This is the only man any STRONG and INDEPENDENT woman needs

This is the only man any STRONG and INDEPENDENT woman needs

Attached: 1508816781741.jpg (1440x2299, 1.19M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=HLAJq8TkL70
straight.fleshbot.com/5639733/the-chelsea-handler-sex-scene-we-seem-to-have-forgotten/
youtu.be/5KK6GjhMu3k
feministcurrent.com/2017/04/27/sex-robots-epitomize-patriarchy-offer-men-solution-threat-female-independence/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Notice how the incels become angry at the thought of women's sexual liberation and freedom to make their own decisions the second one of them decides to use their liberation to do nothing at all. Patriarchal pathology only allows the idea of women's sexual liberation so long as it serves the fantasy of allowing a man to have lots of sexual partners and so on. The anger exemplified when a woman decides to reject the otherness of this asterisk sexual liberation, clearly shows the patriarchal selfishness.

anheros after wine aunt fase pases

she fucks that dog.

She's fucking that dog, I guarantee it.

i like it when women take the knot

Most def.
What a filthy whore.

Shoo shoo white trash.

no shit sherlock.

And that is actually a good thing. Better if she records it.

youtube.com/watch?v=HLAJq8TkL70

i hate white women

Can you die?

Why do white women fuck dogs? I'm a white woman and I want to fuck a dog asap. At least I've got my bad dragon.

It's not a pit. Weird

I bet doggo has bigger dick than u :)))

Attached: 1540242263596.gif (352x240, 2.66M)

I don't remember this Marvel movie. Stan Lee's cameos are getting better every time.

Clearly german.

The same reason you fuck other animals.
Eg. Niggers

The dog looks uncomfortable.

White. Trash

gobbledygook

But I don't like niggers, that's why im on Jow Forums.

It's okay to be white.

Maybe some people just think she sucks

t. american public school

thats not how this place works

Any man who lives in a civilised society should reject women's sexual liberation because the whole fucking point of civilisation is to utterly curbstomp women's natural hypergamy so men don't have to waste all their fucking free time competing for women's attention and listening to their bullshit.

There's nothing wrong with incels hating a society that allows women to be whores if they are in any way productive because societies need to be maintained and if your taxes go to a system that not only allows and encourages but finances women to slut around you're just being a cuck.

The same motivation exists for black people and dogs. It's the same fetish. I'm not trying to insult blacks. This just proves how hypocritical Jow Forums is with some of the shitposts in this thread. You're not from Jow Forums. Piss off white trash.

Most woman don't if they have a fantasy choice. Woman need to be capable and gotta choose and love their man. They forget they can be the supporting force that can help take them themself further than if they were single. Its how were supposed to be. As woman and man.

white women only fuck 2 things.

dogs and niggers.

but sometimes both.

I've been on Jow Forums since /news/ you newfag.

Just dogs you cretin.

>the whole fucking point of civilisation is to utterly curbstomp women's natural hypergamy so men don't have to waste all their fucking free time competing for women's attention and listening to their bullshit.
This is not true and has never been true in any post enlightenment civilization and debate-ably never been true in any pre-enlightenment civilization

Incels hate because they recognize the sexual liberation of our society, but do not have any ways of achieving any of these things that our society has to offer. They have this idea that sexual relations is whats preventing them from achieving their own self realization, and things that prevent their own sexual fantasies incur their wrath as is it not just a choice being made by women with relative sexual liberation, it is an attack on their own personal identity.

Because you also completely missed my point in the first post im going to have to type it out again.
Notice how this woman receives vile hatred when she rejects the idea of a patriarchal sexual liberation of women. Men accepting women's sexual liberation is not really accepting of liberation at all. There is a catch to it. Women can only be sexual liberated if they then satisfy the sexual fantasies of men. You are free to have sex with whoever you want and without societal judgement, but only if you then use your freedom to satisfy my own fantasies, not yours. Look how much anger this post has attracted, not because the woman is being some kind of filthy slut or whatever, but because she has embraced the idea of sexual liberation, and done nothing with it. She chooses to do nothing to satisfy men's fantasies with her own choice. She chooses to be alone. And by rejecting this Otherness of patriarchal women's sexual liberation, look at the responses she is met with. Dog fucker, whore, race traitor, and so on. It is pure pathological ideological rejection that attacks the identity of the incel.

The world is better off when people like this don't breed anyway.
Natural Selection baby.

based and undeniably redpilled

This is very based and redpilled. "sexually liberated" women just cause society to decay back into cave manish and tribal ways. Just look at other primitive cultures where women are sexually liberated. I saw a documentary made by some hipsters and its all about some primitive tribal people where women have sex with as many men as they want, and there all the "dads" of the child born. So they all willingly are cucking each other. Of course this is why they are a primitive tribal and starving culture. The documentary was basically trying to say that we are polygamist by nature, its good for us and shit. Actually my take on it is that cultures that sexually liberate women are shitty and primitive. Family structure sucks. The women/mothers are just whores. Kids are probably molested on a regular basis as the "dads" probably really don't give a fuck, they just go bang another woman. Women are hardwired to cuck men. And men who want a better society, and family will not tolerate this shit, wether or not its "natural". Its only natural for women to cuck, because that's how they get resources and their kids and themselves cared for when the dad is killed while hunting or fighting as this happened a lot, naturally.

My friend's uncle dated this jew cunt, no idea how

Also this:

straight.fleshbot.com/5639733/the-chelsea-handler-sex-scene-we-seem-to-have-forgotten/

Whore.

>primitive
>human nature
>blind assumptions
mein gott how disgusting

People are pissed women are being 'sexually liberated' in civilised, 1st world countries the same reason they are pissed at all free loading in general. They aren't even so much pissed at the women specifically, they are pissed the cards are stacked against them and constantly told how good they have it. Everyone knows the reason women can even choose to 'be alone' is because men have spent hundreds of years building and maintaining a society where that is possible.

If society were to crumble all 'single women' would evaporate into nothingness. Ironically, most 'liberated' women utterly despise NEETS because they provide next to no value to them and don't understand how hypocritical their thinking is when they are pretty much two sides of the same coin.

What breed is that? It's very cute

2 years until suicide.

Silly Canada, no need to hide your face in this thread :)

Wanting to fuck dogs is hardly sexual liberation, son. Just another fetish to be beholden to.

Ashkenazi

Found the roastie.

Never know if these types of comments are from real brainless twats or are from subversive forces wanting to destroy our society.

See you seem to think that these Women owe something to society or by extension, (You).

You are proving my point. You are lashing out at the idea of a rejection of the object petit a of being freeloaders and embodyment of nothingness because they do not belong in the predominate patriarchal pathological ideology.


the point is that you're only calling her a dog fucker because she chooses to not have a partner in a supposed sexually free society.

Because roasties read Lacan, right?

You are free to make a counter argument that does not spiral off into conspiracy theory at the mere thought of something outside of your comfort zone

>sexual liberation
Make me pity these degenerate

You already express enough pity as is. Its just directed at yourself.

Knotlets btfo

You are a full of shit word salad artist who talks in meaningless abstractions.
There is no way one can have a reasonable discussion with someone who thinks like you do because your abstract ideology is you. It is a deep rooted quasi-religious part of you that cannot be altered without destroying a part of you.

>mutt brain

>thats not how this place works
You don't know how this place works either. Neither do I. Or anyone.

Just watch what happens when men talk about their sexdolls. Women go completely mental and make incels seems like reasonable people in comparison.

The enlightenment was gay af. Bring back feudalism.

Did that dog just assume Chelsea's gender?

Ok let’s see that fucker open a jar then.

this

She's the one who's gonna die childless, miserable and alone, and that's only because she chose to be a "liberated" dog fucker instead of a normal human being. Muh "patriarchal selfishness" has nothing to do with that at all, it's just common sense to despise someone so self-destructive.

Where's the problem ? Sometime you need no one in your life for a while because you aren't ready and it doesn't make you sad

It was only a matter of time until these dog moms are fucking those dogs.

Zizek is retarded and outdated, you will never get anywhere by imitating him like a stupid ape.

I bet you want to compare

How is it my fault that you lack the capacity to discuss complexities?
Nothing I am saying is a meaningless abstraction.

Not really. This place is really quite simple. Almost entirely shallow even. You can predict what people are going to respond with 3 posts in advance as long as you understand that this place is just an echo chamber for reactionary fringe ideology

I believe the opposite is true. They just think sex dolls are creepy but the idea of masturbatory aids are not something women are opposed to. In fact a good deal of them think that it is a good thing because it might satisfy some urges that lead to violent lashings out or sexual assault.

But your anger and resentment towards her for making the choice to just have a dog instead of getting married or whatever shows your pathological patriarchal selfishness. You only entertain the idea of sexual liberation as long as it satisfies your fantasies.

Anybody that chooses not to give in to the Otherness of patriarchal sexual liberation you cry out that they will be miserable and die alone and is a dog fucker because a rejection of the Otherness you see as a personal rejection of yourself

I know a girl who used to intern for her old show on E! She said that she was an absolute nightmare to deal with and was a raging cokehead. At one point she tried to pressure one of the PAs to mule in a bulk amount of coke for her across the Mexican border. At the end of the day, she's an untalented, raging coke whore, that is only where she is because she's fucked her way up the ladder. The video package she would send to bookers and festivals was her getting fucked, sandwiched between 5 minutes of unbearable hack material and she was literally fucking the head of the E! Network when she conveniently got her own show.

What women go mental? I would think man-hater style feminists would encourage sex doll manufacturing. More dignity for women, and less of a reason to interact with men.

I don't think you have actually experienced women being mad that you want a sex doll. Would you like to think that they would be mad?

Attached: whitegirlsfuckdogs1.jpg (900x1200, 239K)

I wonder if she lets the dog pee on her.
youtu.be/5KK6GjhMu3k

jej, of course Chelsea handler is a dog fucker.

dog porn anyone?

feministcurrent.com/2017/04/27/sex-robots-epitomize-patriarchy-offer-men-solution-threat-female-independence/

Here you go; batshit psychotic women with retarded double standards, coming right up!

What is that sign supposed to mean?

So in your mind there are only 3 choices available for women:
>be a whore
>be a dog fucker
>be a slave of the patriarchy
And all of them show our "pathological patriarchal selfishness".

...Yeah, sorry dude but you're a retarded cuck.

The dog looks traumatized, someone report her to the proper authorities.

Apparently dog fucker here is descended from literal german Nazis on her Dad's side.

And her mother is Jewish. She was raised jewish.

Attached: chelseahandler2.png (1365x645, 398K)

Why the fuck did you get on this board?
To belittle others with your “theory of incel as a pathology”?
To impress others with your “Look at me, I’m a feminist intellectual” bullshit?
To satisfy your daily need for dopamine hits because you didn’t get enough likes in your twitter account today?
Whatever your motives, they are disingenous in that they are selfish. You are here for you. You are not here for a greater understanding.
>otherness of patriarchal pathological ideological enlightenment pre and post.
God, just fuck me.

That white females have sex with their pet dogs.

Although Handler is (((white))).

Attached: whitegirlsfuckdogs2.jpg (768x1024, 70K)

You are crazy

I poop and fart my pants

I'm talking about that hand and the guy you silly shit.

It’s fine if you don’t want to help rescue it, Pierre. Go be a coward elsewhere.

Thats not what im saying in the slightest. Thats what YOU are saying.

You are saying they must be part of your patriarchal fantasy, because the second she stepped out of it, you are all calling her a whore and dog fucker and whatever. That is YOU. I am not saying these things.

I believe in sexual liberation in a way that is actually liberation and not hidden asterisks and caveats.

Because I want to be on this board. I cant fucking leave. I've been glued to this shitty website since 2011

Just consult a psy, you really need it it's a normal behaviour for a dog to make that face when you take it with your hand and it doesn't mean it is hurt

Goddamn France, I’m fucking joking. I think she’s annoying cunt but I don’t think she fucks her dig. JESUS, CAN Jow Forums NOT TAKE EVERYTHING SO SERIOUSLY?

*dog

Sexual liberation just means going back to pre civilization times where Chadgrug got all the cunts while everyone else tried to scavenge what's left.

You're literally parading in favour of a literal hyper masculine patriarchycal society but you think it's liberating because you're spending your prime years getting wasted, taking drugs and getting fucked with men that only want you so they can get their weekly dick wetting session, dumb whore.

Just look at how many seething eliott rodgers there is right now, there must be one or two of them being dead serious

Eurasier
>the fucking hapas of dogs

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 282K)

I would hope not, but you’re probably right

What do you call a woman who fucks dozens or hundreds of men without ever having an actual relationship? What do you call a woman who prefers the company (often sexual) of a dog instead of that of a man? All "liberation" means is just degeneracy with the expectation of not being treated as a degenerate.

>Sexual liberation just means going back to pre civilization times
Its not.
I dont understand why you think this

>YOU
>projecting this hard
jesus you sound like a woman
please get off this board, fuck a dog and make an Instagram post about it like other sexually liberated women
what the fuck does sexual liberation even mean, that they're free to fuck whomever without the consequences? Because that seems a whole lot like men just have suck it up that women are sluts who just love to go around fucking anyone

Just be sure beastiality is OK in your state girls!

I agree. Pre-civilization had a tendency for a monogamous lifestyle due to the simple fact that if your tribe-leader had 10 girls, and you had to share 1 girl with 10 guys, things are going to end up quite heated very fast.
What women want with sexual liberation is fuck around and not have any social consequences tied to it, which is how only children think.

>What do you call a woman who fucks dozens or hundreds of men without ever having an actual relationship?
A women that wants a lot of sex but not a relationship

>What do you call a woman who prefers the company of a dog instead of that of a man?
A woman that doesnt want a sexual relation

>What do you call a woman who prefers the sexual company of a dog instead of that of a man?
a furfag


>All "liberation" means is just degeneracy with the expectation of not being treated as a degenerate.
It depends what you classify as degeneracy. In this case even the idea of a woman not having a relation with a man is seen a degenerate.

Sexual liberation means rapid spread of STDs, and other disease that need not be spread. People grow old and feel genuinely unfulfilled if they do not find a life partner. Someone to love. The picture is a picture and you are trying to dissect a meme. The problem is you could have summed up all of your word salad phrases with "it's sexist." and it would have been fine. Please sort yourself m8

>SLIDE THREAD
Assange in danger lads.

Attached: based wizard.jpg (1000x635, 86K)

>"The feminist is immunized against all dangers:
one may call her a bitch, cunt, feminazi, maniac, it all runs of her like water off a raincoat. But call her a whore and you will be astonished at how she recoils, how injured she is, how she suddenly shrinks back: 'I've been found out."

GTFO Furfag

Attached: 110px-Furfagmeme20110724-22047-16wy1rl.jpg (600x584, 45K)

fpwp

>what the fuck does sexual liberation even mean, that they're free to fuck whomever without the consequences?
Free to fuck, free to not fuck, free to make their own decisions.

>Because that seems a whole lot like men just have suck it up that women are sluts who just love to go around fucking anyone
Yes. This is where we get incels. They fail to recognize that they are owed nothing by sexual liberation and that true sexual liberation does not exist to satisfy their fantasies.

>sexual liberation and freedom
here is a gif of a kike pissing all over Chelsea Handler's liberated and free face

Attached: 807345.jpg (224x189, 5K)