Fuck False Prophet Muhammed

>Right to free speech does not include right to free speech

Fuck these cunts, they don't even know the meaning of liberty.

Attached: 1539521279927.png (636x764, 652K)

You wanna get b& and v& homie?

ominus

Attached: Screenshot_4.jpg (1040x710, 487K)

are all of you euros such coddled children you can't imagine abandoning your nihilistic lives with your degenerate Jewish aristocrats and state mandated homosexuality?
Feels bad man

I don't think there is any theological element at play here.

It's just that our elite hate us, and they see Islam as a hammer with which they can beat us for their own pleasure, whereas Christianity is a minor hindrance at worst to them.

Do we have the Right to Criticise Islam?
By Grégor Puppinck
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is called upon to decide on the scope of the right to criticise Islam in the case of ES v. Austria, (No. 38450/12) in which a speaker was convicted of blasphemy: for criticising the sexuality of Muhammad.

The speaker who filed the case before the Strasbourg Court was convicted of publicly “disparaging a person who is an object of veneration”, namely “Muhammad” the "prophet of Islam", in a way likely to arouse justified indignation, in violation of section 188 of the Austrian Criminal Code.

The contentious statements were made during a series of lectures entitled “Basic Information on Islam” at the Institute of Education of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), given in front of about thirty participants.

The speaker is alleged in substance to have said that Mohammad had pedophile tendencies (he “liked to do it with children”) because he married a girl of six (Aisha) and consummated that marriage when she was only nine. The speaker noted that this was problematic since “the highest commandment for a male Muslim is to imitate Muhammad”, adding more generally that “Muslims get into conflict with democracy and our value system.”

Following a complaint made by some journalists, the speaker was ordered to pay a 480 euro fine or serve sixty days in prison in default of payment. The Austrian courts gave this ruling in order to protect the "religious feelings" of Muslims and the “religious peace” in Austria.

The speaker brought the case before the European Court of Human Rights who will decide on whether freedom of expression prevailed over the respect for Muhammad and the “religious feelings” of Muslims.

I agree, fuck Mudhammed the child rapist.

The ECLJ, an amicus curiae, was authorised to submit a written observation to the Court.

In the view of the ECLJ, only the propagation of gratuitously offensive and unnecessary obscenities to the debate as well as statements inciting to imminent violence could be restricted. Any other statement, especially one that is based on facts, should be guaranteed under freedom of expression.

In its submission, the ECLJ particularly expounded on the attempts made by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, at the international level, to introduce into international law a crime of blasphemy under the name “defamation of Islam”. The ECLJ opposed this initiative at the United Nations for several years, saying that the freedoms of religion and expression are complementary and that a right for believers not to be criticised does not exist (neither does it exist for unbelievers). More generally, the sincere quest for truth should always be encouraged and should benefit from freedom of expression.

According to the ECLJ, the right to freedom of expression of the speaker has been violated in this case, since she was convicted of denigrating a belief in itself, that is to say for blasphemy, even though his remarks were based on historical facts whose propagation, in a political context, contributes to public debate .

Piping hot take my goy

(((European)))

What's scary about this is the use of 'prophet'.

A prophet is one who is divinely inspired to be a teacher of moral truth. By using that word, the ECHR have taken the formal position that Islam is the true religion since Muhammed was divinely inspired to say that it was.

Fucking hell.
You are absolutely right.
We are genuinely headed towards a bloodbath, unless a radical change happens and we return to normalcy (ie prior to this islamoshit invasion and pc lunacy).

Liberty, my friend, is a free man's game. You wouldn't understand it, but in a truly free country, any responsible man is an aristocrat, because he controls his own life.

You should just go back to your hovel and work for your betters now. Maybe they won't leave you in the woods to die when your back gives out in ten years.

Is this the same case? the verdict looks like it's in her favour from this.

you got a license for that speech?

Feels good to not need a loicense

If this doesn't prove that (((human rights))) were made just to destroy (((their))) opponents and that all (((international structures))) guaranteeing these so-called rights are fully owned by (((them))), I don't know what will.

BTW muhammad sucks my dick along with allah.

wow I'm surprised you can parrot Freemasonry with all that dick in your mouth

But Muhammad legit had sex with a 9 year old.

>bloodbath
man can dream user, man can dream

Attached: ultra violence.png (488x519, 42K)

I honestly don't know
that article was from 2 years ago

this is fun. they literally saying "no you are not allowed to say shit about muhammed, else they chimp out"

Attached: 1538684181900.png (445x436, 233K)

>muslims are violent pieces of shit, so do not criticize them.
Cowardice.

Jewish fabrication, Aisha was older and that hadith chain is unreliable and pushed by kikes and cryptokikes (((Saud)))
not that you'd want to upset your masters or anything, goy. Cursory research would reveal this, so simple Western intellectual laziness continues to prevail.

isnt Belgium the capital of international pedophilia? I KNOW, let's ask Jean-Claude Juncker!

The ECLJ is the European Centre for Law and Justice, which is an NGO without any legal power that gave the court advice on what it thought was right.

The ECHR is the European Court of Human Rights, which is the court in question. It ignored the advice and ruled that her conviction was lawful.

For future reference, the ECHR is part of the Council of Europe, not the European Union, and Britain is not leaving the COE or its court the ECHR.

>be radical fundamentalist christian
>get mad at radical fundamentalist islam
Stupid.

IIDF pls go

Muhammad had sex with men. So it is obviously okay to do in islam

hey Belgianpedoanon, where did this happen again?

Attached: 5760.jpg (620x372, 37K)

Does that mean that criticising (((Jesus))) isn't free speech too?

>accusing the Prophet Muhammad of pedophilia
>amounted to a generalization without factual basis
but it's in their texts

>"Da jews!"

jesus...

In America, we have two concurrent amendments. The first guarantees - among other things - free speech, except when it calls to incite violence (e.g. you can't yell "fire" in a crowded movie theater if there is no fire). The second guarantees that the people have the right to bear arms and form a militia against the government, should they attempt to infringe on the First.

i imagine in europe, despite the many gun deaths in America, you are currently wishing there was some way to protect your free speech. and i feel bad for you.

fuck mohammed. He WAS a pedophile. He fucked 9 year old girls. He WAS a murderer. He IS a false prophet. There is only one god: The Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit.

cool story bro

notice the word FACTUAL
they say that calling muhammad a pedo is not based on facts (no factual basis)
but we are supposed to accept that muslims claiming muhammad got on winged horse and flew to heaven to have a chat with St. Peter is based on facts

the difference is that ALL muslims are radical and fundamentalists by definition
while not all Christians are radical

Fucking morons
Another good reason to get out of the EU

literally genocided by kikes several times in history, now the French are their neutered lapdogs

Liberals differentiate between homosexuals and 'men who have sex with men'. Why not between pedophiles and 'men who have sex with children'? It's just a personal choice you bigot

In theory, yes.

In practice, no.

The excuse they'll use is that the sanctity of Muhammed's person is more central to Islamic theology than the sanctity of Christ is to Christian theology, which is why in Islamic law insulting Muhammed is punished more severely than murder.

She had her dolls with her. Only pre-pubescent girls were allowed dolls - once they had their period they were forbidden. She was a child, he was a pedophile.

Just another reason to say Fuck the EU

Attached: 1518695008759.jpg (720x715, 71K)

oh it's the buttblasted OP again
lebboed.au

is there a single one to stay? its just a farce at this point

>that hadith chain is unreliable
Dat lack of cope.

Islam in the Secular Nomos of the European Court of Human Rights

Abstract
If, with the benefit of hindsight, Mr. Choudhury's case was a harbinger of the emergence of various problems associated with Islam and the rights of Muslim minorities in European nation-states, then the events of September 11, 2001 have propelled these issues to the forefront of law and politics in a way unimaginable even a decade earlier. In Denmark, cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad as a suicide bomber have been published leading to protests and violence across Europe and the Islamic world; a law prohibiting students in public schools from wearing symbols or attire through which they conspicuously exhibit a religious affiliation has been enacted in France; the French Parliament has proceeded to enact a law which now bans the wearing of the burqa and other Islamic face coverings in all public places; and a popular referendum has passed in Switzerland prohibiting the construction of minarets during which a political party used posters depicting minarets as missiles standing on top of the Swiss flag behind a woman wearing a burqa.

This Article argues that what is most interesting about these controversies involving Islam and the place of Islamic norms in European nation-states (and the international legal sphere more broadly) is how such encounters are unsettling existing normative legal categories and catalyzing reconsideration of both the historical and theoretical premises of modern liberal political orders. These controversies raise two critical questions for ECHR jurisprudence:

First, what is the nature and scope of the right to freedom of religion and belief? Does it include, for example, a right to be free from injury or offense to religious sensibilities? If so, why has the Court held that it is not discriminatory for a state to recognize and protect this right in the case of one religion (Christianity) but not another (Islam)? Second, what is the relationship between religion and morality in the "secular" public sphere? This question applies, not only. to the public realms of different European nation-states, but also to the supranational nomos of the European Court of Human Rights itself. How does the Court imagine and construct notions of secularism and neutrality in each sphere? What role, politically and normatively, does the margin of appreciation doctrine play in this aspect of the Court's Article 9 jurisprudence?

Wow it's somehow even worse than I originally thought. They were told the right answer and still failed

Attached: 1538075448979.gif (540x300, 364K)

very based ! mashallah!

It doesn't matter faggot. Replace your idol made of shit with any other character (real or not) in the same situation. Can't you see the double fucking measure, or are you too fucking a dumb subhuman nigger for that?

AKA FUCK THE JEW WLITE BANKERS

Quran says nothing about "oh and btw make a bunch of hadiths in (((Bukhara))) centuries later"
why does your country facilitate pedophilia in the modern era and why are you unwillong to discuss it?

Attached: gamergate 2.0.jpg (749x754, 57K)

The other part of the First Amendment is freedom of religion, which means that the government cannot dictate what religion you practice. It's kind of the reason America was created. So reading this, I'm reading that because Islam is criticized (and rightfully so), it must be protected. That's some backwards thinking, and I apologize that you have to put up with this nonsense.

quiet cigan

repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol32/iss4/2/

I've never heard of any country with protected free speech except the US.

>The ECLJ is the European Centre for Law and Justice, which is an NGO without any legal power that gave the court advice on what it thought was right.
>The ECHR is the European Court of Human Rights, which is the court in question. It ignored the advice and ruled that her conviction was lawful.
>For future reference, the ECHR is part of the Council of Europe, not the European Union, and Britain is not leaving the COE or its court the ECHR.
This is the kind of shit you need to send bombs in the mail for.

Congrats on your new State religion Europoors.

Can Euros still post pic related??

Attached: 1535184865559.jpg (987x549, 152K)

>Quran says nothing about "oh and btw make a bunch of hadiths in (((Bukhara))) centuries later"
Lol, better tell all of Islamic history to stop considering the Hadiths as legitimate.

They were told the morally right answer, but they prefer to keep Islam as a hammer with which to beat us.

So they went with a legalistic explanation, which is that no formal legal safeguards were violated in convicting this woman. In other words, they say "this is right because it was done correctly from a procedual perspective".

link?
fucking newfags

we kill at least 8 Muhhamads a day.
we never critisize muhhamad.
we ask him are you muhhamad ? and he says yes but you cant critize me. we shot him in his ugly arab face. he drops dead. boomb boom. muhhamad is dead.
but there is an endless supply of muhhamads. gypsie whores give birth to muhhamads in literal shit on the street of gaza, hoping this muhhamad will be the one. alas he also eventually meets his doom as a sniper shots his balls of (fun fact: during the riots by the fence military snipers were instructed to shot below waist line, they literally aimed at the balls. many muhhamads lost their dicks that weekend).

but i agree we cant critisize muhhamad for being what he is, born ro a gypsie filthy arab sand nigging nighog slut out in the sand, as she was raped by Abdul the butcher (a butcher in shitskin culture is like a lawyer) who pumped some smelly gellow arab semen into her black roasted sand filled vagina.

OH NO NO NO NO

Attached: 1521269580484.jpg (258x360, 55K)

nice, Based EU

You're alright, kike

how many of them are jews?

Attached: file.png (1824x1563, 371K)

>that hadith chain is unreliable

oic, so the 2nd most reliable source in islam is fallible.

how about the most?

Europoors don't realize their degenerate kike aristocrats are planning
>OY VEY WE'VE ALL CONVERTED TO ISLAM NOW AND CLAIM TEMPORAL AUTHORITY OVER THE UMMAH, ENJOY YOUR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND CASTRATION, GOY!
and won't do anything about it except repeat Jewish talking points on the internet while lamenting the loss of their crucifix penis idol.
For free.
>WOW ELIZABETH CLAIMS TO BE DESCENDED FROM THE PROPHET!
How will they ever recover?

Attached: 1540447690230.jpg (600x600, 142K)

A lot of countries "have" it, but it's nowhere near as universal or aggressively defended, which as this shows, makes it completely pointless

Based child killers. Honestly modern Israel is the closest thing to WW2 Germany.

Attached: 1538183437511.jpg (600x466, 55K)

I didnt allow you to reply to me stupid non white

the Talmud endorses pedophilia but your stupid cattle are barely literate

your president is a black cock loving faggot and you voted him in

start a new religion, get a new messiah, say yeye this is the new guy, maximum prophet etc. Write some mumbo jumbo, beat them at their own game. Check out this new hip religion.

based jew!

keep shooting those mohamads dicks off bro

Attached: 1508777564570.png (378x357, 81K)

when are you going to condemn the extreme pedophilia in your country?
>never it is a beautiful belgian tradition

basically fighting it in myself first, seeing as how teenage girls dress these days, i always try to make it off public transport sane.

Basee

So the lesson is, if your followers are sufficiently violent, you'll get all the legal protections in the world thrown at you. Nice

Has it ever not been like that in world history?

Why do you think they let tommy robison walk away?

>What's scary about this is the use of 'prophet'.
It's posted on a muslim website, so no, it's not that scary if you think about it.

>freedom of speech
>but don't say certain shit
partial "freedom" ISN'T freedom

Attached: 1534496087185.gif (245x152, 994K)

Whats stopping white natives just coopting Islam and using it as a vehicle for demographic resistance and leftist immunity?

Haha, you'll die last on the Day of the Glass, Shekelstein.

this cant be real

hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-187188"]}

Actual ruling. Key part:

>The court found her guilty of publicly disparaging an object of veneration of a domestic church or religious society, namely Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, in a manner capable of arousing justified indignation

>Muhammed, the Prophet of Islam
>in a manner capable of arousing justified indignation.

How would you interpret that?

But you're allowed to insult Christ as much as you want. The list of leftists traitors and Jews I want publicly executed is immense.

Euros just need to make friends with burgers.
Some of us would be happy to troll the EU on your behalf.