Pic related is possibly one of the most inconceivably, unimaginably, irredeemably...

Pic related is possibly one of the most inconceivably, unimaginably, irredeemably, and irreparably Jewish things I've ever read.

And there's a shitload more of similar stuff in the Talmud. The amount of shit in their involving money is ridiculous, like, really true to stereotype. As an anti-Semite it's a laugh a minute and if I were a Jew, particularly a modern or secular one, I would be fucking embarrassed as hell.

There's a funny one about how Jews aren't supposed to carry coins on the Sabbath, because if they fell down, then the Jew would have to pick it up, and then break the law. But, if two Jews are sitting at a table, and they want to pass a coin, one to the other, they are allowed to use a stick to push it over. (I swear I am not making this shit up.) The stick-pushing, I would imagine, makes it far more likely for the money to fall down, and if you are desperate enough to push the money with a stick, then you are probably going to pick it up if it falls down, but if you care enough to push it with a stick, then you aren't going to want to violate shabbos by picking it up, but if you care enough about shabbos to avoid picking it up, then you'll want to use a stick, because the Talmud specifically mentions it.

Only Jews would create a book that is basically about getting away with shit that is against their own religious law and figure it makes them super pious; in fact, it is basically the essence of Judaism. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? The "Jewish Bible," i.e. the TaNaKh, i.e. the Hebrew Old Testament? Naaaah they don't really give a fuck & haven't since some time after the time of Christ

The 'scribes and Pharisees,' of course, literally went on to found modern Judaism, but, of course, in the name of 'religious dialogue,' we are taught that they were the 'corrupt leaders of Judaism at the time'

ITT: discuss Talmudic teachings/interreligious dialogue/take the piss out of the Jews/anti-Semitism general thread

Attached: Judaism 101.png (1094x732, 186K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pA2fRgOzH8k
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject//TG/ - Talmud General/
richarddawkins.net/2016/11/i-had-to-take-my-dirty-panties-to-a-rabbi-and-so-has-every-orthodox-jewish-woman/
youtu.be/f1nrN1tCVIk?t=283
jewishencyclopedia.com/
yoatzot.org/taharat-hamishpacha/?id=603
biblebelievers.org.au/jewhis1.htm
jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6585-gentile
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg#Theological_views
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh-day_Adventist_Church
youtube.com/watch?v=NJ3HNcjr1WY&app=desktop&bpctr=1541444290
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19506405/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Lisa Kudrow's son was "drive by bar mitzvah'd"

> youtube.com/watch?v=pA2fRgOzH8k

they just went up to him and did it when he was alone

the end of the video is the best part (no, really)

she's still qt as fuck tho

Oh boy, a Talmud General!

Here's my old threads:
archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject//TG/ - Talmud General/

Staring with some of our favorites!

>9 years old

Attached: Sanhedrin 54b - Eng.jpg (3240x4320, 3.5M)

When i first started my Talmud research the kikes here would attack the infographs saying that none of the excerpts were real, so I bought my own hard copy and started scanning.

Now the typical kike argument went from "Those don't exist" to "T-That's not what it means!"

>three years and a day

Attached: Sanhedrin 55b - Eng.jpg (3240x4320, 3.28M)

from trying to google something else I found this

richard dawkins is an edgy faggot but

richarddawkins.net/2016/11/i-had-to-take-my-dirty-panties-to-a-rabbi-and-so-has-every-orthodox-jewish-woman/

(pic is actually related, so I wonder if the rabbi was popping an awkward boner or two; or if he was pervy enough that the boner wasn't awkward. probably the latter)

Attached: attractive jewess.png (289x394, 60K)

>"T-That's not what it means!"
Then came this neat video:
youtu.be/f1nrN1tCVIk?t=283
>The quickest way to grasp the Talmudic view of Gentiles is not directly from the Talmud, but from the Jewish Encyclopedia(s).
>If we quote an isolated opinion from the Talmud a rabbi may quickly object, saying "...but that is not the overall opinion of the Talmud! That is not the definitive view!"
>What the Jewish Encyclopedia provides us is a definitive overview of perhaps hundreds of rabbinic statements on any subject; giving us accurate summaries of what the Talmud generally teaches.

jewishencyclopedia.com/

Pic:
>Gentile steals from gentile, property must be returned
>Gentile steals from Jew, property must be returned
(cont)

Attached: Sanhedrin 57a - Eng - PART 1.jpg (3240x4320, 3.07M)

So I managed to save a completely-working, completely-offline copy of the entire website www.jewishencyclopedia.com:
>filedropper dot com
>/jewishencyclopedia

Pic:
>Jew steals from Jew, property must be returned
>Jew steals from gentile, property MAY BE RETAINED

Attached: Sanhedrin 57a - Eng - PART 2.jpg (3240x4320, 2.98M)

imagine copying that kind of shit, just in it's sheer repetitiveness, all day, before (and after) the printing press
fuck

>a gentile that smites a jew is worthy of death

Attached: Sanhedrin 58b - Eng - PART 2.jpg (3240x4320, 2.88M)

>imagine copying that kind of shit
I'd rather gnaw my hand off.

>a gentile that studies the torah deserves death

Attached: Sanhedrin 59a - Eng.jpg (3240x4320, 2.95M)

>molech

Attached: Sanhedrin 64a - Eng.jpg (3240x4320, 3.33M)

>molech

Attached: Sanhedrin 64b - Eng.jpg (3240x4320, 3.23M)

>Jews get circ'd
>Converts get circ'd
>Slaves get circ'd
If you're cut, but you're not a Jew or a convert...

Attached: Shabbath - 137b.jpg (3240x4320, 3.24M)

>about getting away with shit that is against their own religious law and figure it makes them super pious;
You mean like Christian cucks who cherrypick to justify drugs and racemixing?

didnt understand pic

Off-topic. This is a Talmud thread.
The Talmud has nothing to do with Christianity other than Christ rejecting it and it rejecting Christ.

Attached: Sanhedrin 107b - Eng - admitted censorship highlighted.jpg (1620x2160, 901K)

no you fucking sperg I mean they actually ORIENT THEIR RELIGIOUS PRACTICE towards AVOIDING THEIR OWN RELIGIOUS LAW

(here's one about farting and praying in the shitter, in case you might forget that there's a sacred object tied to your head and hand while you are farting. FORGET.)

Attached: j00z.png (566x552, 117K)

> jews on sabbath not supposed to pick leaves off of apples even if apples are not on trees because they are not supposed to harvest the fields on the sabbath according to the Mosaic Law (yes this is at least 3 degrees of separation from the actual Bible)
> no that's not the silly part
> rabbi leaves a gift of apples for other jews
> "did he do it to obey the law?"
> "or did he do it to look like he was generous and wealthy because there would look like there were more apples?"
> "does it matter?"
> "no"
profound discussion of one of the World's Great Religions

The jew presented a basket of fruits but did not remove the stems and leaves. That might be because the Talmud says that Jews are not to separate food (fruit) from waste (stems) unless the picked fruit is going to be immediately consumed, and since this was a gift it was NOT going to be consumed immediately.

That might also be so that the basket of fruits appeared to be more full than it was, exaggerating the jew's generosity.

It's meant to point out how a religious law permitted him to be intentionally dishonest.

Attached: Kiddushin- Map Of Babylon.jpg (3240x4320, 2.66M)

Holy fuck I hate jews.
To all the kikes reading this, there is now one more person in the world who wants you all dead.

Attached: bret.jpg (1080x1138, 292K)

Rashi's take on the Tower of Babel:

>“This one asks for a brick, and that one brings him mortar, and the former attacks him and injures his brain.”

Glad I could be of service, based leaf!

I don't know - I don't have any of my new scans ready yet but I don't want this thread to die. Should I post scans from Sanhedrin or Kiddushin?

ומעשה בתלמיד אחד שהניח תפיליו בחורין הסמוכים לרשות הרבים ובאת זונה אחת ונטלתן ובאת לבית המדרש ואמרה ראו מה נתן לי פלוני בשכרי כיון ששמע אותו תלמיד כך עלה לראש הגג ונפל ומת באותה שעה התקינו שיהא אוחזן בבגדו ובידו ונכנס

And an incident occurred involving a student who placed his phylacteries in the holes adjacent to the public domain, and a prostitute passed by and took the phylacteries. She came to the study hall and said: See what so-and-so gave me as my payment. When that student heard this, he ascended to the rooftop and fell and died. At that moment they instituted that one should hold them with his garment and in his hand and enter to avoid situations of that kind.

>ascended to the rooftop and fell and died

that is absolutely the most Jewish discussion I have ever heard of in my life. Repulsive.

Language is too sophisticated, what does it means in the end - talmudic jews are allowed to worship and sacrifice to Moloch and it isn't an idolatry?

yoatzot.org/taharat-hamishpacha/?id=603

"Insert the finger deeply but GENTLY into the vaginal canal as far as the length of your finger will allow. If this is difficult for you, try to go deeply at least for the hefsek taharah [first] examination and for one of the examinations during the seven blood-free days – preferably the first.”

Here, it's more important what isn't said than what is, much like .

In Sanhedrin 64a and 64b it goes into detail about worshiping molech - how you may sacrifice your seed OR allow them to pass through the fire, but not both. It doesn't say anything about the seed of others.

And in detailing what is NOT permitted, they are detailing what IS permitted.

Nice - which tractate/folio?

>One may not meet his fellow at night for fear he might be a demon.

Attached: Sanhedrin 44a - ENG.jpg (3240x4320, 2.79M)

hello fellow goyanon

have you read Israel Shakak's "Jewish History, Jewish Religion" (1984)

probably

but also to all others... this is basically the topic of this thread, 101, with a lot of concrete examples and just interesting insider insights into how deranged the rabbinic jewish religion is.

shakak is an athiest (might be a marxist actually IIRC but it doesn't matter for this purpose he doesn't lay any commie shit on heavy for the purpose of the book) Jew who served in the israeli military in '48, but sometime thereafter saw a Gentile die in the street on shabbos because the Jews wouldn't let the bystander use their telephone, and afterwards, was like FUCK THIS SHIT and wrote book related to tell the world. it's based. predictably, nobody knows about it, but fucking Gore Vidal actually wrote a pretty based introduction to it.

its also online in it's fullity at biblebelievers.org.au/jewhis1.htm

which is something that should be mirrored (I have one somewhere) in case it gets shoah'd

will be posting some excerpts

Attached: jewish_hx_shakak.jpg (180x280, 11K)

Berakhot 23a

How many normie jews are aware of this shit?

>have you read Israel Shakak's "Jewish History, Jewish Religion" (1984)
I am now!

Thank you!

Hard to say. The ones that attended hebrew School are probably privy, but seculars are probably not.

The problem is that the Rabbis dictate their congregation's behaviors and goals according to the Talmud, and even seculars respect the rabbis opinions. They're the puppet masters (the rabbis) but it wouldn't surprise me to find other more powerful jews above them.

[...speaking of how most bilingual English/Hebrew translations, or Hebrew/Latin translations of old, excerpted 'offensive' bits from the translations, and the rabbis would teach their flocks about them...]

In 1962, a part of the Maimonidean Code referred to above, the so-called Book of Knowledge, which contains the most basic rules of Jewish faith and practice, was published in Jerusalem in a bilingual edition, with the English translation facing the Hebrew text.

The latter has been restored to its original purity, and the command to exterminate Jewish infidels appears in it in full: 'It is a duty to exterminate them with one's own hands.' In the English translation this is somewhat softened to: 'It is a duty to take active measures to destroy them.' But then the Hebrew text goes on to specify the prime examples of 'infidels' who must be exterminated: 'Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot'. Not one 'word of this appears in the English text on the facing page.

Religious Orthodox ones? A lot.

Random secular ones? Probably about as much as random people know about the Bible, which is to say vaguely about the important stuff.

But Jewish supremacy is the important stuff.

The first mechanism I shall discuss is that of sereptitious defiance, combined with outward compliance. As explained above, talmudic passages directed against Christianity or against non-Jews l7 had to go or to be modified - the pressure was too strong. This is what was done: a few of the most offensive passages were bodily removed from all editions printed in Europe after the mid-16th century. In all other passages, the expressions 'Gentile', 'non-Jew', 'stranger' (goy, eino yehudi, nokhri) - which appear in all early manuscripts and printings as well as in all editions published in Islamic countries - were replaced by terms such as 'idolator', 'heathen' or even 'Canaanite' or 'Samaritan', terms which could be explained away but which a Jewish reader could recognize as euphemisms for the old expressions.

As the attack mounted, so the defence became more elaborate, sometimes with lasting tragic results. During certain periods the Tsarist Russian censorship became stricter and, seeing the above mentioned euphemisms for what they were, forbade them too. Thereupon the rabbinical authorities substituted the terms 'Arab' or 'Muslim' (in Hebrew, Yishma'eli - which means both) or occasionally 'Egyptian', correctly calculating that the Tsarist authorities would not object to this kind of abuse.

> At the same time, [handwritten] lists of Talmudic Omissions explained all the new terms

At times, a general disclaimer was printed before the title page of each volume of talmudic literature, solemnly declaring, sometimes on oath, that all hostile expressions in that volume are intended only against the idolators of antiquity, or even against the long-vanished Canaanites... After the British conquest of India, some rabbis hit on the subterfuge of claiming that any particularly outrageous derogatory expression used by them is only intended against the Indians. Occasionally the aborigines of Australia were also added as whipping-boys.

>[...speaking of how most bilingual English/Hebrew translations, or Hebrew/Latin translations of old, excerpted 'offensive' bits from the translations
See:

Miamondes:

"Some of the Turks [i.e., the Mongol race] and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does."

Now, what does one do with such a passage in a most important and necessary work of Judaism? Face the truth and its consequences? God forbid! Admit (as so many Christian scholars, for example, have done in similar circumstances) that a very important Jewish authority held also rabid anti-Black views, and by this admission make an attempt at self-education in real humanity? Perish the thought. I can almost imagine Jewish scholars in the USA consulting among themselves, 'What is to be done?' - for the book had to be translated, due to the decline in the knowledge of Hebrew among American Jews. Whether by consultation or by individual inspiration, a happy solution' was found: in the popular American translation of the Guide by one Friedlander, first published as far back as 1925 and since then reprinted in many editions, including several in paperback, the Hebrew word Kushi,,:, which means Blacks, was simply transliterated and appears as 'Kushites', a word which means nothing to those who have no knowledge of Hebrew, or to whom an obliging rabbi will not give an oral explanation

Surely one is driven to the hypothesis that quite a few of Martin Luther King's rabbinical supporters were either anti-Black racists who supported him for tactical reasons of 'Jewish interest' (wishing to win Black support for American Jewry and for Israel's policies) or were accomplished hypocrites, to the point of schizophrenia, capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of rabid racism to a proclaimed attachment to an anti-racist struggle - and back - and back again.

The third example comes from a work which has far less serious scholarly intent - but is all the more popular for that: The Joys of Yiddish by Leo Rosten. This light-hearted work - first published in the USA in 1968, and reprinted in many editions, including several times as a Penguin paperback - is a kind of glossary of Yiddish words often used by Jews or even non-Jews in English-speaking countries. For each entry, in addition to a detailed definition and more or less amusing anecdotes illustrating its use, there is also an etymology stating (quite accurately, on the whole) the language from which the word came into Yiddish and its meaning in that language. The entry Shaygets - whose main meaning is 'a Gentile boy or young man - is an exception: there the etymology cryptically states 'Hebrew Origin', without giving the form or meaning of the original Hebrew word. However, under the entry Shiksa - the feminine form of Shaygets - the author does give the original Hebrew word, sheqetz (or, in his transliteration, sheques) and defines its Hebrew meaning as 'blemish'. This is a bare-faced lie, as every speaker of Hebrew knows. The Megiddo Modern Hebrew-English Dictionary, published in Israel, correctly defines shegetz as follows: 'unclean animal; loathsome creature, abomination (colloquial - pronounced shaygets) wretch, unruly youngster; Gentile youngster'.

My final, more general example is, if possible, even more shocking than the others. It concerns the attitude of the Hassidic movement towards non-Jews. Hassidism - a continuation (and debasement!) of Jewish mysticism - is still a living movement, with hundreds of thousands of active adherents who are fanatically devoted to their 'holy rabbis', some of whom have acquired a very considerable political influence in Israel, among the leaders of most parties and even more so in the higher echelons of the army.

What, then, are the views of this movement concerning non-Jews? As an example, let us take the famous Hatanya, fundamental book of the Habbad movement, one of the most important branches of Hassidism. ACCORDING TO THIS BOOK, ALL NON-JEWS ARE TOTALLY SATANIC CREATURES 'IN WHOM THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING GOOD'. EVEN A NON-JEWISH EMBRYO IS QUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT FROM A JEWISH ONE. The very existence of a non-Jew is 'non-essential', whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews.

This book is circulated in countless editions, and its ideas are further propagated in the numerous 'discourses' of the present hereditary Fuhrer of Habbad, the so-called Lubavitcher rabbi, M.M. Schneurssohn, who leads this powerful world-wide organization from his New York headquarters. In Israel these ideas are widely disseminated among the public at large, in the schools and in the army. (According to the testimony of Shulamit Aloni, Member of the Knesset, this Habbad propaganda was particularly stepped up before Israel's invasion of Lebanon in March 1978, in order to induce military doctors and nurses to withhold medical help from 'Gentile wounded'. This Nazi-like advice did not refer specifically to Arabs or Palestinians, but simply to 'Gentiles', goyim.)

Thanks, but there are no seeders.

>no seeders
Just me at the moment. Another user said he'd seed for a few weeks but stopped after just a few hours.
A fine summary of the folks that use Jow Forums.

I wish it was smaller, I'd upload it to a file-hosting site directly instead of torrenting it.

(cont'd)
According to the cabbala, the universe is ruled not by one god but by several deities, of various characters and influences, emanated by a dim, distant First Cause. ...first a male god called 'Wisdom' or 'Father' and then a female goddess called 'Knowledge' or 'Mother' were emanated or born. From the marriage of these two, a pair of younger gods [and so on] these two should be united, but their union is prevented by the machinations of Satan, who in this system is a very important and independent personage. The Creation was undertaken by the First Cause in order to allow them to unite, but because of the Fall they became more disunited than ever, and indeed Satan has managed to come very close to the divine Daughter and even to rape her (either seemingly or in fact - opinions differ on this). The creation of the Jewish people was undertaken in order to mend the break caused by Adam and Eve, and under Mount Sinai this was for a moment achieved: the male god Son, incarnated in Moses, was united with the goddess Shekhinah. Unfortunately, the sin of the Golden Calf again caused disunity in the godhead; but the repentance of the Jewish people has mended matters to some extent. Similarly, each incident of biblical Jewish history is believed to be associated with the union or disunion of the divine pair. The Jewish conquest of Palestine from the Canaanites and the building of the first and second Temple are particularly propitious for their union, while the destruction of the Temples and exile of the Jews from the Holy Land are merely external signs not only of the divine disunion but also of a real 'whoring after strange gods': Daughter falls closely into the power of Satan, while Son takes various female satanic personages to his bed, instead of his proper wife.

**********List of Jewish Tricks**********

The following list has been compiled by me and details Jewish tricks I've encountered while dealing with Hasidics in my area.

>Pilpul
The intense analysis of a text, action, or statement that attempts to reconcile apparent contradictions and/or explain conceptual differences.

>Racism/Anti-semitism
The accusation that any resistance or criticism of Jews is discriminatory purely based on race alone regardless of the criticism's merit.
Most European Jews aren't even Semites, they're most likely Edomites.
Additionally, 'racism' is an important survival mechanism and is essential to promote philia within a sophisticated society.

>Misdirection
Placing blame belonging to one group of people on another by deception, usually false-flagging.
Jews even ritualistically shift blame from themselves in a ritual called "Blood Libel", transferring their sins to livestock (and, allegedly, Christians) and then executing them for those sins.
"The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you"

>Grotesque Imagery
Using language to paint a vile and disturbing image in the minds of others in hopes of associating disgust with the subject at hand.

>Divide and Conquer
Creating in-fighting within the ranks of their opposition, usually by pointing out differences among opposing individuals.

>Art
Disguising a subversive, invasive, and/or violent operation as "Art" or "Free Expression".
When confronted, the argument made is usually that the piece in question is simply satire.

(cont.)

Attached: bpeh.jpg (600x400, 30K)

**********List of Jewish Tricks**********

(cont)
>Multi-Culturalism
Intentionally triggering survivor instincts in native women so that they become submissive to the newly introduced invasive population, resulting in the intentional creation of rootless and unhealthy offspring.
Forcing different races to live together is actually quite cruel to minorities: they have to compete in a hierarchy of attractiveness that is heavily stacked against them. This breeds resentment, racial tension

>Sexual Liberation
Intentionally supporting overwhelming manipulation of dopamine and oxytocin in the brain through excessive sexual stimulation and masturbation.

>Memory Hole
Performing and/or staging a noteworthy action or event on the same day/time that another major national, global, or social conflict happened (one that does not fit the desired narrative) in order to re-associate a given date with the desired event.

THIS LIST IS INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS EXPANDING

Attached: Jewish Bingo - rough draft.jpg (1500x1500, 416K)

The duty of pious Jews is to restore through their prayers and religious acts the perfect divine unity, in the form of sexual union, between the male and female deities.6 Thus before most ritual acts, which every devout Jew has to perform many times each day, the following cabbalistic formula is recited: 'For the sake of the [sexual] congress7 of the Holy Blessed One and his Shekhinah... ' The Jewish morning prayers are also arranged so as to promote this sexual union, if only temporarily. Successive parts of the prayer mystically correspond to successive stages of the union: at one point the goddess approaches with her hand-maidens, at another the god puts his arm around her neck and fondles her breast, and finally the sexual act is supposed to take place.

Other prayers or religious acts, as interpreted by the cabbalists, are designed to deceive various angels (imagined as minor deities with a measure of independence) or to propitiate Satan. At a certain point in the morning prayer, some verses in Aramaic (rather than the more usual Hebrew) are pronounced.8 This is supposed to be a means for tricking the angels who operate the gates through which prayers enter heaven and who have the power to block the prayers of the pious. The angels only understand Hebrew and are baffled by the Aramaic verses; being somewhat dull-witted (presumably they are far less clever than the cabbalists) they open the gates, and at this moment all the prayers, including those in Hebrew, get through.

Or take another example: both before and after a meal, a pious Jew ritually washes his hands, uttering a special blessing. On one of these two occasions he is worshiping God, by promoting the divine union of Son and Daughter; but on the other he is worshiping Satan, who likes Jewish prayers and ritual acts so much that when he is offered a few of them it keeps him busy for a while and he forgets to pester the divine Daughter. Indeed, the cabbalists believe that some of the sacrifices burnt in the Temple were intended for Satan. For example, the seventy bullocks sacrificed during the seven days of the feast of Tabernacles9 were supposedly offered to Satan in his capacity as ruler of all the Gentiles,10 in order to keep him too Or take another example: both before and after a meal, a pious Jew ritually washes his hands, uttering a special blessing. On one of these two occasions he is worshiping God, by promoting the divine union of Son and Daughter; but on the other he is worshiping Satan, who likes Jewish prayers and ritual acts so much that when he is offered a few of them it keeps him busy for a while and he forgets to pester the divine Daughter. Indeed, the cabbalists believe that some of the sacrifices burnt in the Temple were intended for Satan. For example, the seventy bullocks sacrificed during the seven days of the feast of Tabernacles9 were supposedly offered to Satan in his capacity as ruler of all the Gentiles,10 in order to keep him too busy to interfere on the eighth day, when sacrifice is made to God. Many other examples of the same kind can be given.busy to interfere on the eighth day, when sacrifice is made to God. Many other examples of the same kind can be given.

LITERAL SATAN WORSHIP
I
T
E
R
A
LITERAL SATAN WORSHIP

ok i won't post a shit ton of this because it is right there online
biblebelievers.org.au/jewhis1.htm
it's not that long
mandatory Jow Forums reading right up there with CoC

If you have any other ideas on how I can get it to you, I am open to them.

sneaky sneakers

Attached: 0001a465_medium.jpg (639x430, 43K)

Copied this to a word doc, converting to PDF now.

Standby...

It's waste. The literature of Judaism is huge fucking talmund, tanakah, halakah, kaballah, madharchod, bhenchod so many things.

>filedropper dot com
>/jewishhistoryjewishreligion

>What if a jew commits beastiality in ignorance?
Lost my sides, I'm suing you.

>God's Chosen™

Once more:

Imagine...not only did a Jew think about this,
But he thought it relevant to debate with other Jews,
Who discussed it,
A Jew transcribed it,
A Jew collated the transcriptions,
Hundreds to thousands of Jews copied the manuscripts,
Jews still memorize and discuss it,
All thinking it a worthy point to ponder,
What if my dick falls on a hen,
Or I mistake a cow for my wife?

Attached: judenkiken.jpg (600x485, 56K)

gematria

Attached: mamika the temperance of chaos.jpg (2587x1118, 724K)

more gematria

Attached: yuuya ssaaan.jpg (3776x736, 612K)

Attached: bliz nuke the left.jpg (2392x478, 277K)

pepê gematria

Attached: bang the meme agent memetic himpact.jpg (1618x609, 279K)

canada

Attached: altair the meme lose memetic power.jpg (1512x931, 403K)

christ trump

Attached: ragna the emperor of chaos.jpg (2444x1620, 453K)

Can you elaborate on these please? I remember a leaf saying a lot of Jewish literature was encoded in a hexigesimal system - is that what you're showing us?

I still don't understand how Christians are secular people in general can square the idea that Judaism is a legitimate religion in light of the Talmud and the Satanic garbage found therein.

>in light of the Talmud and the Satanic garbage found therein
As much as I hate to admit it, The Talmud is still not common knowledge. If I didn't have a hard copy to back up my claims my friends and family would have disowned me by now.

christ trump

Attached: akainu the justice of chaos.jpg (3028x848, 514K)

They are literally retarded. No wonder the legal system is so fucked.

is gematria and go this youtube channel. jose m.herrou aragon. and this is blog avec jesus et marie

indubitably, absolutely indubitably jewish

What?

This thread being a honeypot so that jews can murder you because you "studied" the talmud and according to their law can be killed without sin.

Youre gonna be legally murdered son.

the j00z, in their discussions about anti-Semitism, do a pretty good job of making a meme of "medieval criticism of the Talmud causing persecutions due to being based upon anti-Semitism" ... when pressed, they'll admit to the Toledot Jesu, but try to put it in some sort of "acceptable" context (ve vas beink poisecuited for 1,000 years!) but to fathom the amount of complete degeneracy found therein

the jews really fucked themselves up, big time. you can see little bits of it in the Gospels, but it has grown so geometrically, for obvious theological reasons ... throughout the Law and Historical Books and the Prophets, God smacked them around when they neglected or transgressed His commandments ... he even had Hosea literally marry a prostitute as an allegory for what it was like for him to deal with being "married" to Israel ... and, yet, in AD 70 the Romans sack Jerusalem, and for another 1,870 years they don't have possession over it and just grow in degeneracy, now Israeli society is either degenerate or religiously degenerate, and still, the Jews don't get it (PS: God will blind their eyes and hearts. Jews, as a people, generally, DFU'd.)

I was not born to anti-Semitism. But (a) I met Jews (b) I understood history (c) I understood anti-Semitism (d) try to scratch the surface of the theological aspects, which is far deeper than "you reject Jesus? get cucked"

>so that jews can murder you because you "studied" the talmud and according to their law can be killed without sin.
>Youre gonna be legally murdered son.
Kike fear tactics to keep gentiles from exposing jewish-supremacy inherent in the Talmud.

Let them come.

each letter of the jewish alphabet equals a number also a and letter combinations that are equal to sums

Attached: yuugi the death of chaos.jpg (2680x936, 517K)

Oh, so that's where pic related comes from?

Attached: Leviticus 25.png (1215x887, 781K)

Attached: deku the fool of chaos.jpg (3628x1116, 684K)

speaking of cucking, da fuq kind of religion involves praying to Satan to keep your God from getting cucked?

I mean, what the fuck kind of religion involves attributing sexual properties to your Divinity, either?

(Primitive, polytheistic ones -- but at least in those, someone like Zeus is generally doing the cucking.)

In this particular case, the Jews, under heavy influence from neo-Platonic gnostic sects (i.e. the antecedents of basically every Christian heresy that was +not+ Judaizing, plus Freemasonry, most 'New Age' spirituality ...)

Every heresy that the Church fought against in her early history was either Jewish or Gnostic. And then the Jews went and become Gnostics themselves.

So what have we now, Judaeo-Gnostico-Bolshevist-Transsexualism?

zu, ischt der gelt in dis froot?

yes and go

avec jesus et marie the best ocultis french blog explain very well the genostic and jewish agenda

>the jews really fucked themselves up, big time.
I've always believed in "Say it, forget it - write it, regret it!"

>I was not born to anti-Semitism. But (a) I met Jews (b) I understood history (c) I understood anti-Semitism (d) try to scratch the surface of the theological aspects,
My journey was weird. I went to CCD classes and they always talked about Israelites, but never Jews. My grandmother is hard core roman catholic and always despised jews openly.

I was indoctrinated through the public school system, but one based history teacher and my dad both were WW2 fanatics and had explained to me, "You know Hitler may have killed 6 gorillian, but if you look at how Germans were treated during WW2 you'd see that Hitler was a great leader to his people."

At the end of HS I started feeling like something was amiss but couldn't put my finger on it. Over time I started having to deal with Hasidics in my area and I started to wonder if I was turning evil because of my anti-semitism towards the Hassids.

Then I quit my office job and took up a job landscaping, around the same time folks in my town were complaining about the Hassids expanding. The rednecks at my landscaping company all hate the Hassids too.

I avoided Jow Forums like the plague. I knew it was full of folks more equipped to argue their points of view than I was. Once I realized Jews were a big enough problem for grown men to openly discriminate against them I came here and started digging.

The rest is history. I bought my own hard copy of the Talmud, I'm reading like I've never read before, I'm trying to turn folks around to the truth and in a lot of my attempts I succeed - but not all of them.

Attached: Talmud (Soncino).jpg (912x1600, 459K)

Going now, thank you Pierre!

>And there's a shitload more of similar stuff in the Talmud. The amount of shit in their involving money is ridiculous, like, really true to stereotype. As an anti-Semite it's a laugh a minute and if I were a Jew, particularly a modern or secular one, I would be fucking embarrassed as hell.
christianity is the only proven ideology that worked against the usury and jewery
jesus showed us the truth and the truth shall set u free

the pagan romans got fked in the ass 500 years before their demise and themselves sacrificed humans to gods and did filthy stuff everywhere

What's your opinion on the controversial topic of Talmud translations and whether they can be trusted? I know there are medieval translations of some very terrible parts of the Talmud, but complete modern translations are said to leave out or mistranslate controversial parts.

cimer

I need to spend years of my life to learn Hebrew properly then digest whatever the fuck they wrote there, because
>I wouldn't even spit on you.
>Du bist mir Spücke.
>Jigodie.
>Egy köpedelem vagy.
Has the same meaning in vernacular language but uses different was to convey the same message.

This baby genital mutilation ritual is really the cause of (((American mind control)))

>What's your opinion on the controversial topic of Talmud translations and whether they can be trusted?
See:
If you know/learn both Hebrew and Aramaic you have a shot of reading the moon-runes, otherwise any translation is going to be filtered by the rabbi translating it. However, if you cross reference the translated Talmud with the Jewish Encyclopedia it's much easier to decipher the censored translations.

For example, here it is said that "A heathen that studies the torah deserves death!" They mean "Gentile" not "heathen", but "heathen" is non-specific and provides plausible deniability.

In the Jewish Encyclopedia it's clear by their definition of Gentile that heathen, cuthean, goi( goy, goyim) are all derogatory terms for non-jews.

jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/6585-gentile

In summary, I don't like it - but unless you know/learn Hebrew and Aramaic it's the best you're going to get. Some older translations are truer than the newer ones, but they're all filtered by the rabbi translating them.

Absolutely, pic related.

Attached: circumcision causes trauma.jpg (720x427, 101K)

Yeah I'm aware a gentile (Kellogg) brought the practice to Americans in a non-religious way but America is the a completely enslaved nation. Even in Judaism the cut is still the mark of a slave- just a slave to their God. So non-Jews are slaves to God's slaves. God's penis isn't cut. Very symbolic.

>gentile (Kellogg)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg#Theological_views
>Kellogg was brought up in the Seventh-day Adventist Church from childhood

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh-day_Adventist_Church
>The Seventh-day Adventist Church[a] is a Protestant Christian denomination[3] distinguished by its observance of Saturday,[4] the seventh day of the week in Christian and Jewish calendars, as the Sabbath

A christian sect whose Sabbath is Saturday?
Hmmm.......

Thank you for the heads-up, I have a lot more reading to do.

>money bad!

This fucking thread?

Attached: 1536296618481.jpg (600x540, 107K)

Back from exercising.
Torrent is finished.

>Satur(n)day
Whoa
youtube.com/watch?v=NJ3HNcjr1WY&app=desktop&bpctr=1541444290
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19506405/

Attached: Saturn-Cronos mutilating Uranus.jpg (1499x1015, 656K)

Awesome!

Extract the archive and double-click on index.html and it will open up to an offline version of the home page www.jewishencyclopedia.com (there's a READ ME explaining this). the search function and all of the article links should work. Try it and let us know how you make out!

Also, would you mind seeding this for a while with me?

Currently downloading this, thank you!

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19506405/
Must purchase to view.

Hey guys if you want to know more about Gematria and how it affects modern headlines and everything in the world today look at Gematria Effect News on YouTube.
Everything is rigged according to this code.

Attached: 1541300777302-pol.jpg (686x499, 100K)

feelsgoodtospeakfrench.jpg

Yeah I just read the summary, had just found it. Summary was interesting.

French would be cool to learn

It's working and I'm seeding it.
Should I learn Hebrew/Aramaic, something else? It should also make learning Arabic easy, could be useful too. I studied the basics of Akkadian in the university, but I've forgotten a lot.

Yeah apparently a French-Jewish professor Roger Dommergue. Really interesting guy, Now passed.

F.