The most successful countries on earth are democratic socialist countries

the most successful countries on earth are democratic socialist countries

isn't that something

Attached: good day.png (1000x1000, 177K)

No, but the ones you’re thinking of, like Denmark, are almost entirely homogeneous. That proves us right, not you.

they aren't mutually exclusive things you amerilard. having a white homogeneous society and having democratic socialism both contribute to success independently of each other. the success of democratic socialism does not depend on the country being white anymore than the success of a white country depends on them being democratic socialists. I wish that was something shitbrains understood. Every single time someone points out the inconvenient fact for you guys that democratic socialists are the most successful countries on earth you guys just recite that "b-but wipipo" as if it means anything

Attached: 1526407213719.jpg (249x249, 16K)

can you name any successful brown “democratic socialist” countries, then

Attached: 0862E334-3067-4D15-9483-5F6457CA3F46.jpg (680x613, 54K)

oh look, what do we have here. It's another but wipipo user staunchly defending his echo chamber from any reasonable views. What an amazing observation you have made! Democratic socialist countries have only ever been successful in white majority nations. Amazing! Oh wait, what's that? Democratic socialism has only ever occurred in white majority nations. But if that's the case then you can't make the logical leap that it would fail in other nations. Wait! But you can't do that because that would involve acknowledging that you were wrong! Oh, man. what are you to do in a situation like this? Beats me.

Attached: 1526402083349.jpg (225x225, 8K)

There have been attempts to establish democratic socialist nations in other countries. Most of them failed miserably. See FARC, Senduro Luminoso.

What do you make of Mao using socialism and communism interchangeably? Would you say he's a bit of a reactionary?

They tried democratic socialism in low-IQ Latin America many times, and it failed.
National socialism also works, and Baathist regimes were relatively stable and prosperous (by middle eastern standards).

depends what you mean by successful

>capitalism bring easy times
>easy times create weak men
>weak men create socialism

wait a little longer and see if it's sustainable long term

he cute

Basically, what matters is having a good population (i.e. white or Asian, maybe some Arabs but that's already a stretch) and institutions that are not too horrible.

So in the end institutions don't matter that much, one way or the other (obviously don't do retarded stuff like full communism or globalism), as long as you have a good population that is smart and trust each other.

The constitution of Liberia is mostly a copy/paste of the US constitution, but it's a shithole because it's full of low-IQ, violent blacks.

>FARC
>Senduro Luminoso
Marxist-Leninism has nothing to do with democratic socialism you unedicated amerilard. Democratic socialism isn't revolutionary you fucking retard.
see above you dumbass

Attached: good day to you.jpg (182x276, 8K)

nonwhite and/or diverse socialist countries are failures.

e.g. Venezuela and North Korea

Sage

It's all drinking from the same fountain of secularism trying to reinvent the wheel of religion. You'll see the cracks soon enough if you don't already. It goes like this: asking someone to dedicate their life's work to any entity that is easily divided will divide because their is too much status to be gained not to. Humans are pack animals, study biology.

Good luck with your midterms, faggot.

>hehe I can win the argument if I change the topic away from "democratic socialism" to "socialism" looks like you lose
>it'll go wrong soon trust me
is this really the best argument you have? lmao
"oh man you know you guys are the most successful countries on the planet but TRUST ME it'll all come crashing down eventually and you know it! also fuck secularism!!!"

Attached: geez.png (398x168, 82K)

I'm sure thats how the people in those countries feel.

democratic socialist countries are the happiest countries on the planet right now. thanks for bringing that up

The most successful country on Earth is Liechtenstein you dunce. They are radically capitalistic.

Social Democrat*

Big difference, now fuck off you snake tongued tryhard.

I mean, kicking the can down the curb is socialism 101
>Late capitalism
>Peak capitalism
>Any day now
Denmark has massive oil reserves. Once those are depleted they will be singing a diferent tune. History is a long-term game and the nordic pseudo-socialist countries aren't very impressive. South Korea has done far more in less time. Expect more of the same.

How many times do we have to point it out you sheltered uneducated fuck, we aren't fucking socialist in any way shape or form.
>Muh oil
We get our money from agriculture by large, shut the fuck up.

>Liechtenstein
>country
>achtually social democrat* axchually still capitalist* btw
the self hating poltards in the best countries on earth are the best. hope you stick around
>TRUST MEEE!!!!!!

Do you mean Social Democrat?
Scandinavian Nations aren't planning to reform capitalism and give workers ownership of the means of production.

Nice argument you fool.
We aren't socialist, we are mainline capitalist with a market economy.
We have a free market
Everyone can own property
Loads of large private companies
The list goes on

No one is self hating, I love my country - because it's not socialist.
In fact, the party in power right now is a liberal capitalist market/blue party

Fucking eat shit.

post a cute pic of your tummy for me pls
that is completely what is happening right now

He was entirely right to correct you, you bumbling retard. Social democracy and democratic socialism are not the same thing and your whole position is based on trying to sell the former as the latter. Take your ebyn semantic games and fuck off.

Canada is arguably the greatest country in which to live. We have a stronger social safety net than the US, but our taxes aren't nearly as high as in the Scandinavian and other western European countries.

How much is a two bedroom condo in Hongcouver or Toronto?

How do we feel about basketball Americans?

Attached: 632B91C2-45E1-4BD3-9A2D-530077D46D7D.png (225x225, 20K)

Define socialism first, faggot

OP, you're about to enter a decade where the trend towards the right puts conservatives in power more and more. I like the idea of social democracy but I fucking hate:

- mass immigration
- multiculturalism
- SJW virtue signalling
- the general priviledging of individual rights over the collective right of the many: example, letting a 6ft 200lb translesbian man with autogynophilia take their dress off around women in case it hurts their feels not to
- giving an inch to conservative Islam

If I have to vote for a man who makes trump look like the Dali Lhama to put a stop to it, I will.

fuck niggers

Attached: smile.png (692x697, 231K)

Venezuela is a socialist country.
Sweden is not.
The government does not own the productive capital in Sweden.

>that is completely what is happening right now
Doesn't seem like it. Why isn't the Danish government encouraging worker cooperatives and nationalising companies and giving them over to the workers? Why doesn't the current Danish government call themselves DemSocs?

It's blatantly obvious now that you are purposely ignoring absolute facts and twisting Social Democrat into democratic socialism and trying to substitute facts with your own fantasy in order to be able to shill for your own literally retarded ideas.

Too bad it's fucking glow in the dark, any retard with half a brain and an internet connection already knows the facts.

You are trying too hard and you aren't upsetting anyone but your own IQ.

Based

Attached: EDF70BD1-2C4B-469D-8CC7-B3820E3F9238.png (1811x1531, 2.75M)

Stop eating the bait my little rapebaby, it's obvious he's purposely ignoring facts and spurting fiction in an attempt to get (you)'s

you gonna post that cute tummy of yours or what

Attached: dabbing for socialism.gif (554x400, 120K)

Too much, but there are plenty of nicer, whiter, economically thriving mid-sized Canadian cities where any hardworking person can afford a decent place to live. Montreal is also a pretty good option if you know at least a little bit of frogspeak.

t. useless autistic neet

They are democratic socialists because their security and economic well-being is subsidized by the actual most successful country on earth. Even then, those programs are insolvent and can't be funded with a demographically inverted population. Every year, more and more people will retire than enter the work force, and their governments will be forced to either raise taxes to completely unsustainable levels or slash spending down to the bone.

Attached: EU_2030.jpg (890x698, 437K)

>my little rapebaby
take that back

Attached: 1527453334017.jpg (10000x10000, 3.14M)

social democrats*, excuse me

What the fuck nigger we aren't democratic socialists, we aren't even social democratic at the moment

I swear I genuinely hate burgers more for each passing day, you guys are clueless fucking morons

I was responding to the OP, I know you're not socialists, calm down Jens

They may be democratic socialist in government but is still economically capitalist like those nordick states. What can be observed is that a combination of two systems works bretty gud.

I unironically would like you to stop stalling and answer his question.

>Implying it's a bad thing

no

Attached: 438.jpg (1024x970, 202K)

>how to get blown the fuck out the entire thread 101

Attached: 1539677330882.png (680x523, 168K)

We aren't though

haha, they're all white northern european countries of course they are happy

You type a lot and manage to say nothing. Interesting

Yeah when you define success based on how democratically socialist a country is.

the most successful countries on earth are White

isn't that something

Attached: 1540432427708s.jpg (250x250, 9K)

>Reds in a nutshell

Gets the noggin joggin

European nations are successful because they are (or were) highly militaristic and culturally similar enough to allow exchange of ideas while retaining political autonomy.

It is their success which has allowed them the luxury of becoming democratic socialist countries. Your causation is backwards.

Of course, we shouldn't expect any better. I mean, how stupid do you have to be to think some trendy, catch-all term like "democratic socialism" accurately describes the complex and unique economic, historical and cultural influences which shape each nation, and then to think that applying that label to other nations will magically make them more successful?

European success is a tautology. It should be defined as European friendly society.

Read the thread, then neck yourself

We are mainline capitalist

Nice bait, your shitty jewish ideology doesn't work.

Attached: 1471209538366.jpg (960x720, 184K)

That's swedes in that picture by the way
The retarded gaynigger version of me and Norway

Just wanted to put that out there