Ok, Jow Forums, redpill me on Libertarianism

Ok, Jow Forums, redpill me on Libertarianism

Attached: gadsden-flag-don-t-tread-on-me-tea-party-historical-poster_a-G-8830198-0[1].jpg (473x325, 18K)

Other urls found in this thread:

web.archive.org/web/20121019150736/http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch75.html
web.archive.org/web/20090219215305/https://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch5.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

We want to leave you the fuck alone. We want to be left the fuck alone. That's about it.

Gun nut retards who don't care about children.

this its americas principles

they think private property can exist with our state violence and believe everyone will just 'get along' if the government went away

Judaism

BASED blacks in MAGA hats fuck white girls

I feel like libertarianism is only good when mixed with something else. For example, I consider myself libertarian monarchist. God is a libertarian monarchist; he is King but wishes us to have free will.

Attached: o08XRwh.jpg (2000x3000, 441K)

Rule by really, really rich people except somehow it's "the good guys" and not the disdainful elites.

Well it sure was when it was founded. Now, less so.

Its what we wanted. But they didnt let us have it. So know we’re stormfags

well dont you know? money is just a reflection of virtue, obviously if you are rich you are a good guy, and if you are poor, then you are a bad guy. After all, if you were good, you would have money!

Jow Forums is a NatSoc board. If you're one of those "libertarian" cucks just fuck off.

oh fuck off you stupid fucking commie wannabe.

under real glorious Marxist Leninist (im from the ussr originally, came to aus in the 1980s), stupid fucken faggot cunts like you would be the first to be exterminated and crushed like cockroaches under my military boots.

Let people do what they want as long as no one gets hurt.

No government babysitter, self responsibility, shit happens yeah but thats the price of actual personal freedom. Your liberty before the goverment deemed "good of the people".

If you dont like something then go find something you do like. Dont screme these people are wrong and need to be stopped.

Attached: 687.jpg (1000x733, 74K)

No, no, no, you see, there's a difference between "establishment rich" and "libertarian rich". The former are pure evil and poison the nation, whereas the second are by default immediately gifted with insight, kindness and good judgement.
Traitor.

Attached: 1529486025.png (416x545, 91K)

it only works for a white christian state.

>Republicans
>Democrats
>dudeweed party

Libertarianism is an ideal that we should strive towards in all areas but will probably never reach because of practical realities.

It IS worth striving towards though.

Attached: girl_gun_fuck_yeah1.jpg (600x668, 71K)

What happens when the "libertarian rich" pass on their hard-earned wealth as inheritance to their entitled and degenerate children. Do those children or their children not become "establishment rich"?

Bernie wanted to tackle the problem of legacy wealth with a 65% estate tax. But if a man works hard his whole life so that he can pass on his wealth to better the lives of his children, shouldn't he be allowed to do so?

Legitimate question that I've always struggled with. How does libertarianism tackle the issue of income equality when considered in the context of unmerited, inherited wealth? What's preventing a group or class of individuals born into economic privilege from using their resources to stymie the social mobility of the less economically privileged within the theoretically merit-based free market?

Attached: richie_rich.jpg (2700x1800, 921K)

The party is just a spoiler.

The theories behind it is a lot of fun to theorize and shitpost with fellow libs/ancaps. Not as fun now with all the race shit and immigration fear.

Just the opposite. Socialism works with a homogeneous population- the givers and takers see themselves as equals. As you become less similar it's far more popular to have the government butt out of redistribution and protect individual liberties

libertarians are the dogshit hippies of the right wing that cover their decadent lifestyles with a childish philosophy. they only exist to make sure that leftist gains in america are never undone because they will only ever attack the right. fuck libertarians.

Attached: fuck libertarians.png (1262x2094, 952K)

>Legitimate question that I've always struggled with. How does libertarianism tackle the issue of income equality when considered in the context of unmerited, inherited wealth? What's preventing a group or class of individuals born into economic privilege from using their resources to stymie the social mobility of the less economically privileged within the theoretically merit-based free market?
Nothing. Nothing stops them. See, the thing is I'm actually a big fan of inheritance. In fact I think inheritance should be tax-free. However, I'm very sceptical of the rich obtaining large amounts of institutional power. It always results in this shit. The issue is that I can't see any way to prevent that without going batshit authoritarian.

Because the act of using economic power to stifle freedom invariably creates the method by which such stifling can be either overcome or subverted.

Shills for neoliberalism . Muh free market!! Natsoc or die you Jewish nigger lovers.

Attached: ACDD0DD3-EA18-4BF7-958B-580F2B194689.jpg (720x647, 71K)

the ideology that helped create the most prosperous nation on the planet, hated by pretty much everyone else because the truth hurts and don't like it when you point out the moral inconsistencies of other ideologies.

you aren't gonna get any real answers here buddy, go and do your own research.

Imagine being so poorly read that you think statism will solve cronyism, and that working folk and business owners are motivated by kindness.

In very simple terms, the richest private individuals control very little actual wealth. This may run contrary to what liberal media and Keynesians force down your throat from a child's age, but it is nonetheless true. Private individuals have very little control over policy; it is their businesses that have an impact, but in order for their business to run well it must do its job correctly.
Point being that in order for the inheritor to have an impact, it IS merit-based. We no longer live in the old nepotism-riddled economy; sons may get a leg up in their father's business, but no board will just accept them as replacements for a CEO or founder chair unless they do the work.
The truth is that many of the hedonistic nightmare heirs blow through their money astonishingly quickly. Look at the Hilton fortune, or what's happening to the Kardashians. If they are imprudent, they will bereckless, and evil, they will let their money disappear by being unable to control it, or to provide value to the economy via a service or good consumers want.
Cronyism aside, that is.
Now read you some Bastiat and Mises.

Workers and smaller business owners don't have the same capacity for depriving you of rights and property as the wealthy do. It's not a big deal if their motives are selfish.

You are being deprived of rights and property by the state, friend, and by crony business. The more powerful the state, the greater the incentive to corrupt it.

If corporations censor right-wingers, remember corporations can censor who they want. They are not the EVIL HOST NATION!

Borders are created by the EVIL HOST NATION. Open all borders.

People are free to have sex with whoever they want. Homosexuality is the answer.

Fascist binary gender pronouns? You evil fascist authoritarian collectivists don't control the English language. I'm free you fucks!

Gab is filled with white supremacists. Private companies don't need to support them.

If you don't like social media censorship, make your own social media site.

Attached: 2000px-Gadsden_flag.svg.png (2000x1333, 201K)

What you call childish philosophy is merit and freedom, liberty, the authority of the people over all, to criticize government and hold it accountable; what wrote the Constitution and built the free world; raised the masses from abject poverty, allowed for us to construct the Internet, and supercars, and skyscrapers, and satellites.
You hate us because our principles allow us to point out the hypocrisy of your boot-licking, your hatred of freedom, and the meaninglessness of your authoritarianism. We will be here to build the machines and supercomputers that will take humanity to the stars while you wallow in the mud of your petty statist squabbling.

How the fuck do you figure that?

The most objective and sensible political ideology

It's the bee's knees, skippy!

Attached: garynachos.jpg (1920x1080, 545K)

You want another platform, build it. You tire of not having the state step on the throats of those you disagree with, then change its system. No one owes you fucking anything. Create your ethnostate, surely the thousands of you that bitch here together could mobilize and make this reality if you weren't too busy complaining and playing helpless. Pathetic.

Libertarianism is a White ideology that a few Jews have contributed to. Rothbard was heavily influenced by people like H.L. Mencken, Albert Jay Nock, and Lysander Spooner.

Attached: 1525911372267.png (1000x6641, 3.21M)

It's incomplete without racial/ethnic nationalism/identity and an understanding of the JQ.

Attached: 1507342346012.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

kys socialist scum

The only things natsocs get right is race and the JQ.

Keiko Fujimori in prison for three years for taking bribes from Oderbrecht.

rural retard here, i cant believe i was a libertarian, i got educated and became a nazi

Fpbp

Wouldn’t not being able to feed children mean you don’t care about them retard? At least with a gun you could kill a deer and have some food you knuckle dragging troglodyte.

It failed.

Attached: left2.jpg (500x667, 96K)

Yes because you faggots would violate the NAP once and find the fuck out. See that’s the problem with these 10th wave commies. They don’t get their asses kicked and they live off of capitalism.

Friendly reminder that Rothbard was a race realist and defended David Duke.
web.archive.org/web/20121019150736/http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch75.html
web.archive.org/web/20090219215305/https://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch5.html

Attached: murray-rothbard1-182x300.jpg (182x300, 16K)

What are you talking about retard? America was at it best when it was libertarian. It slowly turned into muh feelings and gibs after the Great Depression. Thanks Obama.

See, this is exactly it. I say this to Marxists all the time. There are more than enough Marxists and socialists to form all of the workers communes they want. The white nationalist types could do the same. Just not in any place with this big a government to step on their throats.

Your libertarian society collapsed, thanks to ideological subversion and corporate domination of important political, cultural, religious and financial structures. Don't go around blaming the entire moral, intellectual and societal decay of your country because of one shit president, fucking boomer.

Attached: Tiresome.jpg (492x449, 48K)

see

Welfare is to blame. It creates a mindset and a culture. Democrats took full advantage of it too because in the grand scheme it doesn’t cost much to feed some people as long as they keep voting blue. So fuck off with your lack of humor leaf.

Pic sez it all

Attached: gubernment.jpg (450x450, 27K)

You want to be left alone so you can exploit

There is a better option

Attached: 1539912142807.jpg (8185x5787, 3.56M)