CDA version two could TOTALLY win the indecency clause back into law in the SupCt.
Back then they were arguing the internet was an optional thing that wasnt in everyone's life
Now they same libtards are arguing it is a HUMAN RIGHT to have access to the internet.
That rates it more a "public utility" than TV waves, which STRICTLY prohibit pornography
Its time to slap the pornographers on their snout
Do you really think the ZOG will ban one of their profitable industries?
I think Trump's SupCt will hear it.
And, the facts surrounding the issue have all changed.
Porn is the greatest invention in mankind's history, only a low IQ toothless inbred redneck immoral luddite would consider banning it
Its not a ban on porn.
Its to make access to it reasonable, not unrestricted.
you fucking sperg
this could lead to alot of horny dudes AND chicks
And a lot of children not watching tranny porn
reasonable means unlimited in this case dipshit
I exclusively whack off to trannies. A ban on cisgender porn might increase demand for trans porn, which will increase wages and hopefully attract new, hot dickgirl talent. So I'm in favour of a ban so long as it only applies to vaginas.
Try again. Go read the original law.
>low IQ toothless inbred redneck immoral luddite
That's probably the people most addicted to it.
Its the State's role to protect its people....even from Porn
The porn industry is bigger than you can even imagine. It's bigger even than Hollywood. The amount of money behind it is actually staggering. And the whole market is cornered by literally a handful of the same people.
Basically, there is absolutely no way in hell your pozzed, cucked politicians will be able to scrape together the self-decency to pass ANY anti-pornographic laws in the interests of your population. There's too much money at stake
Ban? No. Restrict? Sure. There's precedent, and the court is conservative. Remember, supreme court justices owe nobody but their conscience once they hit the bench.
>he says, his mouth full of dog cock and maple syrup
Well, it is the judges that decide not the politicians.
I only ever watch JAVs now. Still degenerate but I'm giving money to nipponese instead of dirty antichrist kikes.
Yeah, there's no way a precedent like this could ever be abused to extend outside of porn.
Not like anti-semitism could ever be considered "indecent"...
Am I the only guy who never watches it?
Stop shilling this neoliberal jew
>muh gultural margzism
>my larp is unquestionable
SLIDE THREAD
OPTIONS FIELD
The state has no right to ban any kind of communication.
There's enough pressure from youtubers and online communities like here which preach the corrupting influences of porn. It's also NoFap November so the timing is right for a decent propaganda campaign.
The only grounds for any kind of porn regulation is the exploitation of actors and actresses. Your momscience garbage is unsubstantiated and unconvincing.
That’s someones daughter user
Reno v. ACLU was a unanimous decision. Thomas, Ginsburg, & Breyer all joined together to strike that shit down, along with Scalia, O'Connor, Kennedy, etc.
>b-but gorsuch and kavanaugh are BASED & REDPILL-
They're also accomplished jurists who wouldn't think twice about shutting down a blatant attempt to curb First Amendment rights. "Conservative" judges and justices are very different from the prudes and prohibitionists that make up the "Conservative" political class.
Is it that time again where we blame porn for all the ills of society, and mistakenly believe banning it will solve anything? Several countries already banned it, and nothing's changed. Young males just redirected their lust elsewhere; fertility is still in the dumps; degeneracy still runs rampant.
Exactly. The only way to affect the porn industry would be a federal ban on paying people to have sex for porn.
>TV waves, which STRICTLY prohibit pornography
That's because there's only one set of broadcast radio frequencies in any one place. You can have as many fucking wires as you want. You can't compare wireless rules with wired shit.
Of course it is, retard - do commies think women come out of test tubes, or are delivered by storks?
>t. shlomo goldstein
Is it gay to watch a trans girl fuck a cis girl?
why are we not getting a #noporn #norapeculture campaign going
this is anti semetic please delete
lol. people buy porn
This would be amazing. I would love to see all the butthurt from chimps trying to justify access to their porn lol
why is the government involved with stupid shit like this
Yeah I really want to go to 7-11 and buy a porn licence like I live in the people's republic of britain.
>giving money
The fuck?
Mine came from Amazon tho.
t. retarded tradcuck
You will never save western civilization going after the symptoms and not the causes.
The mechanisms of the US government are not ZOG, the people in charge are ZOG agents. Sans stringing up all current politicians on lampposts, the best course of action is control of the supreme Court
Kys leaf
>Implying smutt is any kind of valid communication
>Trans
>Girl
>Lets regulate free speech to promote our own values!!!
How about no. That methodology is terrible. Make the act of selling porn or paying women for sex on camera illegal. If people want to upload home videos that is their absolute right, but kill the industry.
Every time it's a leaf
A FUCKING LEAF
He who censors in the name of "decency" is a fascist.
God I wish I wasn't a brown retard so I knew how to set a canadian VPN, it'd be the perfect complement to my shitposting adventures.
Not gonna happen. We all know who has run the industry since the golden age. We're also quite aware who Trump actually works for.
It's probably somebody's son with his cock taped up, but whatever.
How does it feel being gay?
Day 3 no nut
Going strong
Only if prostitution becomes easier/more legal.
this
>all of these people saying that porn is speech
What exactly is porn saying? There's nothing in porn that can be considered speech.
I failed the other day, but those ((((xhamster)))) tweets have reinvigorated my spirit to resist the pornographic merchant.
You do not really understand how the internet works, first of all, and you do not understand who should actually be deciding things.
#1. The ISP provides the network gear and L1-4
#2. The real issue the ISP is allowed to sue the living fuck, frivolously, anyone that even makes an attempt to create a cheap, localized solution.
#2 is the real reason you do not have several ISP's in major cities, driving down prices. Localized ISPs.
#2 is why you have shitty internet.
#2 is why you have expensive internet.
#2 is why you do not have a choice in providers, not really, and you do not have a christian focused ISP.
Thanks for playing, faggot. Why don't you fight someone that is worth fighting instead of just trying to give more power to the government.
Right now ISP's are using governmental power to strike down capitalism, capitalism that would make your issue go away with your choice, which right now you can not make.
Muh human rights.
Just ban the payment for sex under any circumstances and porn dies overnight
delet this anti semitic thread sage
Don't. I like porn.
>It's afraid
>God given, kike taken nerves
why do these kikes have to rub it in and then try to shove porn in people's face
well to be fair, i think you overlooked this statement he made:
>[any1 who] consider[s] banning it ...
>Gun rights should be reasonable
Fuck off.
At least I have a choice in where I buy my guns - unlike the ISPs, because you are ignoring me because you are wrong.