What does Jow Forums think about Julius ceaser

Fictional character that never existed

great death.

ET TU BRUTE?

sheeeit

As Paul Cliteur of the University of Leiden stated: "This report is of the same order of importance as the scientific discoveries of Darwin and Galileo."
I would say it is even MORE important than Darwin and Galileo.
The efforts of the scholars to prove the existence of a historical character behind Christianity, a Jewish Jesus, has proven again and again to be a complete and utter failure. How can an empty grave have any meaning when the one who was supposedly put there never existed to begin with?
But now, thanks to Carotta, there IS a historical figure who is actually more commanding and praiseworthy than the pale, insipid Gallilean failure long held up to us as a role model that anyone in their right mind would NEVER follow.
Now we can distance ourselves from the schismatic disputes that have poisoned our civilization and history, now we can KNOW the founder, who he was, what he taught, what he actually did, and even read his own words.
Jesus was, indeed, Caesar: a Roman, not a Jew. Carotta's evidence is compelling and convincing.

Please, do yourself a favor, get and read this book. Don't pay any mind to the naysayers, the "true believers" in the artificially created religion who deny the truth that could set them free. Not only is it liberating to be free of the lies that have been used to terrify humanity for almost two thousand years, it is liberating to know that such a man as Julius Caesar existed: a man who can stand today as a role model for the people, the poor, the downtrodden, and that despite the hatred of the wealthy elite such as Cicero and Cato, his acts were so magnificent and well-known that even they could not cover them up.
Along with this book, you will want to read also Gary Courtney's Et tu, Judas? Then Fall Jesus!, Michael Parenti's The Assassination Of Julius Caesar, and Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah. Only then, will you have the complete picture of the solution of the greatest mystery of Western Civilization.

23 stabbs were not enough

That’s a Shakespeare line not real.

Jew lover

Uh

kαὶ σὺ τέkνον

literally the real jesus christ

i feel like pure shit bros i just want him back

Attached: Caeser.png (545x545, 397K)

You mean CAIVS IVLIVS CAESAR pleb, he's the champion of the people the US needs right now to btfo the oligarchy that is our government and transition us into the true American Empire

Got murdered for being too based, but in the end won when Augustus took over

t. Vercingetorix

Attached: 1530143851000.jpg (677x782, 227K)

Bill didn’t write in Latin

Second greatest general of all time, but even more innovative than Napoleon.

His crisp, to the point style of writing is a refreshing pause for people trying to learn Latin and having to read convoluted sentences which are made just to show off your ability with grammar.

Was one of those guys who could have lead an angry mob to conquer an empire.

One of the greatest general history ever saw.

Alongside with Alexander the Great, Hannibal, Scipio Africanus, Augustus.

Dramatization, he probably said nothing plus the Latin version is for plays only, reportedly he said the Greek phrase

Subhuman committed war crimes against Gaul even Romans were disgusted by his methods, ugly short and balding, didn’t dare to fuck with germanics, epileptic Jew lover, tyrant, gave his own 16 yo daughter away to a 60 yo man for politics, pure materialist, alround subhuman, nowhere near as great as Sulla who he mimicked. Brutus was the good guy.
>”he was the noblest roman of them all” - Shakespeare (true nationalist) on Brutus

Attached: 341CBDEF-4494-4E1B-ADC1-BFF975BA9DE4.jpg (600x422, 38K)

Uh what nigger? There’s no proof of him existing

Laughable. War crimes against a savage people? He was merciful and brought civilization instead of killing them all, which he could have done.
>ugly
Known to be handsome
>didn’t dare to fuck with germanics
Germania was considered to be an effort in vain, a forest swamp full of barbarians who were only good for fertilizing the fields upon which they fell, slain.
>Jew lover
No
>not like Sulla
Not gay and even better general and statesman

Brutus struck like a coward faggot along his treasonous posse. Of course the perfidious, dishonorable Anglo would support him. Ironically you have the most tyrannical form of democracy today

You mean "he who got the other whites to get off their asses?

The historical records tell that his death was a lot more based than a lot of dramatizations.
He was a military general so he was able to put up a good fight against basedboy senators. He grabbed the arm of the first assailant while he swung his dagger which made him cry out for help. Then they all piled on him.
He was able to struggle and push his way through the sixty senators but blood impaired his vision causing him to slip in the blood on the floor.
When he saw that Brutus was among the assassins, disgusted he simply covered his face with his toga.

He killed his own Gaul ally’s after giving them permission to cross through roman territory, he ignored senate orders to attack Gaul village, he launched offensive wars against roman tradition and killed allies.

Certainly not handsome, he insecure of his balding head and wore his lead crown at all times to hide it.

Yes, he settled jews around the empire and gave them special rights and supported synagogues, rebuilt walls in Jerusalem and even removed Jews from being taxed.

Brutus actually had the courage and commitment to strike, rather than just sit back like a cuck and watch Rome be destroyed, if only we had more people in the world today like that.

Attached: 88963BA6-5DB4-4EF1-BAFA-DC7A7DAF8272.jpg (900x506, 53K)

>gave his own 16 yo daughter away to a 60 yo man for politics
That's how the world worked back then user
The Greeks didin't give their women rights
The Egyptians had nobility that did insist
Even the romans were Barairac before they concurred Greece

I'm not trying to imply that he was justified in doing that, but rather it was just part and parcel for the time. We can condem his actions till the end of time for all I care, but just remeber that this guy was the legit chad.

nigger you're high as fuck aren't you

Depiction of Gaul at this time as a few mudhuts around a gangbang is not entirely accurate. Recent excavations from BEFORE Romanisation revealed advanced buildings with tiled roofs and heating.

The only thing was the Celts didn't have a written language, and so what couldn't be contained within their oral folk tradition was written in Greek.

He wasn’t chad at all, he was a beta with power fantasies and population desperate enough to exploit to fulfill them. He married 2 single mothers and adopted augustus, his only real daughter who he gave away died in child birth and the alliance collapsed anyway so he got her killed for nothing.

expanded the empire, saved it from ruin, instuted his self as supreme leader, paving the way for the Roman golden age and literally became a god, and is still remembered today as one of the greatest generals that ever lived, I wonder if people will remember you in 2000 years, get the fuck out of here you faggot.

he was a racist for not letting the poor Helveti refugees settling in Roman territory

>didn’t dare to fuck with germanics
he fucked Germanics at the Vosges doe

> literal who calling one of the most powerful, legendary, and influential humans to ever exist a beta

The internet is incredible.

Empire didn’t exist until augustus, He was a tyrant, but he didn’t save it from ruin, he ruined it himself by destroying all roman tradition, Roman Empire marked the beginning decline, a few good emperors here and there, didn’t accomplish a fraction of the Greeks, he was a good general, doesn’t make him a good person or leader.
People won’t remember me, but people do remember Brutus who finished that faggot Jew lover off.
Only after they crossed the Rhine trying to take territory, he wouldn’t dare move in their territory

Lots of powerful people are betas and cucks, that’s why they feel the need to grab power so much, to prove something.

Impotent cucks of course resort to the lowest ways of dealing with what they hate with their flickerin little embers of a soul. He was a great man pulled down by the weight of decadence around him.

Except he was a product of that decadence, that’s why he disregarded all roman traditions and lusted for power

He sought order in the chaos caused by the senate’s apathetic inaction and incompetence. Augustus saw to that and also brought justice upon the enemies of Rome.

a genocidal egomaniac.

>Roman Empire marked the beginning decline, a few good emperors here and there, didn’t accomplish a fraction of the Greeks, he was a good general, doesn’t make him a good person or leader.

I dont absolutely agree, but i can understand what you mean.
For my part, i deeply prefer the 3rd century BC, the Punic wars.
Rome was still small at that time, there was still the roman tradition, and the struggle was real, 2nd punic war was the last time the romans really fought for their women, their children, their homeland.
After 2nd Punic Wars, they turned to Greece, Asia Minor, Iberia, which caused the massive influx in Rome of slaves, wealth, loots.

Still, to me, the real moral decline of Rome was during the 2nd century CE, with the « Five good emperors »
During that time, the empire was really safe, the people wealthier than ever, and the decadency really was during that century, and not during the 3rd century crisis, or the 4th century.

2nd century, described by all as the Golden Century of Rome, really was the century of the moral decline

Killed the largest empire of all time
Did it cuz ego
Had no respect for the greater goal of rome
Rome was on its way to greatness

Gaius Julius Cæser was way too soft on his enemies.
I prefer my ancesor Marcus Antonius although I like Gaius Julius's populism.

Attached: 1540545449710.jpg (400x388, 19K)

Second best only to his great nephew Augustus.
Augustus is easily the greatest politician of all time, who found a way to hold onto absolute power where his uncle did not

He died before Rome became an "Empire", while it still had colonies it was very much still considered a Republic, it was only after his assassination and the formation of the triumvirate with Octavian (Augustus), Marc Anthony and Lepidus and subsequent reunification wars under Octavian that it became an Empire.

Learn history.

Sulla did nothing wrong.

The Roman kingdom and republic it was based, when it became an empire it was all downhill.

Still rules the world vicariously.

Death to Rome.

>Still rules the world vicariously.
you crazy?
Rome was organized, Romans built monuments they created cities, art and infrastructure.
They built the world, no empire today even come close.
The EU is destroying everything that Romans once built, Islamists is tearing down monuments in the middle east because it scares muslims.

USA is a contender because of growth, thank god for Trump tho.

He messed up by not getting rid of the senate.
Other than that he did nothing wrong

pagan faggot

Thing is ceaser didn’t care about roman traditions in the first place, only about taking power for itself, once the traditions become obsolete then your going to get decline

Handsome guy

Attached: AVE.jpg (800x450, 26K)

i know its bait but just what

Attached: thisiaintit.jpg (640x646, 45K)

Tried to patch a failing system and was killed for it. They didn't have the theology figured out for a long term civilization.