Nazbol is the answer

Nazis aren't brutal, just strong and efficient

Nazbol. The third position for cowardly edgelords that don't want to get punched for being real National Socialists.

Why do some white people not understand that they too can be niggers....

The best thing about getting rid of the kikes and shitskins is then we can move back to getting rid of the low quality whites without interference.

Can confirm. Everyone I know IRL who fell for the Nazbol meme is a literal spastic tranny loving queer.

Shh. We've don't put that in the brochure.

You can't have racial unity without proper economics

Is allowing the 3rd world to invade your country and live off the tit of your tax dollars "proper economics"?

watch me

Attached: 7b1.png (920x720, 418K)

why? so america can be
taken just like germany was?

you all are to dumb to
govern yourselves.

>capitalism is the best system the nice jewish capitalist zionists on the television told me so
wrong, dead wrong

nazbol will win

Attached: o9a.jpg (1357x2048, 219K)

Explain the dif between NatSoc and NazBol.

NatBol is basically just communism for racists...
Although they are only against kikes that are capitalist.
So the better question is whats the difference between (((communism))) and (((nazbol))) and the answer is nothing.

One executes trannies the other fucks them.

KILL IT WITH FIRE

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>being so dumb you don’t realize nazbol is just taking national socialism to its logical conclusion

Attached: F5841E42-2F90-4C85-808A-53EE3C93B05E.jpg (400x386, 65K)

That makes no sense.

Striker is a good example of a Nazbol

basically someone who is very left wing on economics, and anti-imperialist, pro-worker....etc. But also totally woke to the jews and race issues.

>Natsocs and Communists never killed each other over politics, in fact, theyre the same thing!

Attached: Go_away_faggot.jpg (960x741, 108K)

>not knowing the difference between national vs international socialism

Attached: 5BD12AA6-0D1C-48D6-9DE8-C517B0A95778.jpg (2544x4000, 875K)

You mean besides the nationalism over globalism part. In theory, nazbol does differentiate between jews and whites racially and promotes segregation with ethnostates. In practice though, a lot of nazbol advocates seem to be antiwhite queers and/or promote retarded alternative lifestyles.

I pretty much agree with NatSoc from what i know. It's a pretty holistic ideology that seems to get to the heart of the issues. That said, i'm not really knowledgeable in terms of it's economics. I really hate the profit motivator but I also don't have a problem with reasonable income disparity based on merit. Capitalism is exploitative by it's very nature. If not at first or on a small scale, then given enough time and size.

>Unironically being a bolshevik
>Unironically being a marxist
>Unironically being a commie
>Unironically being a socialist

I don't think you do. Nice filenames btw. Totally not a dead giveaway as to what (((you))) are. People here might not know, but I'm not from here.

Attached: 14721909_(2).jpg (250x250, 10K)

I like Striker because he's a good contrast to the regular voices in the right, but I think he's wrong about a lot of stuff. The hardon he has for juche and north korea is pretty dumb.

Like I get hating banks, foreign interference etc, but embracing people like lenin is just stilly. I can even see why people might be drawn to stalin from the right, but lenin and bolsehviks?It was entirely jewish.

Im pretty sure the whole concept of the third position is that communism is not a valid option just like free market capitalism isnt... hence its not nazbol.

fpbp

Just ignore them. They are autistic edgy teenagers who browsed Jow Forums to early in their life and now want to be extra edgy so they can pretend to be special snowflakes.

Nazbol isn't third positionist though. Third positionist is understanding that human selfishness is partly inevitable and thus capitalism on some level is required for healthy economies, but those wills can be directed for the betterment of the nation and race.

its more like edglords that want to be punched by both nazis and faggot antifa to show off how cool of an individual they are.

>capitalism on some level is required for healthy economies

IDK, it starts to sound vague and like a good place for subversion to start. What does "capitalism on some level" even mean? I don't even want private corporations/business. However, i do want wage disparities, even pretty broad wage differences. I guess I want government owned means of production?

No one mentions Strasser.
Y’all truly know not what you’re talkmbout

I mean like meritocratic capitalism. If you make a better product and work harder, you deserve to be paid more. This is assuming the product is a net positive though and not some dildo or something. It's really just saying that competition is required in order for service to be the best. You could have this within different nationalized unions etc.

You don't DESERVE it. It's just making a better product and working hard increases the odds of people actually buying the product. No one DESERVES anything. All there is is what there is, and the people who are willing to take it.

Capitalisms use for finding efficiency is essential for its eventual nationalization, thats Gentiles thoughts on the necessity and advantage of that system over marxisms flat out rejection, right?

competition can exist without private means of production, no? I support nationalised industry. Wasn't VW nationalised?

Same boat here Leafbro. You east or west?

Sure. Do you like pornographers making more money than those working on cancer treatments? How do you feel about criminal football players being taken from the ghetto, pushed through college and paid tens of millions a year to play in the NFL while your average factory worker or laborer in the states barely makes enough to make ends meet? Sure, from your perspective, the universe may be an uncaring calamity that doesn't hand out rewards, but that doesn't mean an ideal society shouldn't be formulated around a moral economy.

Libertarians are just as bad as commies sometimes, i swear.

Sure. I think critical industries should be nationalized but there's no reason to nationalize manufacturing for smaller industries. I think those can be left to a mainly capitalistic process.

Imagine having a few nationalised clothing companies competing and providing options. The heads of these companies would get paid based on it's performance, how much the people like the cloths. Labor could be shared, even in the same factory.

no reason? Efficiency. No sense in propping up a super rich class when you could be using those funds to improve the volk. Unless you propose price controls anyway, then maybe that could fix the issue.

Nature is exploitative by nature.
NatSoc is about fitness.
Not equality of outcome.

Attached: IMG_20181001_182535.jpg (800x1000, 62K)

Join our Nazbol running club unironically

>Disc.ord
GTXepS7

Attached: 0f5bc4ce9738.jpg (966x1466, 352K)

Canada used to have this. Then we opened up free trade and got ass raped by Chinese imports via American Companies.

Exploit the people....the entire reason it places restrictions on capitalism to begin with. NatSoc is not about individualistic considerations where it hurts the people...

I'm just wondering where you draw the line. I saw in a previous post you suggested nationalizing clothing manufacturing. I don't know if I agree with that. Are you going to nationalize street vendors selling icre cream on corners? I think at a certain point that level of regulation just become draconian and you end up having a bureaucratic class that regulates and does nothing else. Singapore has a pretty good model of how to run things desu.

Exploit the people....the entire reason it places restrictions on capitalism to begin with. NatSoc is not about individualistic considerations where it hurts the people...so why must there be a capitalist at the head of companies soaking up unneeded funds beyond what is deemed appropriate?

The funny part is, I actually agree with you but I was just saying why capitalism is bad because the harder working people don't get what they deserve. I get nofap has got you stressed but calm yourself my dude.

I think up to a certain number of employees. Mom and pop shops are fine. That's just my opinion.

I suppose I deserve that

Attached: 1537225097963.jpg (708x588, 67K)

I've come to the conclusion that regardless of the political system I live under that I'd probably be successful at it. So yea I can roll with NazBol

Sorry for the sperging. I just find most hyper-capitalistic arguments super nihilistic and annoying. Thought that's what you were arguing for.

As far as regulating creating inefficiencies, well then i would not support them. My consideration is ONLY what benefits the nation. Nothing should be done to a degree that it's a net negative. I don't think we need multi-millionaires to the degree we have them but I also don't want everything to stagnate. People should be rewarded for innovations that help the nation, in proportion to how much it helped.

NatSoc is about society as a whole over the individual which still recognizes that people are individuals and need to have needs met, because otherwise its bad for the society.
That doesnt mean people are equal and the difference between NatSoc and communism is that achieving equality isnt the goal. Achiving fitness is the goal. If it requres some level of equality then fine, but it is only as an ends to a means. Equality is still not the ideal.
Communists or nazbol, or faggot kikes... whatever you want to call them dont agree with that which makes them retarded degenerates whether they know it or not.

Yes I would tend to agree. I'm more along the lines of a Franco-ist/Falange type economy.

Attached: 1528474798455.png (1000x559, 512K)

fuck off jewish incel

GANG

Attached: 2018-03-31 20.32.14.jpg (720x836, 156K)

yes, i'm aware. I guess I'm arguing for fitness of the economy, meaning that which most benefits the nation. Anyway, the exact policy should be based on observable results, not what I think. I assume there would be some wage/earning controls so that, even if there were private industry, their would not be disproportionate profit inefficiencies. Imagine a society that is functioning well and some athletic shoes that are cheap to produce are selling for $100. You could rely on the people to know not to buy these, but I don't think that will always work. It won't always be so obvious. There must be some regulation there or you lose efficiency, the owner might get rich but families are taking a hit. Alternatively, there could be a situation where someone is making a better product or higher value product for the money but simply does not have the funds to displace an inferior product. This is why I see shared gov controlled means of production as beneficial. It takes barriers to entry down. It becomes just about ideas, with workers standing by to make the best product with their labor. That's not exactly capitalism though....even though the innovators would be rewarded.

None of those counties are great. They are hotbeds for corruption and dsygenic populations.
You are a dumb nigger, because the universe determined it to be so, and rationalizations in your mind will never fix that.

Yeah, thats all fair.
Im not arguing in favor of free market capitalism
Im pointing out that makets should be based on utilitarianism not egalitarian idealism. Which again is the difference between NatSoc and communism.

you don't get it and you never will, silly wignat

Attached: 1494248292244.jpg (368x459, 41K)

I do get it, i just dont care that theres no place i the world for you.
You are a waste or resources, weak, and stupid.

What's the actual difference between you fags and Nazis besides the device you have on your flag?

Attached: 1287771413040.jpg (356x354, 23K)

They are jeaouls of fit people, and as much as they like to take about everyone working together for the best outcome they would rather screw the fit over than move aside for the greater good.
Unfit people... go figure.