>Walk in court
>Defense is a fundamentalist
>Judge is a Catholic
>You have already been paid
What is your defence Jow Forums ?
Walk in court
Camden Bailey
Kevin Wright
Freedom of religion regardless of conflicting opinions.
Isaiah Taylor
Antisemitism
Ryder Evans
Frivolous lawsuit that the satanists know they'll either lose or it gets tossed out. All these weirdos want as is more attention since the world has moved on from atheism and anti-religion nonsense. These guys are still stuck in their Hitchens/Dawkins hysteria.
James Morgan
Hunter Carter
The destruction of the protections surrounding religion is essential to the destruction of jewry. If we destroy the refuge of religious protection they will be forced to identify as a race (racial minorities enjoy various protections) and the goyim will become more fully aware of their alien nature.
Ryder Scott
This could be a constitutional case for Canada (If is comes to Canada), if we manage to rule them down on the defense of Christian religious expression, we will be one step ahead of the world.
Isaac Murphy
>Your honor, the good name of our Lord and Savior has been tarnished by this un-satanic work of fiction and slander.
They can't pull it off
>The religious attack on Satanism is hateful and in Canadian
Then all the movies about ebil Jesus/Mohammed followers are up for grabs
>They utilised our statues and intellectual right in the production of the series
Then they are not religious symbols
Wut do, Jow Forums ?
Oliver Green
Hope they win desu
Daniel Jackson
>alien nature.
>All these weirdos want as is more attention since the world has moved on from atheism and anti-religion nonsense. These guys are still stuck in their Hitchens/Dawkins hysteria.
Retarded christkike thinks these aren't mystery religion kike freemason symbols.
If it were atheism, it wouldn't exist.
Josiah Brooks
Worshiping Satan?
In Hollywood?
Oh no
How silly
Surely you jest
Bentley Clark
>Worshiping Satan in Hollywood
>B.C. production
They are arguing that they weren't worshiping Satan enough
Colton Campbell
They're also suing for copyright infringement
How in the fuck do you copyright the devil?
Nolan Watson
They won't lose, they literally copied their statue. It's not just a depiction of Baphomet, it's the satanists version of it (no breasts and the two kids looking up at him). It would've been one thing if it was just Baphomet, but it's not and the temple has this version copyrighted.
Mason Diaz
>>Your honor, the good name of our Lord and Savior has been tarnished by this un-satanic work of fiction and slander.
I don't know if this is on purpose or just ignorance, but you are misrepresenting what's going on. They are suing because they used their copyrighted statue as a symbol without permission and want compensation for it.
>>They utilised our statues and intellectual right in the production of the series
>Then they are not religious symbols
Doesn't matter what the symbols are, what matters is that they are copyrighted.
Camden Morales
Canada needs to burn
Dylan Nguyen
>bakawk
Easton Adams
We're a religion claiming tax exemption under the 1st, and this is our symbol, but we have it copyrighted.
Landon Scott
Oh, Canada?
Yea, you're fucked. Nevermind, you guys are literally run by Satan already, and you're turning over to his lying minions.
Adrian Jenkins
They didn't copyright the devil, they copyrighted this particular take on him. Wouldn't be a problem if it was just regular Baphomet.
Brandon Ortiz
retard
Mason Campbell
Their image is simply a recreation of images from the 19th Century. The statue that is copyrighted has children, this correct, but they are not in the same place.
A man can make a mouse with round ears and not be in copyright violation of Disney.
Also, Dumbass, why did you take a case like this?
Blake Wood
SATAN HAS NO RIGHTS
IN A GOD FEARING COUNTRY
Liam Rivera
petard
Justin Butler
The pope would want you to make him pay $50M. Praise Satan!
Leo Gutierrez
I don't think the pope copyrighted jesus