Amount of times used to kill women in relationships involving domestic violence: 50 times a month

>amount of times to stop tyranny
Can’t be quantified but every single day is the best guess.
And we are all sick of libturd tyranny so get over it, you’ll never get their guns. Hope you get shot first, not because I’m nasty but because you’re crazy dangerous.
Pic related, look into the eyes of a liberal

Attached: B093E85A-8773-47F9-884A-009165F2182D.jpg (960x1280, 147K)

Based

Do I need to mention 1776?

Attached: 2A3FD5C4-88E5-4724-B38F-27CF228B8A69.jpg (700x700, 81K)

And you dont make it about yourself? You're advocating to take people's rights away lol

Because the women just want to escape and they dont want to kill someone you psychopaths. Not everyone is as bloodthirsty as you. 72% of women who walk away from abusive relationships in stage 3 or 4 are attacked by their abuser and most often fatally. If you want to learn more read crazy love.

I GUARANTEE YOU ITS NIGGERS

When will you cia niggers understand, we keep our guns not because we plan to overthrow the state, we keep them because when the state eventually collapses, we will reorganize and begin the counter purge to the purge that will already be in play. What happene's to all large empires that collapse from Jewish trickery? We aren't illiterate nogs, we'be read history and are prepared, you know this as well as we do which is why you spend more money on trying to make us give them up willingly then to come take them by force.

Why do I get the feeling most of these gun deaths are caused by niggers... but OP would have us all believe it's being perpetrated by people he disagrees with politically. Werid.

You'll be shot, faggot.
Can't wait for gun grabbers to get mowed down.

maybe the government should shrink itself down to how the founding fathers intended.

there should be way, way more gun violence than there is and it should all be directed at the government.

so what you're saying is there isn't enough government tyranny?

Agreed, and it would do us all good to remember not to do business with jews.

because taking guns away is an easier option for people who reason using their emotions than the race war we actually need.

>it can't happen here, the post

If you really cared about people lives you'd ban vehicles too
I mean over 102 deaths a day?!? Thats insane
Nobody NEEDS a vehicle right guys

Attached: 1280px-US_traffic_deaths_per_VMT,_VMT,_per_capita,_and_total_annual_deaths.png (1280x779, 263K)

>amount of times cant be quantified
Well domestic shootings can be. Id rather look at tangible statistics than your unquantifiable do well wishing.

like with pitbulls, it's the owner not the weapon. at least we can get fat old lesbians on our side, on that point.

What makes you think you'll never need to again?

Men were built to fight. Women weren't. Guns won't help most domestics because when he goes off it's too late.

courts.ca.gov/33961.htm
Actually this is what im advocating because i know someone who was in an abusive relationship and used the california courts to disarm her abuser before leaving him. This could save many people from domestic violence

You act like females don't deserve to be abused

When people riot over police shooting unarmed citizens whole neighborhoods go outside to mob and persecute the police station responsible for the unit. They never needed guns to cause submission. In the rare case they do use guns, they kill innocent officers like that blm sniper who killed 4 off duty cops.

>amount of times used to stop government tyranny: once by a mentally ill bern out
What is the Battle of Athens

fucking kek

How does that change the fact that you would be powerless to overthrow a tyrannical government without firearms?

And all that violence will just stop with a few simple laws passed? Because criminals are known to follow the laws right? Makes sense to me.

Attached: 1540739463027.jpg (800x552, 119K)

focus on making poison ivy illegal instead

Nigga if you are determined to get a gun to commit a crime you can, it doesn't matter if it is legal or not. The only difference is that law abiding citizens won't be able to defend themselves

Attached: 1541471484823.jpg (512x691, 152K)

Go watch any number of cartel torture videos on liveleak.
That exists just south of us, where gun ownership is heavily regulated and criminals need not fear their life when perpetrating violent crime. That can be your family without guns, at the hands of someone who has one.
Liberals have this insane idea that banning guns will get rid of every single gun in the country, as if they will all just magically disappear once they pass legislation. They'll quote Australia, or Great Britain, but fail to note that these countries are islands without a border with a hostile criminally ran nation. Or they'll misrepresent crime statistics in these countries, or pivot to the mass shooting narrative rather than individual instances.

Taking away guns takes away an (while not exercised) explicit power from the people over those who govern. If you're for taking power away from people or you trust the government to protect you, I have some oceanfront property to sell you.

>transportation is the same thing as weapons intentionally designed to kill and threaten human beings.
Let me make it clear, im fine with hunting weapons and im not a total gun ban person. I just think people should have more options to get guns away from dangerous people and it upsets me that apologists use these arguments like cars and tyranny to justify these dangerous people keeping their firearms. Theres already tons of checks on driving btw, my brother has a dui and now he can only drive to work and back. But apparently everyone should own a gun and any attempts to disarm dangerous people is muh infringment. Cars already have these removal methods but few states have the same methods california has for disarming

guns are stopping government tyranny 24/7 faggot

This guy is right.
In Argentina anything higher than .22 caliber is illegal with a few extraordinary exceptions. And yet the drug cartels manage to get 7.62 caliber rifles capable of penetrating kevlar and killing cops.
Gun laws only make the average citizen defenseless it doesn't make the criminals incapable of getting them

No, I want the coming civil war to be as violent and bloody as possible.
Every single American should lose a direct family member in the war.
It's the only Way you dense motherfuckers will get the hint that revolutions are bad and we should avoid them.
How many dead relatives is your communist utopia worth?

Communists don't care about blood relatives.

nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3
Guns are used anywhere from 500,000 to 3,000,000 times a year in self defense. That's a lot of lives saved.

Why do you assume the person would mot have committed the crime without the gun?
Why do you never want to discuss motivation?
I think if we are seriously talking about stripping away one of our fundamental rights we should analyse the issue from multiple angles.
We should treat abolishing the second amendment with the same hesitation as abolishing the first amendment

How about how the US is the only first world country that still has free speech? Is that quantifiable enough for you?

>>amount of times used to kill women in relationships involving domestic violence: 50 times a month
and still, women won't do what they're fucking told. are we using the wrong weapons?

Why dont you try reading another countries constitution dumbass. Multiple first world countries have free speech.

>your dick
>amount of times used to jack off: 50 times a month
>amount of times used to fuck a woman: once with a mentally ill bern out

May as well rip it off and throw it away then

>if we didnt have guns then the government would throw us in cages!
Good job stopping that government tyranny gun owners! Oh wait a minute it was your party that was ignoring this issue, whoops.

Attached: 24A2481E-91B0-4011-90BC-5FD58B4EE940.jpg (919x600, 186K)

Imagine if she had a gun to defend herself lol
>I-i don't want to hurt anyone so I don't own a gun
>But I know full well that people with guns might not always feel the same
>I'll be safer without a gun
>The police that are 30 minutes away can protect me, r-right?
Because women want to be protected, even if these feminist cunts say they disagree they're the same too.

No, user they do not.

Because not everyone is a fucking killer and they just want to escape abusive relationships.

If you're not willing to kill someone that's a threat to your health or safety, you are weak, and deserve to die. I just don't understand. 200 people in a club in california and not a single one even attempts to confront the man with the pistol. Pathetic, spineless wimps. And you think I should give up my rights for them? No! I will not, and I will kill you if you try to force the issue.

Having the capacity to defend yourself isn't the same as being a killed dickhead.

There are extreme limitations on gun ownership in California. Yet the shooting still happened.

>Yeah, none of that happens
The government doesn't try shit precisely because it knows the armed citizenry would cause a totalitarian coup to fail.
The success rate should be measured in "Number of years government tyrrany has been successfully deterred: 242"

Those are not emerican citizens though

Legal defense retard

Imaging being autistic enough to think
>I'm definitely going to be able to defend myself against my crazy ex who is a foot taller, 3 times as strong and armed with a gun, without a gun.
If you actually think disarming men will solve that problem you a fucking idiot lol

And yet other first world countries with disarming methods and stricter gun legislation still havent become despot tyrannies like you keep preaching.

>im not a total gun ban person.
You started this thread with a picture of a damn shotgun, you fucking idiot. If a person can't own a shotgun, what CAN they own? Do you know how many americans are killed with guns other than pistols every year? Less than those beaten to death with bare hands.

>women being put in their places
>a bad thing
you know there's a good reason those women got shot by their husband right

My people have been enslaved and persecuted for thousands of years and you have no right to disarm us! Stop trying to speak for persecuted people. You won't disarm us so we can be oppressed again.

Yes they have. All Western European counties are socialist police states where you can be jailed for insulting people.

How do you think these abusers assert and threaten control over these women? Most domestic abusers never even fire a shot but they still own multiple guns to threaten to kill their partners and their families.
Having the capacity to defend yourself is only going to cause more fatal domestic spouts. People just want to escape, they dont want to kill someone even in defense.

Its not about black people you fucking retard.You are delusional

lol NO YOU are the enemy commie.

>People just want to escape, they dont want to kill someone even in defense.
Well too fucking bad. It's not my fault if someone is a weak willed pussy who refuses to defend themselves. I will not surrender the tools for my own defense.

If you don't trust yourself to own a gun without killing your loved ones then you clearly aren't someone who's opinions on responsible gun ownership matter

Shall not be infringed, the public have more right to an AR than the standing military or police forces do to exist

Not an argument. In fact you didn't even deny what I said

Maybe 50 women deserve to die each month just for thinking their lives are more valuable than the many, many more men who die per month due to vilence.

In case you're unaware of obvious biological differences (Never seen a woman before?). You can do that without a gun, men are naturally a lot stronger and better fighters. You can easily make those threats without a gun.
>Calling someone else delusional after all of your irrational shitposting
Ironic!

The shotgun was because i already had that picture on my phone and didnt wanna look up a better pic. And for the handgun thing, its already much harder to get a handgun in my state than a shotgun. I want disarming proceedures like california has and i posted the court disarmament link earlier in the thread. It was a sloppy start, ill give you that. The point has mutated over the course of the thread but bottom line is that im tired of these right wing apologists preventing any effective measures or discussions about solutions because of their “muh tyranny” when people just want to stop civilian violence.

hey faggot did you ever consider people KNOW how to make there OWN guns?

Attached: ezmakegun.jpg (1500x997, 300K)

You dont have to you fucking retard, the solution is court disarming and that only applies to domestic violence and dangerous people being armed.

amount of times used to stop gov tyranny: 242 years

Hey faggot, those guns require ammunition.
courts.ca.gov/33961.htm

You cannot stop civilian violence. If a man wants to kill his wife, he just can, easily. In fact the only possible way to prevent it is to allow women to buy guns.
Mass shootings would be (and already are) likewise inhibited if perhaps 10% of the adult population carried pistols. Not only would the would be shooter be cut down early, far fewer would even try, as in general they are still afraid of the pain of being shot; most mass shooters kill themsrlves or surrender to authorities.

>feminazis who cheated on good men with like 6 black guys at the same time
Pretty much tyranny too. Nothing of value was lost. And if those bitches had their own guns you would have smaller numbers in your statistics. Sage.

A woman in NJ begged the state to let her carry concealed after her abusive bf threatened her multiple times, despite restraining orders that liberal faggots insist are nearly bulletproof. NJ is a "may issue" state, meaning they'll "let" you carry if you can prove you "need" it.

They told her no.

She was murdered by the bf a week later in her driveway.

You and your policies are the true enemies of women. This is why you need to be purged. This is also why it will be easy to do when the time comes. Fuck off and embrace sweet death.

Op here, class is starting. See you faggots and your excuses in the next DONUT IN FRIDGE thread

The court has no right to deny second smmendment rights. Even our current system of disarming felons is both ineffective and constitutionally invalid. If the man threatens the wife, she should leave, and if he follows, call the police and have him arrested, or kill him yourself.

>Trump is president.

I agree with this.

I don't care. If you want to take people's guns, go take them yourself.

>shows pictures from Obama's years
>pics aren't even people protected by the constitution

This has to be bait. The only reason I'm hesitant to call it that is because liberals are actually dumb enough to think this is an argument.

>what is reloading ammo

fuck you're stupid, I bet you've never shot a gun in your life let alone know how one works.

Attached: 29947C7E-3CA9-4B03-B09D-3514A0F08BBA.jpg (738x650, 120K)

A cop who used to find dead women next to their restraining orders once explained to me how to explain to a libtard how restraining orders don’t work:

1)Tell them to get a piece of paper and hold it front of their face.

2) Punch them in the face as hard as you can.

Attached: 874283638346786487_AR.jpg (1600x1067, 176K)

I’m close by to the shooting and Ventura County is jokingly called “Ventucky” by locals. We have police that will issue a concealed carry permit where other counties will not. California is one of the only may issue states:
usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html

They want to use this state to set a precedent of gun laws for the others.

Tongue my anus

Chuck Norris over here is gonna take his fists to a gun fight. Everyone else is a pussy.

kek

Attached: 1521177955614.gif (235x240, 1.93M)

Leftists will go after ammunition next.
They've been talking about it for years.
You reloading is all fine and well, but not all of us are NEETs.
Not all of America lives in the basement drinking Kool-Aid on internet forums.
You would let your rights and the rights of everyone get revoked.
On account of what?
"Muh reloads."
I hope some lefty cunt SWATs you.

Attached: 1524118179059.jpg (500x500, 46K)

>used to kill women
By other dikes I’m sure

Then COME AND GET THEM PUSSY

>amount of times used in SELF DEFENSE by civilians and police: over 900 times every month
>there's never been a tyrannical government!

I love how hypocritical the left is. They love pointing at how 6 gorillian jews were put into concentration camps and killed. Hmm, I wonder if they were armed they could have refused to go into those death camps by fascist government. They have had a movie about jews fleeing into the forest and arming themselves to survive rather than go into the death camps. Defiance (2008) Yes it's just a movie with exaggerations but it's also "based on true events".

Attached: cambodia-established-gun-control-in-1956-from-1975-to-1977-30959895.png (500x628, 188K)

>look into the eyes

this anglo gets it

Attached: daemonica.jpg (980x490, 78K)