Is this image accurate? Where do you get your news, Jow Forums?

They are all bad, reuters is the best, but it still skews heavily left. Drudge report is bad too and very jewish but I read it, and everything he links is sourced.

I get my news from VNN (Valve News Network)

I remember looking up the source of this and finding that it was a random woman and she based it on her opinion, not any kind of data. This was because a friend's professor was using it as a class rule to determine what sources you are allowed to use.

There is without exaggeration no reason to pay attention to any narrative being pushed by majority jew owned media

>wapo
>nyt
>great sources of news
Loving every laugh.
Protip: NYT is owned by the establishment democrats, WaPo is owned by the establisment Republicans. Put together they're the unofficial propoganda arm of the US government.
Brietbart and Alternet might be trash but I'd take them over that MSM shit anyday.

The Hill? Fuck off.

the best way to find out info is to read news from a couple of sources so that you know where the extremity lies

how can you possibly put reuters wapo nyt and AP as not having a partisan bias. they definitely skew liberal

>guardian
>reputable
>>>/2009/

I like Democracy Now and The Intercept most of the time, but they sure do have an obvious liberal bias.

Is this goatse?

>The BBC
>minimal bias
AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah, I'm not an ethno, but Drudge has disappointed over the past two years. Still, I think it's a sure sign that someone's out of touch when they think he's far right and unreliable. He only links to what other people are reporting. If he's inaccurate, it's because all media has gone to shit (if it was ever any good). No doubt he leans right, but he causes almost as much trouble for the GOP as he does the DNC, and he likes to publish Nazi Panic just as much as Satanic Panic. The real litmus test should be something like Bundy Ranch. If you think the Government was completely in the right, you can't be far-right. If you think it's complicated, you're deeply conservative, and if you're with the Bundys, you're far right. Looking for the left/progressive counter example is pretty revealing. Almost all media sources are more forgiving of Antifa than Cliven Bundy. Anyone who doesn't immediately see a problem with that is already solidly left.

This chart is absolutely bullshit.

When the right claims they're too left and the left claims they're too right, perhaps they are somewhere in the center. Just because the center is to your left doesn't mean they lean left in a traditional sense.

He's literally the first listed on CBS

Attached: 1541447631932.jpg (960x742, 190K)

Yes

Everytime I see this image I think it's Metal Gear with a bunch of sponsor labels.

LMAO MINIMAL PARTISAN BIAS

I'd rather get my news from NaturalNews than CNN. When they're totally wrong, massive wars don't start, you know?
MUH WMD'S IN IRAQ, MUH WHITE TERRORISM

>the traditional sense
In the traditional sense, Fox is progressive. The BBC continuously steers conversation to left-wing topics, tolerates further extremes of the left, and challenges left-wing politicians less. If you actually listen, what you'll notice is that the fart left doesn't complain about the BBC being too right, but about not being left enough; their complaints are that the BBC does not defend left wing values strongly enough. Supporting gay marriage softly, instead of showing hardcore gay porn doesn't make them right leaning.

Also, Reuters and AP are both Rothschild property. Easy to see why they're on the top of the (((pyramid)))

>the economist
>conservative
lol no.

This is so fucking retarded

you literally must be some complete fucking moron that started to watch mainstream media yesterday to think that this garbage is even remotely accurate.

75% of people in Britain support gay marriage though so that's hardly pushing a left leaning agenda. It's just your right wing perspective on it of viewing everything to your left as liberal (bias).

SLATE/VOX/THE ATLANTIC: COMPLEX ANALYSIS
POLITICO: FACT REPORTING
CNN, HUFFPO: FAIR INTERPRETATION OF THE NEWS

This is such fucking CANCER

>When they're totally wrong, massive wars don't start, you know?
incredibly underrated

> (OP)
>>The BBC
>>minimal bias
>AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

The CBC in Canada is no better. Neither is Global. The CBC are made up of purely leftist bias NPC's that will tell you to love the new immigrants that they try to bring into the country, make minor edits to what Trump says and spin it non-stop to tell Canadians why they should hate Trump, push that trade tariff bullshit agenda, and make it sound like the US is ruining the Country, while out shit tier Prime Minister makes one bad decision after another. Then they love to promote the communist Chinese.

Attached: Laptop-Decal_V2.jpg (1208x976, 364K)

>no al jazeera
"pls do not watch that documentary telling how your university campuses, news media, and government representatives are being actively spied upon and subverted by Israeli agents. It is anti-semitic."

Attached: 1508276334553.jpg (611x700, 117K)

I always knew the BBC were bias but Brexit shone a big light on it.

You could argue the BBC are the worst out of any other because they solely rely on taxpayers money yet don't represent those who pay for a tv licence.

no it's not accurate, here is the correct version, img related

Attached: Mockingbird media.jpg (1078x915, 154K)

BBC today is literal government propaganda, it's exactly the same thing as RT.

But, there is truth to be fount on RT, whereas there is only the most warped, delusional liberal transsexual muslin 8 year old that supports Israel narrative to be found on BBC. It's such fucking garbage.

Yes and anyone that pays for a TV license is a race traitor

NPR in the center. Gas your self faggot.

In your chart?
Huffington Post, MSNBC, Guardian, Wall Street Journal, Economist, Hill, NPR, the Post, the Times, Associated Press, NBC, ABC, Reuters, Fox, Infowars, Brietbart and both local papers and local stations.
Outside of your chart I also view a dozen other sources. The more points of view you can see, the more easily you can identify all the biased parts of a story so you can be able to remove those and find out what the truth actually is.

Have you notice on a given day the top story on BBC is something inane like "Gender stereotypes: Teen called lesbian for playing football [soccer]".

That was literally a headline today:
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-46074539

WSJ, FT, Economist to know what the themes are
Jow Forums to even it all out

I like watching RT.
It's like an eternal it's happening thread full of putinfags.

I don't read much of these - but Guardian articles come up in my newsfeed fairly often.
I certainly wouldn't consider it to be is borderline mainstream - it's proper lefty.

What's with americans thinking news without agenda (according to (((them)))) are all deep analysis and high quality
If anything majority of us news and publishing is serving the lowest common denominator and should be at the bottom.

I would say it's ironic that sites from both ends of these meme charts often offer greater analysis with higher quality even if the point of view is fucked, than your standard 3 letter news agency in the middle.

What I find funny about all of these people complaining about these graphs is that they are essentially what my teachers in college told me to use. My teacher recommended vox, CNN and huffingtonpost for fact finding and honest sources. I remember telling her I preferred a mix of RT, Aljezeera and local sources. She got the entire class to laugh at me and said those are all the biggest outlets for propaganda and they are false 77% of the time.
It was then I learned how brainwashed college campuses were.

> Vox is sort of reputable
Lmao

why is mainstream media so fucked around the world?
it was not like this just 5 years ago.

>you know nothing, it was always like this! .

NO, it was NOT so blatantly lefty, preachy and "progresive" 5 years ago.

Looks like someone on on their hands and knees about to get reamed

Was looking for this post. Thank God I'm not alone.

All medias are shit. Don't read (or watch) anything of these.

Leslie Moonves was #metoo'd so he no longer works for CBS

Wrong just all wrong.

no, but this is.

Attached: 5.jpg (960x742, 205K)

Shift the entire chart one notch to the left (and move CNN an additional notch left) and you've about got it.

I get my news from Jow Forums and the words of Jesus.

Attached: 1540781589767.jpg (396x385, 27K)

Whomever made that is fucked in the head

Fuck me, I don't even know where to start with this bullshit

Seriously though. What are good sources?

I like individual (or small group) operated Bitchute or YouTube channels. Like Red ice, black pigeon speaks, way of the world, the iconoclast.

Is Al jazera any use?

I only like Tucker Carlsons show on fox

kek'd hard

Attached: jew.jpg (259x194, 5K)

>mainstream, minimal partisan bias

>npr, bbc, wapo, nyt, cnn

r u havin a giggle mate