Hours after Robert Bowers stormed the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh on Oct. 27, far-right personality Ethan Ralph launched a live stream on YouTube to discuss the shooting that claimed 11 lives. Soon, some viewers began paying to have their comments featured on the live chat scrolling alongside the streaming video, through a feature YouTube launched last year called Super Chat.
During the live stream, which YouTube since deleted, one user paid two British pounds to write, “How u get a Jewish girls number? Roll up her sleeve.” Another viewer paid $5 and wrote: “If you want to know if the Synagogue shooting was a false flag then check out the lucky Larry life insurance policies on those dead Jews.”
Lol how does it feel knowing that you have eternally outed the Jew in Western society and the more you try and put the cat in the bag the more you get scratched numb nuts
Brayden Williams
Everything is satire and everyone should be treated as a satirist
Aaron Wood
>lucky Larry life insurance Kek
Jose Reed
We can take down any stream now by super chatting kike jokes
Except they'd never ban a left leaning channel for it, they'd go to great lengths to explain that the channel owner doesn't control what people choose to say in chat.
I literally just spent the last half of my shift talking shit about Jews with my Hawaiian and Filipino co workers and yes I'm a straight white male no one cares about your pathetic attempts to garner support the world has been awakened and all you can do is lash out irrationally in an attempt to maintain the status quo for your kike paymasters I can say without a doubt I'm as happy as I have ever been
David Hall
Who gives a fuck about youtube, twitter etc., its nothing but boomer and zoomer indoctrination
watch them try to take down the chan boards
Caleb Anderson
you gonna cry now little drumpfkin? maybe stop worshiping hitler maybe?
We will win in the end, nothing you can do to stop it :)
Remember a few years ago when some Jow Forumslack got the birght idea to give roddiit gold to the most racist and offensive comments in ribbit threads? I'd like to see more of that.
Daniel Rogers
The Blood of a Brother cannot be washed away...Never to forgive Never to forget...Kralizec Approaches
Caleb Johnson
never heard of it and dont care. far as im concerned it can fly in shit big la
Charles Perez
So apparently it doesn't matter at all that "hate speech" is a completely fictitious and undefinable concept. It literally doesn't exist.
Carson Perry
JF isn't even a good poster boy for this. He routinely cucks out and censors edgy superchats.
Noah Evans
Oh dear, the article isn’t getting many supportive comments on twatter.
Jaxon James
Everywhere I go and everyone I speak to I bring up the JQ, I tell people Israel did 911 and anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot and the more you try and suppress us the more you confirm what we're saying..... It's happening
no one cares about that midget retardfucker here, take it to bant or something
Ryder Peterson
How do you infer from my post that I’m racist? There is no logical linkage between my observation about the response to the article on twatter and you assertion that I’m racist you nigger kike faggot
Caleb Lewis
If you really want to know, just take a look at their twitter.
Jason Hernandez
I'll bet not - just put a leftist lens on the bantz.
* We need to boycott the racist state of israel.
*fascist jew settlers have no problem seeing palestinian children shot in the face
* how can white Jews claim to be the original inhabitants of a middle eastern country?
etc etc. Kep it up with that shit and you'll see those channels lose their superchat ability too
Why are so many of the subversive journalists gook women now? Feel like a new Sarah Jeong is popping up every day.
James Perez
What the flying fuck is wrong with the super chats? Let them say what the fuck they want they are giving money. Fucking youtube is a bunch of god damn kikes.
>Ethan Ralph launched a live stream on YouTube to discuss the shooting that claimed 11 lives
Amongst other things, but don't let that ruin a good opportunity to slander someone or anything. Fuck WSJ.
Cameron Cooper
Unless you start _______ journalists you will lose free speech everywhere. We'll lose Jow Forums too.
Oliver Cruz
Now the whole country knows who these 2 racists are. Prepare to be dismantled one by one and outed to the nation for your antisemitism. Better start deleting those social medias now before the media gets ahold of it and all your friends and family find out your racist
>Our mission is to dig deeper into the nuance inherent in social media to establish context, verify the truth and, ultimately, to help our partners make sense of the world.
>WSJ bullied St Jude's into turning down 26K in donations since the chat had PROBLEMATIC comments Yeah, of course we're the bad ones in this example. Not the "journalists" turned outrage-pushers successfully diverting donations away from sick kids as a part of an ideological conflict.
>intense cries and shrieks of horror fill the room as someone is criticized >"h-h-h-h-h-h-how c-c-c-c-c-c-could you be so-so h-hateful!?" Fuck, free speech sounds like a good time. Anybody who lets words hurt them, needs to be fucking shot, so they can have something to actually cry about.
Gavin Thomas
>Our mission is to dig deeper into the nuance inherent in social media to establish context, verify the truth and, ultimately, to help our partners make sense of the world. Yes, please keep sending people here. I am ready.
Asher Collins
OH GOD >free speech is somehow a problem
Jace Martin
>violent comments i don't even
Thomas Young
the hilarious thing about this is the spergs are spamming twitter with hashtag activism and are talking about going after WSJ advertisers... Just like Gamergate. Like Basedgon wanted. Gamergay 2. Retarded faggots.
Gavin Reed
You don't have free speech on a 3rd parties platform.
Austin Ross
They are so unbelievably out of touch. Nobody gives a fuck about online hate speech except the uber-privileged (Jews) and the more they whine about nonissues, the more they expose themselves as a bitter, tribalistic menace to Western civilization which they apparently think they own now.
Aaron Richardson
WSJ, isn't that a MURDOCH paper? And doesn't MURDOCH hate JEWTUBE cause he wants Google to pay for Headlines? Fuck you.
Ryan Wright
they dont have the fuckign right to claim its a free speech platform if they dont want to complain
fuck you and yrou communism
>so godamn retarded every fucking time
Owen Thompson
we are getting close to a point where someone just needs to name the jew this is getting absolutely ridiculous
Ian Torres
thats the problem and jewtube is bitching its free and open coomments.
why not just tell everyone their real plan? were gonna let jews run everythign? whats the matter with a few true questions you cant handle it can you fucking falsse flag stupid do shit jew
wtf i love WSJ now. finally someone is taking a stand against the low effort ecelebs.
Jace Garcia
these faggots are all up in this board. hell, they're probably in this thread.
Ryder Long
this. they are the people behind all the braap threads.
David Walker
>platform. And that's the key. If you don't have constitutional rights on a social media platform, then that social media platform MUST be legally responsible for any and all activity on their platform. I doubt very much these companies want that.
Xavier Hill
Storyful is owned by Newscorp, who also own WSJ and Fox News, is that right? Are Boomers fucking us?
Connor Ward
>you can rely on (((us))) who better to tell you what the context of [their] discussion is that (((our))) spin
>Newscorp, who also own WSJ and Fox News, is that right? That is correct.
Asher Jenkins
brainlets
youll be giving free money to leftists, their channel wont get banned, but you will be.
Matthew Green
Win? You can't win; even your greatest victory would turn to dust in the emptiness of your damned soul.
David Scott
>implyimng any of us have friends >implying any of us aren't failures to our family >implying "outing us" wouldn't just make everyone we know roll their eyes and go "yeah we know" you can't kill that which has no life
Brayden Brooks
Wanna know how I know you're a boomer?
Mason Miller
is anyone else amused that jared holt is literally being scooped without credit even though he's been crying about all of this for over a year
Nicholas Morris
Murdoch just hates Google and Youtube because he wants to control everything media and he wants payment for use of his headlines. Jewgle refuses, Murdoch, an Aussie Queen's Knight, has been using his press to insinuate that YouTube needs to be shut down for "HateSpeech" and uses the SPLC and ADL like attack dogs to prove his case. Not that JewTube or Jewgle are free of their own bullshit. You can bet that the EU Anti-Meme Article 13 law was funded by Murdoch.
You can superchat 1 shekel, and jewtube gets most of it so you wouldn't really be funding them
Adam Taylor
>platform This word was never used in the context until recently when youtube took over for tv. Deep state enforced fake soapbox to allow the illusion of free expression bullshit gatekeeper terminology.
Adrian Bailey
why does WSJ keep going after youtube streamers? first pewdiepie, now ralph. they call them antisemites and then go after sponsors.
i'm happy how much this will bite them in the ass, they never think longterm. they're grabbing whatever they can to try and stay afloat. this younger audience will grow up and NEVER trust WSJ, or most media in general.
Joseph Sullivan
>WSJ shilling for megacorps to shut down (((problematic speech))); Trump will ignore this attack on the people who won him the election and Sessions will stick his finger in his own asshole.
Joseph Cooper
wow >duhh do you think that somehow these laws wil just outlaw this on youtube and twitter or whatever shit? or will it be somethingm like what they attempted to do with napster, except they done that and it didnt work. youtube.com/watch?v=4te-e9CAv_I
