I have finally set myself free from the libertarian jewish cult. What about you?

>We should be able to do whatever we want guys!1!1 That’d be so epic and fun!1!1!
You have to be 18 or older to post here.

what do you mean he was woke on Christianity? he thought it was Jewish subversive garbage? cool, I didn't know that.

>following those kikes instead of based Hoppes

You only have yourself to blame.

>I'll force everyone to do my bidding!
Literally a 10 years old boy's thought process

Libertarianism is very anti liberty of mind

The way to get to that is by creating a welfare state and removing traditions. The 50s allowed the Jews to take over our large institutions.

A kike is a kike is a kike. There is no such thing as a based jew

The sentence structure of proves OP is not a retard?

Libertarianism is closer to the original American ideology that a man possesses inalienable rights in the face of ((the greater good)) and mob rule. Liberty for the individual, because freedom is dangerous.

Yes there are jews who and ok.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Bloch

youtu.be/8a-x5Tn68u0?t=1459
>I've always thought that the majority of libertarian members were funded by (((democrats))).
And rightfully so. The party exists to steal votes from the right.

Nigger detected. The libertarian party exists to steal votes from the right and weaken their position. They are all open borders cucks, who suck democrat dick and hate trump.

that is so sad

>good goys the free market will fix it hehehehe
>why are so many actors in the free market jewish? corporations, banks -
>SHUT UP GOY IT'S PRIVATE PROPERTY I SAID WE HAVE TO UNLEASH THE FREE MARKET

This is true.

Well when you compare their criticisms of the right with their cocksucking of the left, how is it refutable?

Name a single monopoly which isn't caused by state intervention.

Attached: 1531695308867.jpg (692x692, 100K)

you know the unitited states was founded as a republic and its government would be considered libertarian today right?

How about three?
Facebook
Google
Twitter

oh look all 3 are jewish, what a surprise

>We should be able to do whatever we want
Haha yeh, you said it bro.

None of those are monopolies. Do you know what the definition monopoly is?

>Facebook
Hundreds of other options
>Google
Same
>Twitter
Same

Attached: letmetellyou.jpg (820x801, 383K)

>da j00z
we're at this again, aren't we?

>hehe you want to be right wing goy? you have to be for the free market, the right has always been for the free market, don't also forget we have to defend israel, that's what true conservatives do hehehe

Attached: rat.jpg (640x380, 35K)

Jews took over libertarianism and tried to sum it up with the NAP. Classical liberals were ethno-nationalist slave owners.

>95% of people use these platforms
>But that's okay, because you can just use another service if you don't like it, like gab!
Then gab gets shut down, but that's okay because we should've just invented our own payment service.

THese corps are functional monopolies. Pretty much everyone uses them. To deny these the status of a monopoly is ridiculous.

>Do you know what the definition monopoly is?
Yes, a Company that holds the majority of the market. How large is Google's biggest competitor? Below meaningfully large.

It's irrelevant how many competitors there are, if none of them are large enough to threathen the position of any of the big guys, they're irrelevant.

>95% of people use Twitter
Most people I know have never used Twitter.

>95% of people use Google
Nope, source: statista.com/statistics/216573/worldwide-market-share-of-search-engines/

>95% of people use Facebook
So obviously false, I won't bother saying anything else.

You're wrong, admit it, you're full of shit.

You autist. Look at the damn stats you provided, you proved my point.

GOogle holds 86% of the market. That's the definition of a monopoly.

>You're wrong, admit it, you're full of shit.
Try again bucko.
Also, if we're gonna be autistic anyway

>Most people I know have never used Twitter.
Logical Fallacy
>So obviously false, I won't bother saying anything else.
Defeat by retreat.

Why are you larping as an ex-libertarian? You obviously have no clue what it entails

Now HERE we arrive at the crux of the matter.
>People like X but I don't, how do I force everyone onto my opinion?

Attached: 1478039742469.jpg (336x370, 52K)

It is relevant if you want to call them monopolies

Yes, all those tariffs, government-led infrastructure building, and immigration controls they had really screams "contemporary libertarian."

Nope, It's not about that actually. I never said I wanted to force anyone to use a different product, a lot of statists do, so I get where you're coming from.

The Corps I just named are some of the big corps that censor people, and infringe upon their first amendement right. Due to them being a massive platform and have turned into modern, be it virtual, public speaking places. I believe we should at least enforce our own (or the USA's really, flag related) damn laws and demand a right to freedom of speech to not be infringed by these corporations. They selectively target right wingers on the basis of political disagreement. This we cannot allow.

tl;dr
Libertarianism is inherently left wing. The smallest unit of a civilization is a family, not the individual.

Attached: feminism long post.png (1500x3719, 595K)

Any Libertarian with more than two braincells advocates for immigration controls.

>Any Libertarian with more than two brain cells
Isn't that an oxymoron?

Attached: IMG_2255.jpg (640x640, 57K)

> classical liberal tradition gives the world liberty, freedom and prosperity
> libertarians come along to continue the tradition to keep the flame alight in dark times from the world wars right through to the modern police state and globalism times
> muh its just a jewish cult cos my essoteric fasci fiction writer didn't like gabidalism
Low IQ, low effort kid or NPC, whichever you are that don't impress me much, uh uh oooh yeah.

Attached: 1502078977821.png (1000x1000, 532K)

> I don't care what words actually mean
> I just want to call things by words that people don't like to make people agree with me more
> I don't actually care about the truth but rather my own bias'
That's what you sound like bro, it's really weird and common around these parts. Please be more specific, you can state your personal opinions, subjective preferences and dislikes without trying to shoehorn a round reality into a square hole. People are limited enough in their ability to communicate through written language let's not make it worse aye?

libertarians are also like aids, they allow for the breakdown of society - starting at the family unit.
libertarians were never able to fight socialists/gommies, they just larp in their theoretical fantasy land.

and I just love how libertarians meme pinochet, do you really think pinochet enforced his rule with libertarianism?

Read my other posts my dude.

>turned into modern, be it virtual, public
This is where you're wrong, they are not public, no matter how much you want it. They are private and can kick whoever they want from it.
I do not enjoy having to defend a bunch of kikes but they are in their full right to refuse service to however they decide.

>Libertarianism is inherently left wing.
>Souce: my ass
Right and left are defined by the direction of their morality not by whatever random criteria you pull out of your ass. Libertarianism recognizes natural hierachy therefore it is right wing.

notice how all the yellow flags popped up to defended their jewish cult leaders

>pinochet stages a coup using the most powerful arm of the state, the military, consolidating and enforcing his rule trough the state and it's full apparatus
>pinochet was totally a libertarian throw them off the choppers lol xDDD the free market will fix it xDDD

>I do not enjoy having to defend a bunch of kikes but they are in their full right to refuse service to however they decide.

Who gives them that right?

You're contributing to the decline of Western White civilization, including your own ideology. You're a damned fool if you want to die on a moral highground and keep denying that these "private" power centres to be too important to not regulate using the power of the state. Our enemies know these corps are important, and they're using laws to silence us with decent effect. We should not abstain, Why the actual fuck would you abstain from using government force?

Where the use of force is required for our cause, you abstain and outright refuse. This kind of shitty ideological crap is why you lose.

Imagine believing that current mass immigration is "just free movement" when there's welfare and democracy. Ron Paul was based af, and even Friedman agreed on open borders.

Just don't forget.

The neo-cons, who pushed more libertarian values in the conservative movement, where founded by Trotskyites.

Leo Strauss and others.

>prostrating yourselves to a superstate authority that claims your life and property
Statists are the ultimate cucks

> deliberately leaving hayek out

Attached: 1482613173966.png (433x388, 305K)

the state is the ultimate tool - if you don't use it, someone else will.

>Who gives them that right?
Being in their own private plataform, maybe?
>If we don't force everyone into my ideology western civilization will collapse!1!!11!!1!!
Yeah, nah. When a boot is in your face you don't care if it's a left or a right one.

> Neocons
> Libertarian

youtube.com/watch?v=RZIhijE0ZqM

DERP. Thats the reason the state is bad

Or you can, you know, be an adult, take responsibility for your own life, and reduce the state to a minimal role

you're just going to have to live with it kid. use it or it will be used against you.

He did not, he killed Commies and liberalized some markets. That's all he did right.

Border, police and military. Not "socialism but only for whites"

Rothbard endorsed David Duke. He should be considered honorary aryan.

cool fantasy land where everything always stays the same frozen in time forever perfect

>If we don't force everyone into my ideology western civilization will collapse!1!!11!!1!!

Blatant Strawman. I advocate for free spreading of ideas. I never said to censor the left, I only want the unfair censoring of the right to stop.

How can you honestly support their censoring of us? They're literally kicking a boot in your face, but you're cucking to it because "Muh private platform lolololo"

If they outright told us who was not welcome, it'd be a different matter entirely. Also, you're religiously adhering to a self defeating ideology. Your enemies are using the liberties you support to destroy you, why accept this? How can you be so naive?

no im a libertarian and dont want open borders, iwant conquest of the entire world just like that natsoc faggot hitler sid. the knly difference is i wouldnt be a retard about it and attack Russia in the heart of winter while fighting on two different fronts

Hate to break it to you but when the snow melts and your troops are still freezing their balls off, you get stuck in the mud anyway. You literally have 2 months to defy all odds or you're fucked

>don't censor the left
>left takes over
>starts censoring you
this is how it goes

This.
Friedman isn’t even libertarian, but OP is fucking illiterate on economics and can’t tell the difference between the austrian school and neo classicals.
Ayn Rand is a psycho and brought libertarianism to an extreme, Greenspan was a Rand’s alcoyte too.

Mussolini, the literal founder of fascism:
>"Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state"
Mi General Pinochet Literally privatizes every public industry in Chile including pensions and healthcare
Ummm I wonder which one of these is more libertarian, I can't make my mind...

Attached: 1522378260575.png (410x816, 409K)

> Implying I endorse democracy
I'm all for voting in pro border security, anti mass immigration parties in the short term. Long term, you get rid of the state as there is no welfare for degenerates and no importation of left voters

>But that's okay, because it's a private platform and they can do everything they want on it.

Ancap = White Suicide

>cherry picking
>implying both republican and Democrat parties aren’t 6 gorillion times more kike’d up

NOT
AN
ARGUMENT

>"White people should not be free because 5 Jews say they should be free"

Attached: 1514351079639.png (403x448, 53K)

Also this, Mussolini was a fucking scourge to Italy because he condoned very collectivist practices and promoted the most toxic brand of statalism and slave mentality.
This is still a huge problem in Italy, because a statalist mentality is deeply rooted. Whenever people want to solve a problem they always resort to: “the state should regulate, promote, subsidize, forbid, nationalize...” and so on.

libertarianism is a mental disorder, it's proponents live in fantasy land and rely heavily on theory, they have no strength to fight off the practicality of the true left and the true right. essentially - they get squashed.

So you've decided to accept socialism, good goy.

Attached: marx-bio.jpg (195x274, 9K)

You can see it in so many countries, it's like the founding culture is the defining factor in not just the politics but the style of politics, its aesthetic, and which boundaries it can shift between. Some countries have been fucked up so many times by various dictatorships and what not that generations later it's the same bullshit responses to social problems.

Exactly. Mussolini, Franco, Stasser were all third position nazbols/natsynds. Only right wing dictator was Pinochet. Under capitalism you can have syndicalism and nationalism without the state

>I only want the unfair censoring of the right to stop.
What stops you right now from making a platform and only allowing right wing into it? I'd probably subscribe to it.
>They're literally kicking a boot in your face
They don't because I don't go to lefty cesspools, thank you.
>If they outright told us who was not welcome, it'd be a different matter entirely.
I'm pretty sure they do.
You're simply reeeing at lefty people for not being righty, or at least for having the option to go to lefty places. You need to realize these people will never be right wing and in a right goverment they'd either be open detractors or saboteurs. Make your own right wing space instead of crying and kick to turn left wing spaces into right ones.

Lol BASED. Nazbols are neckbeard incels who already collect welfare but just hate coalburners more than frat roasties

Attached: libertarianlogic.jpg (1312x1410, 355K)

This is actually sad. When Mussolini was executed the two parties who came into power were the socialists and the centrist christians. They took control of the statalist machine and instead of reforming it they basically kept the same exact structure that existed just a decade before.
The parties in power were changed but the underlying mentality was exactly the same “everything within the state, nothing outside the state”.
The constitution is basically the expressions of those sick thoughts.
Art.1: “Italy is a republic based on labor”.

> surplus value extracted
Word salad. $$$ or price =/= value. Price agreed to by person A & B at X point in time =/= price agreed to by person B & C at Y point in time.

If someone builds me a house and I pay them $100k and then sell it for $200k down the track, did I extract $100k of surplus value from the labour of the builder? Of course not, you need to take into account, time, ownership, who contributes what, who agrees to what, choice and so many other factors, time preference being the most important. Until you address these factors, no one will take you seriously.

> Never ran a business
> "My boss is stealing from me"

Co ops aren't illegal commie

I traded my neighbor some logs for a chicken, now he's burning them in his fireplace for warmth and it's not even making my house warmer wtf.

They kill Mussolini but his ideas and impact lives on in the people that killed him, so weird. Almost sounds like some weird Trudeau "if they kill you, you win" but with an actual impact over time.

Attached: 1538979012174.png (5000x7500, 1.81M)

Based Pastaback

Just like panethnic white nationalism, fascists, and nat socs huh. Ideology is the IDEAL part of the word. It means striving toward an ideal but not necessarily achieving it.

dumbass

Attached: 31369554_789416067911057_5902288369064345600_n.jpg (832x960, 99K)