What's so wrong with civic nationalism?

Globalization has pretty much ensured that migration and demographic changes are inevitable. Ethnostates will be a thing of the distant past..Look at the happiness of the family in the pic.You know in your heart and soul that that is happiness that you want to experience one day. So why would you strip that away from someone lucky enough to have found it?

Attached: 1540661566835.jpg (1024x495, 81K)

Go back to asianmasculinity, faggot.

That's not how biological determinism works. I'm not attracted to other races and that's true for the majority of people.

Go back to asianmasculinity, faggot.

Go back to asianmasculinity, faggot.

???

Who implied that you had to bang minorities?

No one, he's projecting.

>civic nationalist
>magic dirt is really what unites us

CivNats are the lowest form of life

Attached: 1537893455632.png (400x400, 175K)

civic nationalism can work.

In theory. You still need to make some discriminations for it to work, so whats the point anyway?

...

Civic nationalism is bad because the only thing unifying the people is the fact that they belong to the same state - regardless of whether that state is good or bad, or whether the people unified within the state are good or bad.

A nation is a people with a common past, specifically a common origin. A folk is a people with a common future, specifically a common destination. Authentic National Socialists are folkish nationalists. Folkish nationalism is not to be confused with civic nationalism. Civic nationalism is, like ethnonationalism, concerned with preserving the traditional culture of a country, but merely differs from ethnonationalism in that it does not require the preservers to be unanimously the blood descendants of those traditional ancestors. The consequence of successful folkish nationalism, in contrast, would be the creation of a new culture altogether.

“The question of nationality just does not arise any more as in the old days. Rather, there is a singleness of spirit, a commonality in pursuit of the same ideals and goals.” – Arno Breker

“As Christ proclaimed ‘love one another’,” so our call – ‘folkish community’, ‘public need before private greed’, ‘communally-minded social consciousness’ – rings out! This call will echo throughout the world!” – Adolf Hitler

>Globalization has pretty much ensured that migration and demographic changes are inevitable.
“If one wished to describe the history of the Aryans, he would have to admit that today the Aryan has vanished except for a few very small traces.” – Alfred Rosenberg

>So why would you strip that away from someone lucky enough to have found it?
I judge individuals based on behavior, the only honorable way to judge an individuals, not on phenotypes that correlate to a behavior.

If you ask me, the racial soul of the young girl is likely to be confused, and it is for her that this image makes me sad.

Attached: Arya-1.jpg (640x343, 26K)

Is the joke that he beat her to death?

Civic nationalism is is like HItler driving Honda Civic

Wrong couple.

No it cannot.
Social Contracts are formed by groups of people who share one or more common unifying factors.
The most powerful of these factors is ethnicity, weaker ones are religion, language etc.
You can easily observe that by putting a hundred strangers in a room, they will soon form groups based on these factors.
Now if you built a nation with more than on dominant ethnicity you will get the same outcome.
People will form blocks based on their ethnicity. You could say they will form their own social contracts withing the reigning one. That means they will act in the interest of their respective group before the interest of the collective.
This is more or less stable as long as the reigning group is clearly dominant. But at some point the balance is tipped and society becomes unstable, that is the stadium south africa is in today.
Then after some more time, the newly risen block begins to question the purpose of the persisting social contract. That is when open conflict breaks out and either on side is subdued(/eradicated) or the nation balkanizes.

Can name a historical example of a civilization that thrived with multicultural society?

What I want is to kill every single one of the people in that picture.
It revolts me to my core. The racetraitor whore, the subhuman nigger, and the utterly disgusting mulatto, all deserve to die.

Only white people have the right to exist.

Attached: img753744.jpg (667x397, 34K)

>minorities
Whites are the minority.

>subhuman nigger

Attached: UCScreenshot20180621151447.png (970x876, 34K)

Because race is still an incredibly important factor to people, and creates divisive voting blocs within the "multicultural" nation. This midterm was proof of that.

CivNat would work if we could magically convince everyone to give up their racial identity, but that will never happen. But if even one group sticks to their roots and puts their race before their nation, then it undermines the whole thing.

Attached: 1136360443741.jpg (3000x1800, 771K)

report demoralization spam!

>Ethnostates will be a thing of the pa-

Attached: 33CECFEB-2599-4010-80F2-780AA4EB7F8E.gif (500x280, 2.79M)

Attached: f73fda8f498b6037ef679ebbf23fbffe.jpg (480x470, 22K)

Ugly Turkish rat, I'll smash your blown out Mongoloid head into the pavement if you don't stop ruining the Black power flag.

Attached: tumblr_o1gqhtzEZA1ubm73lo1_1280.jpg (760x752, 66K)

>What's so wrong with civic nationalism

It's faggotry