If Northern Europeans and East Asians are the smartest people in the world...

Romans weren't arya- WHOOOOOOOOOA!!??

Attached: 1522249808942.jpg (320x276, 20K)

ironically Romans migrated to Italy from modern day Turkey
muh midget-monkey aryan race

wood is okay

Sure thing Pedrou.

Attached: 1514756442197.jpg (350x584, 25K)

>modern day Turkey
Ancient day Turkey was Greek and based, modern day Turkey suck.

My god southerners are retarded.
They've been living inside a stone for hundreds of year shivering in cold and they still haven't figure out insulation.

How would you shiver in cold if you lived in south?

by not insulating your homes and wear proper clothing

that sculpture was made after the rape of the Sabines (women of the Sabini Celts) they were literally the rapefugees of the ancient world

You could be naked and homeless and still be warm

Ever heard of hypotermia? You just think you're warm, it's the final symptom before you die.

Yes vodka and other spirits are miricles of god (PBUH)

>dying of hypothermia in southern italy

nigga what

imagine being this poorly educated about history and how the world works. what a fucking faggot.

You are right, there are some harsh winters here, in the worst years sometime it snow.

Attached: Hemorroides.jpg (450x500, 81K)

Ever tried coffee enema? Pretty godlike experience.

Yes that's the point. They are retarded who never figured out proper clothing or housing.
They just never connected the dots between cold and housing.

>Ancient day Turkey was Greek
Ilium was Thracian and was destroyed by the Greeks, triggering the migration of Trojans to the North-Western Balkans and the Italian peninsula
>modern day Turkey suck.
that much is true

Cold is not a thing over there. Why would you need proper clothing or insulation? You'd die of sweating induced dehydration.

>Why would you need proper clothing or insulation?
So you wouldn't fucking die in cold. Are you autistic?

>Are you autistic?
that's rhetorical, we are on Jow Forums
and he's right, Greece, Egypt and Babylon have mild winters compared to North Europe and Asia

It's literally impossible to die of cold in mediterranean climate.

Asia Minor or Anatolia

They are not the smartest people. Crystal IQ across Europe and the U.S. is mostly uniform, fluid IQ is raised in countries where education is valued.
Asians are similar except they have higher fluid IQs. Their problem solving abilities are diminished in exchange for greater memory and pattern recognition.

Northern Europeans were retards until they slowly began the climb to Neolithic status. If you look at IQ charts of Europe and PCAs you see that proto-Med/WHGs are the most intelligent, Anglos, Germans, North Italian, Spaniards, French, while the least intelligent are the most Steppe admixed people, Slavs, Norwegians (relative outliers in both categories however Sweden and Denmark are the intelligent Scandinavians), Balts, Ukrainians.

so you're saying they are in africa?

(((Wololo)))

The same was true for most of Europe during its warm age before the migration era. Finland had a similar climate to France when the Finns entered it.

lol fuck off cockroach

Greek and Asians designs are the best. The other two are meh.

Asia Minor or Anatolia
literally the same thing. North-Western Asia Minor or Anatolia, depending how you want to call it

please stop hurting my feelings

Stone buildings are impressive but also not very flexible. Wood buildings can easily be built and expanded by small groups of people as needed and the material is readily available. Before power tools and earth moving vehicles large stone structures almost needed slave labour.

this
wood is better than stone for keeping warm

Stone keeps the heat in. I bet you don't even have a normal brick oven, nu-Finn. Huge mass of the right material balances temperature through the night.

You put bunch of stones and bricks on top of each other, congratulations nigger

Attached: 121009033859-06-greece-protest-merkel-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg (980x552, 230K)

Yes. My whole argument is based on the premise that italy is in africa.

a house is not an oven

Did he have anything to say about hay?

>If you look at IQ charts of Europe and PCAs you see that proto-Med/WHGs are the most intelligent, Anglos, Germans, North Italian, Spaniards, French, while the least intelligent are the most Steppe admixed people, Slavs, Norwegians (relative outliers in both categories however Sweden and Denmark are the intelligent Scandinavians), Balts, Ukrainians.

burger education strikes again

Attached: Screenshot_112.png (1057x879, 1.33M)

hay is gay

Because legacy is in the blood, not the building

also very plentiful and much lighter.

Lmao, you’re mentally retarded. Stay butthurt that meds were drawing design plans for entire cities while you all were living in shacks in Northern Europe.

Nords are snow monkeys. You guys are animals who are well adapted to the cold, but incapable of problemsolving and creativity, because your brains didn’t evolve past the primal ape stage.

Because they built in wood and not stone.

They had earthquakes to worry about and didn't have the commodity of giants to build things so wood was what they used. They used it quite ingeniously though. For structures meant to last they would set the wood a certain way, supporting each wooden piece without using nails and this way the building had room to move in the event of an earthquake without being heavily damaged.

>their problem solving abilities are diminished in exchange for greater memory and pattern recognition
>their problem solving abilities are diminished in exchange for greater problem solving abilities
For quite a long time anyone who wasn't royalty was basically dumb as dirt. China lost a lot of great minds and great written works as a result of the revolution and the communist takeover.

china wasnt a civilization, since civilization requires cities and chinkland had no cities-- only semi-permanent primitive settlements

>civilizational development
ignoring the noise from CCP propaganda and comparing Western and east Asian civilization, objectively, based on ancient city footprints, we observe that Western civilization contains more than 4000 ancient cities older than 2000 years and far exceeds east Asia which barely contains a dozen ancient cities. east Asian civilization was a collection of peasant villages that do not even rival the complex network of thousands of large ancient cities of Western civilization

list of ancient, complex european cities with extensive infrastructure still evident

greater than 3k yrs old: Athens, Argos, Santorini, Corinth, Knossos, Mycenae, Cádiz, Siena, Granada, Barcelona, Lisbon, Marseille, Cagliari....

greater than 2k yrs old: Rome, Syracuse, Vienna, London, Lyon, Milan, Naples, Paris, Padua, Augsburg, Córdoba, Venice, Trier, Cologne, Autun, Ypres, Toulouse, Salonika, Speyer, Ravenna, Pozzuoli, Philippi, Marseilles, Messina, Genoa, Worms, Florence, Feodosia, Constantinople, Nuremberg, Bologna, Narbonne, Palermo, Brussels, Dublin, Kiev, Lublin, Leuven, Seville, Plovdiv, Évora, Cork, Béziers...

Madrid, Hamburg, Ghent, Berlin, Amsterdam, Bucharest, Prague, Moscow...

In comparison, china has virtually 0 complex ancient cities with extensive infrastructure that is still evident, not even beijing has ancient city infrastructure and remnants!

yes, Europe went thru thousands of wars, yet thousands of ancient Western cities still have ancient buildings! China was always a glorified collection of primitive peasant rice farming villages and 1 hive queen in the shitty Imperial village to control them. Based on European standards, China never had an ancient settlement to even qualify as a city.

Because structures in that age were built from locally sourced materials brainlette.
Live near a forest on a plain you don't build using rocks. Live in a climate with sparse deciduous forest and stone outcrops guess what you use to build with?
Stone is superior as far as durability yet no one invented it and plaster was probably a happy accident as opposed to serious experimentation.
Native American did the same Pueblo vs effigy mounds, South American Civilizations preferred stone because wood would rot rapidly in humid climates.
Stoners BTFO

Attached: c vi.jpg (1000x565, 176K)

see A civilization is a complex society characterized by urban development (cities with permanent structures), social stratification imposed by a cultural elite, symbolic systems of communication (for example, writing systems), and a perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment

A city is permanent settlement with complex infrastructure (ie Ancient Athens). Cucuteni-Trypillian settlements contained a population of more than 100k, but was made of wood and burnt down frequently, and was thus a settlement, due to temporary structures.

Cucuteni-Trypillian is considered a culture (not a civilization), since it contained dense semi-permanent settlements.

This applies to China as well.

Assuming these chinese villages are "cities" they are still very few, inferior, and sparse to even compare or rival the 10000s of complex European cities.

>If Northern Europeans and East Asians are the smartest people in the world, then how come their ancient buildings are either non-existent or horrible trash?

It's almost as if living in a warm region with no real winters, lots of resources and plentiful food supplies makes it easier to establish a civilisation. Who woulda thunk it?

Attached: 1517250228132.jpg (920x2000, 564K)

I don't have any evidence to show you but i assure you, as the aryans migrated into what is now europe, empires followed. I can't seem to find the paper on it, (if i had more time i am shure i would find it) but the ancient egyptians and greeks had more incommon with northern europeans than current egyptians/greeks, genetically speaking