How did this man singlehandedly defeat the left, the alt right and Jow Forums all while being Canadian

How did this man singlehandedly defeat the left, the alt right and Jow Forums all while being Canadian.

Attached: JP THE P MAN.png (892x735, 1.23M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=i0iL0ixoZYo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

he has the support of the heavies

Attached: the nightmare is over edition.png (276x275, 38K)

by washing his penis

>the left
I heard him talk about socialism more than once, he didn't even know the most basic concepts about it, he seemed particularly retarded.
I sincerely can't believe that anyone at all could actually consider this man an intellectual.

Who is that?

>I... I .... can't.... answer .... this .... question

>he didn't even know the most basic concepts about it, he seemed particularly retarded.
Putting the word "particularly" in front of the word retard doesn't make you appear smarter, Mr ArgenNigger.

Attached: 1536297672134.png (800x764, 803K)

By being literal NWO asset tasked with mentally castrating potential reactionaries and returning them into zionist cattle pen.

Attached: 1532955272718.png (1920x6848, 2.36M)

do you have an argument?

He asked a niggress to fuck his ass with a strap-on and that way he won. Are you going to emulate him in bongland?

I Q
Q

>do you have an argument?
Not until you back up this statement. "I heard him talk about socialism more than once, he didn't even know the most basic concepts about it". Show proof, back up what you're saying instead of doing what other anti JP shills do.

The Canadian is immunized against all insults but realistically he was a sane voice with authority.Also father figure.

>people non ironically look up to this charlatan
kek

He couldn't even defeat himself

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 101K)

he talks about Marxism here:

youtube.com/watch?v=i0iL0ixoZYo

everything he says is wrong, he's using the Pareto distribution as an argument against Marxism, which outright shows he doesn't even know what Marxism is.
Pareto distribution would be a somewhat decent argument even against social democracy, which is a Capitalist ideology, but even then it's a rather flimsy argument, Marxism has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Marx's observation of wealth accumulation happening on a minuscule percentage being intrinsic to capitalism comes from exploitation, the Pareto distribution does not account for this, Marxism doesn't claim that if you are better than the rest you should be just as succesful as the rest, it claims that your success should come from your work, and not from other people's work, this why wealth accumulates for a tiny part of the population, because they're using the rest of the population to accumulate wealth, this is intrinsic to capitalism.

this is just one of the many instances in which Peterson talks about socialism, without knowing what the fuck he's talking about.

>Pareto distribution as an argument against Marxism
His arguments against marxism are still valid and what bret said was the same, valid. He's been studying marx for decades. Also 3:23 of your video.

Imagine believing this ultrakike shill

>His arguments against marxism are still valid and what bret said was the same, valid
again, do you have an argument at all?
>He's been studying marx for decades
it really show's he hasn't even read the communist manifesto, which is a fucking pamphlet.
>Also 3:23 of your video
yes, what he says is literally wrong.
do you have any arguments at all or are you just going to say dumb shit?

in case you haven't noticed, we're smarter than everbody

>are you just going to say dumb shit?
alright you didn't have to be mean about it

Attached: 50's Pepe.png (426x391, 155K)

He's nothing more than another stooge for the Anglo-Zionist world order.

The biggest problem in this world is reproduction, population growth, and resource scarcity as a result which leads to conflict. Individualism of the type Peterson proposes has no response against this problem.

Attached: why.jpg (400x476, 32K)