Muslim behavior explained, everyone should know this

You know it would be a same for this spread on European Social Media.

bumper this important thread, i really miss the danish guy with his moon and saturn threads in relation to islam
the faggot nu-Jow Forums mods care more about e-celeb faggotry than this

This is what worries me, having to work with them or be held responsible for their failures. It's like sharing work with a 3 year old.

You aren't muslim so how would you know how they think and act? The fuck is wrong with you.

>and why they will never seriously threaten the West

Yes, because they definitely aren't outbreeding us massively right now and most certainly won't be the majority in most western countries in 50 years, no sir.

You'd have to be an absolute brainlet to unironically think Islam isn't going to take over if we don't immediately counteract what they're doing and send them back now.

That sounds like something written over twenty years ago. It's probably true but they're definitely a threat now. Bye-bye Europe...

Everyone understands that they are just savages and not a threat. But what about Asians? Especially Chinese

The biggest problem in Islam right now is the fact that Muslims stopped reading the Quran and are using only Hadith from corrupt scholars who try to infuse Islam with Arabian culture.

A woman does not need to cover her hair because the Quran doesn't say so. It only says to dress modestly. The Quran advocates that the Muslim should respect a Nations laws and it's leader and not cause corruption. Islam doesn't require us to convert people against their will, however it requires us to inform.

We are your allies against the Jew menace. Most of us despise those imbeciles who flee their countries and leech off the hard work of others. The Jews want us divided. Divide and conquer anons....

Attached: IMG-20181104-WA0000.jpg (720x1280, 70K)

How is this different than Christians who are "forgiven?"
You can't tell me that assholes like Pat Robertson and the politicians they empower like Trump don't perfectly fit the culture of "Face above Fact" and that their god (or Trump's ego) doen't "WILL" bad shit all the time.

Sound like an article on "Arab Culture" is being represented as a condemnation of a specific Religion, when its intent was clearly to point out that Western Shaming won't work to manipulate Arabs, and that the pedagogy needed changing ....

God only helps those who help themselves. We do accept responsibility, however no matter how perfect we are, something will inevitabley go wrong.

I would like whites and Arabs to live in their countries. And everything would be fine. Until the 80s there was no such thing as Islamic terrorism, and before the emergence of Israel in the Middle East there was peace.

>it portrays a God remote, all-pervading, and wholly out of contact with the individual man
Hey, ever heard of the "Islamic golden age"?
Guess what all those theologians were spilling all that ink over.
That's right - they were trying to disprove the "rationalist" (read: Platonist) conceptions of divine being so as to make room for a personal God who knows and cares about the actions of individuals.

Like where do you think Jihadists come from? They believe their actions will be rewarded in the afterlife. How would that be possible if their religion preaches an impersonal god?

Embarrassing stuff, CIA.

Attached: 1440453460882.jpg (293x282, 10K)

>Chinese
>A threat

AHAHAHA

Attached: FOR.png (757x1411, 189K)

There are a lot of them, they are not as stupid as blacks, they are ruthless and hate us.

The biggest problem in Christianity right now is the fact that Christians stopped reading the Bible and are using only interpretations from asinine church fathers who tried to infuse Christianity with Greek culture.

The biggest problem in Judaism right now is the fact that Jews stopped reading the Tanakh and are using only Oral Law from clueless rabbis who try to infuse Judaism with Babylonian culture.

ALL MUSLIMS ARE NPCS CONFIRMED HOLY SHIT

Attached: 1516154827280.png (396x385, 119K)

>APPROVED FOR RELEASE 1994
>CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM
>18 SEPT 95

Now this is shitposting.

JIDF are active right now since they need the democrats to do well in the midterms.

>BELIEVE ALL HUMAN ACTIONS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES ARE BUT THE SEQUELS OF GODS DOINGS, THE INDIVIDUAL IS MERELY AN ANIMATE PAWN
THEY ARE FUCKING NPCS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: 1516477602010.png (808x805, 488K)

Indeed there was peace. I prefer the world to be at peace. Hence our greeting "Salam" which literally means peace. We do not harbor any I'll will to any people. The only reason why those sorry excuses of Muslims are triying to cause trouble is because they think they are better than you.

They see that Western woman are corrupted. Athesism is rampant. Morals are gone. Corruption is widespread, so they label you as "Kafir". Interestingly they don't even realize that the Quran doesn't label christians and Jews as "Kafirs" rather it refers to you as "people of the book". "Whether you are Jewish or Christian , if you believe in the day of judgement and God then you have nothing to fear"

You do realize your ancestors were at peace with us in Spain my evil cousin.

People speak about Arabs, seriously nationality and religion are two different things, there are tons of Christian Arabs that are as bad..

>my evil cousin
kekito based sand nigger

That's an interesting bit. Saved.

Thank you. I was looking for part 2 for a long time. I only had the first part saved for some reason.

Interesting read.

It is a sound psychological analysis.

But in addition - one cannot rule out other explanations for their experience at the oil refinaries. Such as general lower intelligence (IQ) - or the results of multiple-generation cousin marriage, possibly significantly reducing mental health and fitness of the population as a whole.

People really stopped thinking critically did they.

Attached: 1526319664880.jpg (675x675, 30K)

thegulfblog.com/2008/04/10/al-wahhabs-jewish-origins-according-to-saddam/

I do! and not just spain

You honestly think I support those demon worshippers. Get real you leaf. I'm one of those guys who actually supported Trump. I'm sick and tired of these demonrats victimizing us and stereotyping us as brown skins. Lots of us are white skinned for God's sake

Attached: IMG-20181102-WA0007.jpg (1242x1204, 88K)

...

Catholics did very well without reading the bible or even knowing what the bible is about, loosing our tradition is worse.

Remove yourself, kebab

takbir

Great library. Need to spread more of these gems user!

There's already alot of people in the middle East who pretty much hate the KSA. Heck a good majority of them are starting to suspect that they are Jews for being too friendly with Israel. After the whole journalist killing. It's been multiplied by a thousand.

this I'm going through this
holy hell why do they release such things to the public like that ? are they stupid?

Makes a lot of sense.
I've noticed how non-europeans tend to have a serious lack of self control. In their countries of origin bad behaviour would be punished by family members or neighbours. The community is supposed to keep itself in check. There's no concept of responsibility of the individual.

It also has to do with massive inbreeding. Cousins fucking other cousins etc.

>they lack the qualities of the protestant mindset that built a large part of the western world
What a surprise

>tries to show an Arab that he is to blame for something, he never really succeeds in getting the point across.
So basically niggers . They blame it on islam , but its not islam - its the 85 IQ sand niggers that invented it . islam is the perfect reflection of sand niggerness .

cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol7no2/html/v07i2a05p_0001.htm
>Considerable success was achieved among foreign diplomats tinted with homosexual perversions; it is no secret that the biggest concentration of homosexuals can be found in the diplomatic services of Western countries. Those of these who agreed to work for the Russian network were instructed to approach other homosexual members of the diplomatic corps, a strategy which was remarkably successful. Even when those approached declined the offer to collaborate, they would not denounce the recruiter to the authorities. Soviet intelligence officers were amazed at the mutual consideration and true loyalty which prevailed among homosexuals.
kek
this sheds new light on the people trying to paint McCarthy as homosexual

Islam is the merchants pitbull, christianity its sheep

APOLOGIZE TO THE CIA Jow Forums

So what school of thought is this - that diminishes the role of Hadith, corrupt scholars' and says a headscarf is not needed??

Is it a large movement in the middle east like MB or is it like a movement around Ahmed Deedat??
How popular is it?

This psychology is consistent with all forms of dogma that revolve around an omnipotent irrefutable source of morality. But this is a mere symptom of the fact that human beings are not born with the knowledge of their ancestors, they are born stupid and without critical thinking skills. What I'm saying is Islam and all other radical dogmas like it are *quite literally* memes created naturally out of chaotic circumstances and spread/evolved through children across generations. And the optimal cure is to raise children with a healthy amount of skepticism, rational thought, and a basic understanding of the scientific method. Basically all the tools a mind needs to avoid the pitfalls of rigid thinking. You can also squeak by with a counter-meme though.

yeah but it only sticks with upper middle class, everyone else wasn't paying attention

>APOLOGIZE TO THE CIA Jow Forums
the only apology we got from them was X Files and that show sucked massive cock

Our militaries and police are just waiting to be taken off the leash, all we need is a Bolsonaro type.
You of all people should know how quickly things will change.

Yes, God, not Allah. God doesn't have a face and two hands, nor did God send a prophet who split the moon in half, source:
>look at the moon at night, and no country who's been to space has noticed a line splitting the moon, because it never happened

>Interestingly they don't even realize that the Quran doesn't label christians and Jews as "Kafirs" rather it refers to you as "people of the book". "Whether you are Jewish or Christian , if you believe in the day of judgement and God then you have nothing to fear"
The quran also tells Muslims to follow the torah and gospels, but the gospels contradict Islam. Before you cry that they were corrupted, the gospels the quran refers to, are the ones that come from anonymous sources. There wasn't any gospel before that, they started to exist from the time they were taken as a part of Christianity. Here's why Islam contradicts itself
>the 4 gospels mention repeatedly from Jesus' own mouth (red letters) that he is the son of God, son of Man, and God the Father
>Islam says there is no father nor son
>Islam says that Jesus never claimed divinity
Even if you claim the books were edited, if you conveniently take away the scriptures where God says he's God's son and God the Father (multiple times in the gospels), you will notice that the books are no longer coherent.

Napoleon when he conquered Egypt, was amazed that the locals knew absolutely nothing about these massive Pyramids in their midst and had no curiousity of who built them and why.

Your kind have always been dull.

Attached: 1479829228600.png (1000x1855, 1015K)

Attached: 1479829207149.jpg (700x900, 518K)

Attached: 1490223086876.jpg (720x720, 94K)

Attached: 1490216677091.jpg (300x300, 46K)

Attached: 1464310966291.jpg (720x720, 51K)

Attached: 1490223062386.png (1024x1261, 343K)

Attached: 1464311020688.jpg (1500x2500, 819K)

Attached: 12215363453.jpg (875x2711, 723K)

Attached: 1490573861177 (1).jpg (792x612, 531K)

Attached: 1490219966465.png (666x704, 51K)

Attached: 1490223173416.jpg (480x720, 96K)

Attached: 1456612930131.jpg (1464x1665, 556K)

Attached: 1501960248339.jpg (499x623, 284K)

No it just means that Muslims aren't perpetual we wuzzers like whites and niggers are.

Attached: 1464312559726.jpg (373x527, 54K)

Attached: 1464311165268.jpg (1330x772, 554K)

No, you're just eternally offended and blame everyone but yourself for your failures.

Attached: 1479829315931.png (972x1108, 34K)

Attached: 1532727121029.jpg (814x828, 126K)

Attached: 1494381375552.jpg (898x701, 125K)

Attached: 1481250089182.png (1079x1361, 954K)

Attached: 1518893061664.png (499x499, 272K)

Attached: 1499824334413.png (648x595, 336K)

Attached: 1464310895635.jpg (960x697, 151K)

motherfucker you will never be our ally. Your muslims did enough atrocities on our Hindus. You brutally slaughtered millions of pagans Hindus in India over the centuries since we refused to convert to Islam. FUCK YOU MOTHERFUCKER. WE ARE GOING TO BEAT YOU UP REGULARLY IN INDIA

Attached: 3aMbbCyB8J92E385Tlas-TZlApc3Pwdl3I9ZIBXMjnQ (1).jpg (721x713, 126K)

This.
The pic says Arab Christians are like that as well and says it's because of Islam. Stupid CIA niggers. It's genes.

Attached: 'Face' Among the Arabs.png (824x9241, 2.08M)

>George Washington, American children are told, having cut down his father's favorite cherry tree, showed his sterling character by confessing to the deed. An Arab hearing this story not only fails to see the moral beauty of such behavior but wonders why anyone would ever compromise his integrity by admitting thus his guilt. As to Washington's explanation that "I cannot tell a lie," the Arab asks how a man could rise to the presidency if he were not suave enough to use a well-concocted falsehood as a tactic in emergency behavior.

Taqiya has an underlying rationale.

>The values and rationale underlying these reactions are an aspect of "national character," a factor said to be of importance in estimating likely courses of national action and certainly of importance in dealing man to man with individuals. A syndrome of the Arab values can be called the face concept, an understanding of which is essential for a case officer in his interpersonal relationships with peoples stretching across North Africa and from Greece to Japan. Although we are concerned here specifically with Arabs, the same concept is applicable in a broad way to most Muslim groups and to some Far Eastern peoples.

We'll term this "face" - it's useful in describing some other cultures.

>An understanding of the concept will help define an area of potential difficulty in personal relations and give insight into stated and unstated Eastern attitudes. It will explain the extreme difficulty of resurrecting once-fallen political figures and getting them any public acceptance. It will show motivating forces which may be operationally useful, for example in contriving a character defamation.

If you want to deal with these cultures, you should understand "face".

Attached: 8a765a59cc23f5396bfb0e12f8932338e72c256352aed747caa46ef5fd4f9808.jpg (255x231, 14K)

>The high value which the cultural patterns of the East place upon the concept of personal dignity is central to that behavior from which the frustrated American encountering it for the first time is likely to conclude that an Arab is a living non-sequitur or else deliberately perverse. Although there are many demographic and cultural subgroupings of the Eastern peoples-even the Arab may be an agricultural peasant, a nomad of the desert, a seafarer of the Persian Gulf, a sophisticated urbanite, a university student-the ideal of maintaining face has a universality among them, so that a general analysis of the concept will be pertinent, with minor variations, to all. Yet it should be borne in mind that, since cultural groups consist of individual men, there will be individual deviations from the generalizations drawn in the following discussion.

They prize this idea of "face".

>A society expects from all its members an adherence to its own norms and values. According to the degree to which they do so adhere, people are judged acceptable or not acceptable in that society. For the American, earning social acceptability by maintaining his honor is a matter of equating honor with personal integrity. The American manifests his integrity by an uncompromising willingness to face objective truth and fact. Personal respect and acclaim go to him who makes a ruthless search for facts regardless of how self-damaging the results may be.

Admitting you're wrong is a worthy act to Westerners.

Yikes

I don't read enough intelligent people it seems, what an amazing fresh breath of air.

>In their countries of origin bad behaviour would be punished by family members or neighbours. The community is supposed to keep itself in check
This was actually brought up in another post from an African aid worker a little while back.

In the small villages he visited the populace was actually pretty well behaved because the adults and elders kept a fucking tight leash and anyone caught breaking a rule (which anyone would do without a second thought the moment they thought they weren't being watched) they got the shit whooped out of them.

The problem is that only works in small, tightly knit communities, no larger than a few hundred people tops. Beyond that there isn't sufficient oversight and the collective animal behavior of the populace runs rampant and destroys everything. Curiously you see a similar phenomenon happen within gorilla packs when they grow beyond a certain threshold.

Attached: Surprise.jpg (450x438, 73K)

>The American can apologize for revealed shortcomings and gain respect and prestige with an honest effort to correct his own errors. In our culturally determined scale of values the achieving of impersonal objectivity with regard to facts and truth is thus more important than preserving a man's personal dignity before the world at large. At all times and in all circumstances the American is culturally obliged to reconcile his position and his person with truthfully interpreted reality: witness the fact that the verb "to rationalize" usually has for us an ethically negative flavor.

To Westerners a man who prevents others from refuting his ideas to preserve his status is acting immorally.

>The Arab in his society is likewise expected to show personal integrity in order to be socially acceptable. He, however, manifests his honor and integrity by making a public, outward impression of dignity derived from an ostensible lack of guilt. Even if facts and conditions speak to the contrary, the social veneer of non-guilt must be maintained evident and dominant if he is to achieve the socially demanded face. Dignity and stature are granted only to those who show themselves as flawless; the society of the Arab world has no place or respect for one whose faults or errors come to public knowledge. Blame, fault, or error accruing to an Arab personally brings his immediate fall from social grace and a loss of dignity or face. He therefore feels revulsion and bitterness for anything that tends to compromise him in this way.

To Arabs if your ideas are shown to be flawed you are forever considered flawed.

After muzzies were let in the back door by your evil cousins you mean

>Americans and most other Western-bred persons regard it as merely socially inconsiderate or impolite to mention another's errors in public. Management courses teach psychologically graceful ways to correct erring employees without hurting their feelings, suggesting for example "Maybe it would be better if we did this another way" instead of a blunt and ego-damaging "You are doing this all wrong." The Arab would be quick to grasp the wide divergence between the two approaches. But what in American life is a matter of tact and consideration is to him a highly charged social confrontation with many complexities and subtle ramifications of which the American would never have dreamed.

Westerners find polite ways to point flaws out, but to Arabs it's more profound than simply hurt feelings.

>If, as becomes evident after some exposure to Arab behavior, a lack of guilt is what confers on an Arab the dignity or face by which his personal integrity and social acceptability are measures, there must be further consequences flowing from such a displacement of criteria in the social value system as this seems from the viewpoint of Western culture. If lack of guilt gives social dignity, the Arab must maintain his guiltless appearance at all costs. Facts and circumstances can combine in many different ways to reflect unfavorably upon any man, but the Arab cannot afford to allow accrued facts or logic to impute any flaw or guilt to him personally. In self-defense he must interpret the assembled facts subjectively, deny them outright, or reject as illogical any construction that leads to intimations of personal shortcomings. To the American this defense is non-objective, a distortion of truth, and therefore paradoxically destructive of integrity, unless he can take the Arab point of view and recognize personal face as having a higher value than fact or logic in the society.

Arabs cannot accept criticism even if it is objectively correct because of "face".

unleash Japan
if you're on your way to drive a truck through a crowd of Frenchmen you can be happy in the knowledge that if God doesn't want these degenerate frogs to die he'll give you a flat tyre or cause your truck to break down. Thus it's not your fault you killed all those people.

But the Yemenis are arabs too, no?

>There are, it is true, many situations in American and Western society in which this kind of defensive thinking tends to arise; but Westerners are expected to be able to recognize and admit the logical flaws when they are pointed out to them. Severe cases of inability to achieve objectivity are interpreted in American society as manifesting pathological symptoms of neurosis or psychopathic personality. Not so in the Near East. In the dynamics of the Arab social system dignity or face is not compromised for the sake of the lesser values found in fact and logic.

It is expected you should admit you're wrong amongst Westerners. Not amongst Arabs.

>In an oil company installation near the Persian Gulf, an American linguist in the training department, after drafting some exercises to be used in instructing American employees in spoken Arabic, gave them to three bilingual Saudi Arabs working for him to check for syntactic and orthographic correctness before publication. The drafts were all tacitly okayed, returned without change; but after they had been published several glaring errors in the work were discovered. Distressed, the linguist questioned the three Arabs, who reluctantly explained that the inaccuracies had of course been obvious to them but they did not feel it would be right to point them out and thereby cause embarrassment to their boss and good friend!

Arabs won't correct errors for this reason even if it is their job.

>Here the incompatible American and Arab attitudes reflected well the different dominant criteria of each. The American was interested solely in the objective accuracy of the work, a matter which was of secondary importance to the Arabs. They believed in good faith that they had acted with honor as gentlemen in protecting the linguist's dignity above all other considerations.

Arabs believe they do the right thing by preserving an individual's "face" by not correcting errors.

>If an American family in the Near East uses domestic help from the local populace, it may often happen that a vase, say, is accidentally knocked over and broken during the cleaning of a room. When the housewife comes upon the pieces, perhaps picked up and disposed of, her only minimally tactful "How did you break the vase?" will be met with a startled look of surprise, a sheepish grin, and then, after a few hesitating moments of agonized embarrassment, likely the reply, "Oh I didn't; I would never break anything of yours!"

Arabs think it a virtue not to admit fault.

>The housewife's account of the incident to her husband will probably center on the outrage to her Western ethic-- ". . . and after I saw the pieces he had the nerve to stand right there and deny it to my face." But the servant, though he truly regrets the accident and would not have done anything of the sort on purpose, has by his own lights reacted naturally and properly in repelling the immediate challenge to his dignity. A subtler approach by the housewife, merely taking notice of the debris in the presence of the servant, would probably have elicited from him a discreet explanation of how ". . . the vase fell while I was dusting the furniture" and thus graciously permitted him to save face.

Operate on the basis Arabs will never admit fault.

>In matters that may involve him in guilt or blame the Arab's untruths, half-truths, avoidance of reply, or other ploys that jar Westerners do not spring from any perverse desire to deceive; they are facets of the need to maintain that personal dignity and face which in his system of values take precedence.

It seems like psychopathy to us - but it's their culture.