Are (((they))) pushing pedosexuality now
Are (((they))) pushing pedosexuality now
Other urls found in this thread:
Highly likely.
>now
*crickets*
>now
They’ve been doing it for some time now user
no they haven't. it's all just delusional bullshit from Jow Forumstards who probably secretly wish that someone actually is promoting it
no they're not, it's being pushed into the lgbt movements
i don't mind tho
either we all get to fuck a kid or they'll overplay their hand and everyone will hate them
They can't even the vast majority of LFBTQwhatever hate pedos
as it happens I've been monitoring this subject ever since you lot made such a fuss about it and I'm not seeing much of anything.
a handful of so called non offending pedophiles on twitter reminding everyone that we're not allowed to kill you until you commit a crime.
an interview with former pie leader tom o' carroll in april of this year, conducted by a conservative youtuber no less. with a whopping 7 thousand views.
a fucking kid in drag as if that's got anything to do with pedophilia.
what am I missing here, where is this supposed push?
you are missing the fact that all you deganerate kikes will get the gas chamber, shlomo
BDS will destroy israel
t. delusional pedophile who thinks anyone gives a fuck about normalizing his sick fetish
Nah i do not think
when i go to reddit they say pedo is bad
when i go to Jow Forums they say its bad
i never saw people agree so much on one thing
>when i go to Jow Forums they say its bad
you've obviously never been on /b/ then
i saw /b/ , when some say age of consent should be 17,10 other posters shit on him
/b/ and /tv/ are pedo havens
I have no idea how bad your timing must have been and I don't particularly care. lurk more
Mind it's not a pedo, it's a Minor Attracted Person nowadays.
when i said Jow Forums i meant Jow Forums included
Okay look, I'm a psychologist and the opinion of me and my peers is that the Pizzagate controversy was the most textbook of all the textbook examples of projection you could possibly find.
Spend some time on here you'll eventually see the now infamous copypasta going around explaining why child marriage is the perfect solution to "ending Jewish/feminist/Marxist/whatever degeneracy" and most of the users on here seem to agree that pedophilia is perfectly fine as long as it leads to marriage and the formation of a white family.
By children you mean anyone under 18?
normalisation starts at the very bottom
you infiltrate lgbt movements and then you push kids in drag twerking on the street
then you push for child nudity, i mean, weren't we all born nude and children should not be sexual in any way.
oh let's also celebrate our sexuality, everyone let's hug half-naked and do this on a regular basis!
if you manage to convince alot of people that all of that is okay, all you need to do is do a half naked hug with a kid, or rather, let a woman do it first, and then the rest of the group follows like sheep
eventually you'll all be raping child assholes for days, or atleast that's the goal i guess
I've got friends in those movements, and they're telling me some guys are trying to push it through
>not marrying a qt 14 year old, teaching her about life and taking her cherry only when she asks you to on her 16th birthday, after which you'll impregnate her and eventually form a happy family of 10 children
why even live senpai
nothin wrong with it
lol just shut the fuck up nigga
this
kill yourself
>now
where have you been OP?
no thanks mate
For now. Alot of things that were unacceptable afew decades ago, are now seen as normal.
>when the preteen peen so supreme you let out a stream
This used to be standard, then feminism happened and the white birth rates declined. Jow Forums will deny it because theyre pussies.
came here to post this.
>no they havent
oh my you sweet innocent child
dont worry guys, pizza is just a meme, honest
(((academics)))
*blocks your hormones*
>I'm a psychologist
Me too. What are the odds? Weird. The opinion of me and my peers is that you are trying to normalize pedophilia through consensus building in the opponents of pedophilia.
>Oh look see my posts made on Jow Forums that support child marriage.
>Even Jow Forums wants child fucking
KYS
this is the most retarded form of so called jewish influence
i quite literally think that the people trying to show that males = pedos is some sort of Jewish trick are either retarded or paid shills
males and females are sexually attracted to characteristics as dictated by our genes, among these is cuteness, big breasts, big asses, being funny and witty, and a whole lot more
males and females both can be attracted to children as children display alot of these characteristics
alot of children are also very mature "foe their age"
because the brains develop differently, definitely not like modern science thinks it does (oh I'm 18 now? let's get mature!)
there are loads of girls who at the age of 16 have a clearer vision of their future and are more mature than loads of 18 year old men
society used to understand this
now we've forgotten our own nature
define pedophilia
define hebephili
what is your objection to child marriage
a 16 year old girl marrying a 20 year old male, is this child marriage, is this paedophilia? And if it is, please show how this harms the child.
>bong
Pedophiles fuck only in the ass and only those who are under 12.
Being attracted to 12 year olds and above, and fucking them in the pussy, is completely normal.
The term "pedosexual" began as a Jow Forums troll to expose how fucked up SJWs are. They started accepting gays, trans, and interracial relationships so Jow Forums tried to convince people that "clovergender" was a thing and some people identify as a child, making "pedosexuality" acceptable.
Once the Jews caught on to the ruse, they found a way to push more degeneracy. So yes, (((they))) are pushing pedosexuality. However, (((they))) also know a secret about "pedosexualtiy" that many people have forgotten.
For tens of thousands of years there was no such thing as an "age of consent". In fact, children weren't treated any differently from adults in all regards. Unlike today where kids have no rights, no responsibilities, can't sign a contract, etc - in the past, kids were just "little adults". They were expected to act like adults in public and take on adult responsibilities. 200 years ago, no one would say that children "couldn't consent". The idea was ridiculous. For the vast majority of human history the question wasn't "has this child revolved around the sun enough for sex", it was "has their body matured enough and are they mentally ready". This age comes at different times for different people. Also, the criteria for "mentally prepared" were much lower.
According to the ancient Greeks, a man should take a wife when he's 30 years old and his wife should be 15. This wasn't written into law, but was a recommendation. The only laws in this time were that the parents must approve of the marriage.
The first known age of consent law was in ancient Rome, where they set the minimum age of marriage at 12.
(To be continued)
So THIS kind of message why you've incarnated as one of Gods' chosen people.. Right.
Until women were granted the right to vote the age of consent hovered between 12 and 16 in every developed nation. Giving women the right to vote meant that only women over 18 could vote, though. This gave women the ability to legally penalize men for dating younger, more fertile, and more attractive girls. And so these 18 year old roasties put it into law that you had to be at least 18 to have sex - otherwise you go to jail.
So how did the Jews seize on this opportunity? The same way they seize on every opportunity -- conflate the opposition with pure moral evil.
>You think it's okay to have pride in your own heritage? You're just as bad as people who senselessly murder others for their skin color!
>You think it's okay to tell people you think homosexuality is unnatural? You're just as bad as people who flog homosexuals and put them in concentration camps!
>You think it's okay to boycott Jewish businesses because you disagree with their treatment of Palestinians? You're just as bad as someone who (allegedly) tortured, starved, and gassed Jews!
>You think it's okay to enter into a consenting, loving relationship with a 16 year old? You're just as bad as 40 year old men who forcibly tie down and rape 5 year olds!
(((They))) know that it's perfectly normal and healthy to be attracted to 14 year olds and there's no physical problems when a woman has a child at 16. (((They))) want you to give up on women in their peak fertility years and wait until they're old and dried up to start having sex. This is the engine of white genocide.
(To be continued one more time)
Shill.
The (((World Health Organization))) performed a study of "peak fertility age" that angers me to my core because of the pseudo-scientific bullshit they pulled.
First, they looked at women in good health and measured their likelihood of getting pregnant if they had sex during their fertile window (the week of ovulation). So far so good.
Next, they separated women into groups of 5 years:
>15-19
>20-24
>25-29
>etc
Why not just look at their real age instead of some age range? We'll see why later
Next, they COMPLETELY IGNORED women who were 15-19. They had this data, and it's meaningful data, so why throw it away? Don't we care about scientific inquiry? According to the (((World Health Organization))), they removed "teen pregnancies" because "teen pregnancies are bad, m'kay?"
After doing this, they came up with the attached graph (pic related). Now we'll see why they split women into groups of 5 years.
The (((World Health Organization))) reported that the peak fertility age is 24! Obviously on this graph we can see that 24 is when everything peaks.
Anyone with two brain cells can tell:
>1. According to this graph fertility peaks at 20, not 24
>2. The graph is on a CONSTANT downward trend, meaning 15-19 is likely more fertile than 20
But NOPE. "24 is the peak fertility age". Utter fucking horse shit.
tick tock, spicbro
science got hijacked by jews long ago, it's used now to rubber stamp their anti-human agenda.
That's a bit far. I'd say from 15 and up anything goes. Girls usually develop faster, so by 15 they've had a few years to grow into their bodies.
Any male in this thread and on this site who says he would not fuck a 15 or 16 year old is lying to themselves.
And I'll be pushing a knife in their guts
Puberty is nature's indicator of sexual maturity. Hormone-laden western diets are making that happen sooner and sooner, of course, so we need education to catch up; there's no reason that we can't appropriately educate the pubescent 11 years olds that are sexting and fucking anyway but otherwise going in not knowing what they're doing and ruining themselves. Teen pregnancy is a problem inasfar as the girl doesnt have a stable relationship with a partner able to shelter provide for her and her child; best case scenario she just gets an abortion, but otherwise it can lead down the path of drugs and prostitution.
Now, who better to provide a loving relationship, a secure home, and a stable income than a mature man? These sorts of relationships used to be quite common, before industrialization and women's rights destroyed wages.
>1 family, 1 man's income
>mechanization begins in england
>women allowed to work in new factories and mills
>wages tank, housewifery becomes decreasingly viable
>children search for work in factories and mines to support their families
>child labor isn't a good look; ban it because muh feels rather than fixing the conditions that cause it
>children and families still poor and hungry
>turn to prostitution as a last resort
>also banned because muh feels
>starve
The long and short of it is that jewry and feminism (jewry) are working together to destroy fertility both socially and economically, as points out.
Who runs the porn industry?
archive.is
Yes. Also beastiality.
>Jow Forums: get your women while they are young or they become degenerate because of the dick carousel, a thirteen year old should be able to marry
>also Jow Forums: muh jewish hollywood pedo's
Oh, good, if it is immutable we can just execute them, no need to bother with trying to "cure" them! Just the rope...
>canada is skipping up the stairs
kek
Reminder that your kneejerk reactionis to the subject is exactly the same as normies' kneejerk reaction to discussion of the Holocaust.
You are an NPC.
Surprise surprise.
>now
This was their entire goal of getting homosexuality accepted. They always pull this crap in stages so no one notices what's going on until it's too late.
Good post and I agree with your points. A mature man with a stable job can and will look after a young mature girl better. I would marry a 14 year old if I could to be honest. It was common about 150 years ago still.
The meme flag cries out in pain as it strikes you.
The fact that that thing looks so unbelievable jewish gets me autistically mad