Pol BTFO

Nope
Nope
Nope
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

We'd love to stop mass shootings, but Trump refuses to stop winning and that's the only way the Democrats can fight back

diaf kike

Do you know what a militia is?

Yep

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

You are originalists, so YEP.

>the right of the people to keep and bear arms

Attached: zeXPJ4R.jpg (819x783, 160K)

Nah, I would rather see the dissolution of the Union, you tear up the consitution that binds these states together, what pray tell is the reason for them to stay together, patriotism to a land filled with people that hate the Republic for which it stands, what the fuck is holding it together but that document and the rapidly fading idea it once stood for?

>poorly written
What's so hard to understand about
>shall not be infringed
?

Holy shit you are a stupid twat. You also have that same smarmy attitude as kids who don't know shit about shit but think they do. I'm going to guess early 20s or possibly teens still. If you are older than that, kys. If you are that young, read some more history you lazy fuck.

>"The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

Confiscate these guns.

Attached: schwarzenegger_biceps.png (500x330, 134K)

>a well regulated state militia shall not be infringed

repeal the first amendment now! printing techniques and communication technology have changed, why haven't our laws?

I'll just leave this here.

Attached: BanPrinters.jpg (727x1160, 163K)

Some engineer-wizards should whip up a design for an assault musket, just to fuck up their shitty arguments.

Attached: 1540613195417.png (1200x884, 383K)

The amendment was not designed around guns, it said ARMS. Armaments, and it was written and clarified that the right was established and intended to give citizens equal access to the same armaments as the military, so that the state and government could never be more powerful than the people.

Nerd.

I don't understand the logic of this.

One is a device that can be used to mass murder as many people as one can before being murder, the other can print off pictures of hot girls so you can cum on them on Jow Forums threads faster.

Nice try, loser.

>sure we would love to stop mass shootings
>but we have to respect a poorly written constitutional amendment telling us to treat outdated barely functioning farm equipment as people with rights

Attached: 64B3428A-1557-4C95-B3BC-E7793E2E5ABF.jpg (437x458, 84K)

So nuclear weaponry should be allowed for consumer purchase, essential?

>I don't understand the logic of this.

>donkey loving faggot

why am I surprised ?
Oh, I am not.

I know they had repeating breach loaders but semi-autos didn't come around until the invention of smokeless powder, of course I'd love to have examples of early self loader.

I wish America would export the second amendment, gun ownership is a human right.

>only referred to a muskets
it also referred to mortar cannons. Do you think your gun grabbing faggot friends will be OK with each and every single rural redneck owning their own personal artillery array?

Attached: Mallets-Mortar.jpg (450x517, 48K)

Go back to being Europe's boot.

Leave me some neapolitan pizza and wine.

Dem here, we need guns to be able to defend ourselves from the government and each other. With the alt right losing their shit, and closet neo nazis, I think we too should have guns to protect ourselves from crazies.

Free speech cannot exist on the internet because the founders never conceived of such a thing.

Doesn't translate into Hebrew I reckon.

that's not an argument, you mentally retarded child.

yea im sure our founding fathers, most of them literal geniuses, didn't think guns were going to progress pass muskets. mind you there were plenty of technological advancements in firearms during their lifetimes.

sage in all fields

All people of each country should never have allowed the development of such destructive weapons.

Constitutionally, yes, some form of civilian militia or group should have access to the same armaments as their government.

State recognized militias are often uses to assist local law enforcement during certain scenarios. These privileges are not extended to random civilians with rifles.

The same can be said for militias, and nuclear arms. Though no country period should have them. The US and UN prevent other nations from having nuclear arms. The people should prevent all nations from having nuclear arms.

Maybe Democrat voters could stop shooting people, seeing how they commit the overwhelming majority of gun violence as well as all types of violent crime and crime in general. Also, gun violence accounts for roughly 1% of the annual death total within the US and about 60% of those are suicides. You're over twice as likely to die from being struck by lightning than you are dying in a mass shooting. If left-wing retards agenda truly is about saving lives and not disarmament, why aren't they pushing to make sure everyone is properly grounded before leaving the house?

Attached: 1541751066854.jpg (441x535, 167K)

Do you realize the hate speeches per minute a modern printer can pump out?

Words are violence. This is the only thing that makes it ok to punch a nazi. Don't you want to justify violence against people who don't agree with you?

Dems are addicted to trying to be as original and non-old fashioned as possible that they would literally shoot themselves in the head because that's anti-the system

Wouldn’t have happened if the citizens in that bar were conceal carrying.

Attached: AC469347-67F9-458A-A4E8-3AC462EB79C2.jpg (600x604, 85K)

you can purchase cannons now.

Not an argument.

with exploding shells?

This. I'm a Democrat, but I think an armed population would make crazies think twice before going full retard. I want the guns in the hands of reasonable people. Guns are like the most American thing. They are the ultimate equalizer.

Read through it and I can't find the word musket anywhere

>They are the ultimate equalizer.
Exactly why commies want them out.

Attached: 1541691387196.png (702x768, 500K)

>Not an argument.
It's the perfect argument.

It's a pictoral argument that says, 'you're an idiot'.
Written in a language even a moron like you should be able to understand.

Guess I was wrong.

Attached: 1511578804075.jpg (640x480, 145K)

Wrong, there is a comma. If the people can't own guns, then how can a militia have guns? Fucking moron.

Not that I'm in favor of any gun control, but the best angle of attack seems to be the definition of 'arms.' Essentially, that refers to military grade weaponry, and during the mob years and prohibition, the Supreme Court ruled that brass knuckles and switchblades didn't count, because they were tools of murder, not arms. If liberals actually wanted to stop gun violence they could go after the shitty hand guns that are used in the vast majority of firearm murders. But that would involve admitting who commits those murders instead of shilling against evul white people, so I'm not holding my breath.

Deal with it faggots, you're more likely to ban snub nose revolvers than you are to get my AR-15.

>Nazi Germany
>banning guns
When will this meme end? Gun grabbing is a distinctly Marxian tactic.

>A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear muskets, shall not be infringed.
well good golly you got me

Repeal the first ammendment. The founding fathers never expected a media to wage psychological war 24/7 and brainwash the masses.

literally not what it says or means, faggot.

It is not disallowed. You could own one with a tax stamp for a destructive device lmao.
Nobody's done it yet so there is really no precedent, you just have to make sure you follow other regulations for storing nuclear materials.

Attached: marx_gun_control.jpg (449x491, 54K)

Meanwhile Antifa chants "we know where you sleep tucker."

Demicrats in ARIZONA and FLORIDA are cheating their asses off.

Fuck out of here

>alt right and closet neo nazis
What? All 10 of them? Even Antifa is more dangerous than those faggots

Right? Like 20 fags showed up with tiki torches in Charlottesville, but they made it seem like there was a five thousand collumn march of ss officers wearing nigger skin hats. If you watch the video, the guy in the car just freaks out after a few people begin attacking his car. Some old guy did the same thing in Oregon a few weeks ago when those anti-white whiteys were cucking in the road. Fucking shit bag cops standing g down and letting this bullshit happen.

In theory, yes; if Davy Crocketts were military standard-issue, then the people should be able to own them too. But the reality is, they aren't standard-issue, and for good reason. The second amendment states that the people have the right to keep and bear arms for the security of a free state. Using a nuclear weapon isn't really securing a free state though. It's just causing massive collateral damage.

> every logical argument made against gun grabbing I will counter with "OMG guns kill people!"

Attached: erefn.jpg (214x317, 13K)

Your political ideologies are more dangerous than any firearm i could ever own.

>logical argument made against gun grabbing

Attached: 00-gary-new-gif.gif (495x270, 835K)

YEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: USA USA USA.png (720x588, 446K)

School shootings didn’t happen when moms were full time stay at home moms. But they wanted to use Microsoft excel and not understand vlookups no matter how many times i have showed. This blood is on womens hands. And don’t put “proficient in excel” on your resume unless can do basic shit. On DOTR “proficient in excel” resume liars get the rope

They say it's poorly written because it is so well written that they still haven't been able to find a loophole, frustrating them to no end.

I'm not for ANTIFA, they are like a weaponized PC police, and they are going full retard. I hate that they get conflated with the Democratic party, when they are just a bunch of crazy people.

The government should be afraid of its people not the other way around. How is this Marxist? It's about equality. Nazi flag poster probably doesn't want guns in the hands of democrats. That would make it hard to genocide.

???
I'm saying that Marx didn't advocate for gun-grabbing. Don't know where you're getting the rest of this nonsense from.

>use mass shootings just to "btfo" Jow Forums
You dems are literally a cancer to society.

I need to learn to read. Must have been blinded by your edgy nazi flag. Apologies.

>repeal the 1st amendment
I'm sure they'd love to
Look at all the bullshit hate speech laws the commies are pushing over here
Look at Britain where you can be jailed for a tweet that's deemed disrespectful to Islam

Attached: assault-musket.jpg (864x720, 143K)

The right of the people,
not the right of the militia, you illiterate fuck!

Reminder to everyone to bulk purchase ammo.

Attached: 1541573008184.png (703x521, 349K)

god i wish that was me

>the people who wrote the constitution were incapable of understanding the concept of technological progression

Attached: NLDugGD.jpg (645x729, 27K)

gosh i wish i was her
FBI be damned

>be me
>take bait

Fuck it, whatever.

Attached: 1539681806305.gif (406x668, 170K)

>barely functioning muskets
they killed redcoats pretty damn well I think.

I'm a gay Hispanic, Democrat male, I hate the westboro baptist church and mr nazi flag probably wants to ethnically cleanse my ass and gas me. Whats actually scarier to me than hearing the hatred is to live in a world where all of us have to walk on eggshells for speaking our minds.

We can't evolve as people if we can't point each other's faults or make fun of each other. And it would be disingenuous to pretend we just love every flaw that every gender, race, culture and religion has and that all these subsets of populations don't take advantage of the system. We can't get to a better place if we can't be honest with each other.

thats the text of the actual amendment you nigger.

THE RIGHT OF A STATE TO HAVE A WELL REGULATED MILITIA TO KEEP ITSELF SAFE FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FAGGOT

THERES A REASON THE NRA LEFT ALL THE MIDDLE PARTS OUT

>mass shootings have nothing to do with unhinged mentally ill people acting out, blame weapons

millions of people have guns but never misuse them. democrats avoid every logical thought process so they can take away freedom, and they're too stupid to realize it.

This again. Are you dumbfucks ever going to realize that even if you do repeal it (which is nearly impossible) you will STILL have to (pic related)

Attached: 1489800354902.gif (442x274, 4K)

> no one will use a gun if it is illegal
are you fucking retarded?

Attached: lamus pepe.jpg (125x118, 3K)

If the constitution meant muskets, it would've said muskets. It explicitly said arms.

How about we shoot you… with an AR-15?

Attached: 1waynzaplzy01.jpg (282x314, 26K)

I don't get why Dems and Reps can't come together on this one thing. We all would be nicer to each other for fear of blowing each other up.

Attached: gotes.jpg (1324x1101, 1.55M)

It cannot be repealed and show me where the fuck it says musket.

>I don't get why Dems and Reps can't come together on this one thing.

Enough Democrats have already said in public they will not stop until all guns are gone.
So you cannot compromise with such people.

Because you're arguing that the rights of the constitution are obsolete because of technology, and that applies even more to free speech than the right to bear arms. That you then go and say that it's not the same because you want to keep this right and (though other lefties don't) shows how much of a disingenuous fuck you are.

B-b-b-but I saw a movie about the revolution once and there were people with muskets. that means that's what they were talking about when they wrote that amendment

In America, the Militia is every able-bodied male aged 17-45.

Nothing like what is happening in Britain today could have come to pass if the people were still armed.

It is actually perfectly legal for an American citizen to own a nuke. None do, however, because of the sheer cost of acquiring one.

/thread.
filthy faggot OP is filthy faggot