Should privately owned nukes be allowed? Why shouldn't a wealthy civilian be able to purchase or build one?
Should privately owned nukes be allowed? Why shouldn't a wealthy civilian be able to purchase or build one?
this
Humanity is going to get rid of all nukes and that means israel needs to be wiped out
Clearly. How else can I enforce my sovereignty?
Reminder that deterrence theory works.
Yes, and they are.
Yes
They should
Ask yourself a question: would you like to let an extremist (either left or right) have the power to wipe an entire city off the maps?
An individual should not have the power to exterminate millions of people just because they're rich.
use this one
It's okay if someone else has a nuke as deterrence.
No it's not. The whole deterrence theory is based off whole countries and the power of setting one nuke off isn't on the hand of a single person, but a whole staff. It's not like Trump could blast one out with a button and his authority isn't absolute there is a whole team behind and after the idea of using a nuke is proposed it goes by votes.
Owning a nuke is the same as pointing a gun to someone's face, you're a clear threat to everybody and you should be neutralized.
Why do you care what's happening on someone's PRIVATE property?
Statist cuckboy.
Why not?
I'm an anarcho-capitalist actuallly, an ideology you obviously know nothing about, you can't use a nuke without impacting other people's private property rights first and foremost retard
WE COULD ALL CHIP IN AND OBLITERATE ISRAEL
Nobody said you had to use it.
You don't need to be wealthy to build an atomic bomb. Go lurk in Jow Forums for a little longer and try again, faggot.
As an ancap myself, I can tell you that restricting the rights of others to do whatever the fuck they want on their private property is a violation of the NAP.
What proof do you have that the nuke will be detonated?
Also
>claims to be ancap
>wants to neautralize gun owners
Just kys, Stavros.
>hy do you care what's happening on someone's PRIVATE property
Because if you don't have some sort of check on it, eventually it's just a little kingdom tumor inside the country
If the 2nd amendment is to be interpreted as I have (and many others), then the citizens should have the right to bear any arm the military does.
Nuclear, and chemical weapons including.
I can see where the holes in this theory will come, but it's just logical. If we are to defend ourselves against the government we should have a fighting chance against them.
How about just not provoking the guy to use the McNuke™? Ever tried that?
Already told you, owning nuclear weapons is the same thing as pointing a gun to some other guy's face, it doesn't matter whether you actually pull the trigger or detonate the nukes you're a threat to people around you and others have the right to neutralize you in self defense.
I suppose you could just buy a warhead like vice did and make a gun style bomb fairly easily.
I think this is what the cia is most (((concerned))) about re: terrorist nukes
Private entities can and do own nukes, since they are the ones that actually develop and research the technology - Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, GenCorp Aerojet, Huntington Ingalls, Lockheed Martin...etc Anyone can own a nuke, not everyone has the economy of scale do to so, faggot.
Nock two enriched chunks together and bam you got a nuke
Nukes don’t exist and never will. You fell for one of the biggest hoaxes, that scared the dumb people into supplying the Governments with trillions in tax payer money. For doomsday weapons that don’t exist.
Fuck no
Rifle
>defensive
>discriminate
Nuke
>offensive
>indiscriminate
the nukes dont exist conspiracy is the dumbest one on this fucking board
Is this actually a conspiracy? makes me double check my timeline.. i just don't get it.
I think in theory you could, if you went through all the licensing for explosives, radioactive material and nuclear proliferation risks.
its not even close to being a real thing
nuke denial posters are legit schizo
You don't even need the warhead. Implosion device would be the better option. Fuck, if you're crafty enough you could make your own plutonium. I'm actually surprised some sandnigger hasn't done this already.
Because it could result in the deaths of millions of people you brainlet.
All private property MUST be respected, commie nigger.
uh no, i don't think you understand the infrastructure and equipment needed to do so. it would be way cheaper to buy an old soviet device
And?
and no, it wouldn't be, do you know how much testing we had to do to perfect implosion devices?
if humanity ever spreads across the galaxy i have no problems with it. however as long as we are living within the same nation i think individuals are too unstable to own nukes.
Kek. Homebrew breeder reactor and a friend who's good with tools. Atomic bombs aren't super complicated.
How can you make your own plutonium? You would first need uranium which can't be easy to obtain as a private individual.
One at the trinity site and one over Nagasaki. 2 whole tests.
A couple boy scouts can breed isotopes yeah okay, but you don't have a fucking atomic chemical lab you idiot
it still would be easier to buy an old soviet head and modify it as needed lol
EBay. Not even joking.
NUCLEAR TESTS YOU IDIOT NOT THE ACTUAL IMPLOSION TESTS
Not being an anarcho capitalist halfwit doesn't make me a commie.
And if you don't see a problem with that then you must be a 70 IQ nigger.
this poster is either 12 or gov disinfo.
I wish this site had a block poster feature
That was 1 boy scout. A competent chemist could do it no problem.
shitty bait
put down a $100B bond and sure Bezos can have one.
Yeah, the gadget was test one and fat man was test two.
Working with radioactive isotopes is the job of a physicist, not a chemist.
Right? I would block high school dropouts. Like you.
I'm well aware of history,
you nigger the physics and complicated ness of making an implosion bomb was the hardest part fucking actually research nukes before you come and post about them you idiot
This planet is over its carrying capacity for humans.
Smart one, designing a bomb to implode isn't as easy as putting m80's on every patch of a soccer ball, there's so much math involved im not even going to try to get you to comprehend it.
They intersect. You need a chemist to produce your materials. My god, this thread is dumb. Jow Forums is a non threat. I'll pass it on to my superiors.
>take out 2 loans on the house
>walk into walmart
>2 fatmans please
>that will be 300k
>tt-thanks
>will have to leave one at CS
>load one in my F550 V12 DEMI
>come back later for the second
>MAGA
no your just fucking retarded and trying to save face by saying WERE the idiots.
you know NOTHING about nukes lmao
True. Doesn't justify letting random individuals arbitrarily decide who to cull though. Why not just stop all trade and aid to shitty parts of the world so that they starve?
The math has already been done, user. This isn't the late 30's. Do you really think you couldn't get a viable design from Russia, or from the former bloc?
No you really don't you fucking moron. Working with and producing radioactive substances is not chemistry it's nuclear physics.
Okay, kiddo.
governments shouldnt be allowed to own nukes tbqhwyl
Wow, to be (you)
YOU NIGGER NO MATH IS REQUIRED FOR A GUN DESIGN
Do you have schematics? do you know what type of explosive we used? do you have some of the same?
Your posts only convey how much you really don't know lmfao
no
Strategic weaponry is not in common use in the militia or infantry. The collateral damage by far exceeds any defensive utility.
a more sane discussion would be machine guns or hand grenades.
idiot
R E C R E A T I O N A L
If you can't safely deploy a weapon on target without an unreasonable risk of collateral damage, I don't think the benefits outweigh the risks.
For example, an RPG or grenade while having an indiscriminate area of effect kill radius can still theoretically target what could be seen as a realistic target.
The odds of someone innocent getting harmed by such a weapon are certainly higher than that of a MG (which should certainly be available for private ownership), but nowhere near as high as a device such as a nuke.
There are effectively no targets a private individual could run into that are large enough where a nuclear bomb would be able to be used to full effect without causing widespread collateral damage.
no because too much power in hands too little and fickle
>inb4 user implies that's a slippery slope to banning knives and beyond
>Should Family Atomics be allowed?
Yes, but off the records. You all know the rules about these things in House warfare.
The purpose of the nuke lie was very simple, to provide a believable reason for why the USA and USSR, two supposed mortal enemies, never attacked each other and only fought proxy wars. In reality the Cold War was a kike dialectic to spread the two different versions of jew-led materialistic globalism (communism and capitalism) all over the third world. Keep in mind that just before the Cold War started, the two ZOG systems were actually united to crush national socialism. The second purpose for the nuke lie was to convince the goy that Israel has some sort of Sampson option where they can destroy the world if they don’t get their ethnostate. The sheer fear of these fictional weapons helps suppress the warrior spirit of the higher races and makes jewish subversion and the management of global conflict into controllable proxy wars much easier. There’s no actual proof that nuclear weapons work, all of the footage is obvious kike hollywood bullshit, and they’ve never been used in war since their supposed debut.
I own a nuke but the serial number has been filed off.
Next you will tell me the earth isnt flat
>no because too much power in hands too little and fickle
Then how the fuck private usury business allowed? Kike bankers caused more destruction to the world than any nuclear world power can hope for.
Pointless thread, because nukes don’t exist.
Well. That's not the problem. The problem is if the whispers the guy with the McNuke has been hearing since he decided to stop taking his meds tell him that the Alien Godhead Spacelizard Pope really needs him to use his bomb to wipe Selma, Alabama off the map because it displeases him. That is where you have the problem starting, and why ancaps are dumb.
They already are.
Governments run on nepotism.
>banning knives
>wop's greasy mind immediately goes to knife-control
>can't even envision a world where he can't supply his oily pizza hole off the edge of his switchblade
>tfw probably gently tapping the flat of his stiletto against his expose penis while typing this
Because they don't exist. Today just happens to be is 11-4 which are the same numbers of the CRM 114 code transmission device used in Stanley Kubrick's film Dr. Strangelove. Serum 114 is the name of the bullshit drug give to Alex in Clockwork Orange. It's basically a code that nukes are bullshit.
Why are the dumbest posts in a given thread always from Americans?
yeah, but if you use the date everybody else uses it's 4-11, which is the number you call when you're doing any excavation to make sure you don't hit any buried cables or gas lines, but it's actually to make sure you don't find the secret jew tunnels because buried cables, gas lines, water lines or sewers don't exist either
You can have more since you didn't sign any Geneva conventions.
in fact, most of those utilities are delivered by secret teleportation devices hidden in the meters
recreational mcnukes
Fuck off with your garbage bait slide thread?