Have you heard of Dr. Judy Wood? Did you know she has been researching 9/11 since 2001 and has already filed several law suits against NIST's contractors for science fraud, and legal requests that NIST's fraudulent data gets reexamined? Dr. Judy Wood has received more than one threat due to the research she has done and the evidence she has gathered, and one of her students was also murdered in 2006. Surprisingly, Dr. Judy Wood is the only 9/11 researcher who has submitted evidence to the courts in pursuit of the truth. I. In 2007, Dr. Judy Wood filed several legal cases against the corporations NIST had contracted to conduct the 9/11 "investigations", many of which are military / defense / weapons organizations involved in Directed Energy research (huge conflict-of-interest). The filings in these legal cases included Requests For Corrections (RFC) based on the Data Quality Act, and Qui Tam whistle-blower cases. One of her legal cases made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in October of 2009. She has been actively pursuing 9/11 Truth with her lawyer, despite the lack of support she has received from Dr. Steven Jones and other members of the 9/11 Truth community. The legal documents from her court cases can be viewed at the following links:
II. Dr. Judy Wood has collected an overwhelming amount of evidence which suggests that a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind was used to powderize ('dustify') the primary steel and concrete portions of the WTC buildings, while burning and bending aluminum, yet leaving paper and many other materials unharmed. These characteristics are matched by those of "The Hutchison Effect", and are the result of "field effects" and energy interference. John Hutchison has filed an affidavit in Dr. Wood's court case, to legally testify to the numerous similarities between The Hutchison Effect and the 9/11 attacks.
III. Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bi-material joints. She has taught courses including: Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials), Strength of Materials Testing. 1. Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D - 'The New Hiroshima' Presentation : youtube.com/watch?v=E2NFKJKFZX8 2. Dr. Judy Wood's evidence-packed website: drjudywood.com/wtc 3. A very important, related website: checktheevidence.com
IV. Here are some very important video documentaries discussing the reality of The Hutchison Effect and other suppressed technologies, such as Cold Fusion, Anti-Gravity, and Military Energy Weapon Technology, which are related to 9/11: 1. Heavy Watergate: The Cold Fusion Cover Up (Documentary | 45mins): youtube.com/watch?v=q3YCYijh478 3. Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect: youtube.com/watch?v=57ZKTA7nx8U 4. What Turned The Twin Towers To DUST on 9/11? youtube.com/watch?v=lGXDmNZCeKo
Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Brief Summary of Key 9/11 Evidence to Explain | Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D (Materials Science Engineering) youtube.com/watch?v=a01FmP8-Bws
New york isnt real and 9/11 is a hologram/movie type deal to spread fear and bring in the patriot act. The "New York" people claim to live in/be from is really Boston and its government programming to make these people think they live in NY to make sure 9/11 has feet to stand on
Joseph Jackson
How come steel and concrete were pulverized, aluminum had electrical burns, but paper was unharmed? Nano-thermite and heat do not selectively damage certain materials, so how come thousands and thousands of paper sheets were completely unharmed? • If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come there are many reports of power outages and electrical failures in the areas surrounding ground zero during the attacks? • If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, where is all the molten steel? Thousands of pictures, yet not a single one shows large quantities of molten steel? • If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come the resulting steel and concrete dust clouds were not hot enough to burn the people it coated nor to set adjacent buildings on fire? • If thermite alone caused the ‘collapses’, how come there was significant magnetosphere readings in Alaska at the very same time of the 9/11 attacks? • Why was the Alaskan magnetosphere normal until immediately before and during the 9/11 attacks, when there was suddenly a huge surge in electromagnetic activity? • If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero experienced metal warping and electricity-like burns and holes during the attacks, even though they were not exposed to thermite? • If thermite alone caused the destruction of the buildings, how come countless vehicles located several blocks away from ground zero were flipped upside down or on their side?
bathtub, debris would have ruptured walls, flood lower manhattan, walls not ruptured
dust hit people, yet no burned bodies, couldn't of been hot yet more than 1400 cars toasted, paper also survived
over 1500 people disappeared, no bodies, no dna
several hundred people's remains were recoverd and ceremonial burried. over 1500 missing
many jumpers stripped naked before jumping
50 times normal level of tritium
hurricane erin diverted off the coast of NY on 9/11, never mentioned in news
recorded in alaska, ground base at 6 different locations, recorded the earths magnetic field shifting with each WTC event (planes crashing, collapsing)
hutchison effect static field interferes radio frequency signals
43,600 windows 600,000 sq ft of glass 200,000 tons of structural steel 5,000,000 sq ft if gypsum 6 acres of marble 425,000 cubic yards of concrete chief of fire department's comment on the debris "nothing but powder and metal"
only 1 horribly melted filing cabnet, from the ben and jerrys near WTC 1, was recovered (out of an estimated 45,000). remnants of file holders found inside
13 first responders, 1 civilian, survived at the base of the buildings and in stairwell b.. and walked out
Jay Jonas (firefighter, survivor in stairwell B) "I looked and said, "Guys, there used to be 106 floors above us and now I'm seeing sunsine." ..."There's nothing above us. That big building doesn't exist." ...These are the biggest office buildings in the world and i didn't see one desk or one chair or one phone, nothing"
no one has disputed Judy Wood's physical evidence, not sure how you dispute physical evidence in the first place (but people sure try)
Aiden Nguyen
cannot be explained by thermal or kinetic mechanisms: faster than gravity destruction no appreciable rubble no appreciable seismic impact bathtub survived dustification cool dust cloud nano-scale dust continued breakdown of dust over 1400 toasted cars exploding scott air tanks levitated cars and witnesses cylindrical building cutouts unburned paper materials glowing w/o high heat smooth bends in structural steel round holes in windows peeling and thinning of metal rapid rusting ground fuming years later tritium without ionizing radiation iron rich micro-spheres bankers trust demolition jumper anomalies parallels to the hutchison effect hurricane erin shifts in the earths magnetic field
why do so many people who consider themselves (((truthers))) spend so much time attacking someone whos actually bringing court cases to the likes of NIST? one of which actually made it to the supreme court, who apparently can deny overseeing a case if they dont feel like it... youtube.com/watch?v=jpLbzLzY9HY
>nukes no. although 50x the normal levels of tritium were found in the water, there was no radiation present. there is also no fucking way nukes would've left so many people/paper/trees unscathed
Hey Mossad. You and all your friends are gonna die soon. Israel will cease to exist.
Nathaniel King
people also survived in the base of the tower in the stairwell seen in the back here. not only did they survive, they walked out on their own shortly afterwards... no way a building actually fell down on top of them, especially not of that size youtube.com/watch?v=LvdNHaOBGk4
what makes you say such a weird thing? im not claiming the innocence of israel, just the methods that were used. israel of course had their hands all over this
i've never seen this many JIDF in every thread. so many of them. some giant shit is probably about to go down
Jacob Perry
israeli on proxy?
David Bell
>projection, the post.
Jace Sanchez
the planners are the same in all these major events, black nobility and the like like this other user said would be my guess. but were talking about judy wood here and the use of directed energy weapons.
how do people survive in the base of a tower that "collapsed"? how come the ground only shook for 8 seconds? how come the buildings hit the ground faster than it takes a bowling ball to hit the ground when dropped from the top of the towers? how does (((controlled-demolition))) even begin to answer all the anomalies found around those buildings
>everyone is a JIDF poster anons, OP is Netanyahu himself. You went straight up accusing OP of being a shill in your first post. Either you are a dumb user, who hasn't reviewed Judy Woods case, and has conducted himself in this manner out of plain ignorance, which is an inmature trait
Or you are a kike shill trying to disrupt the Thread. Stop with the shenanigans cause you are tickling my Ultra-Sense.
Xavier Gomez
this is the kingdome, a real demolition.. notice it shook the ground for MUCH longer than with a much more massive building??? please explain how this makes sense, you cant
here's an inside view of building 6. you can clearly see nothing fell into this building, so what caused the damage? hell, it doesnt even have enough debris to account for its own building
>I have'nt seen Woods case, she must be retarded because I already know Israelis put bombs there. Read and view Judy Woods case before posting you nigger.
Anthony Edwards
The same way they do in any structural collapse. This is not a new phenomena. You can look at examples of people trapped in bombed buildings during any war, or at survivors from collapsed buildings in earthquakes.
Jose Bennett
how anyone can look at these photo and think this was a controlled-demolition is beyond me. where the fuck did those buildings go? they blew away in the wind
jared kushner spends a shit ton of money to shill on his favorite and most influential website. but you already knew this
Brody Baker
some steel hit the ground, not even close to the amount that should have. 200 thousand tons, and no one was crushed. this fucking ambulance parked at the base of the towers went unscathed??? and the people surviving in the stairwell, again. the odds of this with an actual collapse are absolutely astronomical
You keep implying foul play in OP information drop. I apologise for putting words on your mouth. But you are doing the same to OP without having a look at what he posts.
Adrian Miller
does this underground look like 2 massive buildings just (((collapsed))) on top of it??? no
why would people be hanging out of a ~100 story window to take their clothes off? if there was fire, the clothes would protect them some from the heat, so why strip? and why the fuck in such a crazy situation?
>OP subject is about Judy Woods investigation on 9/11 >emotional poster brings in name calling and talks about Kushner shilling as evidence of anons and OP being JIDF posters. No one takes you seriously. You conduct yourself as an idiot, engaged in an emotional response that was'nt warranted. Apologise for your baseless accusations or be treated with hostility.
