause im listening to this and ricky gervais is ragging on about his anti-god bs here and there, ignoring the fact that karl is the true intellectual :3

youtube.com/watch?v=ZkYEcBgXY-c

>what does a old 55+ nihilist atheist look like what beliefs do they hold

what the fuck were you injecting when you constructed that sentence?

>I don't know. I won't believe in something without proof or evidence
That's atheism. Lack of belief in a God/Gods due to insufficient evidence. Agnosticism is in reference to knowledge, atheism is in reference to belief.

>theists

Attached: 1A45796B-234E-485B-BF5C-1C81B44833F1.jpg (780x564, 82K)

You don’t like it when someone forces you to look in the mirror?

You’re in some third world shithole. No shit, Sherlock.

kids get raped and killed all the time. That means god is shit if it exists. Creating life is unethical without consent. God is not even worthy of being acknowledged.

are you fucking stupid mate?

it means exactly what it looks like. can you really not wrap your head around the concept of NOT giving a conclusive answer when there's no evidence for either claim? is that too many words for you, dear?

let me put it more simple

if i'm holding me hands behind me back, and i ask you is there an apple in me hands, and to choose carefully, and you have no way of knowing, what would make you more inclined to believe Yes as opposed to No? the most reasonable would be to say I don't know.

>Him
capitalizing the h... you've reached peak retard.

no, it means you are not taking an honest position. You lack balls.

keep reading man. it's not.

because as much as i don't believe in him without evidence, is equally as much as i don't believe he DOESN'T exist, because lack of evidence that he doesn't.

If athiests were to be right, why don't they prove some evidence that he doesn't exist?

Neither side can. I dont BELIEVE that he does and i dont BELIEVE that he doesnt, EQUALLY. i believe nothing about the situation because i don't have evidence to know either way. and frankly, i think if i had to guess, it's slightly more likely that he does exist.

Shut up shill. Your stereotypes don't even make sense outside of an American social context. Either way this shit serves no purpose but to divide and you know it.

>can you really not wrap your head around the concept of NOT giving a conclusive answer when there's no evidence for either claim?

no. beacuse this line of reasoning is fucking retarded, and only retards think its compelling.

just because you cannot disprove something does not mean you cannot make firm statements about its probability of being true.

>"Most atheists look like guy in pic."
is what i asked you to provide evidence for. You made a claim, i asked for evidence. If you have none (which you clearly don't) then that's fine. I'm just going to make you acknowledge that it's a silly assertion.
>So I'm having a laugh at you.
You're the only one who can't verify their claims, and instead of admitting it, is flailing wildly.

lmfao you stupid fucking mutt

not taking an honest position on something because there's no reason to believe one or the other position.

if "lacking balls" is failing to cling to a definite answer to a question that i don't know, then I guess i'm a proud eunuch. i think balls is more akin to stupidity if it means that you accept an answer to something with no reason. that's the type of balls you don't need, willful ignorance

Attached: 1535684733066.jpg (1157x772, 409K)

The hot coffee goes on the back right as orgasm is achieved. Everyone knows this. What an idiot

>not taking an honest position on something because there's no reason to believe one or the other position.

0 evidence for positive claim

vs

mountains of evidence that the claim is the product of the human imagination.

faggots like you will sit on the fence because you're too pussy to admit the conclusion

Stop treating this as some sort of scientific claim or some kind of debate.

No where did I state that I was going to engage in a factual debate with you. I have come here only to insult you and other atheists.

This would have been painfully clear to anyone with minimal social skills...

It’s just bants. Being a bit of a dick to each other is good every once in awhile, it improves things

Attached: anthony bourdain.jpg (992x558, 50K)

>I have come here only to insult you and other atheists.
whats the name of your imaginary friend, frend?

>If athiests were to be right, why don't they prove some evidence that he doesn't exist?
Right on what? Theists make a claim, and since it cannot be verified, we reject the claim due to insufficient evidence. It's a lack of belief of a claim simply due to insufficient evidence, that's it.
>because as much as i don't believe in him without evidence, is equally as much as i don't believe he DOESN'T exist
What? Either God exists or doesn't, correct?
>because lack of evidence that he doesn't.
That's atheism.

the wording of what youre saying is confusing me honestly, not of your own fault, but i'm pretty sure you're saying exactly what i am but you're interpreting it wrong.

Just because you can't disprove something,
doesn't mean you can't make firm statements about its truth

cant disprove god
but can still make statements about it being true

So you're saying to make a statement with no evidence, just because it can't be disproved, it can still be true

i think in psychology they call that an unfalsifiable theory. you can't PROVE that it's wrong, so there's a chance that it's right?

in which case yeah, but it can go both ways

it's not retarded to say that without knowing, I won't comment

if someone said who would win, this random guy Jeff, or this random guy Richard in a fight:

i don't know. I don't know either of them. I can't necessarily disprove that jeff would win, but that doesn't mean I can make a firm statement that he would. It would be blind. It's just as likely that richard would win.

There's nothing wrong with not taking a side on something that has no information to support either side. It's not supposed to be >compelling it's quite dry, but it's reasonable. call it a cop out if you will, but i'd rather cop out than go with something that i don't know is true.

What's more important is to focus on things that you actually can manage and prove and acknowledge, like morals and giving meaning to your life, rather than worrying about something you will perhaps NEVER know the answer to.

This goy is gonna have bad time in the future. He's not that charismatic, he's not that smart as he think he is.

Divide who? We aren’t in some big grand movement together? You’re a degenerate. I’m consider myself Christian and NatSoc. Who am I dividing? You just don’t like it when you’re forced to look in the mirror.

Attached: 66DFB722-5E11-4AD7-BED4-813845A6EE01.jpg (1280x967, 307K)

>friend, singular

THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY GHOST. :^)

>Stop treating this as some sort of scientific claim
There's obviously no science attached to this, lol. You're still flailing, just admit your assertion holds no water and we can move on.
>I have come here only to insult you and other atheists.
And you're too busy embarrassing yourself by making stupid claims you can't verify. You got caught being dishonest, and you won't admit it. Keep doubling down and proving me right, though.

Fuck off TJ.

Attached: 1539618636528.jpg (443x455, 40K)

and what's this "Evidence" that it's a product of human imagination? it's all contextual. You can say that people citing supernatural influences at near death experiences, or divine things happening would be rubbish, but that's under the notion that 'God' can do those things. What about if you don't believe he can?

What if you believe God to be something that doesn't interfere with anything at all? You can't disprove that just as much as you can't prove it. I'm not 'afraid' to admit that he doesn't exist, because to me it's honestly a solid 50/50. i'll find out when i'm dead, maybe, or maybe i won't.

if you're talking about afterlife and those sorts of things, yeah there's a myriad of evidence disproving people's claims of it, and possibility of consciousness after death- but that's not exactly what everyone believes the idea of God to be.

Are you deleting his pictures off your computer as we speak? Be honest.

>claims you can't verify

Why are you still talking like this top kek. I'm insulting you, it's as verifiable as me kalling you a cuck for Christ's sake

>it's not retarded to say that without knowing, I won't comment

it is retarded. and your analogy sucks. were talking about the existence of something, not the outcome of a fucking fight..

if i told you there was an invisivble demon living in your closet, you're not gonna say "I have no way of knowing whether its true or not so ill say theres a 50/50 chance that its true and reserve judgement" are you?

only faggots try

I just have one banana video compilation picture. I'll keep it.

Attached: giphy.gif (320x180, 684K)

This shit is bananas
B A N A N A S

but it's not a lack of belief, it's a belief that it doesn't exist. agnosticism is a lack of belief. Athiests claim that they're POSITIVE their is no God.

>What? Either God exists or doesn't, correct?
yes. he either does or doesn't

>because lack of evidence that he doesn't.
>That's atheism.
but it's not. athiesm is believing with certainty that he doesn't exist, not just skepticism. I don't believe certainly that he exists or doesn't. I just don't know. If someone could prove either, i'd be happy to believe it. but i would not give a concrete answer to either without proof. you can't just say because i don't believe in him without evidence means i don't believe in him, i'm just open to options that we don't yet have the information to sort out. It goes both ways but you seem to be fixated it just on that one way. maybe your definition of athiesm and mine differ

Athiesm: God absolutely does not exist.
Agnostic: Ill believe it when i see it
Thiest: God absolutely exists.

>THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY GHOST. :^)

what a fucking pathetic, superstitious, slave mentality you have.

>Why are you still talking like this
Talking like what? Now i'm offending you by saying things, or is this another dodge by not having to admit your stupidity?
>I'm insulting you
You're too busy doubling down on your own silly nonsense to be doing that, you've already lost any hope in this happening.
>it's as verifiable as me kalling you a cuck for Christ's sake
Not verifiable, I'm aware. That's a weird way to admit you were wrong, but i'll take it.

Some would say its
bananas

You are a barbaric faggot. congrats.

What ever you say honey. Thanks for the laugh

Attached: 1514233418603.jpg (1088x800, 244K)

Is that tj kirk? What the fuck?

well perhaps there is a demon living in my closet. it depends on your idea of a demon. is it a physical thing you can interact with? is it a bad omen that causes you mental deficiencies that causes you to do evil things like shoot up a school or rape a woman?

maybe demons do exist. they're all unproven ideas. I think it's unlikely because they're more characterised in a fictional way than the idea of a God, but it's possible. they might exist outside of our realm of understanding. Souls and fairies might exist too. Probably not but they just might. anything is possible, but those things are unlikely

what makes the idea of a god more likely is that the definition of it is so vague, hence why i said it's very likely something beyond our scope of imagination. If you're considering him the creator of this universe we live in, and everything outside and around of it, something without boundaries that existed with beyond comprehendable might, then yeah something like that may exist. is he a guy with a white beard in a chair, no. is the creator of this reality we live in a sentient being? maybe, maybe not. we can't understand much past what we've discovered in terms of space and science and evolution, we're far too feeble minded for that. our true understanding of the universe is probably minimal

>Athiesm: God absolutely does not exist.

Atheism is not a statement of knowledge you fucking retard, its a statement of belief.

stop posting long winded shit if your basic understanding is rotten.

>agnosticism is a lack of belief
No, agnostics state they don't know a God exists.
>Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable
It's a knowledge claim. Atheism is a lack of belief in a God/Gods due to insufficient evidence. AKA a belief claim.

See: merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agnostic
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist (Read "How Agnostic Differs From Atheist")