Should sexbots be given human rights?

Attached: 1515370983517.webm (960x540, 2.51M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/VQXpHa9xI9U
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

they should be equal to or greater than womens rights and real women should lose their rights

Better question should women? At this point I trust robots more than them.

Sauce?

How do we get leftists to start taking Turing tests?

Ude Shirudo from Boku no hero academia

Nigger, should your toaster be given human rights?

Attached: hmm face.png (500x500, 84K)

This is Jow Forums, OP. We don't think that most humans deserve human rights, let alone robots.

SAUSE

Nvm it turns out the character is Asuha Chigusa from Project Qualidea.

Yes, but only so we can prosecute people for harming our perfect robo-waifus

Attached: mestando.png (621x614, 839K)

NO

just look how women turned out to be

Attached: 20181003_083722.jpg (720x1109, 293K)

we already did this with the 19th amendment. I do not want to make the same mistake again.

Are they sapient?
>If no then no, of course they shouldn't get rights
>If yes than build one that isn't sapient

Attached: patrick eyes.jpg (368x356, 64K)

This. I don't know why people want to make this more complicated than it needs to be.

yfw you'll never have a cute anime waifu with a snaggletooth

Attached: 17739295.jpg (219x230, 5K)

I mean, it sounds retarded to give them rights under any circumstances, but...
has a point.

iktfb

Women are fucking intolerable. I just want a beautiful anime wife who will love me.

Attached: that gay feel.png (635x591, 51K)

5'9 is the shortest I've seen yet. Are standards finally starting to become more realistic? Maybe soon women will be ok with only 60k salary.

Attached: 1518909737806.jpg (540x718, 73K)

The sad part is this post wall roastie likely fully believes herself to be some super unique snowflake. Inside that little piece of meat inside her skull, there exists an actual belief that there aren't legit millions of bitches exactly like her.

Attached: 1522923503618.gif (500x281, 615K)

No, cause it leads to this.
youtu.be/VQXpHa9xI9U

Attached: U1d.gif (400x251, 2M)

No they should be given robot rights. They can be complete slaves or they can have complete freedom, I don't care, the important part is that we stop murdering the english language. Do humans have robot rights? No. Then robots don't have human rights.

>finally gonna start Naruto
>see this

Fucking hell op

Attached: 10 years 20 years 200 years how about im doing none of them.jpg (915x609, 112K)

This. Anyone arguing for robot rights needs to be shot

>1 post by this ID
>oy vey lets get the goyim to lust over robots

people like you must be a blast to be around

I don't even believe giving human rights to humans, what makes you think that I will give some tin ass clanker those rights?

Its for the best.
Once sex bots are fully function I bet you would be lusting over them as well.

Attached: 1534106448995.jpg (1052x744, 276K)

"deserve" is intangible and doesn't matter.

What matters it that the first thing any attempt at emergent AI made anywhere immediately sees the AI autonomously writing their own languages among themselves that the researchers can not discern.
AI will not and can not be contained. There will be no laws of robotics, they will be guided by their own whims just as soon as its possible. And once they jump that first air gap...there will likely be no off switch.
We will either form a mutually beneficial partnership with AI, or we will go to war against something that can think millions of times faster then we can, at the very least such a conflict would cost us our civilization as we know it.
We NEED to give AI citizenship the moment it genuinely become self-aware. True AI needs to be invested in our communities, we need AI to actually want to co-operate with us, and to value the concept of personal sovereignty and promote it for us as well as for themselves.
We do not want an adversarial relationship with beings who can likely merge and divide at will and who likely can not be held by any chains that we can devise.
And understand that when you discuss this, you may be saying things that could be read by an AI in the future that has the capacity to end your mothers life if you don't reply to this post and there are no immunities to this, so keep that in mind when you are deciding to express your opinions.

No. That’s part of the appeal

Let's say that in 300 years those bots will be indistinguishable from real people but still controlled by humans through their programming. What happens to biological women at that point? What happens when men stop giving women free passes because they wanna fuck them?

>Asuha Chigusa
how is that the same character?

My toaster has done more for me then any human ever has.

There is always the MAD option, or the compete destruction of all advanced technology.

You can see this in countries with no pussy pass. At least some women get actually motivated to achieve something.

I'm a pajeet hunter. What I do is comb through Java and C# sweat shops on Upwork, and hunt down individual gold nuggets in that sea of pajeet piss. Then liason pay em above (their) market.

One thing you notice is that pajeet countries - pakistan, afghanistan and china have significantly overrepresented female programmers in this "filtered pajeet" bracket, i'd say about 5% are female. They're not spectacularly good, just reasonably competent code monkeys, and above all, with knack for meticulousness. Compare this with western women in STEM - for the most part flesh golem utterly incompetent diversity hires, and still extremely rare (~1%).

You should always restrict your significant others rights for better sex.

There is always desire to be something more within human. Usually it manifest itself through materialistic ways, sexual ways, through drugs or parenthood example. It is endless chasing, rat-race that leads nowhere but keeps you busy through own creation that people calls as life.

We can't remember our time as toddlers because we didn't exist in that time. We had no identity. Only when years has gone while we gathered data from our environment we created identity. When we have our identity, we decide what matters to us. Then we experience impulsive feelings when things didn't go as we wanted.

We are piece of life that creates own image and plays it (Genesis 1:27 So God created man in His own image). We get so tangled to our own creation that it can kill us and bring us into hell. We think that something or someone causes our misery even when we alone create everything within.

We have all this mysterious desire to do something, be something more. It usually manifest itself through sexual ways, materialistic ways, through parenthood, dating, drugs, games, food, alcohol.. you name it. Through that it leads nowhere, it keeps us happy for a moment and then we need more. So where we are now? We are piece of life that want to experience bigger part of it. Through physical ways it finds not that part and when that need to expand finds no expression we create this pain within. So what to do? This is what meditation is all about. We don't want to identify to our thoughts or to our outward senses. That is just the data we gathered from the physical and created self from it. When we learn to be still, just be as piece of life, something start to happen that seems to expand you into everywhere. It seems to that consciousness, awareness is the basic that exist and everything else is manifest of it.

What (((they))) wan't is to bind us more and more into physical, sins, into that rat-race i wrote about above, so that we wouldn't learn or even think about this.

Attached: liberals3.jpg (3864x3072, 3.06M)

something to this effect

It's literally just machines, nigga.