You faggots actually thought California was going to turn GOP red

Attached: 0955038D-9FE6-4104-BDF1-99E5022BC0F8.jpg (480x690, 55K)

THE PEOPLE

Attached: IMG_20180903_131728_449_1536031389021.jpg (960x909, 93K)

2016 John Cox 2,811,627
2014 Neel Kashkari 2,929,213 votes

The unpopular republican governor candidate in 2014 got more votes than Cox. What the hell?

Attached: adc46de15f5a7b3558d02582a58e9d15ecf297f54cad3c058d91ce391e4c9c88.jpg (600x415, 104K)

someone needs to inform the dead people about politics! they keep voting democrat!

4,483,810 Californians voted Trump in 2016. Republicans didn't show up this time.

LOL, i hope you expirience Yugo communism. Mexicans will end up in work camp. Puto.

>being proud of a political force that led to mass starvation and repression
the absolute state of mexiniggers

>Asians aren’t cringy

>In 2002, then-San Francisco Supervisor Newsom promoted the Care Not Cash program which cut county general assistance programs to be replaced with housing and other forms of service. He also promoted a 2003 ban (Proposition M: Aggressive Solicitation Ban) on aggressive panhandling which included a ban for panhandling on public transportation and near ATMs. It also prohibited repeatedly soliciting money, blocking the way, touching or following a person while soliciting, or intentionally trying to intimidate.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Proposition_N_(2002)

>Care Not Cash altered city welfare assistance to the approximately 3,000 homeless adults who received about $395 a month to $59 a month plus housing and food. According to the measure, if the services weren't available, the city couldn't reduce a homeless person's aid. The idea behind Care Not Cash was to use the city's savings from cutting the welfare checks—an estimated $13 million a year —-- to set baseline funding for creating affordable housing, expanding shelters, and adding mental health and substance abuse treatment.

(1/2)

>Care Not Cash caused a significant amount of controversy in San Francisco. The name was seen as a euphemism, and critics complained that the quality of care provided was not equivalent to the cash. The major debates, however, were in the many underlying issues that Care not Cash brought up, including:

>The "right" to be homeless. This issue was raised by some like Angela Alioto, who criticized the provision of the Care not Cash law that states if the homeless person refused "care," he or she would not be given "cash." In other words, it should not be illegal to be poor. Most supporters of the law did not see that as a weakness in the law, but rather as the fundamental point of the legislation, to strongly discourage people from homelessness if shelters and other services were possible.
>The quality of the shelter system. Both certain supporters of Care not Cash and certain critics were very negative towards the prevailing homeless shelter system in San Francisco at the time, criticizing it not only for being of low quality and unsafe, but also as a source of cronyism and graft.
>Many critics, such as Alioto, point out that the premise of the law does not affect the main class of homeless, the so-called "hardcore homeless," who Alioto claims are by and large so mentally unstable as to not even know how to collect General Assistance in the first place.

(2/3)

>communists
>home to big tech corporations that generate billions
>housing and cost of living so high, even 6 figured income workers are unable to afford living there

You realize the moment California pulls something like what Seattle tried to do to Amazon, the big tech industries are going to pack up and leave, right?

>Additionally, Eugene Dong MD, JD, an Associate Professor of Cardiac Surgery Emeritus at Stanford University, conducted an independent investigation of the cost of the program and proclaimed, "[the] program just does not add up." Dong said that the city claims to have used $14,000,000 to house just 1,000 people, suggesting the city spent $14,000.00 per housed recipient per year, or $1,226.00 per month, rather than the $410.00, which was the maximum monthly benefit. Dong believes that difference, or 70 percent of the county welfare fund, went "directly to the hotel owners in the form of cash payments and capital improvements that they would not otherwise have received." Dong also said that the CNC Program did not actually decrease the numbers of homeless, since in the same year, the numbers of homeless in the surrounding communities swelled commensurately.

(3/3)

In short, he promoted a welfare program that was funded by taxes to giving anyone claiming homeless enough money for food and free shelter. From experience, LA is the same way now. "Charities" walk for blocks, providing free food and resources to the homeless using our tax dollars. It enables homelessness in south american illegal immigrants. Immigrants from Africa, Asia get jobs.

So I see why illegals voted for him.

Do you ever wonder why your state is such a shithole?
Honest question.

Attached: 1534723246591.png (888x1192, 174K)

But its not though. Voting does not reflect that. I don't like the leftist politics but it isn't turning off lots of people. 2 million Trump voters didn't even show up to the polls in California yesterday.

cnn.com/2018/11/07/tech/prop-c-results/index.html

cnbc.com/2018/11/07/san-francisco-proposition-c-homeless-tax-passes.html

It's happening already.

>Voting doesn't reflect that
see

Prop 10 went overhwelmingly No
Feinstein got elected. Again.
It's fucked.

biggest wage inequality too and you have designated shitting streets in san fran
If you are not among the 1% in cali and vote democrat you are a fool.

Attached: 1541332058214.jpg (680x450, 57K)

Of the 37,688 people that voted Trump in SF county in 2016, 32,194 showed up this time.

Its a weird mix. Keep the gas tax but no rent control. Its not exactly socialism.

If only it were true ;_;

Someone need to challenge California's open primary system in court.

What it does is lump all results for the primaries in one race, party doesn't matter -- then the top two vote getters have a run off. The problem is 3rd parties NEVER have enough votes to make the final ballot, isn't this discriminatory? Republicans only sometimes make it on the ballot, why do they sit still for that?

Attached: _CA.jpg (1332x965, 336K)

those are people who just didnt like hillary

I need to get out

LOL yeah get away from dem fruits and nuts.

>Feinstein got elected
De Leon was actually amazingly fucking worse.
And he doesn't hold a statewide office, so him losing hopefully means he fucks off forever and I never see his stupid face.
Also DiFi might keel over in office and we get a few months of no blue senator at all.

I think that reflects more on how many moved to Texas, Colorado, etc in the past two years. Not to mention how Republican votes are suppressed

washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/new-yorkers-and-californians-cant-stop-moving-to-texas

So care to respond to without spouting a random, possibly skewed fact?

Slumlords have family and friends. If most residents are illegals, you can see how easy it would be sway your tenants into voting.

>n how many moved to Texas, Colorado, etc in the past two years.
That is silly there are always people leaving and they aren't just republicans.

I honestly didn't even know if he was worse or not, I'm just sick of fucking Feinstein and Brown at this point.
>hurr durr ban GUN everywhere it's KILLING the YOUTH
>ignores any and all crime stats, doesn't want to put money into any police force
>obama wants to sell guns to saudis
>It's A Good Thing.jpg
sick of her shit
Can you actually tell me more about De Leon, I've honestly barely even heard of the guy.

I don't know what this mean.

>Can you actually tell me more about De Leon
He is a gaf machine. Said half his family is illegal on fake documents and "you gotta do what you gotta do to survive."

Attached: kevin.jpg (600x444, 67K)

>De Leon
He was actually the 'progressive' candidate of choice. He was WORSE on gun control, he was the leader and sponsor of almost all the gun control bills that passed in the last few years.
It's wild that there's actually a candidate that in comparison makes Feinstein seem like a moderate on guns, but he was it.

The argument in favor of him was that he would be a new senator and wouldn't have any power, but fuck that. I'd rather he not get a footing in congress or he'll be the rep for decades. I'd rather shut his crazy ass off early and stick with DiFi who is practically a comic book villain at this point, she drives republicans in other states to the polls due to hatred of her. She also looks super evil.

>she drives republicans in other states to the polls due to hatred of her
Kevin would have made this state look just as stupid if not more with his dumb proclamations.

>That is silly there are always people leaving and they aren't just republicans.
People are always leaving, just more Republicans are.

Slumlords are property managers that rent as many houses out to people with little to no credit. They can bribe their tenants for votes by making rent cheaper for a period of time. If most residents in California are illegals, then it would be fairly easy to sway them to vote against Prop 10 without paying them anything.

Illegals can vote. You don't need ID or be registered to vote in California. They can ask for it and claim discrepancies to suppress votes. But they won't if they're Democrat.

cnn.com/2018/06/05/politics/california-primary-los-angeles-voting-error/index.html

>If most residents in California are illegals, then it would be fairly easy to sway them to vote against Prop 10 without paying them anything.
Most residents are not illegal and if so most illegals don't vote.

Look, I can tell you don't live in California. We don't even trust our own statistics based on what we've experienced.

>Most residents are not illegal and if so most illegals don't vote.
You can keep lying, and I can keep sharing information. That's entirely up to you and me, user.

I don't. Fuck, they always vote for more taxes on themselves. God damn it we couldn't even repeal a small gas tax. Fuck this hell hole, then you have non-firearm owners making decisions on what happens to firearms. CAN'T WAIT FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS TO JUST BUY BULLETS.

>I can tell you don't live in California.
626 here.

Most residents are not illegals!

He's right, most residents aren't illegals.

I'd say it's probably 20%.

When I went to vote yesterday, they literally didn't even ask me for ID, the security guard just said, "ah go ahead" and when the gate buzzed me because I had a pocketknife in my pocket he just waved me through. All I had to do was say my name, and sign next to it.
I could have literally just walked up to the table, glanced at the list in plain sight and said anybodies name who hadn't signed yet.

>they literally didn't even ask me for ID
This is normal. Was your name in the book?

>626
Look outside of your highly concentrated Asian community. You're still living in part of what we call "Pasadena"

latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-san-gabriel-ice-20180205-htmlstory.html

sgvtribune.com/2018/04/04/san-gabriel-approves-safe-city-sanctuary-resolution/

sgvtribune.com/2018/11/04/the-debate-over-birthright-citizenship-distracts-voters-from-real-issues/

iceoutofla.org/en/about-us/

>"Pasadena"
I live in Arcadia and we have zero blacks. Pasadena can't say that.

I've seen the white flight of the 90's. DESU it was demise of the defense industry not the liberals that made them leave. This area is still safe and my home value is high. What can republicans offer me?

>I live in Arcadia and we have zero blacks.
statisticalatlas.com/place/California/Arcadia/Race-and-Ethnicity

>Look outside of your highly concentrated Asian community.

I'd say it's less than 50% percent based on past studies factoring in temporary legals with visas. Those would expire in 2 to 3 years. Most studies were in 2014-2016. The most recent study I can find claims it's as high as 30 percent when you are considering the undocumented only.

Remember, visas expire and they become illegal immigrants that were formerly documented

Find me a black and not one that is passing through from Pasadena or Monrovia.

You've already made it clear that you've never lived in California. So why bother?

Didn't they run 2 Dem nominations? There was almost no possible way for them to go red...

Cant wait to see in a mass grave

>muh boomer post

Republicans can offer you ROPE

30yo boomer.

Welcome to California. They rigged it so it is both popular votes get in even if it is the same party.

Republicans are leaving this shithole

Good. I still don't have the motivation to move away from people I know to live in the snow.