If Only You Knew

tl;dr: I have a list of red pills at the end of this dump (wait for it and scroll down) in which I'll link to the post in which each red pill is introduced.

>----------

I dumped a series of posts and pictures on Monday, October 29th, based on a weekend's worth of research on my part. The original thread can be viewed here for those interested: >At the time I typed up everything in about an hour and a half in a notepad document prior to dumping, then found a series of pictures on Google that seemed vaguely related to each post. I've now gone through and made some improvements to the original series of posts:

>I've separated historic fact from conspiracy theory and labeled theory posts very clearly
>I've eliminated bait photos since they derailed the thread when faggots didn't know how to read
>I've provided more links and sources
>I've amended a few sentences that were found to contain misleading or false information
>I've expanded upon a few sections
>Removed the original "tl;dr" post in favor of the summary post(s) at the end
>Expanded many posts to 1800-2000 characters instead of keeping them below 1500 characters

The purpose of this dump is not to provide one single red pill. It's not to try and blow your minds or introduce some new way of looking at the world. The world is pretty fucking simple and if you haven't figured it out yet, no single post will change that. The purpose of this dump is to provide a narrative about the research I performed, and hopefully teach you some things you didn't know about our history.

This is just as much for entertainment as it is enlightenment, so please enjoy the read.

Each of the following posts will be labeled "BACKSTORY", "HISTORICAL FACT", or "CONSPIRACY". If you're only interested in the facts or the conspiracy theories, feel free to disregard other posts.

Attached: 1.jpg (259x195, 15K)

Other urls found in this thread:

healthline.com/health/adhd/history
sites.google.com/site/psych54000/early-dsm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spicer_(surname)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphetamine#History,_society,_and_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazăr_Edeleanu
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novartis#Sandoz
youtube.com/watch?v=_3Lizrgbb9s
whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/hist04z1-fy2019.xlsx
treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm
forbes.com/sites/mikecollins/2015/07/14/the-big-bank-bailout/
scribd.com/doc/60553686/GAO-Fed-Investigation#outer_page_144
nationalpriorities.org/budget-basics/federal-budget-101/spending/
acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/A-Brief-Guide-to-the-Federal-Budget-and-Appropriations-Process.aspx
ufile.io/zzo77
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_government_in_the_United_States
greatdreams.com/political/1930-bankruptcy.htm
usa-the-republic.com/emergency powers/United States Bankrupt.html
archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/roosevelt.html
presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-documents-archive-guidebook/executive-orders-jq-adams-1826-trump-2018
macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_views_and_involvement_in_US_politics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Training_and_Service_Act_of_1940
history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-imposes-the-draft
presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-9279-providing-for-the-most-effective-mobilization-and-utilization-the
blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/08/05/political-beliefs-genetic/
bankrate.com/rates/interest-rates/prime-rate.aspx
treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield
youtube.com/watch?v=OE7JSd7bv_Q
unqualified-reservations.org/2009/01/gentle-introduction-to-unqualified/
imgur.com/a/WUzxsjO
haaretz.com/jewish/jewish-american-psychiatrist-robert-spitzer-dies-1.5382438
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

BACKSTORY

I will begin with last Thursday, October 25th. Not a lot happened on this day, save for a conversation with my wife and a small amount of Googling on my part, but I wish to record these events in chronological order to avoid the tangent in later posts.

My wife and I were discussing how ADHD is a bullshit diagnosis and we don't think it's a real disease. It only started getting diagnosed recently, yet somehow almost one third of children are suspected of having this disease. Symptoms of the disease are child-like wonder, child-like excitement, child-like enthusiasm, and child-like interest in various activities. Basically the disease is defined as "being a child". Furthermore, the disease is treated with some hardcore drugs -- effectively methamphetimine. But what really pisses off both my wife and I is that these drugs don't "treat" anything. They just suppress symptoms. Once a person receives an ADHD diagnosis, they're on pills for the rest of their life. If you have to stay on pills for the rest of your life, the doctor didn't cure anything - they just drugged you up so they didn't have to worry about you anymore. And these drugs seriously fuck with your mind. ADHD meds turn children into mindless zombies with no free thought.

Jow Forums taught me well, though. I know that we live in a gynocentric world. I know that LGBT is just a fresh can of paint on top of mental illness. I know that the Holocaust was groslsy exaggerated and a well-functioning military wouldn't senselessly murder free labor. I know that black people are more violent and less rational. I know that homosexuals recruit children, spread disease, and live more dangerous lives (doing drugs and having hundreds of sex partners). I know that a few ocmpanies own all mass media and that pornography rots the brain. I know taht global warming is a hoax. Most importantly: I know that when things smell fishy, see if jews are involved.

Attached: 2.jpg (400x520, 68K)

HISTORICAL FACT

A little bit of Google searching led me to discover that ADHD was actually ridiculed as "not a real disease" until 1968, even though a single "doctor" (who did volunteer work at a homeless shelter for children) claimed to have discovered it as early as 1902

healthline.com/health/adhd/history

The original DSM was written by George N. Raines - a military veteran who has dealt with psychological issues during the World Wars. After writing the DSM he sent it to the American Psychological Association for review, and 93% of people agreed with it:

A hallmark of the DSM was the word "reaction". Raines originally believed that human behavior was governed by biology and chemistry. However, after a lifetime of study, he concluded this was INCORRECT and that human behavior was a response to circumstance. In other words: anyone would be depressed if put into the same situations as a depressed person. Anyone would be suicidal if put into the same situations as a suicidal person.

Later, a special committee was established to "improve" the DSM. The new manual was not reviewed by the APA, but was instead published by a small group. The new version, the DSM-II, had many differences:

>The word "reaction" was dropped. It was proposed that all conditions could be cured through medication
>Several adolescent and childhood "disorders" were recognized for the first time
>A new section was added on sexual deviance calling out homosexuality, fetishism, pedophilia, transvestism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, sadism, and masochism as extensions of human sexuality
>Hyperkinetic Reaction (the original name for ADD) was first recognized

The primary author for this new version? Robert Spitzer.

sites.google.com/site/psych54000/early-dsm

Though he reported to be athiest, the surname is of Jewish origin with many modern-day Spitzers working as Jesuit priests.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spicer_(surname)

Attached: 3.jpg (700x1001, 103K)

HISTORICAL FACT

It turns out Jews did more than just invent ADHD, though. It was a Jewish chemist, Lazăr Edeleanu, who first synthesized amphetimines in 1886

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphetamine#History,_society,_and_culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazăr_Edeleanu

Ritalin, the most common name for methylphenidate, is produced and sold by Novartis Corporation. Novartis also makes several fertility treatments, but that's a rabbit hole I didn't bother going down. Here's one I DID go down, though:

Novartis was formed by the merger of Ciba-Geigy Ltd and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals. Ciba-Geigy was, itself, a merger of CIBA and Geigy. Looking up the history of CIBA and Geigy won't turn up too much Jewish history. One is a German textile and dye factory that eventually turned to chemical production, and the other was a Swedish company with a similar background.

Sandoz, on the other hand famously discovered LSD, which they marketed as a "cure" for sexual deviance. Sandoz also dumped chemicals into the Rhine river, pushed for the recreational use of drugs in the 1960's, and developed baby food

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novartis#Sandoz

I didn't dig too deep into the history of Novartis, but the more I looked at it the more dates and times seemed awfully coincidental. Like how Dodge & Cox, the primary investor in Novartis, managed to start a successful investment banking company at the peak of the Great Depression. Or how Novartis pivoted their company immediately prior to the release of the DSM-II

Attached: 4.jpg (507x408, 26K)

CONSPIRACY THEORY

I don't have hard evidence to support this, but I believe that Novartis is a leading factor in how the Jews have managed to control the minds of the masses. Why would a company famous for inventing Ritalin and LSD also be making baby food? Why would they be making fertility treatments, and right at a time when white birth rates seem to be plummeting? What do we think of the fact that many of these fertility drugs end up in urine and pollute our drinking water?

I keep this theory vague and open-ended because I didn't spend much time thinking on it. The real meat of this dump is coming up next - when I dive into the history of the United States national debt, and the truth of the Democratic party.

Attached: 5.gif (440x340, 5K)

BACKSTORY

On Friday, October 26th, a video showed up in my YouTube feed titled "What If The US Paid Off Its Debt?"

youtube.com/watch?v=_3Lizrgbb9s

At the time I thought "eh - I'll give it a go, could be entertaining"... The video was 7 minutes and 50 seconds of blaming Republicans for our massive debt, followed by 10 seconds of "oh, and if we paid it off nothing would change so let's just stay in debt forever"

Now this didn't really jive with me. First, since when are Republicans solely to blame for the debt? Next, how could paying down $21 TRILLION dollars of debt not be a good thing? Third, why the fuck did they title the video "What If the US Paid Off Its Debt" then proceed to waste 90% of the video NOT talking about what would happen if the US paid off its debt? The whole thing reeked of a liberal / Jewish conspiracy - and has turned me off of the Infographic Channel for live. The whole channel is nothing but opinion pieces, fake news, pseudoscience, and propaganda.

That said, I started looking into the facts surrounding many of the claims made in the video. As I did, I came to some startling realizations about our history that were never taught in school, which are never discussed on the news or online or in general political discourse, and that made a lot of our current economic situation suddenly be more clear.

Attached: 6.jpg (246x138, 10K)

BACKSTORY

According to the video (it's only 8 minutes, so you can watch it if you don't believe me):

>In 1939 (the first year mentioned in the video) the US national debt was at $40 billion
>After the second World War, the debt had risen to $271 billion
>The debt remained around $271 billion until 1957
>By 1977 the debt was at $699 billion
>The majority of our debt can be blamed on "war spending", as the US has been at war for 225 years versus 21 years at peace
>Debt spiked in 2001 due to the war on terror
>Between 2001 and 2017 the war on terror cost $1.9 trillion, "so it appears that much of the US debt is incurred by massive spending in an aggressive defense policy over a long, sustained period of time"
>Other factors contributing to our debt include $24.7 billion spent on hurricane Katrina and $350 billion spent bailing out the banks
>From 1992-2000 the debt began to be paid back
>The United States has declared bankruptcy 5 times, most recently in 1933
>Even if we paid off the debt, a new president could come along and ruin everything in a "manic spending frenzy". To quote: "It has happened in the past, and will probably happen again" as it shows a picture of Donald Trump
>The debt can only be paid off in two ways: If you steal money from the poor and little people, or if you tax "the big business monopolies, high class politicians, and corporations"
>If the US paid off all of its debt, nothing would change. The country would function as it does now, and would just increase the debt once again

Attached: 7.png (720x406, 239K)

HISTORICAL FACT

>The majority of our debt can be blamed on "war spending"

After hearing this, I immediately noticed several things that didn't add up. First, spending $1.9 trillion on a war doesn't increase the debt by $1.9 trillion, because the war could be funded by tax instead of debt. I also noticed the large span of time (2001-2017), so I looked up the change in our debt over that period. From 2001-2017 our debt rose from $5.8 trillion to $20.2 trillion. Of that, even if $1.9 trillion were due to the war on terror, that leaves $12.5 trllion unaccounted for!

The video also seemed to implicate Bush and Republicans between:
>Saying we paid the debt down from 1992 to 2000 (Clinton)
>Saying the debt spiked in 2001 (Bush)
>Blaming the war on terror for the debt spike (Bush)

But from 2001-2017 the biggest increase in debt was under Obama! And it wasn't war spending.

The federal budget is a public document. Most people don't read it because it's hundreds of pages long. But I started digging. I first looked at 2009 and 2010. Because it was during these years that Obama had a Democratic congress, forced Obamacare, and ran up a deficit.

The first thing that I noticed was that military was relatively small. I've heard for years that we over-spend on military. But the department of defense was only $636 billion in 2009 and $666 billion in 2010.

Compare that with:

>$700 billion given to the department of treasury
>$726 billion given to social security
>$796 billion given to the department of health and human services

whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/hist04z1-fy2019.xlsx

Also, this may seem like I'm being pedantic, but despite the tales you've been told CLINTON DIDN'T PAY DOWN OUR DEBT. The debt rose every year from 1992 to 2000

treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

Attached: 8.png (1261x531, 131K)

HISTORICAL FACT

>$350 billion spent bailing out the banks

That's half of the number that I remembered, so I did some research into the federal bailout of the banks to see if it was $350 billion like the video said or if it was the $700 billion I remembered... It was SO MUCH worse.

forbes.com/sites/mikecollins/2015/07/14/the-big-bank-bailout/

The total amount of money given to all banks was $16.8 TRILLION dollars. That missing $12.5 trillion? I think I found it, plus some change. But wait, we haven't seen our debt rise by $16.8 trillion, nor have banks suddenly posted trillion-dollar profits. Where is the money? Turns out only $4.6 trillion has already been paid out. The remaining $12.2 trillion is "owed" by the government to the banks. And for what reason? Because they asked for it.

scribd.com/doc/60553686/GAO-Fed-Investigation#outer_page_144

No matter what laws are passed between here and 2050, no matter who's president, and no matter how much people scrimp, save, and pay taxes -- our debt will rise another $12.2 trillion because we "owe it" to the banks. Sound skeevy? It is. But believe it or not, that's not the worst of our problems.

Attached: 9.jpg (1102x1184, 250K)

HISTORICAL FACT

So if we spend so little on military, why does graphs like (pic related) seem to show that ">50% of our spending" is on military?

nationalpriorities.org/budget-basics/federal-budget-101/spending/

Well, it's >50% of our "discretionary" spending. Military is considered discretionary! But discretionary spending is only about 29% of our total budget. This means that military is only about one SIXTH of our total budget. Most of the money (65%) goes to "mandatory" spending... but why the classifications?

Turns out "mandatory" spending is 100% welfare! "Mandatory" spending includes:

>social security
>SNAP (food stamps)
>TANF (another type of food stamps)
>medicare
>medicaid
>unemployment
>earned income tax credit
>child tax credit
>etc

Why welfare is "mandatory" and defending our sovereignty is "discretionary" is beyond me, but this caused me to realize that almost two thirds of all spending (and potentially 100% of debt) was due to welfare programs. So I looked into how the budget even gets made.

Yes, yes... surely I should know how the budget gets made. I mean, they teach that in school, right? Well, I wanted to be 100% certain of the SPECIFICS. Not just "congress gives a budget to the president", but exactly who drafts the initial proposal, how is it voted on, what happens if there's a disagreement, who has the right to change it, how often can it be changed, etc.

So at the start, the president gives the congress a budget. Unlike normal bills, the budget isn't first passed in the house and then the senate. Instead, the house and senate work in parallel and design their own independent budgets based on the president's request. Also, the budgets they end up with don't have to look ANYTHING like what the president gave them. These budgets are given to an appropriation committee who then drafts 12 bills, and these bills goes through the standard process (first they must be approved by the house, then the senate, then the president)

Attached: 10.png (1003x915, 145K)

HISTORICAL FACT

Like normal bills, these 12 bills can be modified by each branch before they're passed. In fact, the final budget passed by the senate can look nothing like what the house passes! And if the president vetoes a bill then it goes back to the senate, where a 2/3rds majority vote can overrule him.

This means at the end of the day, 2/3rds of the senate have absolute and unquestioned authority when it comes to the budget. There are no checks or balances. If you have a supermajority in the senate, you decide the budget.

acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/A-Brief-Guide-to-the-Federal-Budget-and-Appropriations-Process.aspx

Realizing this, I compiled an Excel sheet that recorded the following from 1913 through 2017:

>National debt
>Change in debt
>Inflation
>Which party controlled the house
>Which party controlled the senate
>Which party was in the presidency

I then divided the years into several categories:

>Who had a super-majority in the house (R, D, Neither)
>who had a super-majority in the senate (R, D, Neither)
>Who was president (R, D)

I then did rudamentary statistics. With only 100 samples it's not perfect, but it's the best I could do with the data available. Here is what I discovered:

>1. The house and president are statistically insignificant. The senate drives the debt.
>2. Under a Republican senate, the debt falls on average -2.00% (inflation adjusted). Under a Democratic senate, the debt rises +6.23%. A split senate splits the difference with the debt rising +2.33%.

In my previous thread I claimed a split senate was just as bad as a Democratic senate. This was due to including World War 1 in my analysis, which was an outlier.

The Excel sheet can be downloaded here:

ufile.io/zzo77

Attached: 11.png (302x262, 21K)

HISTORICAL FACT

To any Republicans this may make sense. After all - the debt is caused by Democratic welfare bullshit. But this result left me confused. If Democrats make the debt worse and Republicans fix it, how did things get SO BAD? Shouldn't we expect to see a pendulum effect where Democrats take power, the debt rises, then Republicans take power, and it falls?

Now take a good hard look at (pic related). This image is directly from WikiPedia:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divided_government_in_the_United_States

Without a Republican SUPER-majority in the senate, the debt rises. This has been true for the last 100 years. So when was the last Republican super-majority? Republicans have not controlled the senate since 1930! Despite media outrage, cries of "a Republican controlled house", and the main stream media talking about "evil Republicans" pushing their "agenda", Republicans haven't controlled anything for 88 years!

Even though Republicans have occasionally held the presidency (Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush) they've NEVER had a senate super-majority. The 24 years out of the last 88 (14 of which were in the last 20 years) that the had ANY majority they only held between 51 and 60 seats. So next time anyone tries to tell you about what some "evil Republicans" did in the last 88 years, remind them that Republicans haven't done SHIT in the last 88 years -- the Democrats have had the congress in a strangehold.

Attached: 12.jpg (1463x2700, 476K)

BACKSTORY

Seeing the year 1930 sounded oddly familiar to me. What happened in 1930? I did a few quick Google searches for terms like "USA what happened in 1930" and it turned up a few articles with rather haunting titles...

greatdreams.com/political/1930-bankruptcy.htm

What? The United States declared bankruptcy in 1933? Wait -- this is exactly what the video said that started all of this! But why wasn't this taught in class? Why isn't there a WikiPedia page on "American Bankruptcy of 1933"? Why isn't this in any history books or any encyclopedias?

Further research reveals this bankruptcy was delcared in executive orders 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260:

usa-the-republic.com/emergency powers/United States Bankrupt.html

I started by trying to Google executive order 6073, but was surprised how hard it was to find any information. There was no wiki page on this executive order, no government documents, no links... In fact, the government archives from these years look like they've been purged from the record:

archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/roosevelt.html

Fortunatley, I caught a break in the least-expected place. University of California maintains an accurate record of all executive orders, but it's not indexed on Google:

presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/presidential-documents-archive-guidebook/executive-orders-jq-adams-1826-trump-2018

Searching for any particular exeuctive order won't turn up this link on Google, but once you've found this handy database you can search it freely.

Attached: 13.jpg (600x600, 104K)

HISTORICAL FACT

Finally, some answers! Roosevelt:

>(6073) - Allowed banks to reopen (after the Great Depression) under the condition that they cannot give out gold coins, gold bullion, or gold certificates and that currency may only be given out if it is to be used, and not hoarded
>(6102) - Demanded that all US citizens turn in their gold, with the exception of gold needed for industrial purposes, gold held by foreign banks, and a $100 per-person allotment of gold that you may keep for personal reasons. This gold would be given to banks in exchange for writing off of national debt, and the banks MUST (per the executive order) accept this payment
>(6111) - Specified how citizens must turn in their gold, and prohibited the exporting of gold to other countries
>(6260) - A reminder that you can't hoard gold or export gold to other countries

If you read that again carefully, you may notice something that sounds a little... un-American to you:

>(6102) - Demanded that all US citizens turn in their gold

The executive order was at least kind enough to define compesnation for their gold: $20.67 per ounce. Within six months of the government forcibly buying all gold for $20, the price almost doubled to $35

macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart

But it wasn't just a coincidence or a lucky guess that caused the price to rise like this. Once the government had all gold, they had a monopoly. In 1934, the Gold Reserve Act allowed the treasury to sell this gold back to Americans at a higher price.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act

This is not a conspiracy theory. This is fact. The government passed a law requiring all gold to be sold to them for $20, then sold it back for $35.

Attached: 14.png (888x560, 54K)

CONSPIRACY THEORY

This explains one of the facts from the video:

>The debt remained around $271 billion until 1957

It seemed weird to me that under a Democratic super-majority the debt would remain flat for 20 years. It turns out the government stole gold from their citizens and sold it back to them to keep the debt artificially flat. They drove up spending but the debt didn't balloon because they kept making payments on it with essentially stolen money. This would be like if I owed you $5 so I stole your shirt, sold it back to you for $5, then used that $5 to pay off my debt.

That's bad enough, but why did this stop suddenly in 1957 and the debt started going up again? Well, prior to 1957 we had Democratic presidents (Roosevelt until 1945 then Truman until 1953). When Eisenhower took office it was only a matter of reversing this executive order and they could pin the rising debt on "the first Republican president since we got the debt 'under control'".

This anti-Republican propaganda was easy to push. During Nixon and Ford there was a Democratic super-majority, meaning they could drive the debt to whatever level they wanted and even start senseless wars in Vietnam -- because the president takes the fall for the actions of the senate. Finally under Reagan he worked hard to try and fix our economic position but was never able to get cooperation from the congress, in which the house had a nearly 75% Democratic majority and the senate was split 50/50.

Attached: 15.jpg (900x2841, 671K)

BACKSTORY

At this point I slapped myself for not remembering that 1930 was the Great Depression... but I was also confused why "USA what happened in 1930" didn't turn up the Great Depression. I was also REALLY intrigued by the fact that since the Great Depression, there has NEVER been a Republican super-majority in the senate. Why did the Great Depression change so much?

I'd almost hit a wall with my research. Maybe Republicans and Democrats aren't just two people who fail to understand one another, but Democrats really are the bane of sovereignty and exterminating them would lead to an era of propserity... But then I remembered the central rule of Jow Forums: When things look fishy, see if Jews are involved.

So I applied this rule now, to see how Jews might be connected to the Democratic party. WOAH BOY did I turn up a lot. Here's a fun fact: Liberal Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe have been at the forefront of EVERY progressive movement since the early 1880's:

>Worker's rights
>Civil rights
>Women's rights
>Gay rights
>Freedom of religion
>etc

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_views_and_involvement_in_US_politics

So modern "bleeding heart liberals", puppets of the Democratic party who pass unaffordable welfare bills in the name of "caring and sharing", are really puppets of the Jews who have manipulated the Democratic party since the turn of the 20th century.

Thinking about Jews brought up World War II. If they had their hands so deep in our pockets in 1933 ("coincidentally" the same year Glass-Stiegal was passed), then why a war? We could try to argue that the Jews didn't cause the war, but if the Jews had so much power and control, we should believe that they had a hand in every global event.

So what did World War II do for them? This is where things get scary.

Attached: 16.jpg (2000x1333, 1.56M)

HISTORICAL FACT

The New Deal drove up our nation's debt more than any law before or since. The only thing that increased our debt more was war itself. Our debt increased roughly 20% year on year from 1932 to 1936. This had a lot of Americans fed up with the Democrats, and they were ready to kick them out of power. At that moment, World War 2 began and distracted the public.

When World War 2 first started in 1939, Americans wanted to stay out of it. Fresh from World War 1, no one wanted to get involved in foreign affairs. This made it especially strange when in 1940 the US government implemented a military draft, even though we weren't at war. This was the first and only time in history that a draft was implemented for a country that wasn't at war.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Training_and_Service_Act_of_1940

The USA joined the war after Pearl Harbor on December 8th, 1941. From 1942 to 1945 the draft was expanded several times. First they expanded the age range from 21-36 to 21-45, then later to 18-65. Next they allowed for blacks (who previously weren't part of the draft for fear of incompetence).

history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-imposes-the-draft

With all of this mandatory conscription, you'd think they were having trouble finding volunteers. Au contraire! During World War 2 something else happened that had never happened before or since. They banned voluntary military service. The argument was that this would "provide protection for the nation's home front manpower pool". They had SO MANY volunteers that they shut down volunteering, yet still implemented a draft.

This means that every single person who died in World War 2 after 1942 was selected by the government, and was not a volunteer. Every. One.

presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-9279-providing-for-the-most-effective-mobilization-and-utilization-the

Attached: 17.jpg (1600x1169, 711K)

CONSPIRACY THEORY

Now suppose for just an instant that the majority (not a 99% majority, but just enough to swing future elections -- say, 55%) of people sent to die in war were conservative. Then factor in that "conscienscous objectors" (mostly liberals) were either allowed to decline the draft or were given peaceful office jobs.

World War 2 wasn't about killing Jews. It was about killing Republicans. World War 2 was a carefully orchestrated GENOCIDE of the Republican party and ensure they could never rise to power again.

This is the current truth of our nation. All of the good guys were sent to die, obscured under the pretext of war, and ever since then the Jewish-controlled Democratic party has been ballooning the debt higher and higher.

Now remember that political views are hereditary:

blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2015/08/05/political-beliefs-genetic/

This also causes a lot of our World War 2 strategy to suddenly make sense. Remember (pic related)? If we knew the Germans had a strong defensive barrier set up on the beach at Normandy, what general in their right mind would send wave after wave of their own men into machine gun fire until we overwhelmed them with sheer numbers? That's a Zapp Branigan level tactic. But now remember that every single soldier on those boats was hand-selected by the government in a mandatory draft with zero volunteers. It wasn't a mission. It was a slaughter. Just as they planned.

This perfectly explains the following 88-year dominance of the Democratic party in politics. They killed anyone who opposed them.

Attached: 18.jpg (1280x960, 372K)

BACKSTORY

At this point I'd gotten deep into a rabbit hole that I wish I'd never fallen into. The thought that the US government managed to conceal a genocide of millions of its own people is horrible enough. So I decided to back out and remember how I got into this research in the first place. I was looking up the national debt! Which is currently hovering around $21 TRILLION (with a T) dollars.

And yet, despite doomsday predictions and fear and paranoia, no matter how high the debt gets (it's literally a number so big our brains don't have a good way to comprehend it) the world hasn't collapsed... Why?

Well, the size of the debt doesn't mean anything. None of these numbers mean anything.

In 1938 the first minimum wage was established at 25 cents per hour. At the time a loaf of bread cost 8.6 cents. This meant that for one hour of work, you could buy 3 loaves of bread.

Now, in 2018, the minimum wage is $7.25 per hour. Currently a loaf of bread costs $2.37. This means for one hour of work, you can buy 3 loaves of bread.

Nothing has changed. Inflation has increased the numbers, but the equation is still 1 hour for 3 loaves.

The same is true of our debt. Our debt doesn't mean anything. If we paid off the debt, nothing would change. If we keep amassing debt, nothing will change. Because at the end of the day the debt isn't taken into account when funding government projects, the debt has no effect when you go to apply for a loan, and the debt doesn't influence your job application.

So why does it keep going up if it doesn't matter? What's the net effect? Why do Democrats keep ballooning the debt, and is there some hidden affect your life?

To understand this, I took a look at who we actually owe the debt TO: banks

Well, "investors" -- but that's just investment banks with a fancy title

Attached: 19.png (606x402, 58K)

HISTORICAL FACT (or simple lesson)

Without government, banks are simple. Person A gives a bank $100. The bank loans $50 of person A's money to person B. A year later, person B pays back the $50 with 10% interest, so the bank now has $105. The bank then gives person A $102 (2% interest) as a thank you for letting them borrow the money, and the bank keeps $3 as profit.

This is why loans and credit cards have interest (the 10% interest charged to person B) and it's why savings accounts yield interest (the 2% interest paid to person A). It's also why the interest on savings accounts will always be lower than the interest on loans and credit card (so the bank can make a profit).

Things get weird when government gets involved.

The government can give the bank a "loan" of $50 at 5% interest. The bank can then turn around and re-loan that money to person B at 10% interest. So long as the government interest rate is lower than the rate they charge to person B, the bank can do this infinitely. In this way, the government replaces person A. Person B still gets his $50 loan, still pays back $55, and the bank still makes a profit.

The bank can choose to buy $50 worth of government bonds that pay 10% interest. So long as the bank is making 10% interest on their loans, they don't care who they loan the money to. In fact, a government is bigger and has more money than person B, so they're more likely to pay it back! In this way, the government replaces person B. Person A can deposit $100, receive their $2 in interest, and the bank still makes a profit.

If person A and person B are BOTH unecessary, then banks can keep making money by borrowing money without ever involving citizens and without ever actually creating economic value. By borrowing money from the federal reserve and lending it back to the government in the form of bonds, banks keep siphoning off tax dollars without actually DOING anything.

Attached: 20.png (640x640, 22K)

HISTORICAL FACT

Surely this doesn't work in real life, right? After all, this only works if the government is willing to loan money to the banks for less than the interest rate on government bonds.

As of October 31st, 2018 the federal funds rate (the rate at which banks borrow money) is 2.25%

bankrate.com/rates/interest-rates/prime-rate.aspx

As of October 31st, 2018 the interest rate on a 30-year US treasury bond is 3.39%

treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield

Since the treasury bond rate is greater than the federal funds rate, a bank can borrow money from the government, then lend this money to the government, and make a 1.14% profit. If they lend $1 million in this manner (borrow $1 million then turn around and lend it right back) they will make $114,000 per year in profit and they didn't do anything!

This may sound like a weird glitch in a video game, but this is real life, and it actually happens. What leads to this glitch is the fact that the "federal" reserve is actually a private entity. It's just another bank, and therefore not beholden to any government policies about lending. And as a bank, it's the job of the federal reserve to make a profit.

So if the government keeps lending money to banks in order to borrow that money back, the government will keep owing more. When a government owes more money than it has, the only solution to this is to print more money. If this sounds like the kind of mentality that lead to hyperinflation in Germany or Zimbabwe, you're correct! This isn't a an exaggeration or a warning. This is a thing that has been happening for the last 100 years.

Printing money, and printing money alone, is the SOLE cause of inflation. Inflation occurs when more money is printed. Nothing causes inflation EXCEPT printing more money. The fact that inflation exists proves that we're printing more money. If we stopped printing money, we'd stop seeing inflation.

Attached: 21.jpg (1408x1200, 139K)

CONSPIRACY THEORY

Think this is weird? Well, it gets bad now

If there's inflation, a dollar today will be worth less tomorrow. If you borrow a dollar from someone today, you have to pay them back MORE than a dollar tomorrow. If you work hard to earn a dollar today, tomorrow that dollar won't buy as much.

Now let's return to what I said about "inflation not mattering" 3 posts ago. One hour of work equals 3 loaves of bread. But if you do one hour of work, then wait a year, that money only gets you two loaves of bread! The only way to keep getting fed is to keep working.

One more time: The only way to keep getting fed is to keep working.

This may sound fairly obvious. One person in my previous thread even said "Your conclusion that it's a bad thing is wrong. Of course you have to keep working to stay alive. That's the nature of Nature."

But there's no law of nature that requires a human to work. If a robot farmed your land and delivered the food to you then you could sit on your ass and get fed without working a day in your life. Alternatively, if you spent a year caring for a farm and that farm yielded 10 years worth of grain, you could eat for the next 10 years without having to work a single day. This isn't unnatural or abnormal. It's called RETIREMENT. Humans have done this for the last 12,000 years.

The only way to keep people working forever is inflation. The only thing that causes inflation is printing money. The only way to justify printing money is to run up a national debt. The best way to run up the national debt is with welfare programs.

All welfare feeds those who can't work in order to ensure that those who can work will never be allowed to stop. It's just communism with more steps.

This was the goal of the Jewish Democrats all along. You can't save enough money. You can't pay off your loans. You can't pay back your debts. You can't earn enough to retire. You will ALWAYS have to work. It's an infinite labor cycle to keep people working.

Attached: 22.jpg (800x600, 104K)

CONSPIRACY THEORY?

There's hope though! I wouldn't post a huge black pill about how we're screwed and there's nothing we can do but wait for death without telling you how to fight back. And fortunately, we can fight back with full force.

There's one central theme in all of these posts:

>National debt
>Bankruptcy
>Fiat currency
>Loans
>Inflation

It all has to do with MONEY. They never took control of the means of production. They never took control of the people. They never took control of our minds or our bodies or our spirits. They only took control of the pieces of paper in our wallets.

So long as you use money, you are forever a slave to the Democratic super-majority that has ruled our government for the last 90 years. A Democratic super-majority that was put in power by the Jews and retains their power through the Jewish indoctrination of the voting masses.

In order to be free, and in order to rise above the system, you must live without money.

Ideally, you could find people in your local community willing to barter. Offer services in exchange for food, offer food in exchange for housing, offer housing in exchange for clothing.

If bartering is difficult, turn to money-like objects that have tangible value. Use wheat, or gold, or ink, or pasta. But use something that can't be printed by the Democrats to pay off debts that they're intentionally creating in order to keep us slaves. I can almost guarantee you that if you walk into a mom-and-pop shop down town and offer them gold in exchange for food, they'll take you up on the offer.

Finally, if you absolutely cannot escape money (for instance, your employer pays you in money instead of gold) then replace it with tangible assets as quickly as possible. Buy gold, silver, brass, iron, glass, wood, wheat, salt,... buy things that won't spoil. In 10 years your dollar would have only been worth 50 cents, but your dollar worth of gold is now worth two dollars -- because inflation can't touch assets. Only money.

Attached: 23.jpg (960x539, 67K)

We went a long way and learned a lot, so let's review:

>ADHD is a fake disease defined by the Jews so it can apply to any child. The Jews invented the "cure" to ADHD, which is mind-altering medicine you must take daily for the rest of your life:

>Novartis may be a vehicle through which Jews are pushing white genocide (the reduction of white birth rates). They invented Ritalin and LSD yet they also make fertility pills and baby food:

>Despite what MSM shills may tell you, only 15% of our annual budget is spent on military whereas 65% of our annual budget is spent on welfare:

>The massive bank bailout wasn't $700 billion, it was $16.8 trillion and we're still paying:

>The senate has 100% of the power in how our debt changes (not the president). Any graphs that show you how our debt changed under different presidents are intentionally misleading:

>The senate has been Democrat-controlled for the last 88 years:

>The United States declared bankruptcy in 1933:

>The United States seized American gold and sold it back at inflated prices to hide the ballooning debt:

>Jews control the Democratic party:

>World War 2 had mandatory conscription (a draft) yet they didn't allow volunteers:

>World War 2 was a carefully orchestrated genocide of the Republican party:

>The federal reserve allows the government to print money in a controlled manner so that we don't experience hyperinflation, but the government has a vested interest in printing money because inflation keeps us as wage slaves:

>Live a life without currency. Buy gold. Buy stocks. Buy salt. Buy anything, but don't sit on cash:

Attached: 24-overview.jpg (600x655, 34K)

I'll stick around for a bit to answer questions and respond to people. I might be on and off randomly, though, as I have a lunch meeting with a client and I'm technically posting during work hours.

Shameless self-bump

Haven't read it all, just read the first. Wanted to give OP props. Well thought out posts with reasoning logic, evidence and a conclusion such as these should happen more often cheers bud.

Haven't read it all yet I should say.

Appreciate the bump. Take your time reading it. Until some people have gotten through it all and discussion has started I'll keep shamelessly self-bumping to keep the thread alive.

Last time I did this the responses were pretty much divided into 3 categories:

>1. Some people appreciated the post and loved the effort put into it, praising it as the ideal for Jow Forums
>2. Some people didn't read any of the post, looked at a picture or picked one sentence out of context, and tried to prove their mental superiority through ad hominem attacks
>3. Some people assumed all of the positive attention was evidence of a JIDF shill, and started saging like crazy

I'm expecting more of the same. I'd be lying if I said that watching the responses wasn't entertaining for me, but the primary reason I do this is to educate the masses. Until I began this research I had NO IDEA that World War 2 eliminated voluntary conscription.

Heading out to my lunch meeting now. One more shameless self-bump for now, and I'll try to keep an eye on the thread on my phone while I'm out.

If some others could help keep the thread alive I'd much appreciate it.

reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
reeeee
ree

pic is the more typical pie chart I'm used to seeing
the main thing that everyone loves to skip is how fucking cheap running the military is when you dont have the other gibs programs fucking up our budget/economy

in any case bump due to reasonable effort put in

Attached: 1512011631862.png (1003x915, 146K)

Bumping quality thread

Attached: 61273156273273.jpg (221x228, 11K)

Wanted to make a quick comment on the adhd. It is 100% real but caused by sleep deprivation or poor sleep quality. They are finding sleep is affected by lack of proper nutrients and poor gut bacteria that means your stomach can’t process nutrients properly even if u are getting them. (((They))) have been fucking with our food chain from all angles, taking out shit we need and flooding us with shit we don’t. The red pill here is not the adhd diagnosis but the fact that it and other sleep related illnesses like fatigue and fibromyalgia are being created in the population on purpose

Alternatively adhd is just keeping kids pent up and not allowing them to get any activity at all. Who the fuck doesn't get antsy when they're stuck in an effective prison for 10 hours out of the day and told to sit, let alone as a kid when you want to go out, play, explore, tinker with things.

Pretty good effort post m8. Good to see something worthwhile on Jow Forums. Will be reading through it as I have time. Very interested in the ADHD topic and it's Jewry.

quality thread op

I did stick around and read all of this through. I’ll have to follow up with these sources and some further reading of my own, but everything looks solid and cogent thus far OP.

Thank you for researching, compiling, and sharing. You are a great guy and I will be taking your advice and purchasing gold bullion.

If only there was a shopping platform who only accepted gold backed currency - an Amazon of sorts. Or perhaps a digital platform that facilitated barter!

You’ve set my minds gears into motion and for this, I thank, salute, and honor you.

Attached: image.jpg (1242x2208, 912K)

>checked and bumped
I've had your old thread in a tab for a couple of days, waiting to have the time to read it OP

medicare and social security are paid in by taxpayers thru payroll taxes. really can't compare to discretionary spending. other than that, lots of good info. bump.

Attached: GrandCross.png (640x480, 436K)

Attached: 1111.gif (540x540, 71K)

Attached: 1_large.jpg (330x480, 29K)

Attached: 1533609806791.jpg (500x750, 233K)

This thread is a CIA glownigger PSYOP. Lurk moar if you can't tell.

Attached: BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE CIA.jpg (1024x544, 60K)

Some of this seems reasonable, but a lot is hard to believe even with evidence to back it up.

>heres proof that its happening
>idk man this seems spoopy
>this much of a brainlet

>democratic supermajority since the 30s to jew america to its current state
does this mean that the business plot was there to prevent all that?

Attached: 1531425412899.jpg (322x235, 75K)

>this much of a newfag

>heres proof that its happening
>idk man this seems spoopy

Correct. I can read the evidence but it's not enough for me. I am going to have to read up on these things before I can make a conclusion wheter or not this is legit.

ADHD is fake though.

OP, absolutely fantastic thread, well done. I have come to similar conclusions re: the banks, federal reserve, and currency but it’s good to see some solid research laid out to back it up, particularly about drugs. I think there are esoteric and metaphysical reasons WHY it’s always the Jews behind the destruction of the world. I don’t yet have a coherent theory, but I would encourage people to think about how we are in the age of Quantity now (as opposed to Quality or Principle) and that Jews seem to be the human embodiment of the tendency toward Quantity, which is ultimately destruction. They are Satanic in the broadest sense of the word, and indeed they (at least the Talmudists, which is Judaism since Christ) more or less explicitly worship Satan. Particularly, money is the vehicle in our day of Quantity, and we know it is the Jew’s principle weapon. They are metaphysically and religiously opposed to anything that seeks something higher than the material world, i.e. God and especially Christ, who is the sworn enemy of Satan and therefore the Jews. Once you realize that they Jews have created an inverse hierarchy in the world based on material wealth and bent on the accumulation of all the world’s resources and enslavement of every other race, all the (((coincidences))) make much more sense. However, it’s important to realize that Satan and his agents, the Jews, have the advantage in the material world and can only effectively be fought with spiritual weapons. We, in the west, while protecting our families in whatever way we can, must MUST attach ourselves to orthodox tradition and become spiritual, rather than material. That is the indispensable condition to waging war against our enemies. Anyway, great post, keep up the good work and God Bless.

I would add also that we should follow OPs recommendation to disengage from the Jewish money system as much as possible by converting it into some kind of tangible asset immediately.

quality thread OP.
i remember sharing russo's film freedom to fascism back in like 2006-07.
it would take something cataclysmic to replace fiat currency.
in the meantime, converting paper to appreciating assets is about the only defense.
anyplace barter or local currency finds success will always be targeted.
as an american im sad our country was captured maybe 100 years ago. it might go all the way back to lincoln.

Attached: 1522260814110.jpg (466x480, 31K)

Israel's internet is down right now
Everybody hurry up and get your quality redpills out in peace while we have the chance.

Attached: Muh 6 Million.png (1271x1279, 1.39M)

Nevermind, Israel took Irans internet down, apparently.

still hardly any meme flags right now

This is true. They probably just redirected their efforts elsewhere temporarily.

>Iran was the real Jew all along

Another bump for OP.

If you’re in the West and you want to better yourself and wage war against Satan and the Jews, you MUST become a Catholic. There is no other option. It should be obvious that the Jews don’t really give a shit about the 6 million Protestant sects out there, or the Pagan LARPers, or the New Age occultists, and in fact encourage these groups in various ways. But they have always virulently hated the Church and sought to infiltrate and destroy it. However, the current hierarchy is heavily compromised and you will have to do the work yourself of seeking out holy priests and pastors who serve good parishes. You will also have to discover spirituality, prayer, and meditation pretty much on your own. Read St. John of the Cross, read the Ways of Mental Prayer, pray in LATIN. Do it for the sake of your soul and that of your family.

Wasn't LSD discovered by Albert Hoffman? The bicycle story thing.

>If you want to rid yourself of the Jew you must follow a Jewish religion created by Jews who worship a Jew
user. You need to go get checked by a doctor. Because I think you might be missing a few chromosomes and might actually be absolutely fucking retarded.

Attached: lmao.png (324x291, 137K)

Idk user I just get sad when I read posts like yours when it’s obvious you understand nothing except very simplistic memes. Hopefully you have a realization some day, good luck.

people hate the jews for poisoning western society for hundreds of years.
people hate (((christians))) for the holier than though attitude and they're love of all things jew and holding them above everything else.
people hate sand niggers because they're militant kikes that kill and rape everything.

I appreciate your work and effort user.

You're very smart. These black pills are hard to swallow, sometimes I think I need to switch to a suppositary. The redundancy of these programs seem so well thought out, its almost scary.

Have a good day.

Attached: 1540909655738.jpg (738x741, 79K)

>Has no argument
This is because you can't refute the fact that Christianity is a Jewish religion created by Jews and you literally worship a Jew. Jews wrote the bible with the intention of pacifying, subverting, and controlling the goyim. No amount of mental gymnastics can refute these facts and you know it. Stay cucked and continue submitting yourself fully to the kikes.

Check out Thomas Sheridan’s videos. He gets into how the First World War was population control to thin out the cities of men. WWII finished up any more of the warrior genes.

was reading this on my phone, came to computer, find it waaaaay deep
bump
bump
this is excellent mr. OP
bump bump

Attached: 1540320416774.jpg (651x956, 366K)

When you get to the Jew you are at the beginning of the Satanic hole. This group called Jews are not just disreputable merchants. It goes way beyond that.

The redundancy was born through evolution and selection. For the last 3500 years Jews have been trying one plan after another to subvert nations and domesticate the goyim. Some plans succeed and others fail. The successful plans they keep doing. At this point there are 10-15 plans running in parallel.

HOLD MY BEER, I'm gonna start a farm!

Quality thread OP

Cocaine

I personally believe the ONLY things we should spend tax dollars on are:
>Military
>Infrastructure

Then the question is just "what counts as military" and "what counts as infrastructure". You could technically make the argument that mapping the ocean floor is a military endeavor since we scan for submarines and underwater mines in the process. You could technically make the argument that healthcare is "infrastructure" because if people aren't healthy they can't work.

I don't mind people quibbling over whether or not something is infrastructure (valuable to society as a whole for its ability to facilitate commerce). What I mind is people trying to inject morals into government. Government is not a moral industry. It's a protective industry. If you want to impose morals on someone, become a parent or a pastor.

the jewish project of the 20th Century
Globalism and neo-liberalism
- Lecture
Phil Mullan, author, Creative destruction: how to start an economic renaissance
Academy of Ideas
youtube.com/watch?v=OE7JSd7bv_Q

Attached: unnamed.jpg (48x48, 2K)

Can someone explain the "glownigger" meme? I legitimately don't get it.

Also a great investment choice

Although once all drugs are legalized its market value will tank significantly. It's currently artificially inflated by a constricted supply. Wait until it's legalized, then stock up.

It means you work for the CIA and your shit thread is a psyop. But you knew that already.

whats with all the quality lately? theres been at least 3-4 comfy threads in the last few days. it usually would take weeks to see that.

I mean if you wanted to shill correctly you'd try; but you can't refute any of this so you just bait instead

Bump, thanks OP.
We need more threads like these

OP favorite Youtubers?

I've been really enjoying this

unqualified-reservations.org/2009/01/gentle-introduction-to-unqualified/

It's Mencius Moldbug, creator of the neo-reactionary movement. Very much up your alley.

Again thank you for the quality thread!

Probably oldfags coming back to Jow Forums around election time

I expect after November 6th it'll go to hell again

Can't say I have any favorite Youtubers. Maybe I'm too old but I think anyone trying to make a living off of Youtube should get a real fucking job. I remember when Youtube was a small hobbyist project with a handful of videos made by artists -- not a bunch of corporate bullshit constantly trying to turn a profit. At this point whenever I go to Youtube it's less for fun or entertainment and more that I've gotten bored, caught up on all of my web comics, already skimmed /b/ and Jow Forums and found nothing interesting, and I just want to waste 30 minutes rotting my brain. Nothing on there is worthwhile. It's all clickbait, propaganda, and thinly veiled marketing attempts. There's not a single authentic thing on the whole fucking site.

I usually just skim through my feed for anything that looks slightly educational to see if I can learn anything. I usually learn nothing. Sometimes all I learn is that today's children are being sorely misinformed. Can you believe that well over half of fucking children think Apple invented emojis? It's a goddamned Japanese word -- why would they think an American company invented it?

Heres an image-stitched pic of ur whole thread

imgur.com/a/WUzxsjO

Attached: 1541033293245.png (889x1072, 374K)

Thanks. May have been worth the effort to crop the bottom half, but I can do that on my own time

>Can someone explain the "glownigger" meme? I legitimately don't get it.
I also find it hilarious how you find it preferable to LARP as a newfag of all things after being outed as the glownigger you are.

You definitely should switch careers. I know you probably think it's your dream job to get paid to shitpost on the internet, but the reality is that your salary is probably shit and you only have this job because your IQ is too low for any decent positions at the CIA. You're terrible at shilling this garbage propaganda and there are better careers you can pick rather than selling your soul trying to influence people on the internet.

This guy seems legitimately mad. I think you should take some Ritalin and lay down.

>Ritalin
I'll go ahead and engage the OP since I'm curious what you glowniggers think. You state that ADHD was "invented" by Jews with your "evidence" being that the guy who authored a specific DSM version had a "Jewish sounding surname". Could you not have done any more specific research into this Robert Spitzer to see if he really had Jewish ancestry?

What do you think of autism? Did you know autism was actually invented by Jews? There is much more evidence behind that than the evidence you provided for ADHD. I feel like I'm doing your fucking job for you now glownigger

ok...

Spitzer is a German name, you fucktard.

Is Sean spicer secretly a (((Spitzer)))?

Attached: download (19).jpg (277x182, 11K)

Typical amerimutt logic.
You need to have more juice in order to make it a conspiracy theory.

Really good information. How does crypto factor in to this considering how manipulated those markets are?

The real redpill is there's no difference between German elite and "Jews" and the real power behind them is the Swiss who are the power center of the Vatican

It's literally the Jews. Stop misdirecting.

So let me see if I understand your stance here...

>1. You read the first 3 posts of a 21 post dump
>2. You concluded the entire dump revolved around ADHD
>3. You ignored some of the more important facts like how the DSM was carefully reviewed by thousands of scientists of the DSM-II was approved by a small panel of a few men, or how the "treatment" for ADHD is to put someone on mind-altering medicine for their entire life
>4. You cherry-picked a SINGLE fact out of the hundreds I provided that you felt provided weak evidence for a conclusive statement
>5. You wanted to prove your mental dominance and superiority by tearing apart a carefully constructed narrative when you pulled out the perceived cornerstone of faulty logic
>6. You realized that this one tiny fact you chose wasn't actually a cornerstone of anything and that you were committing a logical fallacy
>7. Instead of spend time researching your opinion or forming a well-organized rebuttal to anything, you decided it wasn't worth your time, threw your hands up, and said "screw it, call him a glownigger! That'll shut him up!"

Is that about right? If I've hit the nail on the head, allow me to get this conversation back in alignment:

ADHD was only a small introductory paragraph, extracted from a later section because it was a bit tangential when I originally brought it up in the last dump. I considered removing that part all together. The real meat of my argument lies in the Jewish connection to the Democratic party and, more importantly, how the Democrats use welfare to ensure an infinitely growing debt (and thus inflation). If you want to argue with my posts, try to argue with the main course, not the appetizer.

Now with regards to autism, this is a matter of conflated terms. The same way "an 18 year old kissing a 17 year old in the back seat of their car at the movie theater" is now conflated with "a 40 year old man forcibly penetrating a 5 year old girl in his basement". When you use the same word to refer to two vastly different things (in this example, "pedophile") then you bring in a whole world of connotations that don't really apply.

The word "autism" literally means "self-absorbed". It used to refer to individuals who were bad at communicating. This broad definition allowed it to refer to:

>The deaf (they can't communicate)
>The mute (they can't communicate)
>The mentally handicapped (they can't communicate)
>The narcissistic (who can communicate, but choose not to)
>Foreigners (they can't communicate effectively)
>etc

Jews didn't "invent" autism. But Jews may have had a key role in classifying several things as autism in the DSM or in prescribing medications for autism. Hell, even Asperger's is now considered autism - and that's just hyper-neuroplasticity.

Thanks for this OP. I learned a lot.

It came from Our Lord and Savior, Terry A. Davis (Peace and Caesarhood be Upon Him). As Terry said: "If you see CIA niggers, run them over with your car. They glow in the dark."

>based on a weekend's worth of research on my part

Nice LARP, you are on the good way but you need to swallow a lot more red-pills. God is real and Satan is real.

Attached: 69ad005bc22784af3b9a2a41ce455bacddb08e1eb7a5603682c02e72fe1ef3f7.jpg (424x480, 64K)

Nowhere did I conclude your psyop garbage was only about ADHD, I obviously skimmed it and saw a bunch of different shit. I wanted to get your opinion on autism. But here, since you're fucking garbage at research I'll make your little copy pasta stronger, glownigger.

Robert Spitzer was indeed a Jew. You didn't need to make the argument that his surname was a common Jewish surname. It is also German. But here is an indisputable Israeli source:

haaretz.com/jewish/jewish-american-psychiatrist-robert-spitzer-dies-1.5382438

>Robert Spitzer, Jewish American Psychiatrist Who 'Normalized' Homosexuality, Dies at 83
>Spitzer played a leading role in eliminating homosexuality's designation as a mental pathology.

>Jews didn't "invent" autism.
Yes, actually, they did. I have researched this one extensively and there is information widely available on this. Autism was quite literally invented by the Jews and there is more proof of this than the ADHD claim you made.

Attached: ZQHdLmSz.png (402x469, 166K)

O that they were wise, that they understood this,
that they would consider their latter end!

How should one chase a thousand,
and two put ten thousand to flight,
except their Rock had sold them,
and the Lord had shut them up?

Attached: d44999c960f1e8d92f0f91bcccd7e9b3d454b63bf1d74f3d9dce507e6a1c97df.jpg (710x710, 330K)