So

Is it safe to say that the van is owned by FBI?

Attached: fbi.jpg (1024x639, 116K)

Other urls found in this thread:

www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/trafficapp/AllSearches.aspx?menu=public&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
browardclerk.org/
profiles.superlawyers.com/florida/ft-lauderdale/lawyer/daniel-r-aaronson/10dfa130-d5cf-4f46-b68f-1197f2ac4848.html
vice.com/sv/article/wdyvqn/the-fbi-are-the-most-prolific-islamic-terrorists-in-america
theintercept.com/2016/03/30/fbi-honeypot-ensnares-michigan-man/
rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/how-fbi-entrapment-is-inventing-terrorists-and-letting-bad-guys-off-the-hook-244905/
progressive.org/magazine/terrorist-or-victim-of-entrapment-milwaukee-case-raises-trou/
news.vice.com/en_us/article/3keyqy/the-line-between-fbi-stings-and-entrapment-has-not-blurred-its-gone
thefreethoughtproject.com/fbi-groom-mentally-ill-right-wing-terrorist/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

There's no need to attribute the suspects presence to the van, because he was arrested from the van.

They don't have any reason to treat the van like they just found it in the woods with a body in the back.

Why would the FBI leave cameras in a van that they're gunna use to frame someone?
Also why would the FBI use cameras that are that conspicuous?

don't bother they're just grasping at straws

I would love to know what the deal was with the tarp. I fail to understand why they would tarp it off to tow it. What was the point of the tarp? Fingerprints don't blow away in the wind, but a tarp flapping in the wind could wipe them off. And all that tape all over the front to try to hold the tarp shut, what would be the point of that, other than contaminating the outside of the van even more.
All that aside YOU WOULD THINK that IF there was some value in making sure the outside of the van remained untouched by wind, that they would bring transport for the van that was covered. They are a thing. They exist. You yank the van into the back of an enclosed trailer, and close the doors. The FBI does not know about these? They also make CAR COVERS, and yes, they make them for vans too.
But really, what would be the point in putting a tarp on the van? The van was found outside, I assume, because that's where vans usually spend their time.
Does the FBI cover a house that is a crime scene in a tarp?

Oh, and has anyone noticed yet that there are no windshield wipers on the van? Sorry, I've been at work all day.

Tarps are cheap and fit all car shapes.

Hmmm... florida is tropical, right?

So it rains a lot.

Not really they don't, since they had to tape it on, and have multiple FBI agents ride on the back of the tow truck to keep it from flying off. And they were doing like 10mph. What was the point of the tarp?

watch interview with his former manager shes been in the van.. theres also a picture of the van with a stripper trailer attached advertising his business and the van is unstickered.

why werent they terrified of explosives in it

No tropics are deserts silly goy. Just like gender is different than sex

(Jews like to change definitions to suit them)
(I guess that's a red pill: conscriptive vs descriptive dictionaries)

No, it really rains a lot. Same in Hawaii.

Save your good critiques for a bit, so they can't spin shit immediately.
Exactly, the nigger loading the vehicle onto the flatbed was working like there was no chance the thing could have explosives.

Are you really stupid enough to think they would tow it without searching for explosives first? Are you bots or just retards?

Probably because they had already cleared the vehicle of explosives by the time the picture was taken. Do you really think the photo was taken first thing they went to the van?

Searching without gloves, equipment, or a full bomb squad. Yaaaaaaaaa surely this isnt a false flag.

>fake and gay

>Are you really stupid enough to think they would tow it without searching for explosives first?
Doesn't match the timeline of the tweets, but nice attempt at sensibility. It would make sense to search it, yes. But, 2 hours isn't really enough time, is it?

Dumping the vehicle reports from that other thread

Attached: BAC4A591-A5CB-4307-9692-5DB0766EA190.png (675x887, 101K)

Attached: 1EEA4FEF-3C08-45C9-8FAB-4381374B07B4.png (673x887, 86K)

Attached: EF0C9D5D-695C-4800-A73A-BF82169E5B7B.png (677x889, 85K)

Surveillance Cameras?

Attached: DF250911-D358-4D2C-8933-6B05360C90C6.jpg (1024x639, 127K)

Attached: DDFA08E5-C8D0-4EF3-AFDF-4D38318D66D7.png (677x886, 77K)

Attached: 01E5D9B2-2730-42B0-BDF0-CF3AD39BBFB3.png (680x887, 88K)

Attached: A62D185A-99D0-448C-ADDC-9E3135A4FE99.png (640x1136, 79K)

Attached: AEB50A09-D779-4E72-8CEF-A84A81BF9BCC.png (640x1136, 113K)

Attached: 720E55CF-04D4-4908-95D2-840E43CCE4A8.png (640x1136, 132K)

Attached: C923237D-BC86-4309-9342-E02FEF27C886.png (640x1136, 104K)

Attached: BF410741-3AD2-4405-88B9-56EA933B3534.png (640x1136, 105K)

ref: Your image.

Those are not FBI surveillance cameras. They aren't even police cameras. Those are commercial grade cameras .

If they are hooked up, they were probably so he would know if anyone was "messing with the van"

Attached: 11FF8987-0B69-4187-987C-7273B2EF5C1D.png (640x1136, 106K)

Such a classic false flag. I hope the party of crime loses their asses nov 6th.

>live in van
>mail out 13 hoax bombs from local USPS
>remain in van for next few days until police arrive and arrest you
This man was set up
Wouldn't this man be on the run?
Especially once he learned there was a federal investigation going on?
Even the news stated that he suspect was in Florida, why the fuck didn't he start driving away?

Done

Attached: E7DA6356-32C3-4C5C-91D8-7677687A5EC8.png (640x1136, 105K)

Also, to continue...

... so your theory is that the FBI went through an elaborate process to frame this guy, but while putting the hats on the dashboard no one thought to ask... hey fred, should we take these big ass cameras out of here?

This theory doesn't pass the smell test.

I mean a glow in a dark spook like you would be an expert on FBI cameras wouldn't you? That's why you're posting here to show how wrong we are about the FBI conspiracy. :)

>mail out 13 hoax bombs from local USPS
that never entered the USPS system
>stamps not canceled, no tracking/sorting stickers/stamps, no due postage stamps

I mean you're here so the FBI isn't exactly known for competency.

Because the FBI has a "brand" of camera.. What a doofus. Back 2 REDDIT.

test
>this kike site have me shadow banned again?

>1 post by this ID
Clearly, nigger. Say nothing useful to slide?

No, but I'm an expert on commercial camera systems. And these cameras are cheap cameras that are shitty for any serious work.

The police don't use CMOS board cameras for surveillance. They use them for body cams because they're smaller, but for surveillance they use cameras with adjustable lenses.

Also, they don't leave the camera on the fucking dashboard for anyone to see. If it is an undercover operation, the cameras are behind tinted windows or disguised.

> park a trumptacular magavan in a Jewish community
> leave it in the same spot for over a year
> not a single shlomo lawyer makes the city come remove it
> produced by JJ Abrams
> no Jewish l

No. Nigger corncob sucking mods don't like anyone that says anything to hurt their pet niggers.

Dude it fucking rains everyday for 3 months out of the year

Exactly, what if some people who glow in the dark paid him to create some hoax bombs and then personally delivered them.

An NPC would just see the pro-trump logos and be uncaring about any other objects or reports. Question answered

I think the biggest red flag is that they didn't bring the bomb squad out to investigate the van, knowing full well that he's attempting to manufacture bombs inside of it.

They don't need to make the up the man or get a fake van, all they need to do is pay him to make hoax bombs. He's a fucking homeless man in a van, he needs money.

A moron in charge probably.

I find it hard to believe this guy lives in a van

Attached: uncle muscles.png (1568x699, 1.14M)

Don't forget that guy lived in his van for years and is broke as fuck.
>van dweller
>having access to a printer that is not 24/7 under CCTV
All this shit glows in the dark.

um actually, the van is evidence and was confiscated as such.... they should be wearing gloves before the evidence is processed.. that's how it works.

A type, not a brand. All three of of these cameras are CMOS board cameras (the camera mounted on the board with the lens like (see image). These have the advantage of being cheap, but you don't have a manual zoom or focus.

The camera on the right is infrared (see the lights in a circle around the lens). The two on the left don't look like they are (though the picture is bad)

These cameras are OK for people on a budget, or for a passable store system, but they're the wrong type (and far too cheap) for a police agency with a nearly unlimited budget.

If it were a surveillance van, the cameras would be larger, with adjustable lenses. They would be in the back of the van not the front (so the agents can adjust and monitor them).

And again... if the van was being converted to false flag evidence, they wouldn't be so stupid to leave the cameras on the fucking dashboard.

Attached: CMOS_Board.jpg (450x450, 19K)

So a couple of windshield cams and some low tech CCTV cams for a retail store count as FBI surveillance equip? I will be called a shill, but your are as retarded as the suspect if you think that.

heh needs money for what? No house payment. No electric bill. No home owner insurance or taxes.

What, exactly, does he need more than $500 a month for?

Man, it must really be getting to Jow Forums that it was MAGA and not some easily discovered liberal conspiracy. You know the FBI works for Republicans now, right?

>"surveillance equipment" = FBI
Or, you know, he's just some dude with Trump stickers all over his Van and he's sick of it getting vandalized all the time....

>OMG NO WIPERS
Probably one such occurrence of said vandalism...


(stop grasping at straws guys)

No, question not answered. You seriously think the FBI is smart enough to set up a multi fake bomb conspiracy but not be smart enough to leave the cameras on the dashboard?

You guys need to start using your brain, you're acting like fucking children trying to support a theory that holds no water

Oh For Fucks Sake, I am not an FBI spook, but if
I wanted to surveil someone I would buy pinhole cameras or something smaller like a Go Pro and NOT make it obvious.
COPS have better cameras than the ones in this van.
Stop wasting time on this ONE detail and focus on the shit that sticks:
--He knew through media that there was a manhunt and didn't leave the van or take flight.
--The window stickers in different pictures don't match.
--FBI handling the van without gloves. Dont they ALWAYS handle shit with gloves until its in a secure area?
--The fact they handled and moved the van without a bomb squad.
I hope to fuck you're not shills trying to figure out what to print or announce in media.
Even more, I hope you realize you're being idiotic sticking to the details that JUST DON'T pan out.
Don't you realize that fed agencies slowly dilute this shit by getting goons like you to question the credibility of the inconsequential details?
THINK anons, THINK.
--

Attached: perspective on truth.jpg (680x618, 29K)

it's sad

Holy shit you guys are stupid. Good thing ya don't vote and aren't having kids or you'd fuck the next gen right up.

>tfw nobody notices the trips or comment....

Dud was a nutjob on opioid's and had the cams in the van just to scare people.

Symbolic covering of the Trump can with a blue wave. Seriously.

Did you see if the wind shield wipers were noted as missing or replaced?

I mean it's like you don't even try to hide the fact that you're a dumb fucking shill. I legitimately don't understand why you come here to embarrass yourself.

He makes it obvious so people DON'T vandalize the van. It's like a house that has a sign that it has cameras up. It's to scare off would be trespassers.

>two not fitted cheap suits
>5x the same outfit with minimal changes
>suites haven't been dry cleaned for ages (you can tell it from the shoulder wrinkles)
>terrible tie knot
>collard shirt not ironed (you can tell from the collar)
>rallies that are free to go to
>gym membership, that's a van dweller must

>fingerprints / dna of accomplices
>explosives/drug/other residues
>booby traps
>delicate evidence like partially-build bombs, electronics, etc
yeah no reason to treat evidence as evidence, goy

Says the same guy who was crying less than a month ago that the FBI doesnt do their jobs cuz
>muh Ford allegations got denied
Yah nope you cannot for one second even claim the FBI sucks at their job one second then the next claim.....
>they did their job well pack it in bois it was a Drumpfy
Pretty wild shit show you and your kind put on.

>There's no need to attribute the suspects presence to the van, because he was arrested from the van.
how do they know there is only one perp?

They treated the inside like evidence. That's why they put the red tape over the doors. But the outside isn't real evidence. What's it going to show, fingerprints? His attorney would say "maybe he was walking past and touched the car, that's not evidence"

Attached: 1540567209394.jpg (1674x1334, 183K)

This is a ff to demoralize Rep voters cause Dems have fizzled so badly. They are trying to prevent the collapse of the 2 party system.

Attached: bully.jpg (273x185, 7K)

>pic related

Attached: SmartSelect_20181026-210135_Gallery.jpg (1067x700, 425K)

Forgot to add the suits are 100% polyester. There's zero wool or linen that you would expect in any kind of quality garment.

It's the typical poorfag larping as businessman outfit.

www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/trafficapp/AllSearches.aspx?menu=public&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1

Cesar Sayoc
DOB 03/17/1962

browardclerk.org/

profiles.superlawyers.com/florida/ft-lauderdale/lawyer/daniel-r-aaronson/10dfa130-d5cf-4f46-b68f-1197f2ac4848.html

Mr. Aaronson has been a key component in changing the laws in the area of adult entertainment in South Florida, including cases such as State v. Kessler and Silvers and Hall v. State, which addressed lewdness and the constitutional boundaries thereof. Mr. Aaronson is also recognized for winning the case of Daytona Grand v. City of Daytona Beach, which was completed under the Alameda Books test.

This should help the search

Good advice user

Attached: maxresdefault (13).jpg (1236x960, 70K)

Real life isn't an episode of CSI. They had him under servailence for a whie. The FBI has dealt with bombs before. You think the picture you've seen are when they first rolled up?

Because cartoon bombs dummy

That sounds bad ass

Unless they knew it all ahead of time, but thats crazy talk.

Proof pls

Despite the highly dubious narrative with more holes than a Hollywood plot and the fake as all fuck "explosives" - with the media driving this nonsensical narrative, you believe it's all above board, nothing glow in the dark about this whole thing? You can only be either a shill, misdirection or a fucking imbecile.

Its make or break and its afraid
Its time is short

Let's don't go here. Makes us look like morons.

Or are you a shill TRYING to make us look like morons.

Ah... you think the hoax would be so simple that a bunch of Incels on pol would figure it out within hours. No wonder all these imbeciles on pol believe in larps like flat earth and Sandy Hook.

> Classic false flag.

Can you give us a few examples of real false flag events that fit into this classic pattern?

Got to keep on posting this to raise its profile, just a reminder that this incident fits into a long history of alphabet agencies entrapping mentally-ill people in harmless but highly-publicized terrorist """schemes""".

vice.com/sv/article/wdyvqn/the-fbi-are-the-most-prolific-islamic-terrorists-in-america
theintercept.com/2016/03/30/fbi-honeypot-ensnares-michigan-man/
rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/how-fbi-entrapment-is-inventing-terrorists-and-letting-bad-guys-off-the-hook-244905/
progressive.org/magazine/terrorist-or-victim-of-entrapment-milwaukee-case-raises-trou/
news.vice.com/en_us/article/3keyqy/the-line-between-fbi-stings-and-entrapment-has-not-blurred-its-gone

They've had two decades to practice on muslims, not surprised they're targeting political spectrums now.

thefreethoughtproject.com/fbi-groom-mentally-ill-right-wing-terrorist/

jokes on you because /pol is FULL of morons.
fact.

Thats kinda awesome

It really is as simple as that

Serious question, are conservatives all mentally ill or just the MAGA morons?

So windscreen wipers are a must.

>collard shirt

Guess who I spotted

two words, user: broward county

>there's nothing here goys go away

Attached: image.jpg (815x925, 939K)

This van with it's thousand of stickers and unopened maga hats right there on the dashboard is what I imagine a democrat thinks a fanatic Trump supporter rides in. This whole thing is like a poorly made B movie parody of what an actual bomb threat is like.

My question is why would a fanatic Trump supporter do something so negative looking for republicans literally weeks from the midterms? Are (((they))) trying to shill the "dumb republican trump supporter can't even realize his bombs hurt his favorite party" narrative just because the only other plausible explanation is to point the finger at democrats?

Attached: 1495663542610.png (74x148, 2K)

Attached: s-l300 (3).jpg (299x300, 27K)