Is Jacob Wohl fucked?

Attached: Clipboard01789.png (582x452, 73K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5f8pjn/1998_scifi_author_isaac_asimovs_son_arrested_with/
anonymousconservative.com/blog/mueller-set-issac-aisimovs-son-free-after-he-was-arrested-on-child-porn/
sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Charges-shatter-Asimov-son-s-reclusion-3099867.php
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Mueller is /ourguy/ and we get to watch Jews fight each other over him.

are you sure Mueller is /ourguy/ ...? I guess Jow Forums does have a bad reputation...

reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5f8pjn/1998_scifi_author_isaac_asimovs_son_arrested_with/

anonymousconservative.com/blog/mueller-set-issac-aisimovs-son-free-after-he-was-arrested-on-child-porn/

David Asimov, of Living Oak Court, Bennett Ridge, Santa Rosa, the son of the late science fiction writer Isaac Asimov, was sentenced on March 28, 2001 to six months’ home detention with electronic monitoring and three years federal probation for possessing child pornography. U.S. District Court Judge Maxine M. Chesney sentenced Asimov after reviewing a series of sealed psychiatric reports, one of which was ordered by the court. Asimov who was charged with four federal counts of possession of child pornography with each count carrying a five year sentence, pled guilty to two counts in a plea bargain deal. There was no forfeiture of any of Asimov’s assets in this case, despite his owning a home in Santa Rosa purchased in 1996 for $375,000, and despite his receiving $3,000 per month from his father’s estate.

How did Asimov, who possessed one of the largest stashes of pornography in California, skate away from federal prison? A look at the players yields the answer.

Asimov’s child porn stash was so big many child victims and perpetrators would have taken a fall, had Asimov been zealously prosecuted at trial.

Asimov would probably have escaped detection, if he had not taken his personal computer to a store when its scanner and color printer malfunctioned. A technician working on the machine discovered images of children engaged in sexual acts with adults. A store supervisor contacted the police. Asimov’s case is not the only case where tips about child porn were generated by store technicians. It seems either child pornographers are stupid about fixing their computers or they are unwitting framed.

>Are the ass stains faggots?

Yes

Attached: IMG_2532.jpg (640x640, 85K)

In fact, a few days later, Judge Frank Passalacqua released Asimov after having been told no local victims were identified in the porn seized from Asimov's home. Thus, within only a few days of his arrest, Asimov was released, because the police happened to know no local victims were involved. How could they have known so fast?

Obviously, the Sonoma County Court didn't care that victims who were not "local" may have been involved. Someone's child was on those tapes. "As far as local victims, we don't know of any. There are some homemade tapes,'' Sonoma County Deputy District Attorney Gary Medvigy told the judge.

Why was a distinction made by the Sonoma County Judge and District Attorney regarding determining if Asimov's tapes involved "local" victims as opposed to non-local victims? What did District Attorney Mullins consider to be "local"? Within Sonoma County? Within California?

Medvigy also acknowledged to Judge Passalacqua that the investigation was still in its infancy because of the massive amount of material taken from Asimov's house. Despite the investigation being in its "infancy", Judge Passalacqua set Asimov loose. By releasing Asimov on his own recognizance, the Sonoma County Judge and prosecutor made it clear that they considered the case to be light weight. There was no pressure on Asimov to turn in any of his confederates or to spill the beans, when he was just lounging around his luxurious home, unemployed and enjoying Santa Rosa life.

Asimov was ordered released on the condition he stay away from children, computers and the Internet. The public was expected to feel safe because Passalacqua sternly told Asimov he would have to comply with a list of conditions, including observing a curfew and allowing a probation officer to search his house at any time, and would have to take random chemical tests and engage in psychological counseling.

The police raided Asimov’s four-bedroom home with a search warrant and discovered the largest child porn “processing center” ever discovered in California.

In July 1998, before a preliminary hearing commenced which would have put the massive amount of evidence before the public, suddenly Sonoma County Deputy District Attorney Gary Medvigy announced that U.S. Attorney's Office in San Francisco agreed to prosecute Asimov, 46, thus relieving Sonoma County of the prosecution.

Sonoma Superior Court Judge Frank Passalacqua "conditionally'' dismissed the two felony charges against Asimov related to distributing child pornography. Passalacqua stated the charges were dismissed only so federal authorities could file their case and would be reinstated in 30 days if for some reason federal authorities did not proceed.

Medvigy tried to convince the public that the reason for the dismissal was that his office was limited in its ability to investigate the sources and possible distribution of the ``enormous'' amount of child pornography found in Asimov's home. Medvigy also cited the fact that much of Asimov's porn came from the internet and involved out-of-state and international sources, which made it more appropriate for federal authorities to take over.

At this point, J. Michael Mullins apparently wanted the public to believe that the federal government was going to do a much more extensive prosecution of Asimov than Sonoma County authorities were able to do. However, Asimov's attorney shed light on the true reason for the dismissal. Chris Andrian said he believed Sonoma County prosecutors handed the case to the feds because they had weak evidence of any felony being committed.

Deputy District Attorney Medvigy stated about the dismissal, "We had hoped to show that it was not just for his personal viewing pleasure.''

sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Charges-shatter-Asimov-son-s-reclusion-3099867.php

I love how fast everyone moved to discredit a man who was going to be implicated in the #MeToo movement when it was Robert Mueller. Meanwhile, when literally any other man is implicated.

>WE BELIEVE SURVIVORS!
>FIRE HIM!
>RUIN HIS LIFE!

Jacob is the fall guy because he's constantly tweeting pro-Trump shit. This is yet another Democratic pre-mid-term tactic.

Are they saying the metoo movement is a hoax?

>Oy vey, kvetch kvetch
I swear those fuckwits cause more antisemitism than The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion with every tweet

Attached: tips nose.jpg (172x158, 7K)