Why aren't more people libertarians

What is it about having more personal freedom that people are so resistant to? You would think people would want lower taxes and less useless regulations, And not getting Involved in unresoveable middle eastern conflicts. Why do we only get a percent of the vote?

Attached: IMG_1662.png (1200x892, 57K)

gibs

Jeffersonian Democracy is way better

Personal freedom requires personal responsibility, something nonwhites lack

because I don't believe meth should be legal and I think the government running some things actually has residual benefits. I still believe in mostly a free economy. also libertarians are many times open borderists.

It's the equivalent of being a pacifist in a warzone.

because libertarianism died with the American frontier.

The issue with libertarianism is that you cant define it. Its just "more freedom". Well? What the fuck does that entail?

No party with Liberal economics and Conservative social policies

Because part of becoming an adult is becoming instinctively aware of things like negative externalities, Laffer curves, and the realization that a healthy society requires for individuals to often place their own interests below the needs of the community.

>le freedumb to turn america from muh 1776 to modern divided america xD

Attached: 1505706948573.jpg (1018x1528, 570K)

the libertarian party are socialist shills

Because the idea of a purist Libertarian society is dystopic, it's not possible and in modern society totally illogical.

The dangers of free market capitalism is becoming known to more and more sheep and more people are waking up to realise the destruction that neo-liberliam has had to local economies.

The only thing Libertarians have going for them, is they're usually not hypocrites

Examine your soul, you know why.

Attached: AIDSGIf.gif (480x267, 2.16M)

Roads

No, money origin and financial freedom are far too abstract for the majority of voters. Most of them would easily support the ideas of the Libertarians, if detached from other discussions.
That said, you may be correct, many of them may be voting to gibs themselves.

Libertarianism would be cool in a homogeneous society. In our society I want whoever is willing to get rid of the shitskins in power.

people on here complain about cultural/social degeneracy, thats what you get with liberal social policies.

Also complete economic liberalism is the most retard shit. Markets only work giving extremely strong assumptions of perfect information, perfect rationality and externalities, not to mention tragedy of the commons and other significant issues

>its a meme ideology for npc's that think their edgy and intelligence because they read Ayn Rand

i.e. those that lack critical think and sufficient education about economics and economic theory
i.e. fedora tippers

>MUH BITCOIN
>MUH PAUL RAND

maybe if we lived in 1790 or 1800 when society was largely agricultural and 90-95% white or homogenous, i find it hard to see working in a post industrial service sector economy with multiculturalism and no ethnostate like Scandinavia

i'm a white nationalist libertarian. its hard to find like minded people like me.

Libertarian != Anarcho Capitalist
Libertarians do believe that there are a few areas in which a small government can be beneficial, but that those powers should be ennumerated and highly specified, and that the public sector goons shouldn't have the ability to act outside of those powers.

this

Libertarians are for Austrian Economics.
That means a 100% backed or accountable monetary system that cannot be printed at will and devalued like the current debt based fiat system can be.

This factor alone makes Libertarians THE BIGGEST THREAT to the status quo and the jew overlords.

This is why libertarianism is constantly attacked and NatSoc is promoted as it keeps government relevant and even worshipped.

If you've fallen for the natsoc meme, you have fallen for pol psyops and social influencers.

Attached: Authoritarian NPC.jpg (1003x595, 153K)

What do you do when your neighbor starts stockpiling weaponized muslims?

I'm a lolbertarian. I love liberty and the pursuit of happiness and fuck commies.

1. The rich elite don't give a flying fuck about Libertarianism.
2. The rich elite are race traitors and will sell out the entire Western world for a couple extra shekels for a decade or two, until everything turns into a worthless Niggerworld.
3. Libertarians suck on rich people's dick, eager for their pulses of cum to hit their tongues. They need their taxes lower. So they can hire more lobbyists and fund more political campaigns to invite in more beloved niggers.
4. Libertarians ideologically must support open borders if they're to be ideologically consistent in their opposition to a state. Say what you want, you're picking and choosing same as everyone else, and using argumentation for what you want, if you're not a consistent ancap anarchist.

5. As the tip of a rich elite's cock nudges against a Libertarians eager asshole, the Libertarian cries "Nigger me, Daddy, Nigger me! Censor my speech on social media and nigger poz my neghole! Open borders all the way!!! Oh, give me your untaxed Load up in my freedoms, now. Oh good you are to us, Daddy." Then he rams his multicultural cock in his ass and loses another election to muslims. As the arriving imported dune coons literally stomp the life out of FreedomBoy and his seeded boypussi, you hear a last gasp out of FreedomBoi Libertarian:

>At... at least I held to my p-p-principles!

Jeffersonian democracy worked so well the first time around. :|

It means I want my guns, but I also want my drugs; now fuck off cocksucker