Why not just improve yourself instead of venting through right-wing politics? Globalism is only bad for you because you don't have good enough academic credentials to get a great salary and move to a low-crime area (globalism correlates with falling crime rates in the 1st world) and the motivation to get into good shape/mental health.
Statistics show that only low-education, poor, senile, or social outcasts go in for this reactionary shit.
Globalism is great when you make 100k a month, when you make 1000 a month it's hell. Guess which group is more numerous.
Oh wait this was bait. My bad.
Because globalism is used by people that claim to want to help society to have access and import abusive wages and behaviors from other countries. Because if we just use making money as the main reason to do anything, well you end up doing all sorts of fucked up things.
Your argument is basically. Hey pol im an abuser and doing real well for myself. Stop crying about the abuse and join me in becoming an abuser so we can make money together. Go fuck yourself and what you create in this world.
Why not both?
Yes, by bettering yourself to be able to have control over the circumstances of your life you can limit your exposure to the negative effects of globalism (other than walking down the streets of Londonistan). That doesn't mean you shouldn't fight against the tide of destruction facing the west
>Globalism is great when you make 100k a month, when you make 1000 a month it's hell
That's what I'm saying, get a great education and you'll be paid something more like the former.
Wages cannot be abusive, you aren't entitled to any wage. Make yourself better and you'll receive a good wage and enjoy the fruits of globalism.
That's not how it works.
Yep, great education just magically grants you a job with 100k a month
>t. leddit retail worker giving life advice.
>best case scenario is you get to live in an insulated bubble in relative luxury that you can not leave for fear of being killed and eaten by the underclass
Wow great future and definitely something to aspire to. How about we don't build a dystopian world and I can keep buying my own groceries instead of needing to have them delivered by drone because otherwise I'll be robbed and killed for looking like my net income is over two dollars a day.
Problem -> Action -> Solution
Most Jow Forumssters are stuck at the first part and won't realize they've wasted their life until they've become what they hate; decadent, poor, lazy and alone.
Save yourself first and foremost by becoming a man of action.
The correlation of money to happiness peaks at around 75k/annum, that's what I mean by "closer" to the 1%, not in terms of literal math.
Illiterate. Crime over the decades has been following, so the "globalist bubble" is a myth. Even outside your superior residence, you'll be fine.
Great post.
>reactionary shit
You outed yourself as some kind anarchocommunist faggot, probably from /leftypol/ coming here, not knowing half of us were far leftists in the past, the other half were moderates.
People are not equal.
Jews are coward sissy faggots who torture middle class civilians for political purposes:
>appealing to academics on Jow Forums
this place is probably majority >3.6 GPA
/thread
The globalist system is a bubble in the sense that it relies on indefinite, compound economic growth in order to sustain itself ("it needs to keep moving faster in order to stand still" as JFK said about the job market in the 1960s). A system based upon a feature as untenable as indefinite compound growth on a finite planet with a finite number of people with finite needs (demand maturity in developed countries is well documented) is doomed to collapse. We will keep trying to prop it up by importing more Africans, outsourcing more jobs, inflating the economy with more debt, etc., but we are only pushing back the day of reckoning.
>Statistics show that only low-education, poor, senile, or social outcasts go in for this reactionary shit.
Do you even listen to yourself? You sound like a fascist
>>Make yourself better and you'll receive a good wage and enjoy the fruits of globalism
Become a good wage slave so we can further drop the wages of basic labor in all countries to that of the most fucked up of all the countries. Why not spread the wealth instead of just fucking everyone over with the lowest common denominator (cultures that are willing to sell their own sons and daughters at pennies of a dollar) yeah let's all compete with these idiots sounds like a great solution.
What? I'm explicitly advocating for globalist capitalism here.
>brainlets need to condense all their enemies into one archetype
Lunatic.
The stats say most voters for reactionary shit are not college educated, nevermind actual academics or specialist professionals.
>The globalist system is a bubble in the sense that it relies on indefinite, compound economic growth in order to sustain itself
That's not true though, since it survives recessions, which are the opposite.
>I'm explicitly advocating for globalist capitalism here.
Yeah. I don't want to be ruled by a bunch of Jewish gangsters and pedophiles.
But the system is structured to work under conditions of long-term GDP growth, which is going to become an ecological and structural impossibility in the coming decades. Look at the political consequences of secular stagnation in Europe so far, and this is only the beginning.
That’s a great big [citation needed] ya got there, pal.
I don't mind that accusation, but I will point out that most ACTUAL fascist governments seemed to use my kind of rhetoric except for the opposite targets, i.e. they basically rewarded low-education, poor, senile, outcast, volk tards instead of my preference towards the well-educated.
Basic labourers in the rich countries have had it too good for too long, they lack specialist skills, and they should learn them or suffer the consequences of competing with harder working foreigners.
Anti-semiticism is not welcome ITT. I don't care for conspiracy theories that apply to the low-education, poor, senile, or social outcasts.
>But the system is structured to work under conditions of long-term GDP growth
That's not proven either (not saying the opposite it true, but there hasn't been a long enough case study yet). I suspect you're wrong because even if there were to be long-term depression, even in such circumstances the most militantly globalist countries would survive best. WW2 is really the closest experiment of those conditions, and globalism won out.
For what?
>Crime over the decades has been following, so the "globalist bubble" is a myth.
>has been following
>Illiterate.
Oh the irony. Your poor typing ability aside crime rate alone dropping along is not indicative of anything. If you look at the graphs of the US crime rate it's clear that the large drop that came at the middle of the 1990s was largely just the return to the mean from the massive spike in crime at the end of the 60s and had the trend from the 1950s and prior held crime rates would be significantly lower than today. It's also worth noting that harsher incarceration and policing actions in the 1980s and 90s were largely a response to this and were a major driving force behind the lower crime rate. Coincidentally the 60s is when neoliberal policies began to move into full swing in the US but correlation != causation etc.
We can also look at individual US cities to see microcosms of how extreme class, and ethnic divide play out and the answer is poor ethnic areas have crime and the wealthy white or model minority areas do not. The people from the affluent areas do not go into the poor ones and vice versa. Multiracial US cities are highly segregated and there is almost zero intermingling between the two and nothing gives us any reason to doubt this would change if this trend was amplified through globalist policy.
I don't see how any of that is a problem if you can just make yourself affluent. You make a pedantic point about literacy and you can't even process the one simple question of this thread.
>Implying blacks and Muslims are well educated
>implying they get paid high wages in the West/US.
Oh wait, some of them do, the few that got a great education. So yes, in a way. I know that must hurt for the reactionaries to see that despite their own native privileges, foreigners and their descendants are more valuable than them.
Are you functionally retarded? I correctly pointed out being wealthy in a globalized world is just having a nicer prison cell and you claimed that wasn't true which was then shown to be incorrect and now you're backpedaling claiming I hadn't addressed the original point which was addressed in my first post. If you're going to throw around shitty bait at least have a backup plan that doesn't involve arguing like a Jew as described by Hitler.
Education and hard work does nothing, you must scheme and obtain monopolies by manipulating masses in great secret alliances, without this you'll always be tax-cattle for the wealthiest
>>they should learn them or suffer the consequences of competing with harder working foreigners.
Thanks for proving my point, you just want an excuse to abuse and fuck over the most vulnerable of your own population... I can only imagine how you abuse foreign populations.
Globalization from this statement has the incentive to continue fucking over and making these populations larger, actually helping them would drop your profits. That's the point. That's where it's obvious you are just a piece of shit abuser pushing for further abuse in the world. Go fuck yourself trash. Your bank account doesn't remove the fact that you are a trash human.
>>I don't care for conspiracy theories that apply to the low-education, poor, senile, or social outcasts.
In other words, I don't have to actually admit that globalism is a good cover to abuse people in extra fucked up ways because im one of the good guys that only abuses people "ethically" please don't let me argue anything else.
Further in the day. Look at this whore, she is willing to fuck me for a free dinner. She doesn't deserve to make enough money to pay for it though because she needs to compete with imported wage slaves that are willing to work for half the wage she needs to live in this city.
Go fuck yourself
>I correctly pointed out being wealthy in a globalized world is just having a nicer prison cell
Where the fuck did you do that? You repeated some retarded myth that if a rich person leaves their gated community they will be robbed and killed (even though people living outside those rarely get robbed or killed). How is it living in a prison cell to have a wealthy life? You can buy everything. And people today have access to even more commodities and travelling (including sea and space) than the royals of olden times.
Honestly, the only people seeing decline in the West are the degenerates themselves losing out to harder working foreigners.
Not true, a great qualification from a top university is an easy route to a good corporate job.
Wages are not an entitlement, so lowering them is not an "abuse", it's merely rectifying the privilege low-skilled first-worlders had over their far-away competition. You are so eager to demonise me that you refuse to see that very simple fact: people are not born entitled to stuff just for existing.
>In other words, I don't have to actually admit that globalism is a good cover to abuse people in extra fucked up ways because im one of the good guys that only abuses people "ethically" please don't let me argue anything else.
It's hilarious that you accuse me of that for attacking a conspiracy theory that was literally akin to the ideology of the German Nazi party.
Yes, refusing to pay people what you think they don't deserve it ethical. Killing all jews because you think they are all part of some universal timeless scheme is actually unethical. Stop trying to demonise me merely for not wanting people to be paid what they are not worthy of.
>>lowering them (wages) is not an "abuse", it's merely rectifying the privilege low-skilled first-worlders had over their far-away competition
So please state what the global humanitarian wage should be??? Please give me a number, does it include enough money to pay for where you live? Or 2 times the cost of a liter of milk. What is it. What does it take into account since it's obvious you just want to get people to sell themselves for as cheap as possibly human. So what the fuck is a livable wage to you?
They do this as a distraction so they have no free time to improve because that’s hard.
Tell me where you live mate, I'mma send you a present, first class post.
A big box of my shit.
Eat my shit.
>So please state what the global humanitarian wage should be??? Please give me a number, does it include enough money to pay for where you live? Or 2 times the cost of a liter of milk. What is it. What does it take into account since it's obvious you just want to get people to sell themselves for as cheap as possibly human. So what the fuck is a livable wage to you?
I already said there should be no such thing, no guaranteed wage (in theoretical terms anyway, if economists/politicians think the masses will be better pacified or the economy will run better with minimum wages, I'm happy for them to put those in place whenever they are needed).
London.
True. I think with the power of therapy such habits could be erased though.
For sure man
Who wouldn't want a global currency to permanently control and enslave the plebs
Im a high school drop out, sooo.....
So what do you suggest be done to people that intentionally create predatory scams, religions, politicians that intentionally manipulate dumb masses into further dropping the value of basic labor to obtain an unofficial slave labor class with 0 opportunity to rise above it. Are they just dumb? Does that give everyone the right to keep them like animals since you intentionally stunted their intellectual growth?
That study was a load of shit. I was making over six figures but being in the city it still sucked ass, and I would have been more happy with more money.
I make ~300-400k a year from being a professional trader. I still despise globalism and wish people like you were lit on fire.
It may be control and enslavement, but it's pretty tame compared to what would pass for those even a millennium ago. Globalism has been good for the masses, even when it lowers them.
Don't worry, globalism will probably force you into relatively inexpensive community college courses or something sooner or later. It may be tough,it may get tougher but it would have been worse without it.
Important post, OP. The only way out of the populist/reactionary cul-de-sac is by really taking in OP's message.
Globalism has been lowering crime in general. If dumbasses are still getting taken advantage of, that's hardly a fault. Things don't become extinct overnight. Globalism is also making the planet better educated than ever before.
Wrong and anecdotal.
Populism always destroys itself, or globalism will do it for it. But I hope people will take in my message for their own good.
What is your heritage?
Anglo.
What would you have thought if I said
A) Jewish
B) Middle-Eastern
C) South/SE Asian
D) East Asian
E) Continental Euro
F) African
?
Just wondering why it matters to you.
Crime is higher than before, the scams are just being implemented as government programs. Healthcare and insurance in the USA being a perfect example of that. Provide less service while charging more to justify 30 thousand different scams that people are running.
The only crime that has dropped is the one that low income people commit on higher income. Its only increased in the opposite direction. Go fuck yourself shit abuser.
I Come from the upper class, I'm one of those that takes benefits from globalism.Thus I still hate it because it ruins our culture and floods us with gays and shitskins.I'd rather be poor in traditional Italy like my ancestors have always been than being rich in a shithole and my race on the way to extinct herself
Then I would have excused your lack of attachment to the society you occupied.
What is wrong? You don't have to believe me, but I am highly educated. I don't see why you find it surprising that lemmings abide by the current depraved system. This is the natural condition of citizenry. They serve who feeds them.
A small elite of anti democratic anti globalists will eventually take power though. All empires fail, and globo homo is on its last legs. Don't be an obstacle.
Sounds good, but the problem is there are people like me who are literally not good at anything.
Where do I start?
Violent crime was replaced with white collar. Now that is being dealt with. Be patient.
Your culture ruined itself, don't blame globalism.
But "anglo" is also a mix of immigrants. Why are recent assimilations any different?
I don't deserve to burn. I believe you, but it's anecdotal.
You're open-minded unlike everyone else here, that's a massive advantage in itself. Therapy, education etc can sometimes fix "useless" people, if not you can hopefully live a peaceful life on welfare, or if not at least only do petty crimes to survive.
>Violent crime was replaced with white collar. Now that is being dealt with. Be patient.
Lmao you mean organized and legalized by government right.
You're just classist posting like a shitty plutocratic anglo. Class conflict is one of the reasons your dogshit globo homo system does not work.
>All empires fail, and globo homo is on its last legs. Don't be an obstacle.
Ive heard that term before. What does it mean?
Globalist homosexual accepting society. Globo homo.
As for the latter point, it means don't get in the way.
>Statistics show that only low-education, poor, senile, or social outcasts go in for this reactionary shit.
Statistics show a rising disparity between the wealthy and the poor. Wages (at least in the U.S.) have been stagnant since the 1980's. So why don't you just pay more in taxes to take care of these people?
Prior to globalism, people were paid a livable wage. Now they have to compete on a global level and against a flood of immigrants. I'm not saying people can't rise out of poverty. I'm only pointing out how stupid your advice is.
>Academic credentials
>Statistics show that only low-education, poor, senile, or social outcasts go in for this reactionary shit.
Nope, opposite is true.
Self-improvement is a meme.
The educational status and income you can realistically achieve is determined by stuff beyond your control, like your genetics, the presence or absence of lead poisoning and head injuries. Remember, the brain is a physical thing, neuropathways are real.
Isn't it only a meme in the sense that people with bad genetics will have the opposite attitude to self-improvement unless forced to?
>You repeated some retarded myth that if a rich person leaves their gated community they will be robbed and killed (even though people living outside those rarely get robbed or killed).
How is it a myth when it's objectively true in US cities. If you go to the ghettos you will be robbed and maybe killed if you look like you have money. What you're proposing is a world with this class divide cranked up to 11 and you somehow think this robbing and killing trend will not hold when the class divide is larger, and the underclass stupider and more violent. Look at South Africa's cities if you want a snapshot of your future.
>How is it living in a prison cell to have a wealthy life?
Because your movement is limited entirely to a tiny slice of the world where the walls and gates are high enough to keep out the animals. Regardless of how nice it is that is definitely a prison in a figurative, if not literal sense.
based mexican
Wages are fine. The wealth disparity is a result of the global economy drastically increasing the wealth of multinational corporations and their shareholders, officers, etc. Before globalism, the "1%" primarily did business within the USA and had a limited market. Now, the "1%" does business all over the world has a much bigger market and much larger share of wealth.
GOYIMS DEFENSE LEAGUE.
PLUS JOB.
fine for me.
get out Jew and go to improve yourself istead of losing time with reactionaries.
oh but we are
>Why can't you be part of the elite?
Gee, I wonder