Was Gaddafi right?

Attached: Qaddafi.jpg (2560x1536, 510K)

of course.

His wall wouldn't be necessary if the West grew a pair and started turning the boats around or sinking them. Middle Eastern despots are dicks but apparently they have their uses.

it seems like the middle eastern despots were preventing the boats from existing altogether

He was one of the greats.
Libyan civil war is a great way to redpill normies just because there was a cellphone camera behind fucking everything.

IF

>Was Gaddafi right?
10000%

Attached: THUMB-UP:.png (457x480, 39K)

If you get killed by the US government you're probably 100% right

F to pay respects

That would imply having to control Libya because you can't control every inch of the mediterranean and if you're going to control Libya you're basically replacing Gaddafi

>be libya
>live under dictatorship and prosper
>usa spread democracy
>have 3 civil wars

Very good point.

Another very good point.

F

His spirit is laughing like a madman now. I bet he haunts a European woman's bedroom just to see the mess that the West made for themselves.

He's a Clinton Special

Gaddafi definitely hit on some bigly points from the standpoint of being right and geopolitically useful

Obama's foreign policy had huge holes in it but the public isn't really aware of it currently because of the Trumptastrophe and the magic negro effect which will wear off over time.

His administration utterly fucked Libya, withdrew from Iraq prematurely just as ISIS started to rise - he called them the JV team as they were blitzkrieging across Syria & Iraq, LOL. His nuke deal with Iran was hastily done and was out of desperation. The pivot to Asia was haphazard and was ineffective in containing China's rise. He purged some of America's best generals(Including Mattis) because of ideological reasons. He completely missed Russia.

Why do you want to stop people who are just trying to improve their lives? What if you were born in one of those countries? It's not fair to block someone just because they are from a poor country.

Attached: LetThemIn.jpg (480x269, 147K)

The short answer is yes

F

You don't have to control the whole of the Mediterranean, just the littoral areas where refugees would try to land. That's an easy task for even modestly equipped navies. Let them have the open sea, if they drift and starve/drown, that's one less boat that Europe would have to sink.

>Why do you want to stop people who are just trying to improve their lives?

Because they'll detriment our lives, because of expansive welfare programs. But if such programs did not exist, then much more immigration would be allowed.

>withdrew from Iraq prematurely just as ISIS started to rise
could we have really fucked up ISIS in the presumably Syrian/Iraqi regimes enough to capacity them in any significant way? And left Libya alone?