Kiddy fiddlers should be gassed

Should sexual drawings and depictions of individuals under the age of consent be allowed in a society that espouses freedom of speech?

Attached: Gab.jpg (440x330, 9K)

Other urls found in this thread:

caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-discover-seat-sex-and-violence-brain-42567
youtube.com/watch?v=ZQht2yOX9Js
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Gab should just avoid porn. No idea why he drew the line at drawings. Essentially he is just dodging the child porn headlines since the platform isnt big enough to get away with it.

Is someone recieving harm from the existence of these drawings and depictions?

Gab from when the news constantly accuses them of child porn.

That's them receiving harm from the news companies, not the pictures.

yes

your child will be raped by "Asians" and your government will not execute them

If u get turned on by drawings of kids you’re gay and need to be shoahd

The viewer is receiving psychological harm.

"conversation starter" thread OPs should be thrown from syscrapers

yes

PEDOPHILES WILL HAVE THEIR COME UPPANCE ON THE DAY OF THE PETROL.

TAKE NOTE OF ALL WHO PROMOTE AND CONDONE PEDOPHILIA.

REMEMBER: DO NOT ENGAGE IN ANY DISCUSSIONS / ARGUMENTS WITH ANYONE WHO IS 'TRYING TO BE REASONABLE', OR 'WANTING TO DISCUSS PEDOPHILIA' OR SAYING ANYTHING AT ALL ALONG THE LINES OF 'PEDOPHILIA IS JUST ANOTHER HUMAN EXPRESSION OF SEXUALITY'.

PEDOPHILES ROB A CHILD OF THEIR INNOCENCE, PERVERT THE CHILDS NATURAL DEVELOPMENT EMOTIONALLY PHYSICALLY AND SEXUALLY, AND DESTROYS THE CHILDS LIFE FOR EVER.

THIS IS NOT UP FOR A SINGLE WORD OF 'DISCUSSION'.

REMEMBER: THE DAY OF THE PETROL.

> PIC RELATED: THE NIGS GOT ONE THING RIGHT

Attached: human-torch[1].jpg (900x598, 72K)

stfu sjw

PEDOPHILE DETECTED

> 1LITRE4U

This fucks your head up - although so does gore, but thats legal to view (and rightly so) - idk i guess ; i don’t like how it is completely speculative in regards to the age of the cartoon representation, but as far as common sense goes it is a no brainer to be despicable

Why do you hate love?

PEDOPHILE DETECTED

> 1LITRE4U2

?? Why

Attached: Kids-and-music-lessons-Sept11-istock.jpg (851x564, 268K)

>someone posts snuff films on gab
>theyre taken down
>but it wasnt the snuff films that harmed gab

Are you gonna pull the lever you little bitch?
>You think you're hot shit dontcha
Call me when you can lift more than your tiny dick
>Nothing personal kid

I'll have you know this loli is a 10,000 year old elder dragon who simply chose a form more pleasing to me.

Is someone forcing people to view these things?

Correct, it's the fault of the ones unfairly punishing.

>Kiddy fiddlers
>1 post by this ID

You can call them kidfuckers, but you're not comfortable with that, are you, Jayden?

saged

Already produced CP isn't hurting anyone. People whom sell real CP or produce it should be thrown in prison or killed. Cartoon representations are not harming anyone and it isn't fucking your head up. If that were true their would be science behind it but their isn't. Violence = sexual images are the same. If people watching hollywood movies aren't out their mass-murdering people because they've seen tons of it. It also opens up a can of worms if someone decided to plant this stuff on your computer its easily done and I'm pretty damn sure people have had it done to them already just no one believes them.

Attached: 1535519825775.jpg (645x729, 37K)

>if that were true, there would be science behind it

What, a cohort study of people who just recently picked up CP? Find a study design that's both feasible and ethical before coming back with that retard argument.

I don't get it either. They're just kids!

Attached: KIDDY FIDDLER.jpg (500x661, 58K)

>depictions of individuals under the age of consent
Depictions don't have an age since they're not real people. While to you this depiction looks like a child, to someone else it could look like an adult. Art is always open to interpretation.

>there are people out there in the world programming apocalyptic nightmare weapons

>but we should really get emotional about little cartoon butts

I've seen threads carpet-bombed with CP before, arguably not but there are times at which your eyes passing idly over a thumbnail has been enough to count as "viewing" it

yeah sure thing faggot because guess what their isn't any. My points still stand if looking at CP causes you to go out and rape kids. Then looking at violent images doesnt cause people to go out to murder people and watching porn doesnt sent men out to rape women which btw is an actual feminists talking point against porn.

caltech.edu/news/caltech-researchers-discover-seat-sex-and-violence-brain-42567

False equivalence, porn is damaging to the mind and should be dealt with seperately from non-pornographic media.

The only rights a drawing has is copyrights. If some 2Diddler keeps to himself and masturbate to drawings of kids then I don't care.
Could be argued that photo-realistic depictions are over the line.

PEDOPHILE DETECTED

> 1LITRE4U3

>porn is damaging to the mind
No proof of this at all but some insane faggots with broscience. If porn was that damaging their would be actual science behind it and feminists would be throwing it out there.
>seperately from non-pornographic media.
Again violence = sex its a proven fact brainlet.

How does someone who was molested become 'normal' again?

I do think porn has a significant influence on society. All I had as a child was JC Penny catalogs now it's at the touch of a button. People with low self control on their sexual urges can descend down a dark tunnel.

does gab ban all loli images or is it just loli that can be interpreted (by a retard) as sexual in nature?
does it differentiate young young-looking lolis from old young-looking lolis (500 year old shinobu, or 360 year old sophie)?

Attached: 1529555909425.jpg (775x1600, 93K)

That’s the issue, its a moving target. Next thing you know, they start making the argument that cp is art - i think i’m with the “LITER4U” guy on this one

>guess what there isn't any

I said come up with a study design that could falsify the statement, not find a preexisting study. Or did you just concede the point?

Degenerate fetish porn completely alters the way a person percieves stimuli associated with it. Depictions of sex are a much, much more powerful conditioning stimulus than depictions of violence, and even if it doesn't lead to child rape, it does lead to unsalvagable sexual degeneracy. Anyone on /d/ can tell you they're on some level of slippery slope.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZQht2yOX9Js

the prisons are full and no one (even you internet tough guy) has a taste for actual violence, so you should really find some more appropriate crusade

A LITRE OF PETROL LIBERALLY APPLIED TO THE PERPETRATOR MIGHT HELP ...
> ... ON THE DAY OF THE PETROL!

Attached: necklacing-toss-og[1].jpg (700x372, 48K)

SEE
YOUR DAY IS COMING PEDO....

Based Brit

no it should not. Fuck off pedo scum.

See that's the issue, it's an authoritarian part of my mind arguing with a libertarian part of my mind.
I think pedophiles should get LITRE4U'd but that doesn't particularly mesh with a "free speech" society and I've yet to see a robust argument against it in that context.

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech. The answer is yes, of course. A speech is just a speech. A sheet with writings is just a sheet with writings. A drawing is just a drawing. All of these do not shape states and bear power in any way. Only how they are used is what matters -- and this, is not something completely free at all and is why we have politics.
In the case of gab ? Avoid all porn and sensational provoking headlines that even the right will buy and hate, until it becomes very popular (if it ever does.....)

So, if someone draws a picture of a 12 y/o, and waits 6 years to fap to it, is that legal?

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH BURGER BRO, I LOOK FORWARD TO ALL THE NEW HOLIDAYS...

> THE DAY OF THE ROPE
> THE DAY OF THE RAKE
> THE DAY OF THE BULLET
> THE DAY OF THE PETROL

I recently found out pretty much every adult in my family is a diddler.
Even my sisters.

None of them care they where diddled.
They do it themselves now.
They have good relationships with my parents.
They're not broken junkie traumatized trash

I don't agree with pedos.
No morality involved.
Sex is for reproduction, babies, toddlers, and the like can't have babies or make a woman pregnant.
Its not natural

Anyways ..my head is really fucked up now.

I'm the one who wasn't diddled as a kid and I'm a useless NEET with no future.

All the kids who got diddled got tons of money and gifts and stuff

KEK

Attached: 6a00d83451af9f69e20147e0966c7a970b.jpg (325x402, 33K)

It may have not been my fault but the psychological damage was, and is still pretty heavy. It just feels like I will never be normal, but part of me wonders if i would have turned out autistic anyways. Bah, I try not to think about it.

"What are you going to do, lynch me?"
-Man, moments before getting lynched

Pornography isn't speech.
That notion was pushed by jewish lawyers over and over until they managed to get some idiot judge to let it go through sheer talmudic pilpul.

Attached: pilpul.jpg (1698x605, 320K)

If they want to do that, they can join the cancer on Twitter.

They had no reason to kickstart you into anything without the diddling. Because the diddling carries on later, not just as kids. It's a sad, dark thing, but truth and happens in many, many families. Even (especially) traditional families. It's some kind of contract, and kids that carry on with this have value to diddlers because they can achieve their sick lust as much as they want. So they will support them, and they'll be themselves infected with the same thing, and the cycle repeats. All "elite", "higher", "very cohesive" families are almost guaranteed to always be families where diddling is rampant. In my country most pedophile cases (except the rings, which are linked with pure fucking satanic evil) are cases within own families and incest, where everyone was willing to do it. It repulses me. But I am a NEET too, and I haven't been diddled.

Any society that values the safety of its children should allow child pornography.

Attached: 1540129391860.jpg (1200x1530, 725K)

im not a loli guy, but your gonna let scat fags, guro fags, vore fags and other fetish people run all around and lolicon shit is the only thing you want to ban. I dont get moralists at all, you only look at loli and shota porn cause muh children, you havent even looked down the black hole you only notice a puddle on the sidewalk leading into the black hole.

You just need to get over it, that usually involves thinking it over deeply until you see the thing for what it actually is, or talking it over so you can actually leave it behind you.

have an upvote

Attached: 1489274615893.jpg (1282x1789, 220K)

It’s sexualizing the idea of children so no. Also, I think all pedos who get caught before they hurt children should be shot by a firing squad of better men and I think that pedos who have harmed children should spend whatever time of their life is left in solitary confinement. I would keep them healthy since I want them to serve as much time as possible in solitary confinement. Not
Too healthy of course, a little pain would serve justice as well

That's absolutely true and very serious, provided we are not using the terms "rape" and "statutory rape" interchangeably.

PIC RELATED:

mrcZitel AS HE TRIES TO THINK OF ANOTHER WAY TO APPROPRIATE A Jow Forums MEME THAT WILL WORK ...
>.... 'THIS TIME'....

Attached: c455d-1483984496889[1].jpg (372x203, 98K)

Attached: 1540379222934.jpg (2359x1330, 366K)

Fucking nigger don't even try that. The NPC meme has been around for years before Jow Forums started using it.

2D ain't real, mate. Concern yourself with real cp instead of stuff drawn by weirdos and weebs.

No victims, no crime. I don't see how a drawing could be a crime, it's not like a real child is depicted. Diddlers who actually touch a child should be gassed however

OPTION Z

REMOVE KEBAB
BURN ALL PEDOPHILES

BY DOING THE SECOND, YOU REDUCE THE KEBABS BY ABOUT 80%, WHICH MAKES THE FIRST EASIER AND CHEAPER.

SHUT THE FUCK UP 'WOLFIE'

>Circumcised