If you can't argue against at least 5 of these 19 paragraphs, why would you call yourself Jow Forums?

Aren’t fallacies supposed to be false?

No, merely fallacious.

>edible
Yes
>Nutritious, easily digestible, and easy to absorb
Nigger

archive.is/PjOED
What horrendous formatting.

Those are not paragraphs, they are sentences. And they're not arguments, they're just the author saying "I don't like that." Who cares?

Attached: 1538417282343.png (658x545, 176K)

I like meat.
It's part of my diet.
Fuck you and fuck all vegans.

Attached: 1540527396837.png (500x397, 100K)

Sheisse,i wish i could afford meat rn...

Plants are living too. Vegetarians and vegans are killers, they just have a different line in the sand as meat eaters.
t. Plant Lover.

Don't worry; vegans are fucking themselves with malnourisment anyway.
>inb4 that one picture of a vegan body builder
>which totally isn't any kind of a fallacy

apples are a-peelin

>19 fucking paragraphs of idiocy
Fuck off,Vegan parasite.
youtube.com/watch?v=5q5JukUxlC0

Attached: 1534433420047.jpg (1092x615, 72K)

Apple skins are good for you. You should eat them. Peeling apples, I mean what the fuck? Unless you're trying to make apple sauce or something why would you ever waste time peeling an apple?

I wouldn't argue against this, what fascinates me is how offended people become when it's suggested, there are other options.

>What the fuck is pesticide?
Poison. It tends to be mostly in the skins of fruits and vegetables.
>Why do apples at the market shine like that?
It's called floor wax, ya fucking dumbass.
Go right ahead and eat the wax and pesticides, you'll be fine.

Attached: AntifaBoomer.jpg (738x794, 70K)

The fallacy fallacy only means that the core argument isn't necessarily wrong just because the guy arguing is arguing fallaciously. If you intend to make a point and argue something, you're still expected to be logical, not fallacious.

Well I guess you could wash your produce like an ordinary person unless you buy the kind that got done over with a floor polisher.

Logically I can eat meat. If I preferentially like meat, I will eat more meat. If I have access to meat, I can eat meat. If I have less preference for vegetables I will eat less vegetables. Your preference is not my preference. Therefore I can eat meat.

No, that's an appeal to nature, which means it's a fallacy.

What absolute shite.

What appeals to nature? If I can digest it and I like it I can eat it, and our preference isn't the same so because you don't like it I don't have to also not like it. That's it.

Washing removes some of the wax, but the pesticide is IN the skins.
If you eat regular supermarket fruits and vegetables with the skin on you are maximizing your pesticide intake.
"Organic" does not mean "Pesticide Free", by the way, so those may or may not have less poison on them. Usually not.
Do not trust my word on this, look it up.

Attached: 1532263169968s.jpg (250x243, 9K)

>Logically I can eat meat
Just tacking "logically" front of the sentence doesn't make it a logical argument. "I can do it and I like it" is a weak argument for anything.

>pesticide is only in the skins
Do you get your scientific advice from the morning shows?

that is not an argument for vegetation, that is an argument for how profoundly nutritious and delicious meat is

Having an opinion means you're biased. Admit it.

I don't need to argue it

I can do it and I like it, there is no argument there, its fact

That's the axiom.

and women have a plethora of fuckable holes and you want to fuck the stinky(est) one.

Yeah, but it's a weak argument aka a fallacy, so you're wrong.

(((AI))) detected

>No, that's an appeal to nature, which means it's a fallacy.
Not always. That means you ARE committing the fallacy fallacy. Your organs cannot fight nature, dumbass.

It's not weak. Every preposition after follows holding true. You're just saying fallacy over and over without attacking the chain of logic. That's not logical.

>Incorrectly quotes me as if it is true
I specifically said MOSTLY, not ALL, you literal fucking retard.

Attached: YouAIportrait.jpg (890x884, 202K)

If my organs didn't fight nature I'd have died from infection a long time ago. Checkmate, atheist.

You can't force me to stop eating meat any more than you can force me to cut my dick off and ask everyone to call me sally.
Fuck off queers.

>only 70,000 edible plants on earth
>7 billion starving people
There is no way 70,000 plants can feed the entire world. We hve to supplement with animals or we would run out of plants. I had no idea vegans were consuming such a limited resource.

>using the logic fallacy

No one gives a fuck.

>eating what we evolved to eat is a fallacy
absolute state of skeptic muh fallacy logic

Who eats meat with a spoon? This is triggering to vegans and carnivores alike.

Cunts should be farmed and slaughtered for meat. Their meat would taste better than other animals and their milk is better.

Attached: spl87771_008.jpg (2657x1772, 821K)

Appeal to nature IS a fallacy. Again, the fallacy fallacy does not apply in arguments. The fallacy fallacy is only the fact that just because the guy arguing something is wrong, doesn't mean the argument is necessarily wrong. But the point of an argument is to determine if the argument is right or wrong, and to do so you need to argue non-fallaciously.

Spoons work best for getting all of the tuna out of the can.
>Finnish Intellectual

Attached: 1529240006673.jpg (1024x1011, 201K)

Does the fallacy fallacy fallacy apply in logical arguments? I didn't take logic to the graduate level.

>70000 edible plants
>7000000000 people to feed

An opinion isn't a preference, but preference can be bias, but that doesn't change anything. People can have biases and a bias isn't always bad, especially as a preference. Do you like green tea or black tea?

look at your teeth nigger and ask yourself, why did I evolve to have teeth that could bite and tear?

If an opinion isn't a preference then what the hell is it?

The biased amerimutt doesn't want to give up his (((prefrences)))
>butt muh cavemen
>Lions do it
Take the vegan pill, dont eat the flesh of young animals

If you mean telling people to not try to excuse their fallacious arguments by saying "fallacy fallacy" then yeah it applies

Why would you eat a young animal when you can just wait until it grows and then you have more to eat? Are you stupid or just retarded?

Trying to turn me queer eh Akmed not gonna work I eat meat like god intended

Am I arguing with a retard or are you just pretending? Everything you said was wrong, you stupid fuck.
You're committing the fallacy fallacy because you think saying "It's a fallacy" shuts down the conversation. That *IS* how it applies in arguments, you motherfucking idiot, which is exactly what you're doing.
Appeal to nature is *not* always fallacy, you stupid piece of shit. It only becomes a fallacy if you think "it happens *in* nature, so therefore it is always ok or correct".

Oh, ok. So the fallacy fallacy fallacy is only logically admissible if I tell somebody something on the internet.

That's a good axiom.

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF EDIBLE ANIMAL SPECIES

AND PEOPLE WANT TO DESTROY THEIR HABITAT FOR PLANTS!!

An opinion is a view that may or may not be based in fact, a preference is a greater liking of something over another thing. I suppose a preference can be an opinion if not based on a reason, but you can also reason a preference, ie. I don't like milk because I'm lactose intolerant.

>I'm sick and tired
>I'm sick and tired
>I'm sick and tired
>I'm sick and tired
Something tells me he needs to sleep and take his meds.

Not an argument.

I will kill three animals for each vegan posts I see in This board from now on.
No I won't even eat them I'll leave them to rot. Just go to the woods shoot three rabbits and back home.
You'll have them all on your coscience.

I was with you up until you said you can reason a preference. If I met a guy and I liked the way he smelled, which is weird, that doesn't mean I can reason out why the fuck I like the way another guy smells.

There are a bazillion edible meat on earth

what's your excuse?

Also a strawman.

If he's sick and tired all the time, he should probably change his eating habits to include a more balanced diet. I suggest he consume more meats.

Not always! In the case of the milk it wouldn't be an opinion, as it's a reasoned preference.

What is this even. Is this a white preference reference?

Well no, as I said, the fallacy fallacy only means that the thing being argued isn't necessarily false just because the guy arguing is arguing falsely. To determine if the argument in question IS true or false, you have to argue non-fallaciously.

Example, "the sky is blue because I like the sky and my favorite color is blue, so the sky must be blue." The sky of course is blue, but if the argument rested on that alone, it would be an illogical argument. The fallacy fallacy would be to say that the sky isn't blue because the guy arguing it is used such poor logic.

checked
So you admit there is a fallacy fallacy as well?

soys will be soys

Its 3rd world brown people that are eating all of our wildlife to death, world wide.

Whites have been subsisting on farmed domesticated animals for centuries, and for the last 100 years almost exclusively.
98% of white hunters only shoot deer and other animals that breed rapidly to unsustainable population levels.
The handful of evil hunters you see on the MSM are shooting old animals, ones that are killing their own, or ones raised for that. And paying a very high price so conservationists can help their population grow.

There is a fallacy fallacy, but it's not something you can call whenever you commit a logical fallacy. The idea is that you could possibly be right even if you're unable to argue why you're right. But if you're going to argue something, logical fallacies are invalid.

>logical fallacies are invalid.
At last I see the light.

Attached: 1537435304182.png (550x617, 75K)

There is room for all of Gods creatures, right next to the potatoes.

What a stupid argument.

>dead plant < dead animal
wow... wow wow wow

I can’t shoot plants.

Attached: 850CF953-39AA-4585-916E-9B4A3C36A885.jpg (3264x2448, 1.68M)

Your aim is absolutely terrible. Try practicing by shooting dandelions.

This guy might have a different opinion.

Attached: 9288A516-4A79-4E8B-944F-0264FF3BF332.jpg (1024x763, 231K)

You missed the plant

>over 70,000 dead animals on earth
>and people want to chew on sticks and leaves and bug feces.

Replace "most" with "all", and "want" with "need".

Flesh is delicious

They come to America en masse to change the USA against the will of it's citizens. That's an invasion in my book.

Reducing immigration was the main thing he promised voters in 2016. Keeping your campaign promises is in no way misusing office.

He spent plenty of time commemorating the six gorillion Jews that died in Pittsburgh and there literally were no vicitims in the mail bomb thingy.

The press is the enemy of the people. The fact that WaPo keeps posting opeds like this proves it.

Hating Soros isn't the same as hating Jews.

Democrats are just as partisan as republicans. This oped exemplifies that. Clearly partisanship is a much broader issue than Trumps twitter feed.

I don't trust pro-democrat lie detectors.

Fake news. He spends more time at rallies alone than that article claims he is working.

Ending birthright citizenship isn't "kooky". 164 countries including all of the European countries the dems like so much refuse birthright citizenship.

The extra debt is a bit shitty, I admit

Trump doesn't have to have the same agenda as Reagan or Bush just because he is republican. No inconsistencies in his pro-tarrif stance.

You and king nigger also politicized justice. If Trump did nothing, the FBI would still be a tool for the Dems

Yes, new republicans like Trump keep appearing. The fire rises. That is a good thing.

>And I say that as a former Republican.
You were literally the VP in a Dem cabinet. How fucking dishonest can you get?

I have no problem eating the flesh of a live animal, but they’d nail me for animal cruelty

Attached: Red.png (1000x1346, 1.04M)

1. Higher trophic level foods allow us to absorb more nutrients.
2. Animals are an extension of our digestion. They are a step in the process of getting energy from the sun and soil.
3. Plant products dont have b 12.
4. Agriculture has very little genetic relevance.
5. Most fruits and vegatables are only recently domesticated.
6.Meat has been the best source of nutrition for MILLIONS of years for humans.
7. Cooking large quantities of meat is what allowed us to have intelligence.
8. Animals and humans suffer in harmony together.
9. Global environmental change is not a bad thing.
10. Peopl eat exclusively meat and live extremely productive healthy lives, some as long 10 years.

Agriculture used to have B12 on vegetables before pesticides were introduced.

In India the veg still has b12

B12 is made by bacteria poop

You clean the life out of your food and are terrified of germs in the west

no wonder MRSA took hold

Taking psychoactive plants gave you intelligence.

Suffering in harmony is the most stupid thing I have ever heard

bacterium are animals too

No.