Massholes, are we all on board to kick Pocahontas the fuck out the Senate?

not even voting this year desu, obviously the state will go straight blue, mixed feelings on q1, haven't even considered q2, obviously tr*nnyshit will win on q3, plus, they still didn't give us dudeweed from last time around yet.

>you will never gshit in the streets instead of the water wasting toilets

>Shiva is there to siphon R votes.
they somehow got a hold of Trump's mailing list and were billing him as Republican, if he was the Republican candidate I would vote for him

>Wanting to funnel millions of dollars on a failed idea that Commiefornia already
>Wanting sex offender trannies going into the same bathroom as your 7-year-old daughter
Fucking degenerate.

>not voting

You shame your republican brethren. There's supposed to be a red wave!

>Voting no on question 3 means you are scared of trannies which is fucking embarrassing
why should any money at all be spent to cater to a very small group of people with mental health problems?

kill urself fag

Voted for Shiva and Mcmahon.

>it costs money to let trannies into the bathrooms they want to go into to
Ok retard

>falling for hospital executives propaganda
>being so soft that you are scared that you can't protect your daughter from a fucking TRANNY

Attached: AF439991-CAAA-49F1-B1BF-5B9802A59012.jpg (220x230, 21K)

The argument for Yes on 1 is that nurses are overloaded with patients and cannot provide the best possible care due to being stretched too thinly. By setting a maximum number of patients per nurse, they feel that admitted patients will receive the best possible care.

Unfortunately this isn't retail and the purpose of a hospital is to treat the ill and wounded. Sometimes it's a slow day, but a lot of the time it's slammed busy. Nurses should be able to prioritize based on severity of case and give the best care to those who require it, even if some who dont require intensive attention receive less than stellar care.

It makes me sick to think that some incoming patients are told to take a number and wait because Karen is already watching five people. Voting yes on 1 turns hospitals into the DMV.

Attached: 1540453396201.jpg (598x554, 20K)

>Not wanting more government regulation makes you a establishment bitch
>Even though he was born with a shlong and touched children in the past he is actually a SHE and should be able to go into the womans rest room because his fucked up head says so
You must be a troll I didn't think anyone on Jow Forums was this stupid. I hope you aren't voting.

>voting no on letting men use the women's bathroom means you're scared of trannies
remember goy, if you don't like something, that just means you're scared of it

this. every single nurse I've asked is against it too. the only ones for it are the union nurses in the very inner city. it's literally government applying more rules and minimums in a one size fits all manner. voting no on that was pretty much the only reason I was motivated to go

Vote no on all ballot questions.

Attached: 1513357020591.jpg (620x898, 447K)

If you don't like government regulation, can I ask you why you are voting yes on 2?
Also, the bathroom law has been in action for two years and there have been zero reported incidences of sexual assaults. I think it is a bit sketchy, but the evidence points to it being completely harmless.

>me not liking something means it should be illegal
Wew

yes, unironically

You betrayed Shiva!

Attached: be5f3abc-5d7c-4d3b-a718-e14f5580d889_screenshot.jpg (1128x480, 31K)

The vast majority of nurses want you to vote yes on 1. The unions support it, all polls show nurses support it. You can disagree, but the few nurses you know are not the standard.

At least you are honest, I guess. Retarded life view though.

t. Rich Hospital exec

Hire more fucking nurses, you fucking retard. God it is incredible that you guys fall for this obvious propaganda. We are spreading nurses WAAAAYYYYY too thin, it is proven that this will increase quality of care. The rich hospital execs will have to give up some of there insane profit to hire more nurses, which is a good thing.

>Full R with Bill Belichek write ins when no R candidate.
>1. No
>2. Yes
>3. No

> current shortage of nurses
JUST HIRE MORE NURSES LAWL

diehl has a better chance than anyone things. he may not get shit but i think it will be a lot too close for comfort than the dems would have liked even if pocohontas wins. member that time they had it already won, done deal, and scott brown won?

There are still a ton of unemployed nurses. It is not a perfect solution, but studies have shown that quality of care would go up.

I early voted straight republican over a week ago. I did, however, pull over this morning to a bunch of warren supporters, and yell " no vote for pocahontas"

Literally the roastie job of choice. Don’t need to encourage it shill tranny

Attached: E5D49798-BAA4-4A24-92DC-9DBBCF954AE6.jpg (4032x3024, 3.18M)

DDDIIIEEEHHHLLL! WOOOOOOO

Attached: Diehl 5.jpg (338x250, 20K)

Fuckkkk yes

VOTE OUT FAUXAHONTAS AND VOTE 3 TO DAB ON TRANNIES MASSHOLES

What a waste of space

Vote NO on 3 , he means

I voted Yes , No , No.

Attached: Diehl 3.jpg (1060x800, 204K)

Why the fuck would you stupid fucks vote yes on 2? Its a waste of time and money that will accomplish nothing.
Also fuck question 1, the globe asked the nurses union about it and they said it should be passed so they can negotiate better with hospitals, and that the state gov would "fix" it before it went in to effect. Fuck that noise, shit is going to cost a billion dollars a year.

I voted no/yes/no. Felt conflicted on the nurses question 2bh but I felt like a yes vote would just be voting for higher healthcare costs

2 is important if you want us to eventually on a national level ban banks and shit from funding candidates

I just wanted to spite those Jewish hospital owners. And I dont vote Yes to ANY Committee.

>voting no on 2
How does it feel to be considered retarded in all circles?

Dont trust Committees. Waste of time and taxpayer money.

>I love corporations
Fuck off

>warren is +25
Come on, guy.

The only thing worse than megacorps are unions.

holy crap I thought Shiva was Republican

SHIVA
KAMINI
SOMA
KANDA
KRAM

The thing that nobody mentions about question 3 is that it is easy to legally change your gender in MA. The law only protects people who are too lazy/crazy to submit a few forms.

Caught in the middle... Unions are for Socialists and Mobsters and Corporations are for Jews...

Didnt he invent E-Mail or sumptin...? Thought I read that somewhere.

Attached: Diehl for MA Senate.jpg (2048x1152, 358K)

I voted for him for bants.

Holy shiet, that ballot paper has more text than all ballots I've used so far in my country

I voted for her. We need more Native American representation. Also Diehl is a cuck.

Attached: a75da669f1e435999d3abedee96ec851.png (506x720, 230K)

Voted straight R, No/No/No
Reminder that Maura Healey is a stain on society and needs to be removed from office immediately. Her gun policy is absolutely abhorrent and a disgrace towards out founding fathers.

I work in a hospital and voted no on all ballot questions. 1 is fucking retarded.

>Not voting for the libertarian auditor to keep partisan hacks in check

Voted no on all three questions and for Diehl

The only people who would vote Yes on 1 are lazy nurses and the blind idiots that listen to them

Im just tryin to spite the Jewish hospital owners , man.

and why should voters dictate how our hospital is run? that's fucking retarded. There's already a massive nurse shortage how in the fuck would you make more appear. If someone comes into the emergency room and their arm is cut off, "well fuck them I already have 5 patients lol cuck enjoy your death." This would be very apparent on holidays such as new years day when most idiots go out and party and dont come in the nexy day. There may only be a handful of nurses for hundreds of patients that day. limits on nurses is complete and utterly stupid UNLESS its in a nursing home which I agree they are overworked, having worked in both areas before.

Did my part and fuck Tall Deval, I'd rather throw my vote away.

Attached: IMG_20181106_134909.jpg (2009x4048, 1.31M)

It's a felony to take a picture of your vote.

Depends on the state, and even in the ones where it is illegal nobody enforces it.

No yes no is the only way to go

Faggot

It won't happen since she's facing two options. She'll get the plurality.

Reminder: Voting yes on 1 means increasing healthcare costs, and wait times. Rigid staffing ratios will lead to major issues, and even patients being turned away.

I swear I am not bamboolzing, Charlie Baker cheated on his wife with my mom seven years ago. I still voted for him.

Attached: 1522789217463.jpg (1080x1074, 59K)

I am behind the idea of #1, but the words "unfunded mandate" make it a hard no from me. My first thought was that it would create more jobs though

>not voting for the candidate named shiva
cucked and bluepilled

I voted no on 3. The looks of disgust from the faggots in line to scan their ballots was gratifying. If 3 miraculously goes no, the meltdown is gonna be almost as good as 2016

Stop showing me endless storefronts, Google.

I have huge respect for nurses, and would normally be glad to help them, but question 1 is something that the nurses should work out with the hospitals on their own

really? everyone I knew voted no to 3 its supposed to fucking pass?

Unfortunately if no on 3 wins mass will just give it the Cali treatment. Some fag rights group will sue over the change and the state will just not defend themselves against the suit, some shitlib judge will be happy to reinstate the law again.

Everywhere I go in my city there are "Yes on 3" signs. Massachusetts is way too liberal to not go with the tranny virtue signal bandwagon.

I voted for Diehl. I'm republican but even most of my democrat friends cant stand Warren, shes a cunt.

Also I think I was the youngest person at my polls when I went and now its raining, so idk if dem turnout is gonna be as good as they think it will be. Warren election could be close if dems figure they have it in the bag and decide to stay home while repubs go in to vote her out.

lol first worlders vote with pen and paper in the computer era lolololol backward cucks

There were 2 polls that had yes on 3 at over 70% , no idea if they were accurate or just leftist propaganda.

Vote no on 3, why should trannies get special treatment.

Idk dude Unions are retarded

Is governor Baker really such a cuck?

>Blacknigger was governor of Cali in 2008

I guess so. Blue state republicans are pathetic.

in the flyover midwest suburbs we have touch screen voting

Nah. I voted Warren and yes on all ballot initiatives. Fuck Trump and the GOP.

Yes
Yes
No
Proper choice

>Wanting unreliable electronic voting

Attached: 7aefe6c157544b3c07e863793ead0e5e2c4d50eb_hq.gif (500x484, 1021K)

Its because Mass is a corrupt shithole that larps as California

>I work in a hospital
Let me guess, you are a high up exec that has a lot of money on the line

You do realize it doesn't effect emergency room procedures, right?

Ur funny, new england states will never unfuck themselves

Voting yes on 3 is a no brainer unless you are a massive pussy

>not invested in the no on 3 meltdown.

Tits or GTFO, faggot

>giving people rights is virtue signaling
Wew

Men going into the women's bathroom isn't a right

Attached: 800px-OP_C014_misato.jpg (800x600, 149K)