Would Jow Forums support independent ethnostates, within the boundaries of current USA...

Would Jow Forums support independent ethnostates, within the boundaries of current USA, for the indigenous peoples of the Americas? Why/why not?

Attached: 1.jpg (630x472, 38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=NFM25J0VRBo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>for the indigenous peoples
Europeans are the indigenous peoples. It's been that way for centuries.

Well you are british, you know, the country that conquered them first. Also, can you even define what lands belongs to one indian nation and what to another? They had wars just like every people. Also the other guys is right; a lot of european descents have called it their homeland for ages, which is correct.

>of the Americas
Nice try faggot, how about “of North America”, where the USA is?

We already have them, they're called reservations and they're basically hellholes full of inebriated natives who get drunk off mouthwash and furniture cleaner and still refuse to go to college even when offered free rides to top Unis because the fucks dont have the tenacity or dilligence to study

I would support independent ethnostates for any people in any part of the world.

This is the LAST thing the injuns want. With sovereignty they would lose their welfare cheques and 99% of the native communities depend on welfare. They would turn into Africa tier squallers overnight and make the Injuns look bad and their liberal handlers who peddle the idea that they're equal to the white man.

No, they have no claim to this land. All the natives that were already here were given their own ethnostates.

Lol no.
In canada they are the most over represented demographic in prison. More than american blacks are. This is with canada taking active measures to give indians lighter sentences because their parents and grandparents had to go to carholic school

they already exist, faggot OP

I support all ethnostates. Ethnostates for everyone.
So yes, if it could be done, giving some clay to natives to have their own state and live by their own rules would be a good thing. But it means also responsability: you cannot desire independance then do shit, and finally wanting to emigrate like blacks and muslim do. You must become responsible of both your failures and success. The tricky part in the natives case is...where. since there are very different people. I am not knowledgable about that topic to answer.

this
eurofags don't even know

literally why all countries have borders, silly OP

They can keep their reservations. The ones from south of the border, though? They're getting Jacksoned.

Attached: 3523523467.jpg (900x589, 251K)

>within the boundaries of current USA, for the indigenous peoples of the Americas? Why/why not?
We already have those. They're called indian reservations, and they fucking suck.

I know very little about Indian reservations that doesn't come through a news filter. Can you share more details about what they're actually like?

Ethnostates are stupid. Crusader state is where its at.
youtube.com/watch?v=NFM25J0VRBo

lots of drunk Indians

only if they're good (aka no)

Theoretically yes, but we have more important things to fight for.

Balkanization is bound to happen in the US sometime in the next 20-30 years. Even with Trump, our economy is going into the shitter and we have more shitskins coming here. Civic Nationalism is basically impossible. Most nonwhites will always vote leftist no matter how they identify themselves. I think some parts of the northeast, midwest and northwest might form a European-American country.

Attached: 6B36E165-802D-4F8B-8371-098970AA71F8.png (800x796, 173K)

>Christcuck state where all niggers, spics and chinks who are Christian would be allowed
Fuck off

Attached: 38A6AB0E-6B73-4DF3-9E7A-4B990E22C2B4.png (777x777, 986K)

Literally third world countries

They're called reservations you retard they already exist and are exempt from state laws and only subject to federal

They're autonomous and poverty stricken compared to surrounding areas. They exist on a tribe by tribe basis, mostly in the west.

How much control do they have over their own laws? (Note: If they have to abide by federal laws, then they're not independent - this is why Britain voted to leave the EU, after all). I don't care if the reserves/reservations are shitholes, at least if they have full control over them then they can no longer blame whitey

First permanent non native in new york was a multiracial portuguese guy from the current dominican republic. America was and always will be brown

Nobody is above federal law. That's just how it is. So illegal drugs are still illegal. Things like gambling are(was) a state issue so they can have casinos regardless of the state they are in. They will never be fully autonomous. The US had never been in the business of giving up its own land

Pretty much everything goes minus slavery, guns (ATF is a bitch to every citizen), and child exploitation (covers porn and child labor) from what I understand. It's how they're able to sell incredibly cheap tobacco and open casinos.

This, for some reason the tribes tend to get money in one big sum due to autonomy of division or some shit. Basically means the Chiefs and their families live like kings driving 4x4s (or snowmobiles in Leaf country) drinking top shelf booze and having the latest smartphone while the rest of the tribe generally gets crumbs.

Recently heroin and pills have become an issue. They've always been depressed alcoholics for the longest time but thanks to big pharma, alot of them are shooting up or popping pills like candy nowadays.

Aside from that reservations are generally depressing or sleazy places. Yeah some of them run casinos but often that requires a closeby urban populace and big backers who practically own it for all intents and purposes. But thats what autonomy with zero initiative gets you. You can toss a bag of money to a native, that doesn't mean he's gonna use it wisely

Exactly - they're not independent

So let them, and let them destroy their own society. Not whitey's job to give them welfare anymore

Lel child labor is still a thing there but mostly for manual labor and tribe shit. Not actual work that requires brainpower

we have those already
I'm in western Washington and you cant throw a rock without hitting indian land

Technichally they are. They're about as autonomous as Puerto Rico and actually get away with alot of shit that would send the IRS or ATF banging down your front door anywhere else

>Would Jow Forums support independent ethnostates, within the boundaries of current USA,
Fuck you. All of these mud races have their own ancestral homelands to which they can return and the buffalo-niggers already have their reservations.

>still refuse to go to college
But you deny it to them.
Also if they dont speak english they cannot assimilate nothing shit

No.

They still Butthurt ,kek.

Imagine that....they will take the East and the south making another war ,they sill think the land is of them, like all the natives of the Americas

The USA is, constitutionally, a white ethnostate.

Oh those fucks speak English alright Most of the ones I grew up with were some of the biggest shit talkers on Halo and CoD.

Issue is that they lack any desire to get off the reservation whatsoever. Oh yeah you get these bright eyed retards from Massachussetts or New Jersey or whatever coming in with their fancy teaching degrees from a snooty university, but give or take a few years and that luster in their eyes deaden when they realize that they're teaching what are essentially plains niggers who are somehow lazier than the urban porch monkeys. Sends alot of them looking at the bell curve

All Christian faithful are allowed.

Christian nonwhites are worse than Atheist whites. Stuff like this is why Minnesota got flooded with Somalians. Because you people try so hard to convert third worlders only for them to end up in America.

Yes, of course.

living in leafland, i can tell you natives are basically the Norths version of niggers.

Their men steal and rape. Their women are whores (but dam they suck good dick), both have an eternal victim complex. Reserves, which are basically their land, are shit holes of poverty fostered by blind tribal allegiance and absolutely no regard to laws when they apply to anyone not red (they also have no regard for eachother. but only when no whitey is around).

Giving these people an ethnostate would be like turning Detroit into a country.

Attached: Canadian.png (922x882, 225K)

It is inevitable
Romans 14:11
>For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.

The Trail of Beans

Oh, did he conquer the west? No? Nobody gives a shit.

Are they fuckable? I always thought American Indians were ugly af

lol no they got their asses conquered, fuck em

We already have that in the United States. I think it's relatively harmless to allow indigenous people who existed here before settlers arrived to be recognized, as long as they're still U.S. citizens and subject to U.S. law. That being said, I am against affirmative action. And honestly if I were a member of the native tribe I'd consider U.S. citizenship to be a good thing.

Attached: 43549857295723895792385789275892375893252.jpg (500x640, 60K)

They have their reservations. They're full of drunkenness and rape. They are stone age savages, no attempt at "civilizing" them will ever work. They'll die off soon enough and then they can be completely forgotten about.