Why dont we?

Mama mia

We'll do the killing over here. Then we'll help you guys sort your shit out over there, Bong.

wow i need to go to bed

rage against the machine

Ben Garrison

I'm going to make a conservative social media service. You can't be extremely fash there but you can at least avoid Twitter's liberal bias.

This
Jokes on you. I happen to know for a fact that my British cousin is very well armed.

Sporks away you glorious snagletoothed bastards.

Attached: IMG_20180601_170341.jpg (2621x3993, 1.58M)

Can it be built on some kind of censorship-resistant network? Like a dApp on a blockchain or something?

It could be done with a distributed system yea.

Look at the history of the post office. They dealt with literally all of these problems that we're having 150-200 years ago. Trump tells jared to build the post office into a faceberg/twitter replacement, gives everyone a free account and address. Boom solved.

Unless you're a lolbertarian who hates the idea of important institutions answering to the people instead of a bunch of (((shareholders)))

I like the comics done by this artist. it's fun and relatively easy to repurpose them.

Attached: template.jpg (488x491, 53K)

Attached: poo.jpg (488x491, 67K)

Attached: poo2.jpg (489x602, 64K)

I want our corrupt government to be cleaned out through war.

but we are. the question is how to get the left to become openly insurgent to have justification for slaughtering them and taking back the coasts. they just need a little push. after november they will be fragile. could try it then.

What did the gov do to hatreon?

It says between the first two panels.

Fucking. Seasteading. This is exactly what seasteading is all about. You want a white ethnostate? Bam, you got it. I shill this daily. Do some research. seasteading.org/

Attached: 1_ZZi6tWGQYoT0kbo0rrE8sQ.jpg (1200x675, 264K)

We unironically need socialism where wh*tes start taking seizing control of big tech and other big corporations
>n-no...but capitalism and private property...play by the rules man heh we'll win by the free market :"/

Attached: 1111 lol comic.png (724x1436, 864K)

Good idea! Remove the kike-led NATO first and we can give it another go.

Absolutely necessary.

>implying there no kikes across the seas

Attached: water-world-dangers.jpg (500x348, 165K)

>Sweden
>Ludvika, Dalarna
>Majority white supremists
Come home white man.

Attached: Dalarna-15.jpg (1200x800, 250K)

Yes. Absolutely Necessary. I can't fucking stand it anymore, it's driving me fucking insane. The legal mutilation of our children, the poison in our foods, our media, our cripplingly unnatural society.

God-fucking damnit how BAD does it need to GET for us to start with the pogroms? If NPC's really are soulless they can die too. I refuse to live in this shit-hole any longer. They turned my beautiful niece into a self-cutting suicidal lesbian.

Hatred doesn't even begin to describe what I feel, Anons...my niece...my poor niece.

Where the fukc u get building materials.

Ballistic Geology?

Anarcho-capitalism is the way forward because it's the closest to natural man.
We dont need Governments.
We need a free market, to actually be free.

We need only 5 laws at most
1. no murder
2. no rape
3. no stealing
4. no paedos
5. right to self defence & private property

Corporations can provide security services.
Media can actually be free.
We can all use crypto backed by the energy is costs to create it.
We dont need borders people will naturally coalesce where they please, leading to great homogenization. i.e LGazelles dont go and live with a pack of lions.
Borders actually keep you closer to people you dont like.
We will have real freedom.
No welfare niggers.
No foreign wars by force, greater co-operation and trade will ensue between people.

you need jesus

>fukc u get building
You won't be invited, retard.

jesus was an anarcho-Jew.

Lots of ways to build one that works just well enough to get people to join, then collapses like the FIU bridge, but with a larger death toll.

Everybody wants to build their own government. Nobody wants to do all the work needed to make that government keep working after they're gone.

Attached: Jonestown-2.jpg (3000x2037, 1.11M)

jesus is the lord

We literally already did this, this is unironically what America is.

fucking dellusional

It’s “stone toss”

“Martian magazine” is solid too

>jesus is the lord
that's a matter for deep personal introspection, not political debate.

>according to lolbergs the solution is corporations and shit
>corporations are the ones most heavily pushing for censorship at the direction of (((executives)))

Based hans. See you in literal heaven someday after you get murdered by achmed and I get murdered by tyrone

In what way, educate me in your ways user.
What's delusional is thinking you're free because you get to choose your slave master every 4 fours.
>Who steals from you in taxes.
>Sends you children to child indoctrination camps for 12 years, where you learn propaganda and how to obey.
>Spies on you 24/7;
>locks you up or kills you for crimes you didnt commit
>Fights foreign wars of aggression and sends your tax money to prop up foreign countries.

There's no need for socialism, the government just needs to step in and break up monopolistic companies. Think of that gay "paradox of tolerance" but with large corporations stifling competition.

Most corporations especially media ones are co-opted by the CIA.
In a free market, media companies would produced content that people would pay for not what the state pays for.

Socialism and Government are two sides of the same coin. Both are bad, and to the detriment of the ordinary natural man and the free market.

>children in indoctrination camps

Don’t know or care what shit tier place you’re from, but homeschool is legal in the US. Your kids will be smarter, your wife won’t turn into a fat liberal bitch who hates sex bitter from suppressing her femininity to concentrate on TPS reports, and your kids won’t slurp up gallons of poz.

>What's delusional is thinking you're free because you get to choose your slave master every 4 fours.
>get to choose
That's the part that makes it free.

Look up the American Frontier and the Gold Rush and realize how retraded you sound - they were basically Anarcho-Capitalism.

We unironically need mo money for dem pogroms.

*anti-Jew
Its not up for debate.

>implying we have the option

Attached: traveling-abroad-1.png (1000x1874, 1.08M)

We think that the power is in our hands
'Cos we're holding the remote control
Pile up the lard and what've you got?
Bitter-sweet nothing at all

>implying the frontier days were bad
Go back to your rental shack Bong

Nice. That's good.
But remind me why did you have a revolution again?
You were actually a republic for very long.

um no retard choosing your master every 4 years doesnt make you free. Try sacking the President or telling the Government you're not paying taxes anymore, you're going to find an alternative service provider.

Yeah I know a fair bit about the US West being opened up.
But that was over 150 years ago.
The US is not that country anymore.

>Its not up for debate.

Agreed.
If you want to believe fine if you dont fine.
I dont care.

Yeah that's cool but the market clearly isn't free and sitting around preaching muh libertarianism isn't going to make it free.

Globalist Capitalism will beat Nationalist Capitalism every time unless the government heavily regulates things. We need to eliminate this " anti statism " and " anti collectivism " mentality holding back whites,

No the market isnt free because of Government inteference.
You need less laws and less regulation, and let people decide with their own money what services and products they want to buy.

Governments lie, kill, steal and enslave.
They are the worst institutions to ever exist.
Of course, people are like this too, but one person on their own being a shit bag isnt going to invade a foreign country and cause a million deaths.

Capitalism requires the acknowledgement of individual rights. Order
Anarchy disregards order.
You're an oxymoron.

Enderby. 4plebs.

>going to Hell is fine
Self-destructive retard.

Jack London was a prowhite socialist.

No you're confused about anarchy because of the left.
Anarcho-capitalist is far right of the spectrum and it's societies respect private property.

Only the far left, anarcho-communists want to abandon private property.

Like I said at most you would have 5 laws
1. no murder,
2. no rape
3. no paedos
4. no stealing, respect private property
5.right to self defence

Name one thing that you actually need a 'Gobermint' for that cant be replaced with nothing or a private cheaper free market version of it.

>Police
private police would work better, because then these fuckers actually do work for YOU. See niggers in the neighbour acting 'shady and shit', call the private police. If they dont turn up, they dont get paid and you choose another service.

Sincere question, is everything on this board satire? Lots of extreme opinions on here.

Also you under anarcho-capitalism you have the right to self defence and private property so, if those niggers take one step on your property, and you've asked them not to, you can launch a TOW missile at them if you want.

What's not to love about anarcho-capitalism?
It's never been tried.

You can't have anarchy and laws you moron.
You can't even have private property.

How do you plan on punishing people for breaking the law? You can't, cause they have the right to defend themselves. Oops you just murdered them for defending themselves. Damn that girl lied about her age and now you're a pedo. Oh shit you also stole her ovaries with your sperm, cause its her body her property. She has the right to defend her body with an abortion.

Dilbert

This doesn't happen in an ordinary, healthy society. Non-retards are capable of determining the difference between a home owner shooting a burglar and a burglar shooting a home owner. If you can't, consider moving to the UK where the police do all the hard thinking for you.

Great but the libertarian solution is some nonsense about just voting them out maaaaaaaaan

Libertarians are just less-smelly hippies

>You can't even have private property.

No that's anarcho-communism.
Did you even read what I wrote?
Anarcho-capitalism is 100% private property and far right of the spectrum.

>How do you plan on punishing people for breaking the law?
Your courts are already 'money houses'.
You just have private courts and private prisons.
But how many actual murderers and paedos do you think they'll be if people can dispatch them themselves?

If anyone is interested in Anarcho-capitalism, Ive been reading the works of economist Rothbard recently. But there really isnt that much to 'get'; it's the closest system to 'natural man' out there and so doesnt need vast laws as such.

>wiki.mises.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard

>Libertarians are just less-smelly hippies

Dont be afraid to take the boot off your neck user.

There is literally nothing stopping you from setting up your own shittier version of the internet.

You can cry all you want about natural monopolies, but facts don't care about your feelings.

I don't mind sharing the world with u goofs until you start trying to shove your paranoid delusion of an ideology down my throat.

>those people imposing their will on everyone is bad
>i know how to fix it, I'll impose my will upon everyone instead
Sure, user. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
You might want to consider though that the people in power think they are correct, just like you think you are correct.

But a good lord who only requires attention, dedication, and will instead of food, gold and a few kidneys.

Makes you wonder if it's the people that are refusing to change, not the institutions.

Attached: snek.jpg (800x1175, 107K)

All right. Let's do it. What do we call it?

Big fat Brazilian Titties

Attached: 153611.png (1348x1243, 296K)

This. Oppression can be quantified based on wealth. A rich female/nigger is not oppressed. The moment you realize this is the moment you realize that Jews aren't oppressed and never were.

One has to really wonder whether the time before Hobbes was really as short, nasty and brutish because there didnt exist a government; more likely it was because they didnt have the modern technology and medicine we have today.

Rock throw

Capitalism is inherently a government-supported hierarchy. You really think in a world without government, someone who wanted to wouldn't just take your property and kill you?

Ultra SS Klan 1488

I've seen this before it's funny as hell.
But in reality the group who lost their bitcoins would come together and pay a security service to track down their bitcoin.

What's so hard to understand about that?

In a world without government, the wealthy guy would hire and pay skilled people to protect his wealth, just like the capitalist he is.

I'd pay for half my bitcoin back if the fucker pays. It's still better to lose half and get revenge than to be out 100%.

We will recognize you.

>You really think in a world without government, someone who wanted to wouldn't just take your property and kill you.

In a world without government but with the right to self defence and private property, I would just shoot them in the head first.
Also even with the extortion you pay the government for protection, what is to stop someone doing that to you today?

>This doesn't happen in an ordinary, healthy society
It does when your system can't punish people.
>Non-retards are capable of determining the difference between a home owner shooting a burglar and a burglar shooting a home owner.
In your dystopian world, no they wouldn't. And in fact, the American justice system can't either due to systematic corruption.

Again. How do you plan on punishing people? How do you punish those in charge of upholding the law?

>In a world without government, the wealthy guy would hire and pay skilled people to protect his wealth, just like the capitalist he is.

Then who would make his food, fix his car, give him heart surgery etc etc.
Natural man would co-operate more with others.
At the moment man co-operates with others through the laws and rules of the Government.

Property requires a social contract.
In capitalism, land cannot be used as capital.

Spin that one around your retarded brain.

>Then who would make his food, fix his car, give him heart surgery etc etc.
>the wealthy guy would hire and pay skilled people to