Are there any good non-racist arguments against multiculturalism...

yes there are, the smaller a system is, generally the larger its entropy. What this means is that a small group provides all of the same advantages that a large multicultural group does. Multiculturalism is mediocrity.

Keeping cultures separate is what gives real diversity to the world. Blending everything together into one monolithic global culture only ensures that everyone and everything will be the same. No exciting trip to Japan to experience their unique culture, since it will be the same as back home. No romantic holiday to an exotic locale will ever be nearly as interesting or fun because you will have seen the same people doing the same things your entire life. In short, our current path leads not to diversity, but to boring stagnation and conformity.

Attached: 1532096818339.jpg (500x636, 74K)

niggers

As far as I'm concerned, multiculturalism is a positive claim, meaning the burden of proof is on whomever wants that shit. Yes, historically America has been home to multiple cultures. However, they assimilated to AMERICAN culture and didn't upset the demographics. We aren't seeing that nowadays

Yes. Our forefathers didn’t create this country so the fake news media could demonize us.

White hate is the non racist argument.

Attached: C9DA9A81-E015-43E3-B77D-394BCAF36B1E.jpg (738x606, 82K)

social cohesion.

sprawl and population churn.

Israel's reasoning for existing for the sake of preserving its peoples Jewish "essence" is hard to argue. There is a reason Jews and non-Jewish Zionist fight so hard for Israel to remain the Jewish state of Israel and that includes building walls, funding the military, and keeping multiculturalism as far away as possible.

Attached: 5163175455592.png (1252x560, 154K)

You're a cuck and you should be ashamed, but sure, here's what you say:

>"I feel that diversity is important, and forcing every culture to live together destroys that diversity"
>"Making everybody live together forces EVERYONE into the same monoculture, defeating the purpose of multiculturalism entirely"
>"I LOVE other cultures, but for the sake of preserving diversity, cultural enrichment should take place from accross a border, through trade and tourism"

I'm a racist, but this is still unironically what I believe (just to be clear that I'm not telling you to say something that I wouldn't)

Attached: 1541025911821.webm (480x360, 835K)

Not if you count ever objection to it as racism. Try this one: The poor members of many communities never wanted to be integrated with so many new citizens/slave laborers. But they don't get a say because "Fuck You, You Poor Racist!" (Read, worker who likes thing the way they are and likes decent wages.) In most cases it is only the rich members of society who get to decide who gets to live where. They love importing desperate foreigners to work more cheaply than the locals who have enough saved wealth to not tolerate atrocious behavior by their bosses. Foreigners without citizenship can not complain without being fired and or deported. Bosses hate workers with enough wealth to stand their ground.

>1 post by this ID
> word "racism" used unironically
وپ یس آ فاگوت

This is what infinite diversity in infinite combinations means.

Well I'll put it this way. Are there any good argument FOR multiculturalism? Besides REEEEEEEEE bigot!!

Attached: tell ya what.jpg (288x500, 55K)

Culture is when everyone shares common values and beliefs. This makes a country and its people stronger.

Multiculturalism is what happens when parasites who don't share or even respect the culture want to leech. Illegals don't care about America - they just want to benefit from the welfare state. That's not just direct welfare - free gibs - but also indirect welfare in the form of the police + army protecting them.

But these economic parasites never contribute back. Hispanics are a 30% net drain on the economy. Blacks are a 120% net drain. All that loss is paid for by hard-working whites. It is unsustainable.

Even worse, the actual reason isn't because of altruism, it's because capitalists want a cheaper labour force. You don't want to pick cotton for $1 per day? They import African slaves. You don't want to clean toilets for $8 per day? They import Mexicans. This depresses *your* income, even if your job has nothing to do with cleaning toilets.

So the rich capitalists make a short-term profit, at the cost of the long-term future of the country. In the meantime enjoy your higher crime rates and eroded values - divorce, crime, rape, murder, all increasing, all due to immigrants - and with the occasional bomb-chucking Muslim thrown in for good measure. Shoot up a teenager concert, or rape 1000s of young girls, and it's just part and parcel of multiculturalism.

If 1 million Europeans were to move to Iran, that'd cause a huge uproar in Iran.
It's "racist"
It's "xenophobic"
It's also perfectly natural human behavior.

i'm going to kill my ni**** neig****, peace.

Multiculturalism is just crypto-segregationism. Why do you discourage immigrants from assimilating to the local culture? To keep them segregated. Why do you encourage immigrants to speak in their native language? To keep them segregated. Why do you create ethnic-only business associations and clubs? To keep them segregated. Why do you encourage to move to ethnic neighborhoods? To keep them segregated.

Culture is a melting pot by nature. That's just how people behave. It's why American-Chinese food is nothing like other American cuisines and also nothing like traditional Chinese food. The salad bowl is just a way to keep people segregated forever.

Diversity requires segregation.
This goes against the interest of a cohesive and strong society.

It objectively reduces social cohesion, which reduces civil trust and creates an every man for himself attitude in society. It is natural among man for him to trust those akin to himself over those different.

>Are there any good non-racist arguments against multiculturalism?
Even the inventors of democracy knew it could not be maintained in a multicultural environment.

Attached: aristotle democracy philia.png (500x531, 131K)

Well since any argument provided to you faggots is automatically racist in your eyes no. There is not. Fuck you and die in the civil war, you've left no other option.

here's a tip buddy, when Jow Forums talks about "multiculturalism" they actually mean multiracialism

It is not soil or name or magic that makes a country succeed. It is culture alone. Great culture produces great nations. Terrible culture produces terrible nations. When terrible nations persist in being terrible, their citizens, burdened with their terrible culture, want to go to great countries, countries with great culture. They then bring their terrible culture with them. Some will assimilate in small enough quantities. In large enough quantities, they import their terrible culture with them and destroy the great nation.

It is not magic that makes one country successful. It is culture. Multiculturalism necessarily means importing inferior culture. People never leave great culture to living in terrible culture.

Filth seeps up. Greatness does not trickle down.

Greatness should be jealously guarded.

Are there any non racist arguments FOR multiculturalism??

Attached: left-exit-12-the-final-frontier-of-space-babysitting-people-30454984.png (500x547, 135K)

>I feel I have to compete against poor immigrants and it just makes my life worst.

well that's already a good argument there. i mean if you're ever caught in a conversation about multiculturalism with some idiot media-worshiping liberal, you just need to say
>i don't have a problem with the prospect of multiculturalism, it's just that the definition has been warped by moneyed interests in an insidious manner that only benefits the 1% by exploiting cheap labor and artificially keeping wages low. that's detrimental to the working class, both natives and immigrants, and the quality of life decreases for everyone in the country save for the wealthy elites. multiculturalism is a natural process, but it was turned into a commercial product by corporations who in essence just want a subservient slave caste
i mean even if you genuinely hate nonwhites and multiculturalism that's still the argument you should use. no point in being "honest" when it comes to politics.

Bolshevism is the declaration of war by Jewish-led international subhumans against culture itself. It is not only anti-bourgeois, it is anti-cultural. It means, in the final consequence, the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by western civilization for the benefit of a rootless and nomadic international clique of conspirators, who have found their representation in Jewry.

It's not racist to point out inferior points of other cultures. Aristocracy was a good thing, so were high standards, which we have largely abandoned to make the playing field "level" for everyone, aka, make everyone considerably shittier at everything.

Try driving a car with 4 different sized wheels and using a mix of water, gas, tar, paint and beer as fuel.

Illegal immigration violates the law of a nation and God says you must follow a law or else you're sinning. Therefore if you're christian and support illegal immigration you are sinning. Follow the law of the land or else you're sinning. Tell that to your illegal immigrant competition.

Do you think anything good comes from cultures that never invented the wheel or discovered how to make fire? Do you think anything good comes from cultures where they cut your head off for memes? Do you think anything good comes from cultures that value trickery and deceit over hard work and honesty?

Think about it.

Attached: 1479732049704.jpg (562x592, 73K)

Pic related OP. Neoliberals are segregationists and corporatists. They put the corporate body and it's labor costs over that of citizens. Rhetorically they speak out against that which they create: an expanded second and third class of citizens, some without natural civic rights. Then they call you racist and sip their $6.50 sugar beverage under fluorescent lighting.

It doesn't matter if you spend every weekend in a soup kitchen volunteering your time. They would never see this because they themselves would never do such a thing. The right way forward is to immediately halt immigration until the homeless problem is solved. However you want to debate that solution is fine, but adding more people to the labor pool under the minimum wage for private employers to benefit from is no longer acceptable.

Attached: neoliberalism.jpg (2048x1366, 768K)

I wish i could own guns

multiculturalism is for commiefornian lib scum who are too scared to leave their SF gated communities to travel so they want all the culture brought to them

There's the Putnam study that liberals love to ignore:
ft.com/content/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340

There is no benefit to multiculturalism. Culture informs nearly every aspect of a society, including their values. Diving a nation's population along such fundamental lines is retarded

There is already a very multicultural place in existance, it's called Earth.
There is no need to turn every nation, state or city into a mirror image of multicultural Earth, or you risk turning Earth into an homogeneous mess.