...that only violence can overcome the tyranny of talent.
If you can't compete with a person/nation/race in a particular skill or industry, your only option for survival is to destroy them. Mother nature holds violence as the ultimate decider of who succeeds and who fails in this world.
All power extends from the barrel of a gun.
Envy is a useful survival instinct, bordering on THE most useful one.
What are your thoughts on this?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
>Implying the strong alpha males don't often look after the weaker members of a tribe.
>Implying the strong alpha males don't often exploit** the weaker members of a tribe.
Fixed that for you.
>All power extends from the barrel of a gun.
Not really. In the US a pharmacist is 10 times more powerful than an infantry division.
Soft power is still a thing. But if everyone in that military became envious of pharmacists and other high-payed, talented individuals and decided to act on that envy in a unified fashion, I think that would change.
Feudal Europe was dominated by a blood-thirsty professional warrior caste for a reason.
Shit tier divisive dialectics. Next.
A pharmacist will still yield and obey a gun-wielding cop who makes 1/6 of his income (unless he bribes him).
The skilled labour underneath that warrior class built them better and better weapons, hence why engineers still have a large degree salary and are well looked after.
You know it's true, faggot. Stop denying that the rich take advantage of and exploit the poor.
It's one of the most prevalent forms of conflict throughout history.
>Implying the Jews aren't out-competing whites in the fields of soft power and manipulation and are now exploiting them.
>Implying this isn't the reason white nationalists are calling for the use of violence (hardpower).
It's not true. It's a dialectical tension you conjured up to appear smart. Any nation that operates within that framework will only tear itself apart. Proving it to be unsustainable and therefore not according to logos. Case in point: Post Enlightenment dialectics.