>BILLINGS — The Libertarian candidate in Montana's U.S. Senate race threw his support behind his Republican opponent Wednesday in a surprise move that came in response to an election mailer from an unknown group that appeared aimed at undermining Rosendale's support among conservatives.
>He said it appeared to be an attempt by so-called dark money groups to influence Montana's election and that he's decided Rosendale is the best candidate to stop such efforts. Federal election laws require campaign materials to disclose their funding source.
>"The reality is I'm only going to get 3 or 4 percent of the vote, and he (Rosendale) has the character to combat this issue," Breckenridge said. "I'm standing in unity and solidarity with Matt to combat dark money in politics."
for some reason they have 1 democrat senator cuck named Joe Tester. he's being BTFO this election.
James Gonzalez
the indiana libertarian candidate should do the same
the democratic party here is currently trying to split the republican vote by sending out fliers extolling the conservative virtues of the libertarian party
Jack Smith
I think they have a democratic senator. Most of them were elected by "blue dog democrats" and have been in office for a while.
Leo Fisher
>we've dispatched the US military >we hope nothing happens
The Montana Democratic party runs only people born in Montana for higher office. Whenever a Republican runs they say "he wasn't born here" and that's how they win.
Lucas Scott
This. Libertarians are so hell-bent on getting all of what they want that they end up electing Democrats and getting none of what they want.
>Voted against Kavanaugh >Good guy Jesus, what the fuck is wrong with you people? Your muh blue dog democrats vote against you all the time.
Noah Stewart
>We will consider that a firearm! We will consider that a firearm! >We will consider that a firearm! We will consider that a firearm! >We will consider that a firearm! We will consider that a firearm! >We will consider that a firearm! We will consider that a firearm!
Nathaniel Perez
Ignore that faggot he is a west coast loser that either moved to Missoula, Kalispell or bozeman.
Ryan Wood
>still much better >out of state douchebag who only wants to fuck you over for money The biggest negative to tester is him being pro-gun control. Otherwise, he at least tries to do good by this state as much as possible. I've lived in this state all my life, LARPing faggot. Tester is objectively a better person that Rosendale. If he didn't vote against him, he likely would've been shat on by the party and tossed out for some turbokike dem from jewzoola
Adam Ortiz
Rick Breckenridge was a Republican Plant from the beginning. He never had any intention of being Libertarian, he was put there specifically by the Republicans to subvert the Libertarians. He's part of the so-called dark money groups ffs.
>won't vote a conservative onto SCOTUS >gun grabber >beholden to the DNC Are you one of them 'muh white gibs' people I've heard so much of? You make me glad, for the first time ever, my Montanan cattle ranching ancestors moved to Alberta, congrats.
Isaiah Foster
>gibs no, I just don't want to trade out Tester for a guy who is arguably a bigger douchebag in every way possible.
tuesday nov 6. probably 8pm eastern time results start coming in and going until like midnight 1am
Nolan Jackson
A solid red state staying red isn't news
Leo Hughes
the incumbent senator is a dem
Lucas Clark
how many libertarian voters could there be. sort of cute anyways.
Andrew Martin
>objectively better person You really are a fucking liberal.
Hudson Mitchell
Kill yourself.
Demonrats haven't cast a single vote for any of Trump's endorsed bills
Sebastian Scott
>we hope nothing happens >I have set the ROE so that rocks are considered firearms >US military has the greenlight to return fire
Kevin Kelly
In Montana? Could be a lot
Lucas Thompson
Ever play Far Cry 5? Nah neither did I but that's how mountain people are
Aaron Williams
Fuck Tester he lied about Donald Trumps VA Sec'y nominee
Julian Stewart
As a Libertarian, I vote for Republicans because they are the ONLY ones who can beat Democraps.
Christian Cox
The state is red
Michael Hill
t. Boomer
Zachary Ward
ok, yeah. that's why the incumbent democrat is in the fight for his life over the senate seat. as a counterexample west virginia is a red state and joe manchin is up for election this year but he's almost undoubtedly keeping his seat
Joseph Cook
i wish the same thing would happen in new jersey
Cooper Jenkins
Tester likes Jews and they like him. Nice try though, "Montanon".
Mick Rich needs to drop out and endorse Gary Johnson or vice versa.
Otherwise the Democrat wins (again).
Hunter Fisher
It's gonna be red everywhere you ignorant Dems. That's what you get for going full commies.
A total bloodbath. Have fun.
Hudson Bennett
Bud Libertarians are an excellent choice when/if the Republicans are controlled by zionist weasels. I only voted Trump because of a feeling he was different. Still didn't trust him for the longest time. But now I do. Only thing libertarians suck at are border and racial issues. Libertarianism is how we should treat our people once our position and country has been secured.
Justin Brooks
Honestly if the general American natsocs were in favor of having their state and being on peaceful terms with a neighboring libertarian territory, letting anyone from their state move to our territory and having an immigration process to allow people from our side into their nation...I would 100% happily work with natsocs. I dont see this as being realistic though, I think if the current natsocs took power tomorrow libertarians would be totally fucked. Right now we have nothing to gain from allying with them.
>I think if the current natsocs took power tomorrow libertarians would be totally fucked. any more fucked than the current system fucks libertarians?
William Evans
Yea actually, the current system wouldnt outright shoot them or jail them.
Austin Powell
What about when they come confiscate property? Or your guns?
Jacob Phillips
Repainting socialism with rhetoric on heritage, which we already have inherently without your ideas, isn't effective. Freedom of association with freedom of speech, and the right to bear arms, are natural rights. These are not granted to us by your god state. We do not need nor would we ever accept your permission for what God has given to us inherently.
>republican drops out of race to endorse another republican shocking
Jaxon Baker
Did Tester vote to confirm Kavanaugh? Didn’t think so. Your point is invalid
Dominic Sullivan
The national socialist system also allowed for confiscation of property and the government taking over a business entirely if it didnt meet their standards. If the government determines the standards, and can take it if it doesnt meet standards, you dont really have private property. Private property wouldnt be more protected in a national socialist system than it is now.
They wont ever confiscate guns in the US, they'll just keep passing tiny incremental laws. Im not sure why you would trust a national socialist government with gun laws either, restricting the rights of the Jewish to own weapons made it a lot easier to round them up. (Holohoax is a myth, but Jew roundups happened and camps happened). Do you think it wouldnt be incredibly easy for them to do that to the tiny group that libertarians are? Do you think we'd find others making a strong defense for libertarians?
