Admit it

>Republicans have broken politics
And that's a good thing!

Nah, this is the most important chart.

Attached: 1537147624451.png (711x401, 332K)

Republicans moved slightly to the right in the last 30 years. Democrats moved FAR to the left.

The source of conflict is the new variable, which is the far left that has grown in influence.

Attached: 1994 average politically active democrat.png (684x654, 29K)

cont.

Attached: 2014 average politically active.png (671x659, 28K)

>voxenstein

Saying admit it is a form of intimidation to agree without actually providing anything reasonable.

Come on!! Everybody knows that vox is bullshit

This is a great post

...

>gay lipsy heeb
that's gonna be a yikes for me

Your graphs are about political activists in the population, while the video is about actual politicians in the Congress.
Democrat activists are much more liberal than politicians while Republican politicians are much more conservative than even activists. That's the problem with the US politics.

>republican politicians are more conservative than activists
LMAO

Attached: three kingdoms kek.gif (320x200, 1.9M)

Compromise is doing whatever Democrats want. That is the belief that underlies their entire argument.

I seriously would be far more liberal if those fuckers were not so insane

The party that elects actual socialists, people who don't believe in borders, and does not value the first and second amendments at all is calling the other side exteme.

I hate these people

I'm so sick of these beta heebs

There's a hooktube link in the OP...

if you want to influence me then you should try harder than using some lowtest lefty bespectacled faggot to send the message

No. Democrats for example might want single-payer universal free healthcare for everyone. Yet they compromised with quite right-leaning ACA (Obamacare) and what did they get from Republicans? Repeal, repeal, repeal. Shutdown government over funding. Healthcare is not a right. Obamacare is socialism. Only people who pay in millions should get healthcare, everyone else should die immediately.

>"broken politics"
That doesn't make any sense. "Politics" is merely a word that describes political competition, no matter how bad or good it is. Politics cannot be "broken". It's like saying "disagreement is broken".

Two party system is shit so the repubs which claim to stand for rights and liberties have been pressed to start following through thanks to Trump. Dems only focus on cities, where there are large, diverse populations dependent on government resources and infrastructure. Can send a dozen people making minimum wage to canvas, go door to door, text and call possible democratic voters. Dems serve a different demographic which is the problem

How can they claim the republicans have moved farther to the right in ther last 30 years then the democrats have moved left?
is there a single issue the republicans are further right on now than they were thirty years ago, with the exception of immigration (which wasn't such a problem then)?
Meanwhile the democrats have started seperating people in identity blocs and are openly for things such as affirmative action which was barely a concept back then.

I fucking hate that faggot that does these videos. He deserves AIDS

It's broken in the US.
Both sides see disagreement as existential.
Working political debate is marketplace of ideas, not struggle for fucking survival.

I lined up the charts and saved for reference. Just a reminder how bad things have gotten.

>Republican in 1994: We need to defend family values and reduce immigration
>Democrat in 1994: We should do both of those, but not beat up the gays or immigrants

Republican present day: We need to defend family values a little harder and stop immigration
Democrat: Family is a patriarchal concept that oppresses women and minorities. Borders should not exist.

Attached: polarization 1994-2014.jpg (686x1115, 64K)

Only one, which is economics. The Republicans use to be for free trade, and now are opposed to it. They also are beginning to despise the Federal Reserve and are now for the gold standard. Beyond that and immigration, nothing.

sorry i was too nauseated about vox that i didnt notice it

Ching chong, bing bong.

I couldn't care less since I don't live in Red Dot Country.

>republicans did it!

Attached: 1468991658233.png (480x593, 67K)

It's actually the proces of governing.

Thanks for posting. It's interesting to see the difference between the extremes on both sides in 2014, how the Republicans really shy away from being consistently conservative while the Democrats don't care much for it.

Attached: hm.gif (498x342, 672K)

>democrats have been consistent

umm no sweetie, obama care is immeasurably further left than anything any democrat has done. and if you want to look at social issues, obama campaigned opposing gay marriage and open borders

who the fuck decided which presidents are """moderate"""" or """extreme""". trumps platform is basically the same platform as clintons on most issues

Right, they seem to be basing their claim on pretty dubious criteria.

I totally believe the Vox video. Democrats are the same as always.
youtube.com/watch?v=fWc1qT8M1eU

>That's the problem with the US politics.
There are a lot more problems with US politics than Republican politicians becoming more conservative. Trying to blame it all on that is a weak move.

and thats from four fucking years ago. just imagine what it looks like now.

>giving a shit what some AIDS ridden looking faggot thinks about anything

youtu.be/YsmgPp_nlok

I forgot foreign policy. Isolationism is now the dominant faction within the Republican Party (which has an Isolationist and Internationalist factions). That was last dominant before Pearl Harbor.

The immigration, isolationism, and anti-federalism is rather potent though, and the Republican's enunciate their views more "clearly" and less willing to compromise on them. Which creates the illusion of being more radical when in actuality it is just their presentation that has changed.

You should start caring.

Attached: 1540064577975.jpg (1024x751, 161K)

1. Polarization is happening everywhere
2. It's because of the left
3. Denying the radicalization of leftist ideals is insanity

And then these faggots don't understand why Brazil of all places elected an actual far-right guy like Bolsonaro.

Unaware and compliant 2020!!

Attached: DUMBfuckliberaltraitors.png (856x1015, 136K)

UH! HOMOPHOBIC MUCH?

Everything you said is true, you just hold the real world in contempt and struggle to reconcile it with your childish worldview.

Translation: traditional kike tricks aren’t working anymore

Attached: 3hoursinphotoshop.png (1268x1248, 33K)

Stop pretending to be that cool Polak

This faggot needs to be hung. I hate this living smuggie fuck

Come on bro, both sides are becoming more extreme.
Let's be honest here.

Attached: 1540879790314.png (996x874, 706K)

There are more liberals than conservatives that have a degree. Explain that, poltards

What's your point, that globalist shills want cheap labor? Maybe immigration was not seen negatively in the 80s but by the 90s it had skyrocketed out of control and both parties began to at least oppose illegal immigration. Prop 187 in California won 59-41%.

What a garbage video. No methodology shown, no unit of "polarization" given. No definition of the "center" or zero.

Pathetic.

the republicans are becoming less cucked (and that's a good thing)

Attached: 06563.png (287x171, 78K)

What do you mean?
It's quite possible to fix the US healthcare, poverty, and inequality problem. It's a problem if you have to pay hundreds thousands of dollars to have some minor surgery or tens of thousands for emergency care visit.

The US is still the wealthiest and the most influential country in the world. It's not hard to set an example for the world that the US could do better for its citizens and beyond.

>Obama was more moderate than Clinton, who signed the budget reconciliation act

yeah yeah

A degree in gender studies and $250,000 in debt only qualifies you to serve lattes to roasties,

>chart ranking people by arbitrary definitions of "extreme"

Open borders and socialism are extreme left as it can get.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-11-02 at 4.36.03 PM.png (631x309, 265K)

I'm not complaining about the right going further right, that's for sure.
We are merely doing what is necessary to keep ourselves alive.

The dude is a flaming faggot millenial with like 20 piercings. You don't even have to watch the video, you know it's flaming hot shit.
You could break this shitskin's forearm with your thumb and index finger.

Gender studies and african history studies BAs are not actual degrees. You might as well say that more liberals are 30000 dollars in debt than conservatives.

Attached: 1541050987742.jpg (359x360, 26K)

The point is Republicans were sane in the 80s and in the beginning of the 90s.

stopped watching when i saw his (((backup)))

This faggot literally refers to himself as a s0yb0y.
Lmao, we're breaking through.

Ideological points were calculated by professor Treehugger Freespirit that has completely no connection to Democratic Party and result was calculated by completely transparent algorithm (but it is secret).

Extreme relative to one another. But that doesn't tell us who is right and who is wrong. Sociopolitical "progress" in the west has matched on unabated in the last 50 to 80 years, you can look at the rightward surge to be a market correction in the areas where rampant liberal methodology has been applied too extravagantly.

Show me a Democratic politician who calls for expropriation of property, nationalization, and other truly extreme "socialism" practices.

I have the line moving slightly, because for the most part Republicans have been moving slightly more right.
However, most Republican positions have remained the same. The biggest difference is that Republicans are giving more pushback as Democrats are trying to pull the country further and further left.

Quantity, not quality

uhh, that's talking about racial demographics in America. Those moon runes on the bottom of each graph in white? They're "Hakujin", white person.
Top is Hispanic. Middle is Asian.
Brown is Kurojin, black person.

>admit it, republicans are using our own tactics against us, no longer playing nice, and beating us at our own game

Ah yes, the classic 'both parties are now fundamentally at odds with one another but somehow only one party is responsible and it just happens to be the one I'm not part of'
What a great take, its like listening to a woman bitch.

reminds me of this graph

Attached: 1528519789690.png (1484x890, 439K)

Low hanging fruit, I know.

Attached: Untitled22.png (1326x900, 950K)

Are you new here? We've been talking about Oretziowhatever for months

More CIA garbage propaganda.

Attached: CIAdowners.jpg (822x1101, 399K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Ocasio-Cortez

>Republicans advocate that we bring laws back to how they were in the 50's

>Somehow this means republicans are MORE extreme than they were in the 50's

It is insanity to suggest importing millions of aliens per year into a nation against the citizenry's will, who happen to be well-armed and will be displaced culturally and economically.

If the same exact arguments and actions were being taken but liberals were winning, politics would be “vibrantly succeeding (and that’s a good thing)”

She doesn't call for that. She is democratic-socialist.

Oh come on at least try

>Republicans advocate that we bring laws back to how they were in the 50's
>Somehow this means republicans are MORE extreme than they were in the 50's
Well, there is a case to be made for that argument. Apathy in adhering to the current situation is different than having the will to change it. You could argue that Clintonite neoliberals are actually conservatives in that sense.

>B-but that's not REAL socialism
Every time, why do you people keep trying to argue with these idiots? Watching paint dry would be a better use of your time.

The problem is you make all these normative claims about what should or should not be done and inherently suggest politics as the vehicle through which they could be solved. There is a fundamental and cultural resistance to your methodology that I think you carelessly misunderstand or dismiss out of hand because it betrays the ascendance of the scholarly central planners as saviors in favor of the parochial, unurbane racists who cannot be trusted to govern their own affairs.

wow its almost like a piece of paper from JewU doesn't make you smarter

Oh come on. I have seen what true extreme left politicians call for. There is no such politician in the US.

the concept of multiculturalism is in and of itself extreme, but we've just been brainwashed to think its normal and morally right. when in history has such a country ever existed? its completely antithetical to human nature.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_Deal
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal

Fundamental and cultural resistance my ass.

The US is a perfect example of such country.
Catholics, Mormons, Protestants, Jews, and others living in one country is multiculturalism.
Freedom of religion in the 18s century is extremely radical multiculturalism.

You have grown a bit numb to actual human history.

Roman Empire.