If you agree with this

If you agree with this.

All men are mortal.
Socrates is a man.
Therefore Socrates is mortal.

Because

Men die and do not survive fatal wounds proving they are mortal.
There is no Evidence that a man is immortal.
Therefore all men are mortal.

Then you have to agree with this.

All processes need a conscious agent.
Radioactive decay is a process.
Therefore radioactive decay needs a conscious agent.

Because

Birds nest and jet engines prove process needs a conscious agent.
There is no evidence that process can be produced without a conscious agent.
Therefore all processes need a conscious agent.

If you don't agree with this then you can't agree with the first statement.

You will know who are your people by who agrees and disagrees with this statement.

Attached: PhotoText.jpg (474x315, 61K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalam_cosmological_argument
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Blood alone isn't a nation. You need ideology as well to have a nation.

You are confusing soundness and validity.

>OP: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalam_cosmological_argument
I agree.

Now stop posting pics like in OP.
Why?
Because such pics are nothing more than
>look, user, this girl is pretty so what I have to say is important and you should agree
I want argument based on principles, not appeals to puerile motivations.
I want logic and reason, not appeal to emotion.
I want wisdom, not women.

Men hear wisdom.
Fools and women see shiny pretty things and are persuaded.

Attached: 1466986848084.jpg (500x382, 27K)

Here's some philosophy for ye.

Attached: 18qpn11kkib3epng.png (268x271, 67K)

Well this evidence based logic and reason I understand that you think science is some how different from this but actually this is superior then empiricism.

Stop.
You're embarrassing yourself and undermining your cause with your illiteracy.

>All processes need a conscious agent
They don't
/thread

>implying wisdom and truth is not instructed by our aesthetic judgments

They aren't atheistic. They believe in creating something from thoughtforms. Such as a Jewish king masquerading as the savior of Goyim. Repeat it enough, and with enough collective focus, they will have severed the Goyim from their true culture and spirituality ultimately taking the throne through subversion.

>There is no Evidence that a man is immortal.
Lack of evidence proves nothing - you could be incompetent in your search for the evidence.

>All processes need a conscious agent.
They do?

>All processes need a conscious agent.

No.

Most processes don't need conscious agents.

Design of process needs a conscious agent.

A lack of evidence by itself proves nothing. But evidence that men are mortal is evidence that men are mortal. If someone said 1 out of 1000 people is as strong as Superman you don't say we don't know because we can't test everyone. You say there is no evidence of that and move on. Basing anything on a lack of evidence is an appeal to ignorance.

Can you provide evidence for that

Induction fallacy on mortality, just because you haven't seen an immoral man doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Blood alone is a nation. Blood creates culture. Culture is blood. BLOOD AND SOIL.

Wrong they are and they are not. Abrahamism has two groups atheists and theists they both stand in the way of the Aryans.

Do you distinguish natural processes as unconscious or conscious? Kinda stuck there to go further. I don't see them as conscious unless you consider all nature acts or God's conscience. Which is fine, but God isn't falsifiable. So argument is moot.

Or->Of God's **

False a nation is blood and ideology. Not blood and soil.

... this is pure retardation.

Natural process are things not made by man. A bird makes a nest without that conscious agent (bird) there is no nest.

If you agree with this
All philophers are faggots
OP is larping as a philopher
therfefore OP is a faggot

Because

Faggots post uninteresting and sudo intellectual posts
There is no evidence that faggots do not post uniteresting and sudo intellectual posts
therefore all philopher posters are faggots

I am challenging directly if natural process objectively exist and it is just subjective.

Yes it is you fucking tard. Where does ideology come from? it comes from blood now blow your brains out already faggot

His name? That masterpiece?

>There is no evidence that process can be produced without a conscious agent.

what about evolution

That ideology springs from the homogeneous tribe. Religion/architecture/ways of dress/warrior culture ALL stem from the tribe