Have optics cucks squandered the last chance for the Aryan race to throw off the shackles of jewish control?
Have optics cucks squandered the last chance for the Aryan race to throw off the shackles of jewish control?
Ryder Moore
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Zachary Morales
John Torres
Nicholas Thompson
>implying you need a failed modernist ideology to preserve your people from ethnic replacement
Jaxon Morris
No matter what you call it, if you fight ethnic replacement the media and the left will call you a nazi
Cameron Rodriguez
what's your proposed alternative?
Hudson Miller
>modernist
seems anti-modern tbhfam
Levi Martinez
Yes they have
Ryan Morales
I have heard Arab immigrants use the same line of logic.
>People call us thieves anyway so why shouldn't we just rob them?
How is this even a question? Do you believe nobody could resist ethnic replacement before national-socialism came along in the 1930s?
pro hierarchical modernism is against egalitarian modernism. That doesn't make it anti-modernist.
Wyatt Peterson
seems explicitly anti-modernist tbhfam
Matthew Mitchell
it is a question because it is asked in the form of one and ended with a question mark.
And not on the same level that national socialism guaranteed.
Camden Morales
>national socialism guarantees protection against ethnic replacement
u wot m8?
PS. In case you were wondering: even though it was asked in the form of a question and ended with a question mark, an answer is not expected.
This is called a rhetorical question.
Josiah Bell
It's like you haven't ever read Mein kampf, where among jews, communists, and atheists, Hitler constantly rails against the inherent degeneracy of "modernity":
>But what sort of pabulum was it that the German press served up for the consumption of its readers in pre-war days? Was it not the most virulent poison imaginable? Was not pacifism in its worst form inoculated into our people at a time when others were preparing slowly but surely to pounce upon Germany?
>Did not this self-same press of ours instil into the public mind even in peacetime a doubt as to the sovereign rights of the State itself, thereby already handicapping the State in choosing its means of defence?
>Was it not the German press that understood how to make all the nonsensical talk about ‘Western Democracy’ palatable to our people, until an exuberant public was eventually prepared to entrust its future to the League of Nations?
>Was not this press instrumental in bringing about a state of moral degradation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to look ridiculous and classed as out-of-date and banal, until finally our people also became ‘MODERN'?
Let me guess, you're the type of brainlet that can't be bothered to actually study the third reich or know what its ideology was before coming here and whining about "muh failed ideologies". Besides, ideoligies don't fail. That's why demokratia and Res Publia were ressurected after thousands of years of being regarded as "failed ideologies". That's why there will always be communism and absolute monarchies. History is cyclical. Its anacyclosis.
Jason Williams
>Hitler constantly rails against the inherent degeneracy of "modernity
How does this disprove the fact that national socialism is philosophically speaking a modernist ideology?
Do you think socialism has anything to do with being social?
Aiden Martin
The recognition of rascism ALWAYS IMPLIES rascism.
She got called rascist because the leftist rascists saw her skincolor.
Oliver Campbell
>u wot m8?
How is this even a question?
Andrew White
it is a question because it is asked in the form of one and ended with a question mark.
Isaac Lee
>How does this disprove the fact that national socialism is philosophically speaking a modernist ideology?
When was this premise ever established? You don't establish a fact just by making the claim, when did you prove it? I've posted three pieces of evidence so far, all youve done is repeat a baseless charge.
>If we do not drag our youth out of the morass of their present environment they will be engulfed by it. Those people who do not want to see these things are deliberately encouraging them and are guilty of spreading the effects of prostitution to the future, for the future belongs to our younger
generation.
>This process of cleansing our Kultur will have to be applied in practically all spheres. The stage, art, literature, the cinema, the press and advertisement posters, all must have the stains of pollution removed and be used in the service of a national and cultural ideal.
>The life of the people must be freed from the asphyxiating perfume of our MODERN eroticism and also from every unmanly and prudish form of insincerity.
>In all these things, the aim and the method must be determined by thoughtful consideration for the preservation of our national well-being in body and soul. The right to personal freedom comes second in importance to the duty of preserving the race.
-- Hitler, Mein Kampf, stalag edition, pg 283
Asher Gray
>When was this premise ever established?
The moment you failed to prove that "railing against modernity" automatically validates your weltanschauung as anti-modernist.
Being social doesn't make you a socialist.
Owen Young
>Kam'raden, die Rotfront
>Und Reaktion erschossen,
>Marschier'n im Geist
>In unser'n Reihen mit
Why did the reactionaries shoot the national socialists?
Why would they do such a thing to their fellow anti-modernist traditionalists?
Landon Ross
>you failed to prove that railing against modernity makes you anti-modernist
>being social doesn't make you socialist
lol is that the best damage control you could come up with: "being against modernity doesn't make you anti-modern"? Are you just using "modern" as a synonym for "contemporary to the present dispensation", ie, "close to us in chronological time", or do you use the word in sense of "the enlightenment, its philosophical values and assumptive framework"?
Sounds more like the former, since everyone ITT with a brain sees you stuck your foot in your mouth and everything that follows is damage control... =]
>Everything that our MODERN age has contributed to the cultural aspect of our great cities is absolutely deficient. All our towns are living on the glory and the treasures of the past.
-Mein Kampf, stalag, p. 293
Luis Cook
even though it was asked in the form of a question and ended with a question mark, an answer is not expected.
This is called a rhetorical question.
Zachary Jenkins
Words have meaning, yes.
Parker Hernandez
>me on the top right
You can see he’s waiting to pull his gun.
Noah Adams
>Why did the reactionaries shoot the national socialists?
Because they were modernist liberals? 80% of Goebbels pamphlets and speeches pointed this out. Fucking brainlet.
Lucas Nguyen
>Words have meaning
not to you apparently lol
Josiah Ross
>The reactionaries were actually modernists because my modernist ideologue said so
This is getting really bizarre.
Carson Young
Damn the optics am going in
Aaron Sanders
Just get it done already.
Brody Wilson
>giving so much of a fuck about a term instead of the practical value of an ideology
intellectual masturbators are the worst scum known to man
Levi Sullivan
Sebastian Walker
>The reactionaries were actually modernists
Well, they weren't romantics dreaming of a pre-1870 world. What were the two enemies of Natsoc that they endlessly denouced? Communists and "cosmopolitan liberals"; the latter they charged the "reactionaries" of being, that they were handmaidens of the Marxist rot, ie, controlled opposition. This is why you should get off your ass and study the 3rd reich, read what they said about these things. Don't just rely on pulling assumptions out of your ass.
>This is getting really bizarre.
Damage control always gets cringe the longer you keep it going. More quotes from Mein kampf regarding Hitler's estimation of "modernity" and "degeneracy""
>The Aryan, therefore, had to take that road which his sense of reality pointed out to him, and not that of which the modern pacifist dreams.
-Mein Kampf, stalag, pg 329
>We National Socialists must go still further. The right to territory may become a duty when a great nation seems destined to go under unless its territory be extended, and that is particularly true when the nation in question is not a handful of Negroes, but the Germanic mother of all those who have given culture to the modern world.
>Germany will either become a World Power or will not continue to exist, but in order to become a World Power she needs that territorial area which would give her the necessary importance to-day and assure the existence of her citizens.
>Therefore, we National Socialists have purposely broken away from the line of conduct followed by pre-war Germany in foreign policy. We are beginning at the point at which our ancestors left off SIX HUNDRED YEARS AGO.
-- Mein Kampf, stalag, pg. 737
Sounds like he's talking about the pre-Enlightenment era.
Levi Harris
By definition Israel is a national socialist state.
Justin Russell
>What were the two enemies of Natsoc that they endlessly denouced?
Reactionaries and rival modernist ideologies like communism. Like they did in their most famous marching song, the Horst Wessel lied.
For some reason, the old Prussian military aristocracy didn't really like national socialists.
They even went as far as trying to assassinate Hitler with a bomb.
Alexander Edwards
kys cucked larping faggot
Easton Hughes
>this projection
-t. zog bot
Cooper Evans
>Israel is a national socialist state.
by permitting dual citizenship?
Matthew Morris
>optics
More like multi-generational brainwashing delivered via public (((education))).
Landon Turner
The Satanists want you to blame the Jews
Read your Bible
It's how they stay hidden
They are religious double agents
Oliver Williams
>optics is bad
What's the alternative plan? You gunna go shoot up some synagogue?
Michael Nguyen
What the fuck does Optics mean?
Parker Collins
It means to consider how your actions will appear to the people who you're trying to convince to help you.
Dominic Nguyen
Many thanks
Ayden Martinez
Optics are real optics matter. If your gonna wile out, don’t do it right before the midterms ffs
Colton Johnson
>The Satanists want you to blame the Jews
>Read your Bible
The bible calls the Jews the "Synogogue of Satan". Maybe YOU should take your own advice.
Carter Richardson
They were trying to purge the skinheads and get this kinda look but than cucks got a hold of it and used it as a way to stop people from doing anything.
Luis Jackson
>Have optics cucks squandered the last chance for the Aryan race to throw off the shackles of jewish control?
You honestly think it's possible to be politically effective without some measure of PR? You think that a miniscule minority of fascist activists can just start running around committing isolated acts of terror and reasonably expect a real political triumph as a result?
Ian Walker
What did people on the internet stop you from doing?
Parker Allen
He wasn't a Trump supporter so wouldn't of cared.
Christian Gonzalez
Nothing it just killed momentum. They didn't like the public rallies and so they stopped. I think we needed to change some things but to stop all together i thinks a mistake.